A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases
Purpose A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1–2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuro-oncology 2025, Vol.171 (2), p.299-309 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 309 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 299 |
container_title | Journal of neuro-oncology |
container_volume | 171 |
creator | Adida, Samuel Taori, Suchet Bhatia, Shovan Kann, Michael R. Burton, Steven A. Flickinger, John C. Olson, Adam C. Sefcik, Roberta K. Zinn, Pascal O. Gerszten, Peter C. |
description | Purpose
A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1–2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.
Methods
Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002–2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8–18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18–30 Gy in 2–5 fractions.
Results
Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.
Conclusions
This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128749484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3151010765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3eaedbb23cffb59f336be435d4a2d830ed9e4ad3dfc60f1a9204eb376e3520d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6BTxIwIuX1iSVdLqPy-KfhQUvCt5COqmsGbo7Y5LeZb69WWdV8CAU1KF-9epRj5CXnL3ljOl3hXPWs44J2TE59NDJR2THlYZOg4bHZMd4rzs1ym9n5Fkpe8aY1MCfkjMYldAw8B3ZX1BnC9KCOWKhdvU0423EO5oCLRUzpmpdjY5OyR9ptj7aGtNK63fM9nCkIWXq0lrjzZa2QpdtrnHGW5xpOcQV6YLVllZYnpMnwc4FXzz0c_L1w_svl5-6688fry4vrjsnVF87QIt-mgS4ECY1BoB-QgnKSyv8AAz9iNJ68MH1LHA7CiZxAt0jKMG8gHPy5qR7yOnHhqWaJRaH82xXbBYNcDFoOcpBNvT1P-g-bXlt7hqlOONM96pR4kS5nErJGMwhx8Xmo-HM3CdhTkmYloT5lYS5l371IL1NC_o_K79f3wA4AaWN1hvMf2__R_Ynt2GV1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3151010765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Adida, Samuel ; Taori, Suchet ; Bhatia, Shovan ; Kann, Michael R. ; Burton, Steven A. ; Flickinger, John C. ; Olson, Adam C. ; Sefcik, Roberta K. ; Zinn, Pascal O. ; Gerszten, Peter C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adida, Samuel ; Taori, Suchet ; Bhatia, Shovan ; Kann, Michael R. ; Burton, Steven A. ; Flickinger, John C. ; Olson, Adam C. ; Sefcik, Roberta K. ; Zinn, Pascal O. ; Gerszten, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1–2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.
Methods
Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002–2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8–18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18–30 Gy in 2–5 fractions.
Results
Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.
Conclusions
This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-594X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-7373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39527381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Central nervous system diseases ; Dermatitis ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Oncology ; Pain ; Patients ; Population studies ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Radiation therapy ; Radiosurgery - adverse effects ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Review ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Spinal Neoplasms - secondary ; Spinal Neoplasms - surgery ; Spine ; Toxicity ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025, Vol.171 (2), p.299-309</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jan 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3eaedbb23cffb59f336be435d4a2d830ed9e4ad3dfc60f1a9204eb376e3520d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39527381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adida, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taori, Suchet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatia, Shovan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kann, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sefcik, Roberta K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Pascal O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerszten, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><title>A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases</title><title>Journal of neuro-oncology</title><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><description>Purpose
A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1–2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.
Methods
Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002–2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8–18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18–30 Gy in 2–5 fractions.
Results
Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.
Conclusions
This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Central nervous system diseases</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0167-594X</issn><issn>1573-7373</issn><issn>1573-7373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6BTxIwIuX1iSVdLqPy-KfhQUvCt5COqmsGbo7Y5LeZb69WWdV8CAU1KF-9epRj5CXnL3ljOl3hXPWs44J2TE59NDJR2THlYZOg4bHZMd4rzs1ym9n5Fkpe8aY1MCfkjMYldAw8B3ZX1BnC9KCOWKhdvU0423EO5oCLRUzpmpdjY5OyR9ptj7aGtNK63fM9nCkIWXq0lrjzZa2QpdtrnHGW5xpOcQV6YLVllZYnpMnwc4FXzz0c_L1w_svl5-6688fry4vrjsnVF87QIt-mgS4ECY1BoB-QgnKSyv8AAz9iNJ68MH1LHA7CiZxAt0jKMG8gHPy5qR7yOnHhqWaJRaH82xXbBYNcDFoOcpBNvT1P-g-bXlt7hqlOONM96pR4kS5nErJGMwhx8Xmo-HM3CdhTkmYloT5lYS5l371IL1NC_o_K79f3wA4AaWN1hvMf2__R_Ynt2GV1g</recordid><startdate>2025</startdate><enddate>2025</enddate><creator>Adida, Samuel</creator><creator>Taori, Suchet</creator><creator>Bhatia, Shovan</creator><creator>Kann, Michael R.</creator><creator>Burton, Steven A.</creator><creator>Flickinger, John C.</creator><creator>Olson, Adam C.</creator><creator>Sefcik, Roberta K.</creator><creator>Zinn, Pascal O.</creator><creator>Gerszten, Peter C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2025</creationdate><title>A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases</title><author>Adida, Samuel ; Taori, Suchet ; Bhatia, Shovan ; Kann, Michael R. ; Burton, Steven A. ; Flickinger, John C. ; Olson, Adam C. ; Sefcik, Roberta K. ; Zinn, Pascal O. ; Gerszten, Peter C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3eaedbb23cffb59f336be435d4a2d830ed9e4ad3dfc60f1a9204eb376e3520d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Central nervous system diseases</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Spinal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adida, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taori, Suchet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatia, Shovan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kann, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burton, Steven A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flickinger, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sefcik, Roberta K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinn, Pascal O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerszten, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adida, Samuel</au><au>Taori, Suchet</au><au>Bhatia, Shovan</au><au>Kann, Michael R.</au><au>Burton, Steven A.</au><au>Flickinger, John C.</au><au>Olson, Adam C.</au><au>Sefcik, Roberta K.</au><au>Zinn, Pascal O.</au><au>Gerszten, Peter C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurooncol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><date>2025</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>171</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>299-309</pages><issn>0167-594X</issn><issn>1573-7373</issn><eissn>1573-7373</eissn><abstract>Purpose
A majority of published series report on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for 1–2 contiguous vertebral levels due to concerns regarding setup accuracy and radiation toxicity. This study evaluates patients with metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous levels treated with SBRT and augments its findings with a review of other studies investigating multilevel spine SBRT.
Methods
Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 49 patients with 55 metastases spanning ≥ 3 contiguous vertebral levels treated with SBRT at a single institution (2002–2023) was performed. Outcomes identified included local failure (LF), pain response, overall survival, and toxicity. The median single-fraction prescription dose was 15 Gy (range: 8–18); multifractionated treatment utilized prescription doses of 18–30 Gy in 2–5 fractions.
Results
Median follow-up was 7 months (range: 1-103). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF were 7%, 11%, and 11%, respectively. No prognostic factors were associated with LF. Pain was reported to improve or remain stable for 49 lesions (89%). Ten adverse radiation events (18%) were identified; pain flare (5%), dermatitis (4%), and vertebral compression fracture (VCF, 9%). The 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates of VCF were 4%, 7%, and 7%, respectively. No instances of esophageal toxicity or myelopathy were observed.
Conclusions
This study of multilevel SBRT is one of the largest to investigate outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario. Spine SBRT confers low rates of LF and toxicity for patients with multilevel disease, which was previously considered a relative contraindication. Spine SBRT may be considered in this patient population instead of low-dose palliative RT.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>39527381</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-594X |
ispartof | Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025, Vol.171 (2), p.299-309 |
issn | 0167-594X 1573-7373 1573-7373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128749484 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Central nervous system diseases Dermatitis Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Medical prognosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastases Metastasis Middle Aged Neurology Oncology Pain Patients Population studies Prognosis Prospective Studies Radiation therapy Radiosurgery - adverse effects Radiosurgery - methods Retrospective Studies Review Spinal cord Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy Spinal Neoplasms - secondary Spinal Neoplasms - surgery Spine Toxicity Vertebrae |
title | A case series and review of stereotactic body radiation therapy for contiguous multilevel spine metastases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A03%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20case%20series%20and%20review%20of%20stereotactic%20body%20radiation%20therapy%20for%20contiguous%20multilevel%20spine%20metastases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuro-oncology&rft.au=Adida,%20Samuel&rft.date=2025&rft.volume=171&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=299-309&rft.issn=0167-594X&rft.eissn=1573-7373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11060-024-04863-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3151010765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3151010765&rft_id=info:pmid/39527381&rfr_iscdi=true |