Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea
To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2025-01, Vol.43 (Pt 1), p.126503, Article 126503 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Pt 1 |
container_start_page | 126503 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Gwak, Eunseon Choe, Seung-Ah Bolormaa, Erdenetuya Choe, Young June Wang, Chengbin Fix, Jonathan Vadivale, Muruga Rousculp, Matthew D. |
description | To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which links COVID-19 vaccine registry data with health insurance claims data. The Cox proportional-hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting were employed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Among homologous primary-series NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 recipients at Day 180 post-vaccination, the aHR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48–0.88) for severe infections. Among homologous 1st-booster recipients, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.75) for severe infections. At 180-days post-immunization, we observed homologous, NVX-CoV2373 primary-series added and 1st booster offered comparable protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2.
•This study used patient data from the nationwide K-COV-N database in South Korea.•We assessed relative vaccine effectiveness between NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2.•NVX-CoV2373 offered added protection against lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections.•No significant differences in VE against severe infections were observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126503 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128747266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X2401185X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3128747266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-8bb9408979efa325caf6c44cdbf7b452b4b979b1c408ee038add8c702b2c02ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhI4AsceGSrT124uSEYPlXUbUSlFVvlu2MqVfZuNiblfj29SpLD1x68kj-zZs38wh5zdmSM96cbZZ741wYcQkM5JJDUzPxhCx4q0QFNW-fkgWDRlaSs5sT8iLnDWOsFrx7Tk5EVwMIUAtif-BgdmGPFL1Hd6hGzJlGT2_jNg7xd5wyvVzfVKu4BqEENWNPP15e8wYs0NXV-vxTxTs6mylKccw0jPRnnHa39HtMaF6SZ94MGV8d31Py68vn69W36uLq6_nqw0XlQPFd1VrbSdZ2qkNvBNTO-MZJ6XrrlZU1WGnLn-WuQIhMtKbvW6dYseEYeC9OybtZ9y7FPxPmnd6G7HAYzIhlCS04tEoqaJqCvv0P3cQpjcVdoaQAIUTDC1XPlEsx54Re36WwNemv5kwfQtAbfQxBH0LQcwil781RfbJb7B-6_l29AO9nAMs59gGTzi7g6LAPqWSg-xgeGXEPZMKX6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3143233361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gwak, Eunseon ; Choe, Seung-Ah ; Bolormaa, Erdenetuya ; Choe, Young June ; Wang, Chengbin ; Fix, Jonathan ; Vadivale, Muruga ; Rousculp, Matthew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gwak, Eunseon ; Choe, Seung-Ah ; Bolormaa, Erdenetuya ; Choe, Young June ; Wang, Chengbin ; Fix, Jonathan ; Vadivale, Muruga ; Rousculp, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><description>To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which links COVID-19 vaccine registry data with health insurance claims data. The Cox proportional-hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting were employed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Among homologous primary-series NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 recipients at Day 180 post-vaccination, the aHR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48–0.88) for severe infections. Among homologous 1st-booster recipients, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.75) for severe infections. At 180-days post-immunization, we observed homologous, NVX-CoV2373 primary-series added and 1st booster offered comparable protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2.
•This study used patient data from the nationwide K-COV-N database in South Korea.•We assessed relative vaccine effectiveness between NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2.•NVX-CoV2373 offered added protection against lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections.•No significant differences in VE against severe infections were observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126503</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39522327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Editing ; Effectiveness ; Health hazards ; Health insurance ; Immunization ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Personal relationships ; Public health ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Vaccine ; Vaccine effectiveness ; Vaccine safety ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2025-01, Vol.43 (Pt 1), p.126503, Article 126503</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 1, 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-8bb9408979efa325caf6c44cdbf7b452b4b979b1c408ee038add8c702b2c02ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39522327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gwak, Eunseon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Seung-Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolormaa, Erdenetuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Young June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chengbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fix, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadivale, Muruga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousculp, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><title>Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which links COVID-19 vaccine registry data with health insurance claims data. The Cox proportional-hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting were employed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Among homologous primary-series NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 recipients at Day 180 post-vaccination, the aHR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48–0.88) for severe infections. Among homologous 1st-booster recipients, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.75) for severe infections. At 180-days post-immunization, we observed homologous, NVX-CoV2373 primary-series added and 1st booster offered comparable protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2.
•This study used patient data from the nationwide K-COV-N database in South Korea.•We assessed relative vaccine effectiveness between NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2.•NVX-CoV2373 offered added protection against lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections.•No significant differences in VE against severe infections were observed.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccine effectiveness</subject><subject>Vaccine safety</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhI4AsceGSrT124uSEYPlXUbUSlFVvlu2MqVfZuNiblfj29SpLD1x68kj-zZs38wh5zdmSM96cbZZ741wYcQkM5JJDUzPxhCx4q0QFNW-fkgWDRlaSs5sT8iLnDWOsFrx7Tk5EVwMIUAtif-BgdmGPFL1Hd6hGzJlGT2_jNg7xd5wyvVzfVKu4BqEENWNPP15e8wYs0NXV-vxTxTs6mylKccw0jPRnnHa39HtMaF6SZ94MGV8d31Py68vn69W36uLq6_nqw0XlQPFd1VrbSdZ2qkNvBNTO-MZJ6XrrlZU1WGnLn-WuQIhMtKbvW6dYseEYeC9OybtZ9y7FPxPmnd6G7HAYzIhlCS04tEoqaJqCvv0P3cQpjcVdoaQAIUTDC1XPlEsx54Re36WwNemv5kwfQtAbfQxBH0LQcwil781RfbJb7B-6_l29AO9nAMs59gGTzi7g6LAPqWSg-xgeGXEPZMKX6A</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Gwak, Eunseon</creator><creator>Choe, Seung-Ah</creator><creator>Bolormaa, Erdenetuya</creator><creator>Choe, Young June</creator><creator>Wang, Chengbin</creator><creator>Fix, Jonathan</creator><creator>Vadivale, Muruga</creator><creator>Rousculp, Matthew D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea</title><author>Gwak, Eunseon ; Choe, Seung-Ah ; Bolormaa, Erdenetuya ; Choe, Young June ; Wang, Chengbin ; Fix, Jonathan ; Vadivale, Muruga ; Rousculp, Matthew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-8bb9408979efa325caf6c44cdbf7b452b4b979b1c408ee038add8c702b2c02ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccine effectiveness</topic><topic>Vaccine safety</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gwak, Eunseon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Seung-Ah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolormaa, Erdenetuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choe, Young June</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chengbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fix, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vadivale, Muruga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rousculp, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gwak, Eunseon</au><au>Choe, Seung-Ah</au><au>Bolormaa, Erdenetuya</au><au>Choe, Young June</au><au>Wang, Chengbin</au><au>Fix, Jonathan</au><au>Vadivale, Muruga</au><au>Rousculp, Matthew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>Pt 1</issue><spage>126503</spage><pages>126503-</pages><artnum>126503</artnum><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>To estimate the relative effectiveness of NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease during the Omicron variant dominance in South Korea, we conducted a retrospective cohort-study among ≥12-year-olds using the K-COV-N database, which links COVID-19 vaccine registry data with health insurance claims data. The Cox proportional-hazards model and inverse probability of treatment weighting were employed to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs). Among homologous primary-series NVX-CoV2373 versus BNT162b2 recipients at Day 180 post-vaccination, the aHR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.93) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.48–0.88) for severe infections. Among homologous 1st-booster recipients, it was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.01–1.30) for all laboratory-confirmed and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.20–0.75) for severe infections. At 180-days post-immunization, we observed homologous, NVX-CoV2373 primary-series added and 1st booster offered comparable protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection versus BNT162b2.
•This study used patient data from the nationwide K-COV-N database in South Korea.•We assessed relative vaccine effectiveness between NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2.•NVX-CoV2373 offered added protection against lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections.•No significant differences in VE against severe infections were observed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39522327</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126503</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2025-01, Vol.43 (Pt 1), p.126503, Article 126503 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3128747266 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines Editing Effectiveness Health hazards Health insurance Immunization Infections Laboratories Personal relationships Public health Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Vaccine Vaccine effectiveness Vaccine safety Vaccines Viral diseases |
title | Relative effectiveness of homologous NVX-CoV2373 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccinations in South Korea |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A59%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20effectiveness%20of%20homologous%20NVX-CoV2373%20and%20BNT162b2%20COVID-19%20vaccinations%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Gwak,%20Eunseon&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=Pt%201&rft.spage=126503&rft.pages=126503-&rft.artnum=126503&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126503&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3128747266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3143233361&rft_id=info:pmid/39522327&rft_els_id=S0264410X2401185X&rfr_iscdi=true |