Eulerian–Lagrangian based large-eddy simulation of a partially aerated flat bubble column

Gas–liquid bubbly flow in a flat bubble column (“Becker” case with a gas flow rate of 1.6 l/min) is studied by means of large-eddy simulation (LES) combined with Lagrangian particle tracking with two-way coupling. The unsteady two-phase flow considered is relatively dilute in a global sense, but has...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical engineering science 2008, Vol.63 (1), p.253-271
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Gusheng, Celik, Ismail
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 271
container_issue 1
container_start_page 253
container_title Chemical engineering science
container_volume 63
creator Hu, Gusheng
Celik, Ismail
description Gas–liquid bubbly flow in a flat bubble column (“Becker” case with a gas flow rate of 1.6 l/min) is studied by means of large-eddy simulation (LES) combined with Lagrangian particle tracking with two-way coupling. The unsteady two-phase flow considered is relatively dilute in a global sense, but has higher gas clustering locally. The bubble size, of the order of millimeter, is relatively large compared to the smallest liquid fluctuation scales. It is demonstrated that, in such a setting, a single-phase LES along with the point-volume treatment of the dispersed phase can serve as a viable closure model, even though its application assumptions are not fully met. For the backward momentum coupling we used a “particle-source-in-ball” (PSI-ball) concept, which in essence is a generalization of the conventional particle-source-in-cell (PSI-cell) method as well as template-function based treatment. A high prediction accuracy is achieved in an extensive comparison with classical experimental data, covering not only the mean feature of the flow and transient bubble dispersion patterns, but also the second-order statistics of the liquid which is vital in assessing a closure model and has not been enough addressed in the past RANS-based studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31263386</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000925090700735X</els_id><sourcerecordid>31263386</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c2a6159bb5f4abc7ef8c2a49f7c5dac0e36e48d04622b00c025d1e9ab1ecd1ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAQx0VoINskD5CbLunNzsgfsk1PJSRNYKGX9pSDGI3HixatvZXswt76DnnDPEm1bCC3nubrP_9hfkLcKMgVKH23zYljXgA0OXQ5qPpMrFTblFlVQf1JrACgy4oaugvxOcZtKptGwUq8PCyeg8Px7e_rGjcBx00qpMXIvfQYNpxx3x9kdLvF4-ymUU6DRLnHMDv0_iCRA85JPKSxtIu1niVNftmNV-J8QB_5-j1eil-PDz_vn7L1j-_P99_WGVVazRkVqFXdWVsPFVpqeGhTq-qGhuoeCbjUXLU9VLooLABBUfeKO7SKKSVUXoovJ999mH4vHGezc5HYexx5WqIpVaHLstVJqE5CClOMgQezD26H4WAUmCNGszUJozliNNCZhDHt3L6bYyT0QyJELn4sdq3WpTp6fz3pOH36x3EwkRyPxL0LTLPpJ_efK_8As-CKbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>31263386</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eulerian–Lagrangian based large-eddy simulation of a partially aerated flat bubble column</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hu, Gusheng ; Celik, Ismail</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Gusheng ; Celik, Ismail</creatorcontrib><description>Gas–liquid bubbly flow in a flat bubble column (“Becker” case with a gas flow rate of 1.6 l/min) is studied by means of large-eddy simulation (LES) combined with Lagrangian particle tracking with two-way coupling. The unsteady two-phase flow considered is relatively dilute in a global sense, but has higher gas clustering locally. The bubble size, of the order of millimeter, is relatively large compared to the smallest liquid fluctuation scales. It is demonstrated that, in such a setting, a single-phase LES along with the point-volume treatment of the dispersed phase can serve as a viable closure model, even though its application assumptions are not fully met. For the backward momentum coupling we used a “particle-source-in-ball” (PSI-ball) concept, which in essence is a generalization of the conventional particle-source-in-cell (PSI-cell) method as well as template-function based treatment. A high prediction accuracy is achieved in an extensive comparison with classical experimental data, covering not only the mean feature of the flow and transient bubble dispersion patterns, but also the second-order statistics of the liquid which is vital in assessing a closure model and has not been enough addressed in the past RANS-based studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-2509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4405</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.015</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CESCAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bubble column ; Bubbly flow ; Chemical engineering ; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) ; Euler–Lagrange approach ; Exact sciences and technology ; Gas–liquid flow ; Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus ; Large-eddy simulation (LES) ; PSI-ball method</subject><ispartof>Chemical engineering science, 2008, Vol.63 (1), p.253-271</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c2a6159bb5f4abc7ef8c2a49f7c5dac0e36e48d04622b00c025d1e9ab1ecd1ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c2a6159bb5f4abc7ef8c2a49f7c5dac0e36e48d04622b00c025d1e9ab1ecd1ec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19866316$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Gusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ismail</creatorcontrib><title>Eulerian–Lagrangian based large-eddy simulation of a partially aerated flat bubble column</title><title>Chemical engineering science</title><description>Gas–liquid bubbly flow in a flat bubble column (“Becker” case with a gas flow rate of 1.6 l/min) is studied by means of large-eddy simulation (LES) combined with Lagrangian particle tracking with two-way coupling. The unsteady two-phase flow considered is relatively dilute in a global sense, but has higher gas clustering locally. The bubble size, of the order of millimeter, is relatively large compared to the smallest liquid fluctuation scales. It is demonstrated that, in such a setting, a single-phase LES along with the point-volume treatment of the dispersed phase can serve as a viable closure model, even though its application assumptions are not fully met. For the backward momentum coupling we used a “particle-source-in-ball” (PSI-ball) concept, which in essence is a generalization of the conventional particle-source-in-cell (PSI-cell) method as well as template-function based treatment. A high prediction accuracy is achieved in an extensive comparison with classical experimental data, covering not only the mean feature of the flow and transient bubble dispersion patterns, but also the second-order statistics of the liquid which is vital in assessing a closure model and has not been enough addressed in the past RANS-based studies.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bubble column</subject><subject>Bubbly flow</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)</subject><subject>Euler–Lagrange approach</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Gas–liquid flow</subject><subject>Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus</subject><subject>Large-eddy simulation (LES)</subject><subject>PSI-ball method</subject><issn>0009-2509</issn><issn>1873-4405</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAQx0VoINskD5CbLunNzsgfsk1PJSRNYKGX9pSDGI3HixatvZXswt76DnnDPEm1bCC3nubrP_9hfkLcKMgVKH23zYljXgA0OXQ5qPpMrFTblFlVQf1JrACgy4oaugvxOcZtKptGwUq8PCyeg8Px7e_rGjcBx00qpMXIvfQYNpxx3x9kdLvF4-ymUU6DRLnHMDv0_iCRA85JPKSxtIu1niVNftmNV-J8QB_5-j1eil-PDz_vn7L1j-_P99_WGVVazRkVqFXdWVsPFVpqeGhTq-qGhuoeCbjUXLU9VLooLABBUfeKO7SKKSVUXoovJ999mH4vHGezc5HYexx5WqIpVaHLstVJqE5CClOMgQezD26H4WAUmCNGszUJozliNNCZhDHt3L6bYyT0QyJELn4sdq3WpTp6fz3pOH36x3EwkRyPxL0LTLPpJ_efK_8As-CKbw</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Hu, Gusheng</creator><creator>Celik, Ismail</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Eulerian–Lagrangian based large-eddy simulation of a partially aerated flat bubble column</title><author>Hu, Gusheng ; Celik, Ismail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c2a6159bb5f4abc7ef8c2a49f7c5dac0e36e48d04622b00c025d1e9ab1ecd1ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bubble column</topic><topic>Bubbly flow</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)</topic><topic>Euler–Lagrange approach</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Gas–liquid flow</topic><topic>Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus</topic><topic>Large-eddy simulation (LES)</topic><topic>PSI-ball method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Gusheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celik, Ismail</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemical engineering science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Gusheng</au><au>Celik, Ismail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eulerian–Lagrangian based large-eddy simulation of a partially aerated flat bubble column</atitle><jtitle>Chemical engineering science</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>253</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>253-271</pages><issn>0009-2509</issn><eissn>1873-4405</eissn><coden>CESCAC</coden><abstract>Gas–liquid bubbly flow in a flat bubble column (“Becker” case with a gas flow rate of 1.6 l/min) is studied by means of large-eddy simulation (LES) combined with Lagrangian particle tracking with two-way coupling. The unsteady two-phase flow considered is relatively dilute in a global sense, but has higher gas clustering locally. The bubble size, of the order of millimeter, is relatively large compared to the smallest liquid fluctuation scales. It is demonstrated that, in such a setting, a single-phase LES along with the point-volume treatment of the dispersed phase can serve as a viable closure model, even though its application assumptions are not fully met. For the backward momentum coupling we used a “particle-source-in-ball” (PSI-ball) concept, which in essence is a generalization of the conventional particle-source-in-cell (PSI-cell) method as well as template-function based treatment. A high prediction accuracy is achieved in an extensive comparison with classical experimental data, covering not only the mean feature of the flow and transient bubble dispersion patterns, but also the second-order statistics of the liquid which is vital in assessing a closure model and has not been enough addressed in the past RANS-based studies.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.015</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-2509
ispartof Chemical engineering science, 2008, Vol.63 (1), p.253-271
issn 0009-2509
1873-4405
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31263386
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Applied sciences
Bubble column
Bubbly flow
Chemical engineering
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
Euler–Lagrange approach
Exact sciences and technology
Gas–liquid flow
Hydrodynamics of contact apparatus
Large-eddy simulation (LES)
PSI-ball method
title Eulerian–Lagrangian based large-eddy simulation of a partially aerated flat bubble column
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eulerian%E2%80%93Lagrangian%20based%20large-eddy%20simulation%20of%20a%20partially%20aerated%20flat%20bubble%20column&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20engineering%20science&rft.au=Hu,%20Gusheng&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=253&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=253-271&rft.issn=0009-2509&rft.eissn=1873-4405&rft.coden=CESCAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31263386%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31263386&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S000925090700735X&rfr_iscdi=true