Short (30 Minutes) versus long (120 Minutes) spontaneous breathing trial among patients with difficult weaning (SL-SBT Trial)

•Difficult weaning is common in the ICU and is associated with increased consumption of hospital resources and worse outcome. Protocolized weaning in this setting might improve patient-centred outcomes.•An SBT duration of either 30 min or 120 min is equally effective when used for the first weaning...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart & lung 2025-01, Vol.69, p.217-221
Hauptverfasser: Hadda, Vijay, Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam, Mittal, Saurabh, Madan, Karan, Tiwari, Pawan, Suri, Tejas Menon, Khan, Maroof Ahmad, Mohan, Anant
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue
container_start_page 217
container_title Heart & lung
container_volume 69
creator Hadda, Vijay
Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam
Mittal, Saurabh
Madan, Karan
Tiwari, Pawan
Suri, Tejas Menon
Khan, Maroof Ahmad
Mohan, Anant
description •Difficult weaning is common in the ICU and is associated with increased consumption of hospital resources and worse outcome. Protocolized weaning in this setting might improve patient-centred outcomes.•An SBT duration of either 30 min or 120 min is equally effective when used for the first weaning attempt. However, the optimal duration of SBT for patients who failed the first attempt is not known.•SL-SBT trial compared 30 min and 120 min of SBT using pressure support of 6 cm of H2O for difficult-to-wean patients and showed that the success rate of extubation is similar with both approaches. The optimal duration of spontaneous breath trial (SBT) for patients with difficult extubation from mechanical ventilation is unknown. This study compared extubation success with two different durations of SBT in patients who failed their first SBT. This single-center randomized controlled trial included adults on mechanical ventilation who had failed their first SBT. The participants were randomized to receive pressure support ventilation (PSV) for either 30 or 120 min. Our primary outcome was the rate of successful extubation (without reintubation within 48 h). Key secondary outcomes were the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and in-hospital and 90-day mortality. A total of 119 patients (62.2 % male) with a mean age of 53.9 years were randomized to undergo SBT for either 30 min (n = 60) or 120 min (n = 59). Among them, 82.4 % of patients had hypercapnic respiratory failure. The rates of successful extubation were similar with SBT of 30 min and 120 min (58.3 % vs. 59.3 %, respectively; p = 0.91). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the durations of ICU and hospital stay or in-hospital and 90-day mortality. Extubation success and other clinically important outcomes were comparable between short (30 min) and long (120 min) SBT in difficult weaning. A 30-minute SBT may be acceptable in this setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.10.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3125484635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0147956324002000</els_id><sourcerecordid>3125484635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-37ad398d9abfb11caa521fd489f432bf5de416b3c3d18ad5dab188662b1e2ecf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qVdlC_wFCPi6HbP2VrHNBKohSpK047PZsOfaY9SqbLLYD6oH_jqMA4lRfRpp5Xo_mQeiUkgUltPqxW2xDarv7BSNM5NaCEPkJzWjJlgVnUn5GM0LFsqjLih-hbzHuSH68Wn5FR7wuiahoPUPP620fEp5zgv_4bkgQz_EjhDhE3PbdPZ5T9mESD32XdAd9HjcBdNr6zKTgdYv1fuQPOnnoUsRPPm2x9c55M7QJP4HuRna-XhXryw3ejJnzE_TF6TbC99d6jP7-ut5c_S5Wdze3Vz9XhWGCpoIvteW1tLVuXEOp0bpk1Fkhayc4a1xpQdCq4YZbKrUtrW6olFXFGgoMjOPHaD79ewj9wwAxqb2PBtp2ukVxykohRcXLjIoJNaGPMYBTh-D3OvxTlKhRvNqpSbwaxY_dLD7Hzl43DM0e7HvozXQGLiYA8p2PHoKKJpsyYH0Ak5Tt_f83vAAewJbb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125484635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short (30 Minutes) versus long (120 Minutes) spontaneous breathing trial among patients with difficult weaning (SL-SBT Trial)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hadda, Vijay ; Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam ; Mittal, Saurabh ; Madan, Karan ; Tiwari, Pawan ; Suri, Tejas Menon ; Khan, Maroof Ahmad ; Mohan, Anant</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadda, Vijay ; Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam ; Mittal, Saurabh ; Madan, Karan ; Tiwari, Pawan ; Suri, Tejas Menon ; Khan, Maroof Ahmad ; Mohan, Anant</creatorcontrib><description>•Difficult weaning is common in the ICU and is associated with increased consumption of hospital resources and worse outcome. Protocolized weaning in this setting might improve patient-centred outcomes.•An SBT duration of either 30 min or 120 min is equally effective when used for the first weaning attempt. However, the optimal duration of SBT for patients who failed the first attempt is not known.•SL-SBT trial compared 30 min and 120 min of SBT using pressure support of 6 cm of H2O for difficult-to-wean patients and showed that the success rate of extubation is similar with both approaches. The optimal duration of spontaneous breath trial (SBT) for patients with difficult extubation from mechanical ventilation is unknown. This study compared extubation success with two different durations of SBT in patients who failed their first SBT. This single-center randomized controlled trial included adults on mechanical ventilation who had failed their first SBT. The participants were randomized to receive pressure support ventilation (PSV) for either 30 or 120 min. Our primary outcome was the rate of successful extubation (without reintubation within 48 h). Key secondary outcomes were the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and in-hospital and 90-day mortality. A total of 119 patients (62.2 % male) with a mean age of 53.9 years were randomized to undergo SBT for either 30 min (n = 60) or 120 min (n = 59). Among them, 82.4 % of patients had hypercapnic respiratory failure. The rates of successful extubation were similar with SBT of 30 min and 120 min (58.3 % vs. 59.3 %, respectively; p = 0.91). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the durations of ICU and hospital stay or in-hospital and 90-day mortality. Extubation success and other clinically important outcomes were comparable between short (30 min) and long (120 min) SBT in difficult weaning. A 30-minute SBT may be acceptable in this setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-9563</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1527-3288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39504619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Airway Extubation - methods ; Airway Extubation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Duration of SBT ; Extubation ; Female ; Hospital Mortality - trends ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Mechanical ventilation ; Middle Aged ; Respiration ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Respiration, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy ; Spontaneous breathing trial ; Time Factors ; Ventilator Weaning - methods ; Ventilator Weaning - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Heart &amp; lung, 2025-01, Vol.69, p.217-221</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-37ad398d9abfb11caa521fd489f432bf5de416b3c3d18ad5dab188662b1e2ecf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5820-3685</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324002000$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39504619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadda, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madan, Karan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Pawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suri, Tejas Menon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Maroof Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Anant</creatorcontrib><title>Short (30 Minutes) versus long (120 Minutes) spontaneous breathing trial among patients with difficult weaning (SL-SBT Trial)</title><title>Heart &amp; lung</title><addtitle>Heart Lung</addtitle><description>•Difficult weaning is common in the ICU and is associated with increased consumption of hospital resources and worse outcome. Protocolized weaning in this setting might improve patient-centred outcomes.•An SBT duration of either 30 min or 120 min is equally effective when used for the first weaning attempt. However, the optimal duration of SBT for patients who failed the first attempt is not known.•SL-SBT trial compared 30 min and 120 min of SBT using pressure support of 6 cm of H2O for difficult-to-wean patients and showed that the success rate of extubation is similar with both approaches. The optimal duration of spontaneous breath trial (SBT) for patients with difficult extubation from mechanical ventilation is unknown. This study compared extubation success with two different durations of SBT in patients who failed their first SBT. This single-center randomized controlled trial included adults on mechanical ventilation who had failed their first SBT. The participants were randomized to receive pressure support ventilation (PSV) for either 30 or 120 min. Our primary outcome was the rate of successful extubation (without reintubation within 48 h). Key secondary outcomes were the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and in-hospital and 90-day mortality. A total of 119 patients (62.2 % male) with a mean age of 53.9 years were randomized to undergo SBT for either 30 min (n = 60) or 120 min (n = 59). Among them, 82.4 % of patients had hypercapnic respiratory failure. The rates of successful extubation were similar with SBT of 30 min and 120 min (58.3 % vs. 59.3 %, respectively; p = 0.91). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the durations of ICU and hospital stay or in-hospital and 90-day mortality. Extubation success and other clinically important outcomes were comparable between short (30 min) and long (120 min) SBT in difficult weaning. A 30-minute SBT may be acceptable in this setting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Airway Extubation - methods</subject><subject>Airway Extubation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Duration of SBT</subject><subject>Extubation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>Spontaneous breathing trial</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventilator Weaning - methods</subject><subject>Ventilator Weaning - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>0147-9563</issn><issn>1527-3288</issn><issn>1527-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qVdlC_wFCPi6HbP2VrHNBKohSpK047PZsOfaY9SqbLLYD6oH_jqMA4lRfRpp5Xo_mQeiUkgUltPqxW2xDarv7BSNM5NaCEPkJzWjJlgVnUn5GM0LFsqjLih-hbzHuSH68Wn5FR7wuiahoPUPP620fEp5zgv_4bkgQz_EjhDhE3PbdPZ5T9mESD32XdAd9HjcBdNr6zKTgdYv1fuQPOnnoUsRPPm2x9c55M7QJP4HuRna-XhXryw3ejJnzE_TF6TbC99d6jP7-ut5c_S5Wdze3Vz9XhWGCpoIvteW1tLVuXEOp0bpk1Fkhayc4a1xpQdCq4YZbKrUtrW6olFXFGgoMjOPHaD79ewj9wwAxqb2PBtp2ukVxykohRcXLjIoJNaGPMYBTh-D3OvxTlKhRvNqpSbwaxY_dLD7Hzl43DM0e7HvozXQGLiYA8p2PHoKKJpsyYH0Ak5Tt_f83vAAewJbb</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Hadda, Vijay</creator><creator>Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam</creator><creator>Mittal, Saurabh</creator><creator>Madan, Karan</creator><creator>Tiwari, Pawan</creator><creator>Suri, Tejas Menon</creator><creator>Khan, Maroof Ahmad</creator><creator>Mohan, Anant</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-3685</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Short (30 Minutes) versus long (120 Minutes) spontaneous breathing trial among patients with difficult weaning (SL-SBT Trial)</title><author>Hadda, Vijay ; Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam ; Mittal, Saurabh ; Madan, Karan ; Tiwari, Pawan ; Suri, Tejas Menon ; Khan, Maroof Ahmad ; Mohan, Anant</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-37ad398d9abfb11caa521fd489f432bf5de416b3c3d18ad5dab188662b1e2ecf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Airway Extubation - methods</topic><topic>Airway Extubation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Duration of SBT</topic><topic>Extubation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>Spontaneous breathing trial</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventilator Weaning - methods</topic><topic>Ventilator Weaning - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadda, Vijay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madan, Karan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Pawan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suri, Tejas Menon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Maroof Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Anant</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart &amp; lung</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadda, Vijay</au><au>Meenakshisundaram, Arunachalam</au><au>Mittal, Saurabh</au><au>Madan, Karan</au><au>Tiwari, Pawan</au><au>Suri, Tejas Menon</au><au>Khan, Maroof Ahmad</au><au>Mohan, Anant</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short (30 Minutes) versus long (120 Minutes) spontaneous breathing trial among patients with difficult weaning (SL-SBT Trial)</atitle><jtitle>Heart &amp; lung</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Lung</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>69</volume><spage>217</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>217-221</pages><issn>0147-9563</issn><issn>1527-3288</issn><eissn>1527-3288</eissn><abstract>•Difficult weaning is common in the ICU and is associated with increased consumption of hospital resources and worse outcome. Protocolized weaning in this setting might improve patient-centred outcomes.•An SBT duration of either 30 min or 120 min is equally effective when used for the first weaning attempt. However, the optimal duration of SBT for patients who failed the first attempt is not known.•SL-SBT trial compared 30 min and 120 min of SBT using pressure support of 6 cm of H2O for difficult-to-wean patients and showed that the success rate of extubation is similar with both approaches. The optimal duration of spontaneous breath trial (SBT) for patients with difficult extubation from mechanical ventilation is unknown. This study compared extubation success with two different durations of SBT in patients who failed their first SBT. This single-center randomized controlled trial included adults on mechanical ventilation who had failed their first SBT. The participants were randomized to receive pressure support ventilation (PSV) for either 30 or 120 min. Our primary outcome was the rate of successful extubation (without reintubation within 48 h). Key secondary outcomes were the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and in-hospital and 90-day mortality. A total of 119 patients (62.2 % male) with a mean age of 53.9 years were randomized to undergo SBT for either 30 min (n = 60) or 120 min (n = 59). Among them, 82.4 % of patients had hypercapnic respiratory failure. The rates of successful extubation were similar with SBT of 30 min and 120 min (58.3 % vs. 59.3 %, respectively; p = 0.91). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the durations of ICU and hospital stay or in-hospital and 90-day mortality. Extubation success and other clinically important outcomes were comparable between short (30 min) and long (120 min) SBT in difficult weaning. A 30-minute SBT may be acceptable in this setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39504619</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.10.008</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5820-3685</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-9563
ispartof Heart & lung, 2025-01, Vol.69, p.217-221
issn 0147-9563
1527-3288
1527-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3125484635
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Airway Extubation - methods
Airway Extubation - statistics & numerical data
Duration of SBT
Extubation
Female
Hospital Mortality - trends
Humans
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Mechanical ventilation
Middle Aged
Respiration
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Respiration, Artificial - statistics & numerical data
Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy
Spontaneous breathing trial
Time Factors
Ventilator Weaning - methods
Ventilator Weaning - statistics & numerical data
Weaning
title Short (30 Minutes) versus long (120 Minutes) spontaneous breathing trial among patients with difficult weaning (SL-SBT Trial)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T22%3A52%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20(30%20Minutes)%20versus%20long%20(120%20Minutes)%20spontaneous%20breathing%20trial%20among%20patients%20with%20difficult%20weaning%20(SL-SBT%20Trial)&rft.jtitle=Heart%20&%20lung&rft.au=Hadda,%20Vijay&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=69&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=217-221&rft.issn=0147-9563&rft.eissn=1527-3288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3125484635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125484635&rft_id=info:pmid/39504619&rft_els_id=S0147956324002000&rfr_iscdi=true