Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment‐wide association study

Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, yet modifiable risk factors remain elusive. In this study, the authors investigated the potential role of agricultural pesticide exposure in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Methods For this environment‐wide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2025-01, Vol.131 (1), p.e35572-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Soerensen, Simon John Christoph, Lim, David S., Montez‐Rath, Maria E., Chertow, Glenn M., Chung, Benjamin I., Rehkopf, David H., Leppert, John T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e35572
container_title Cancer
container_volume 131
creator Soerensen, Simon John Christoph
Lim, David S.
Montez‐Rath, Maria E.
Chertow, Glenn M.
Chung, Benjamin I.
Rehkopf, David H.
Leppert, John T.
description Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, yet modifiable risk factors remain elusive. In this study, the authors investigated the potential role of agricultural pesticide exposure in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Methods For this environment‐wide association study (EWAS), linear regression was used to analyze county‐level associations between the annual use of 295 distinct pesticides (measured in kg per county) and prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in the contiguous United States. Data were analyzed in two cohorts: 1997–2001 pesticide use with 2011–2015 outcomes (discovery) and 2002–2006 use with 2016–2020 outcomes (replication). The reported effect sizes highlight how a 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use (kg per county) corresponds to changes in incidence. Analyses were adjusted for county‐level demographics, agricultural data, and multiple testing. Results Twenty‐two pesticides showed consistent, direct associations with prostate cancer incidence across both cohorts. Of these, four pesticides were also associated with prostate cancer mortality. In the replication cohort, each 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use corresponded to incidence increases per 100,000 individuals (trifluralin, 6.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.04–8.07]; cloransulam‐methyl, 6.18 [95% CI, 4.06–8.31]; diflufenzopyr, 3.20 [95% CI, 1.09–5.31]; and thiamethoxam, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.14–4.50]). Limitations included ecological study design, potential unmeasured confounding, and lack of individual‐level exposure data. Conclusions The results of this study suggest a potential link between certain pesticides and increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings warrant further investigation of these specific pesticides to confirm their role in prostate cancer risk and to develop potential public health interventions. For this environment‐wide association study, the authors assessed potential associations between pesticide exposure and prostate cancer outcomes in US counties, identifying 22 pesticides associated with increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings underline the significance of exploring these associations further to inform public health interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.35572
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3123805281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3123805281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-ec5f4587ba02a40520c7fea3858799a6f295a6cfe837bec4aca4a81a0f23e7183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MotlYvPoAseBFhaz423V1vpfgFRUUUvIVpOgspu9ma7Fp68xF8Rp_E9EMPHjxNJvPjx8yfkGNG-4xSfqGtdn0hZcp3SJfRPI0pS_gu6VJKs1gm4rVDDryfhTblUuyTjsiTnA9o3iXqEX1jtJmij8BOo7mrfQMNRhqsRhcZu5qF53pa1a6B0jTLy2hoI7TvxtW2Qtt8fXwuAheB97U20JjaRr5pp8tDsldA6fFoW3vk5frqeXQbjx9u7kbDcax5MuAxalkkMksnQDkkVHKq0wJBZOEvz2FQ8FzCQBeYiXSCOgENCWQMaMEFpiwTPXK28YYD3tpwk6qM11iWYLFuvRKMiyx4MxbQ0z_orG6dDdsFSgYXE4IG6nxD6ZCId1iouTMVuKViVK1iV6vY1Tr2AJ9sle2kwukv-pNzANgGWJgSl_-o1Oh-9LSRfgMbEY7C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3151831330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment‐wide association study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Soerensen, Simon John Christoph ; Lim, David S. ; Montez‐Rath, Maria E. ; Chertow, Glenn M. ; Chung, Benjamin I. ; Rehkopf, David H. ; Leppert, John T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soerensen, Simon John Christoph ; Lim, David S. ; Montez‐Rath, Maria E. ; Chertow, Glenn M. ; Chung, Benjamin I. ; Rehkopf, David H. ; Leppert, John T.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, yet modifiable risk factors remain elusive. In this study, the authors investigated the potential role of agricultural pesticide exposure in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Methods For this environment‐wide association study (EWAS), linear regression was used to analyze county‐level associations between the annual use of 295 distinct pesticides (measured in kg per county) and prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in the contiguous United States. Data were analyzed in two cohorts: 1997–2001 pesticide use with 2011–2015 outcomes (discovery) and 2002–2006 use with 2016–2020 outcomes (replication). The reported effect sizes highlight how a 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use (kg per county) corresponds to changes in incidence. Analyses were adjusted for county‐level demographics, agricultural data, and multiple testing. Results Twenty‐two pesticides showed consistent, direct associations with prostate cancer incidence across both cohorts. Of these, four pesticides were also associated with prostate cancer mortality. In the replication cohort, each 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use corresponded to incidence increases per 100,000 individuals (trifluralin, 6.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.04–8.07]; cloransulam‐methyl, 6.18 [95% CI, 4.06–8.31]; diflufenzopyr, 3.20 [95% CI, 1.09–5.31]; and thiamethoxam, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.14–4.50]). Limitations included ecological study design, potential unmeasured confounding, and lack of individual‐level exposure data. Conclusions The results of this study suggest a potential link between certain pesticides and increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings warrant further investigation of these specific pesticides to confirm their role in prostate cancer risk and to develop potential public health interventions. For this environment‐wide association study, the authors assessed potential associations between pesticide exposure and prostate cancer outcomes in US counties, identifying 22 pesticides associated with increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings underline the significance of exploring these associations further to inform public health interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35572</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39492609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Agrochemicals ; Cohort Studies ; Data analysis ; Deviation ; Ecological studies ; Environmental Exposure - adverse effects ; environment‐wide association study (EWAS) ; Health promotion ; Health risks ; Humans ; Incidence ; Insecticides ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Pesticides ; Pesticides - adverse effects ; Prostate cancer ; prostate cancer risk factors ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Public health ; Replication ; Risk Factors ; Statistical analysis ; Thiamethoxam ; Trifluralin ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2025-01, Vol.131 (1), p.e35572-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-ec5f4587ba02a40520c7fea3858799a6f295a6cfe837bec4aca4a81a0f23e7183</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9980-3863 ; 0000-0002-5763-8297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.35572$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.35572$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39492609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soerensen, Simon John Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montez‐Rath, Maria E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertow, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Benjamin I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehkopf, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leppert, John T.</creatorcontrib><title>Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment‐wide association study</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, yet modifiable risk factors remain elusive. In this study, the authors investigated the potential role of agricultural pesticide exposure in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Methods For this environment‐wide association study (EWAS), linear regression was used to analyze county‐level associations between the annual use of 295 distinct pesticides (measured in kg per county) and prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in the contiguous United States. Data were analyzed in two cohorts: 1997–2001 pesticide use with 2011–2015 outcomes (discovery) and 2002–2006 use with 2016–2020 outcomes (replication). The reported effect sizes highlight how a 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use (kg per county) corresponds to changes in incidence. Analyses were adjusted for county‐level demographics, agricultural data, and multiple testing. Results Twenty‐two pesticides showed consistent, direct associations with prostate cancer incidence across both cohorts. Of these, four pesticides were also associated with prostate cancer mortality. In the replication cohort, each 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use corresponded to incidence increases per 100,000 individuals (trifluralin, 6.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.04–8.07]; cloransulam‐methyl, 6.18 [95% CI, 4.06–8.31]; diflufenzopyr, 3.20 [95% CI, 1.09–5.31]; and thiamethoxam, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.14–4.50]). Limitations included ecological study design, potential unmeasured confounding, and lack of individual‐level exposure data. Conclusions The results of this study suggest a potential link between certain pesticides and increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings warrant further investigation of these specific pesticides to confirm their role in prostate cancer risk and to develop potential public health interventions. For this environment‐wide association study, the authors assessed potential associations between pesticide exposure and prostate cancer outcomes in US counties, identifying 22 pesticides associated with increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings underline the significance of exploring these associations further to inform public health interventions.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>Ecological studies</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>environment‐wide association study (EWAS)</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate cancer risk factors</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thiamethoxam</subject><subject>Trifluralin</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQx4MotlYvPoAseBFhaz423V1vpfgFRUUUvIVpOgspu9ma7Fp68xF8Rp_E9EMPHjxNJvPjx8yfkGNG-4xSfqGtdn0hZcp3SJfRPI0pS_gu6VJKs1gm4rVDDryfhTblUuyTjsiTnA9o3iXqEX1jtJmij8BOo7mrfQMNRhqsRhcZu5qF53pa1a6B0jTLy2hoI7TvxtW2Qtt8fXwuAheB97U20JjaRr5pp8tDsldA6fFoW3vk5frqeXQbjx9u7kbDcax5MuAxalkkMksnQDkkVHKq0wJBZOEvz2FQ8FzCQBeYiXSCOgENCWQMaMEFpiwTPXK28YYD3tpwk6qM11iWYLFuvRKMiyx4MxbQ0z_orG6dDdsFSgYXE4IG6nxD6ZCId1iouTMVuKViVK1iV6vY1Tr2AJ9sle2kwukv-pNzANgGWJgSl_-o1Oh-9LSRfgMbEY7C</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Soerensen, Simon John Christoph</creator><creator>Lim, David S.</creator><creator>Montez‐Rath, Maria E.</creator><creator>Chertow, Glenn M.</creator><creator>Chung, Benjamin I.</creator><creator>Rehkopf, David H.</creator><creator>Leppert, John T.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-3863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-8297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment‐wide association study</title><author>Soerensen, Simon John Christoph ; Lim, David S. ; Montez‐Rath, Maria E. ; Chertow, Glenn M. ; Chung, Benjamin I. ; Rehkopf, David H. ; Leppert, John T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2462-ec5f4587ba02a40520c7fea3858799a6f295a6cfe837bec4aca4a81a0f23e7183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>Ecological studies</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>environment‐wide association study (EWAS)</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate cancer risk factors</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thiamethoxam</topic><topic>Trifluralin</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soerensen, Simon John Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, David S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montez‐Rath, Maria E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertow, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Benjamin I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehkopf, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leppert, John T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soerensen, Simon John Christoph</au><au>Lim, David S.</au><au>Montez‐Rath, Maria E.</au><au>Chertow, Glenn M.</au><au>Chung, Benjamin I.</au><au>Rehkopf, David H.</au><au>Leppert, John T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment‐wide association study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e35572</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e35572-n/a</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the United States, yet modifiable risk factors remain elusive. In this study, the authors investigated the potential role of agricultural pesticide exposure in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Methods For this environment‐wide association study (EWAS), linear regression was used to analyze county‐level associations between the annual use of 295 distinct pesticides (measured in kg per county) and prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in the contiguous United States. Data were analyzed in two cohorts: 1997–2001 pesticide use with 2011–2015 outcomes (discovery) and 2002–2006 use with 2016–2020 outcomes (replication). The reported effect sizes highlight how a 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use (kg per county) corresponds to changes in incidence. Analyses were adjusted for county‐level demographics, agricultural data, and multiple testing. Results Twenty‐two pesticides showed consistent, direct associations with prostate cancer incidence across both cohorts. Of these, four pesticides were also associated with prostate cancer mortality. In the replication cohort, each 1‐standard‐deviation increase in log‐transformed pesticide use corresponded to incidence increases per 100,000 individuals (trifluralin, 6.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.04–8.07]; cloransulam‐methyl, 6.18 [95% CI, 4.06–8.31]; diflufenzopyr, 3.20 [95% CI, 1.09–5.31]; and thiamethoxam, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.14–4.50]). Limitations included ecological study design, potential unmeasured confounding, and lack of individual‐level exposure data. Conclusions The results of this study suggest a potential link between certain pesticides and increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings warrant further investigation of these specific pesticides to confirm their role in prostate cancer risk and to develop potential public health interventions. For this environment‐wide association study, the authors assessed potential associations between pesticide exposure and prostate cancer outcomes in US counties, identifying 22 pesticides associated with increased prostate cancer incidence and mortality. These findings underline the significance of exploring these associations further to inform public health interventions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39492609</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.35572</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9980-3863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-8297</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2025-01, Vol.131 (1), p.e35572-n/a
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3123805281
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Agrochemicals
Cohort Studies
Data analysis
Deviation
Ecological studies
Environmental Exposure - adverse effects
environment‐wide association study (EWAS)
Health promotion
Health risks
Humans
Incidence
Insecticides
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
Pesticides
Pesticides - adverse effects
Prostate cancer
prostate cancer risk factors
Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology
Prostatic Neoplasms - mortality
Public health
Replication
Risk Factors
Statistical analysis
Thiamethoxam
Trifluralin
United States - epidemiology
title Pesticides and prostate cancer incidence and mortality: An environment‐wide association study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pesticides%20and%20prostate%20cancer%20incidence%20and%20mortality:%20An%20environment%E2%80%90wide%20association%20study&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Soerensen,%20Simon%20John%20Christoph&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e35572&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e35572-n/a&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.35572&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3123805281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3151831330&rft_id=info:pmid/39492609&rfr_iscdi=true