Ozone risk assessment of common cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) clones and effects of Seiridium cardinale infection

•O3 risk assessment for Cupressus sempervirens was explored for the first time.•Stomatal O3 uptake model was parameterized.•Flux-based index (POD2) was the best approach to assess O3 risk in C. sempervirens.•A critical level of 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2 is recommended for C. sempervirens.•Seiridium cardinal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental sciences (China) 2025-05, Vol.151, p.441-453
Hauptverfasser: Manzini, Jacopo, Hoshika, Yasutomo, Danti, Roberto, Moura, Barbara Baesso, Paoletti, Elena, Rocca, Gianni Della
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 453
container_issue
container_start_page 441
container_title Journal of environmental sciences (China)
container_volume 151
creator Manzini, Jacopo
Hoshika, Yasutomo
Danti, Roberto
Moura, Barbara Baesso
Paoletti, Elena
Rocca, Gianni Della
description •O3 risk assessment for Cupressus sempervirens was explored for the first time.•Stomatal O3 uptake model was parameterized.•Flux-based index (POD2) was the best approach to assess O3 risk in C. sempervirens.•A critical level of 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2 is recommended for C. sempervirens.•Seiridium cardinale infection altered O3 risk assessment. Cupressus sempervirens is a relevant species in the Mediterranean for its cultural, economic and landscape value. This species is threatened by Seiridium cardinale, the causal agent of the cypress canker disease (CCD). The effects of biotic stressors on O3 risk assessment are unknown and a comprehensive O3 risk assessment in C. sempervirens is missing. To fill these gaps, two clones of C. sempervirens, one resistant (Clone R) and one susceptible to CCD (Clone S), were subjected to three levels of O3 (Ambient Air - AA; 1.5 × AA; 2.0 × AA) for two consecutive years in an O3-free-air controlled exposure facility and artificially inoculated with S. cardinale. Both the exposure- (AOT40) and flux-based (PODy) indices were tested. We found that PODy performed better than AOT40 to assess O3 effects on biomass and the critical level for a 4% biomass loss was 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2. However, significant O3 dose-response relationships were not found for the inoculated cypresses because the combination of middle level O3 (1.5 × AA) and inoculation stimulated a biomass growth in Clone S as hormetic response. Moreover, we found a different inter-clonal response to both stressors with a statistically significant reduction of total and belowground biomass following O3, and lower root biomass in Clone S than in Clone R following pathogen infection. In summary, Clone R was more resistant to O3, and inoculation altered O3 risk via an hormetic effect on biomass. These results warrant further studies on how biotic stressors affect O3 responses and risk assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3123073074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1001074224001426</els_id><sourcerecordid>3123073074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-63541b85444195417a6bd49115e3416bd20b1c5300dd3a433436cf1baccf62b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhn1oVSjtA_SCfITDpjOxk90VJ7SiBWklDm3PlmNPJG8Te_EkIPr09XaBYyVLHnn--eT5hPiCUCFg-3VX7YirGmpdgaqgbt-JUwTABSx1fSI-Mu8AQDfQfBAnaq1XuG7wVDzd_0mRZA78W1pmYh4pTjL10qVxTFG6530ur_JiM_8rZpZM457yY8gUWW6rS-mGwmBpo5fU9-QmPgB-UMjBh3mUzmYfoh1IhnhohxQ_ife9HZg-v9xn4te3m5-b28X2_vvd5nq7cEqvpkWrGo3dqtFal_9qXNq283qN2JDSWOoaOnSNAvBeWa2UVq3rsbPO9W3dLdWZuDhy9zk9zMSTGQM7GgYbKc1sFNYKluXoEsVj1OXEnKk3-xxGm58Ngjk4NjtTHJuDYwPKFMdl5vwFP3cj-beJV8ElcHUMUFnyMVA27AJFR77oc5PxKfwH_xf7VI9U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3123073074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ozone risk assessment of common cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) clones and effects of Seiridium cardinale infection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Manzini, Jacopo ; Hoshika, Yasutomo ; Danti, Roberto ; Moura, Barbara Baesso ; Paoletti, Elena ; Rocca, Gianni Della</creator><creatorcontrib>Manzini, Jacopo ; Hoshika, Yasutomo ; Danti, Roberto ; Moura, Barbara Baesso ; Paoletti, Elena ; Rocca, Gianni Della</creatorcontrib><description>•O3 risk assessment for Cupressus sempervirens was explored for the first time.•Stomatal O3 uptake model was parameterized.•Flux-based index (POD2) was the best approach to assess O3 risk in C. sempervirens.•A critical level of 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2 is recommended for C. sempervirens.•Seiridium cardinale infection altered O3 risk assessment. Cupressus sempervirens is a relevant species in the Mediterranean for its cultural, economic and landscape value. This species is threatened by Seiridium cardinale, the causal agent of the cypress canker disease (CCD). The effects of biotic stressors on O3 risk assessment are unknown and a comprehensive O3 risk assessment in C. sempervirens is missing. To fill these gaps, two clones of C. sempervirens, one resistant (Clone R) and one susceptible to CCD (Clone S), were subjected to three levels of O3 (Ambient Air - AA; 1.5 × AA; 2.0 × AA) for two consecutive years in an O3-free-air controlled exposure facility and artificially inoculated with S. cardinale. Both the exposure- (AOT40) and flux-based (PODy) indices were tested. We found that PODy performed better than AOT40 to assess O3 effects on biomass and the critical level for a 4% biomass loss was 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2. However, significant O3 dose-response relationships were not found for the inoculated cypresses because the combination of middle level O3 (1.5 × AA) and inoculation stimulated a biomass growth in Clone S as hormetic response. Moreover, we found a different inter-clonal response to both stressors with a statistically significant reduction of total and belowground biomass following O3, and lower root biomass in Clone S than in Clone R following pathogen infection. In summary, Clone R was more resistant to O3, and inoculation altered O3 risk via an hormetic effect on biomass. These results warrant further studies on how biotic stressors affect O3 responses and risk assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1001-0742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39481951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abiotic stress ; Air Pollutants - toxicity ; Air pollution ; Cupressus ; Ozone - toxicity ; Ozone risk assessment ; Plant Diseases - microbiology ; Plant pathology ; PODy ; Risk Assessment ; Stomatal conductance model</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental sciences (China), 2025-05, Vol.151, p.441-453</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-63541b85444195417a6bd49115e3416bd20b1c5300dd3a433436cf1baccf62b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1008-8080 ; 0000-0001-6063-146X ; 0000-0001-5888-2550 ; 0000-0002-5263-2945</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39481951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manzini, Jacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshika, Yasutomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danti, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura, Barbara Baesso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paoletti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocca, Gianni Della</creatorcontrib><title>Ozone risk assessment of common cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) clones and effects of Seiridium cardinale infection</title><title>Journal of environmental sciences (China)</title><addtitle>J Environ Sci (China)</addtitle><description>•O3 risk assessment for Cupressus sempervirens was explored for the first time.•Stomatal O3 uptake model was parameterized.•Flux-based index (POD2) was the best approach to assess O3 risk in C. sempervirens.•A critical level of 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2 is recommended for C. sempervirens.•Seiridium cardinale infection altered O3 risk assessment. Cupressus sempervirens is a relevant species in the Mediterranean for its cultural, economic and landscape value. This species is threatened by Seiridium cardinale, the causal agent of the cypress canker disease (CCD). The effects of biotic stressors on O3 risk assessment are unknown and a comprehensive O3 risk assessment in C. sempervirens is missing. To fill these gaps, two clones of C. sempervirens, one resistant (Clone R) and one susceptible to CCD (Clone S), were subjected to three levels of O3 (Ambient Air - AA; 1.5 × AA; 2.0 × AA) for two consecutive years in an O3-free-air controlled exposure facility and artificially inoculated with S. cardinale. Both the exposure- (AOT40) and flux-based (PODy) indices were tested. We found that PODy performed better than AOT40 to assess O3 effects on biomass and the critical level for a 4% biomass loss was 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2. However, significant O3 dose-response relationships were not found for the inoculated cypresses because the combination of middle level O3 (1.5 × AA) and inoculation stimulated a biomass growth in Clone S as hormetic response. Moreover, we found a different inter-clonal response to both stressors with a statistically significant reduction of total and belowground biomass following O3, and lower root biomass in Clone S than in Clone R following pathogen infection. In summary, Clone R was more resistant to O3, and inoculation altered O3 risk via an hormetic effect on biomass. These results warrant further studies on how biotic stressors affect O3 responses and risk assessment.</description><subject>Abiotic stress</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Cupressus</subject><subject>Ozone - toxicity</subject><subject>Ozone risk assessment</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Plant pathology</subject><subject>PODy</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance model</subject><issn>1001-0742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhn1oVSjtA_SCfITDpjOxk90VJ7SiBWklDm3PlmNPJG8Te_EkIPr09XaBYyVLHnn--eT5hPiCUCFg-3VX7YirGmpdgaqgbt-JUwTABSx1fSI-Mu8AQDfQfBAnaq1XuG7wVDzd_0mRZA78W1pmYh4pTjL10qVxTFG6530ur_JiM_8rZpZM457yY8gUWW6rS-mGwmBpo5fU9-QmPgB-UMjBh3mUzmYfoh1IhnhohxQ_ife9HZg-v9xn4te3m5-b28X2_vvd5nq7cEqvpkWrGo3dqtFal_9qXNq283qN2JDSWOoaOnSNAvBeWa2UVq3rsbPO9W3dLdWZuDhy9zk9zMSTGQM7GgYbKc1sFNYKluXoEsVj1OXEnKk3-xxGm58Ngjk4NjtTHJuDYwPKFMdl5vwFP3cj-beJV8ElcHUMUFnyMVA27AJFR77oc5PxKfwH_xf7VI9U</recordid><startdate>202505</startdate><enddate>202505</enddate><creator>Manzini, Jacopo</creator><creator>Hoshika, Yasutomo</creator><creator>Danti, Roberto</creator><creator>Moura, Barbara Baesso</creator><creator>Paoletti, Elena</creator><creator>Rocca, Gianni Della</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1008-8080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-146X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-2550</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-2945</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202505</creationdate><title>Ozone risk assessment of common cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) clones and effects of Seiridium cardinale infection</title><author>Manzini, Jacopo ; Hoshika, Yasutomo ; Danti, Roberto ; Moura, Barbara Baesso ; Paoletti, Elena ; Rocca, Gianni Della</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-63541b85444195417a6bd49115e3416bd20b1c5300dd3a433436cf1baccf62b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Abiotic stress</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Cupressus</topic><topic>Ozone - toxicity</topic><topic>Ozone risk assessment</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Plant pathology</topic><topic>PODy</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manzini, Jacopo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshika, Yasutomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danti, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura, Barbara Baesso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paoletti, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocca, Gianni Della</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental sciences (China)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manzini, Jacopo</au><au>Hoshika, Yasutomo</au><au>Danti, Roberto</au><au>Moura, Barbara Baesso</au><au>Paoletti, Elena</au><au>Rocca, Gianni Della</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ozone risk assessment of common cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) clones and effects of Seiridium cardinale infection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental sciences (China)</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Sci (China)</addtitle><date>2025-05</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>151</volume><spage>441</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>441-453</pages><issn>1001-0742</issn><abstract>•O3 risk assessment for Cupressus sempervirens was explored for the first time.•Stomatal O3 uptake model was parameterized.•Flux-based index (POD2) was the best approach to assess O3 risk in C. sempervirens.•A critical level of 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2 is recommended for C. sempervirens.•Seiridium cardinale infection altered O3 risk assessment. Cupressus sempervirens is a relevant species in the Mediterranean for its cultural, economic and landscape value. This species is threatened by Seiridium cardinale, the causal agent of the cypress canker disease (CCD). The effects of biotic stressors on O3 risk assessment are unknown and a comprehensive O3 risk assessment in C. sempervirens is missing. To fill these gaps, two clones of C. sempervirens, one resistant (Clone R) and one susceptible to CCD (Clone S), were subjected to three levels of O3 (Ambient Air - AA; 1.5 × AA; 2.0 × AA) for two consecutive years in an O3-free-air controlled exposure facility and artificially inoculated with S. cardinale. Both the exposure- (AOT40) and flux-based (PODy) indices were tested. We found that PODy performed better than AOT40 to assess O3 effects on biomass and the critical level for a 4% biomass loss was 2.51 mmol/m2 POD2. However, significant O3 dose-response relationships were not found for the inoculated cypresses because the combination of middle level O3 (1.5 × AA) and inoculation stimulated a biomass growth in Clone S as hormetic response. Moreover, we found a different inter-clonal response to both stressors with a statistically significant reduction of total and belowground biomass following O3, and lower root biomass in Clone S than in Clone R following pathogen infection. In summary, Clone R was more resistant to O3, and inoculation altered O3 risk via an hormetic effect on biomass. These results warrant further studies on how biotic stressors affect O3 responses and risk assessment.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39481951</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.026</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1008-8080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-146X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5888-2550</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-2945</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1001-0742
ispartof Journal of environmental sciences (China), 2025-05, Vol.151, p.441-453
issn 1001-0742
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3123073074
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abiotic stress
Air Pollutants - toxicity
Air pollution
Cupressus
Ozone - toxicity
Ozone risk assessment
Plant Diseases - microbiology
Plant pathology
PODy
Risk Assessment
Stomatal conductance model
title Ozone risk assessment of common cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) clones and effects of Seiridium cardinale infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T15%3A12%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ozone%20risk%20assessment%20of%20common%20cypress%20(Cupressus%20sempervirens%20L.)%20clones%20and%20effects%20of%20Seiridium%20cardinale%20infection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20sciences%20(China)&rft.au=Manzini,%20Jacopo&rft.date=2025-05&rft.volume=151&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=441-453&rft.issn=1001-0742&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jes.2024.03.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3123073074%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3123073074&rft_id=info:pmid/39481951&rft_els_id=S1001074224001426&rfr_iscdi=true