Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis

Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023–2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of dermatological research 2024-10, Vol.316 (10), p.727, Article 727
Hauptverfasser: Ghali, Helana, Smith, Logan R., Rubalsky, Kayla, Abraham, Jaclyn, Jajoo, Veena, Mhaskar, Rahul, Cherpelis, Basil S., Albers, Sharon E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 727
container_title Archives of dermatological research
container_volume 316
creator Ghali, Helana
Smith, Logan R.
Rubalsky, Kayla
Abraham, Jaclyn
Jajoo, Veena
Mhaskar, Rahul
Cherpelis, Basil S.
Albers, Sharon E.
description Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023–2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology residency applicant profiles within this new context. A survey of 2023–2024 dermatology applicants was conducted via social media to gather demographic and application data. A total of 63 survey responses were collected: 74.6% matched and 25.4% unmatched. The racial distribution was 54% White/Caucasian, 25.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.5% Black/African American, 4.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.3% other. The median USMLE Step 2 score was 257 (215–277). Racial differences in USMLE Step 2 scores were significant ( P  = 0.031), but did not affect match rates ( P  = 0.116). Letters of recommendation from dermatology program directors were linked to lower match rates ( P  = 0.036). A positive correlation was found between the number of audition rotations completed and matching at such programs (r²=0.817). Of all matched respondents, 46.8% matched to a program they did not signal; of these, 50.0% matched to a program at which they completed an audition rotation and 40.9% to their home dermatology program affiliation. The mean number of interviews was 8.02, with matched applicants receiving more invitations than unmatched applicants (9.02 vs. 5.06, P  = 0.002). The shift to pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scores and expanded program signaling did not notably affect the median USMLE Step 2 score from prior years or match rates among underrepresented minorities. Success in matching continues to depend on a holistic evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122634184</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3122602805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-95c607c743c3c20f817df8ea92548708f49a44c683b69df9fadc3d1b3d22e9103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMotlZfwIUE3LgZPbl0MuNOSr1AwY2Cu5BmkjZlLjWZgrPzHXxDn8TY1gsu3OQE8v3_OTk_QscEzgmAuAgAHFgClCfAuIBE7KA-4YwmkOZPu7_uPXQQwgKiSGRkH_VYzkUKJO2j-fhFVa529QwXxleqbcpm1mFvgitMrTuslsvSaVW3eOkb60oTsG08bucGU6Ds_fUtFo51p0tziRXWvgkhCUa3rqlViVU8uuDCIdqzqgzmaFsH6PF6_DC6TSb3N3ejq0mi6TBtk3yoUxBacKaZpmAzIgqbGZXTIc8EZJbninOdZmya5oXNrSo0K8iUFZSanAAboLONbxz3eWVCKysXtClLVZtmFSQjlKaMk4xH9PQPumhWPs67pYBmMIwU3VDrn3lj5dK7SvlOEpCfOchNDjKuQa5zkCKKTrbWq2llim_J1-IjwDZAiE_1zPif3v_YfgAfrZMC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3122602805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ghali, Helana ; Smith, Logan R. ; Rubalsky, Kayla ; Abraham, Jaclyn ; Jajoo, Veena ; Mhaskar, Rahul ; Cherpelis, Basil S. ; Albers, Sharon E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghali, Helana ; Smith, Logan R. ; Rubalsky, Kayla ; Abraham, Jaclyn ; Jajoo, Veena ; Mhaskar, Rahul ; Cherpelis, Basil S. ; Albers, Sharon E.</creatorcontrib><description>Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023–2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology residency applicant profiles within this new context. A survey of 2023–2024 dermatology applicants was conducted via social media to gather demographic and application data. A total of 63 survey responses were collected: 74.6% matched and 25.4% unmatched. The racial distribution was 54% White/Caucasian, 25.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.5% Black/African American, 4.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.3% other. The median USMLE Step 2 score was 257 (215–277). Racial differences in USMLE Step 2 scores were significant ( P  = 0.031), but did not affect match rates ( P  = 0.116). Letters of recommendation from dermatology program directors were linked to lower match rates ( P  = 0.036). A positive correlation was found between the number of audition rotations completed and matching at such programs (r²=0.817). Of all matched respondents, 46.8% matched to a program they did not signal; of these, 50.0% matched to a program at which they completed an audition rotation and 40.9% to their home dermatology program affiliation. The mean number of interviews was 8.02, with matched applicants receiving more invitations than unmatched applicants (9.02 vs. 5.06, P  = 0.002). The shift to pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scores and expanded program signaling did not notably affect the median USMLE Step 2 score from prior years or match rates among underrepresented minorities. Success in matching continues to depend on a holistic evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-069X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0340-3696</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-069X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39476016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - education ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Licensing examinations ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Paper ; Personnel Selection - methods ; Racial differences ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>Archives of dermatological research, 2024-10, Vol.316 (10), p.727, Article 727</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-95c607c743c3c20f817df8ea92548708f49a44c683b69df9fadc3d1b3d22e9103</cites><orcidid>0009-0002-1411-0975</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39476016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghali, Helana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Logan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubalsky, Kayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Jaclyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jajoo, Veena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mhaskar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherpelis, Basil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albers, Sharon E.</creatorcontrib><title>Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis</title><title>Archives of dermatological research</title><addtitle>Arch Dermatol Res</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Dermatol Res</addtitle><description>Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023–2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology residency applicant profiles within this new context. A survey of 2023–2024 dermatology applicants was conducted via social media to gather demographic and application data. A total of 63 survey responses were collected: 74.6% matched and 25.4% unmatched. The racial distribution was 54% White/Caucasian, 25.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.5% Black/African American, 4.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.3% other. The median USMLE Step 2 score was 257 (215–277). Racial differences in USMLE Step 2 scores were significant ( P  = 0.031), but did not affect match rates ( P  = 0.116). Letters of recommendation from dermatology program directors were linked to lower match rates ( P  = 0.036). A positive correlation was found between the number of audition rotations completed and matching at such programs (r²=0.817). Of all matched respondents, 46.8% matched to a program they did not signal; of these, 50.0% matched to a program at which they completed an audition rotation and 40.9% to their home dermatology program affiliation. The mean number of interviews was 8.02, with matched applicants receiving more invitations than unmatched applicants (9.02 vs. 5.06, P  = 0.002). The shift to pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scores and expanded program signaling did not notably affect the median USMLE Step 2 score from prior years or match rates among underrepresented minorities. Success in matching continues to depend on a holistic evaluation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Licensing examinations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Personnel Selection - methods</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1432-069X</issn><issn>0340-3696</issn><issn>1432-069X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKAzEUhoMotlZfwIUE3LgZPbl0MuNOSr1AwY2Cu5BmkjZlLjWZgrPzHXxDn8TY1gsu3OQE8v3_OTk_QscEzgmAuAgAHFgClCfAuIBE7KA-4YwmkOZPu7_uPXQQwgKiSGRkH_VYzkUKJO2j-fhFVa529QwXxleqbcpm1mFvgitMrTuslsvSaVW3eOkb60oTsG08bucGU6Ds_fUtFo51p0tziRXWvgkhCUa3rqlViVU8uuDCIdqzqgzmaFsH6PF6_DC6TSb3N3ejq0mi6TBtk3yoUxBacKaZpmAzIgqbGZXTIc8EZJbninOdZmya5oXNrSo0K8iUFZSanAAboLONbxz3eWVCKysXtClLVZtmFSQjlKaMk4xH9PQPumhWPs67pYBmMIwU3VDrn3lj5dK7SvlOEpCfOchNDjKuQa5zkCKKTrbWq2llim_J1-IjwDZAiE_1zPif3v_YfgAfrZMC</recordid><startdate>20241030</startdate><enddate>20241030</enddate><creator>Ghali, Helana</creator><creator>Smith, Logan R.</creator><creator>Rubalsky, Kayla</creator><creator>Abraham, Jaclyn</creator><creator>Jajoo, Veena</creator><creator>Mhaskar, Rahul</creator><creator>Cherpelis, Basil S.</creator><creator>Albers, Sharon E.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1411-0975</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241030</creationdate><title>Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis</title><author>Ghali, Helana ; Smith, Logan R. ; Rubalsky, Kayla ; Abraham, Jaclyn ; Jajoo, Veena ; Mhaskar, Rahul ; Cherpelis, Basil S. ; Albers, Sharon E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-95c607c743c3c20f817df8ea92548708f49a44c683b69df9fadc3d1b3d22e9103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Licensing examinations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Personnel Selection - methods</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghali, Helana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Logan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubalsky, Kayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Jaclyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jajoo, Veena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mhaskar, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherpelis, Basil S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albers, Sharon E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of dermatological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghali, Helana</au><au>Smith, Logan R.</au><au>Rubalsky, Kayla</au><au>Abraham, Jaclyn</au><au>Jajoo, Veena</au><au>Mhaskar, Rahul</au><au>Cherpelis, Basil S.</au><au>Albers, Sharon E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis</atitle><jtitle>Archives of dermatological research</jtitle><stitle>Arch Dermatol Res</stitle><addtitle>Arch Dermatol Res</addtitle><date>2024-10-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>316</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>727</spage><pages>727-</pages><artnum>727</artnum><issn>1432-069X</issn><issn>0340-3696</issn><eissn>1432-069X</eissn><abstract>Dermatology remains highly competitive, with strong USMLE Step 1 scores traditionally crucial for securing residency positions. The 2023–2024 cycle introduced significant changes, including pass/fail USMLE Step 1 score reports and an expanded program signaling system. This study explores dermatology residency applicant profiles within this new context. A survey of 2023–2024 dermatology applicants was conducted via social media to gather demographic and application data. A total of 63 survey responses were collected: 74.6% matched and 25.4% unmatched. The racial distribution was 54% White/Caucasian, 25.4% Asian/Pacific Islander, 9.5% Black/African American, 4.8% Hispanic/Latino, and 6.3% other. The median USMLE Step 2 score was 257 (215–277). Racial differences in USMLE Step 2 scores were significant ( P  = 0.031), but did not affect match rates ( P  = 0.116). Letters of recommendation from dermatology program directors were linked to lower match rates ( P  = 0.036). A positive correlation was found between the number of audition rotations completed and matching at such programs (r²=0.817). Of all matched respondents, 46.8% matched to a program they did not signal; of these, 50.0% matched to a program at which they completed an audition rotation and 40.9% to their home dermatology program affiliation. The mean number of interviews was 8.02, with matched applicants receiving more invitations than unmatched applicants (9.02 vs. 5.06, P  = 0.002). The shift to pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scores and expanded program signaling did not notably affect the median USMLE Step 2 score from prior years or match rates among underrepresented minorities. Success in matching continues to depend on a holistic evaluation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39476016</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1411-0975</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-069X
ispartof Archives of dermatological research, 2024-10, Vol.316 (10), p.727, Article 727
issn 1432-069X
0340-3696
1432-069X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3122634184
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Dermatology
Dermatology - education
Education, Medical, Graduate
Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Internship and Residency - statistics & numerical data
Licensing examinations
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Paper
Personnel Selection - methods
Racial differences
Surveys
Surveys and Questionnaires - statistics & numerical data
United States
title Examining dermatology residency applicant profiles for the 2023–2024 cycle: a cross-sectional analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20dermatology%20residency%20applicant%20profiles%20for%20the%202023%E2%80%932024%20cycle:%20a%20cross-sectional%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20dermatological%20research&rft.au=Ghali,%20Helana&rft.date=2024-10-30&rft.volume=316&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=727&rft.pages=727-&rft.artnum=727&rft.issn=1432-069X&rft.eissn=1432-069X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00403-024-03470-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3122602805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3122602805&rft_id=info:pmid/39476016&rfr_iscdi=true