Alveolar Ridge Regeneration With Open Versus Closed Healing in Damaged Extraction Sockets: A Preclinical In Vivo Study

The objective of this study was to compare open versus closed healing of soft and hard tissue following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures in damaged extraction sockets. ARP was performed in five mongrel dogs using collagenated deproteinized bovine bone mineral (cDBBM) and a resorbable non...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2024-10
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Jae-Won, Park, Jin-Young, Cha, Jae-Kook, Hieu, Pham-Duong, Jung, Hwi-Dong, Kim, Chang-Sung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume
creator Choi, Jae-Won
Park, Jin-Young
Cha, Jae-Kook
Hieu, Pham-Duong
Jung, Hwi-Dong
Kim, Chang-Sung
description The objective of this study was to compare open versus closed healing of soft and hard tissue following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures in damaged extraction sockets. ARP was performed in five mongrel dogs using collagenated deproteinized bovine bone mineral (cDBBM) and a resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane (NCCM) in damaged extraction sockets, with each socket entrance left either open (open group) or closed (closed group). Clinical wound epithelization at the socket entrance and the dimensions of keratinized tissue were evaluated over time. Additionally, the augmented ridge dimensions and new bone formation were assessed radiographically and histologically at 8 weeks after surgery. The dimensions of the socket entrance gradually decreased in the open group, and wound epithelization was almost complete within 4 weeks. The mucogingival junction was maintained more apically in the open group than in the closed group (0.14 ± 0.40 mm vs. -0.86 ± 0.71 mm [mean ± SD], p  0.05). Histological analyses revealed no significant differences in the amount of newly formed bone. However, membrane resorption in the crestal region was more pronounced in the open group. Open and closed healing approaches for ARP in extraction sockets with damaged buccal wall resulted in similar ridge dimensions and new bone formation. However, there was less reduction of the buccal bone crest and wider keratinized tissue width after open healing.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.14376
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121283287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121283287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-7c20a4cf45d3fc074ff249df833c61d6ee4f28c364a510aa096f76c391b7816b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtOwzAURS0EoqUwYAPIQxgE7DixY2ZV-bRSJRCFMoxc57kY3KTYCZ_dsBZWRmgLd_Kkq_Pu4CB0SMkpbXOmnT-lCRN8C3UpJyQiKaHbqEskSSNBOe2gvRCeCSFcZnIXdZhMeCql6KL3vnuDyimP72wxB3wHcyjBq9pWJX609RO-WUKJp-BDE_DAVQEKPATlbDnHtsQXaqHmbXX5UXulV1-TSr9AHc5xH9960C1ptXJ4VH5_Te1bhSd1U3zuox2jXICDze2hh6vL-8EwGt9cjwb9caSpSOtI6JioRJskLZjRRCTGxIksTMaY5rTgAImJM814olJKlCKSG8E1k3QmMspnrIeO17tLX702EOp8YYMG51QJVRNyRmMaZyzORIuerFHtqxA8mHzp7UL5z5yS_Ndz3nrOV55b9mgz28wWUPyTf2LZD-fOeZM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121283287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alveolar Ridge Regeneration With Open Versus Closed Healing in Damaged Extraction Sockets: A Preclinical In Vivo Study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Choi, Jae-Won ; Park, Jin-Young ; Cha, Jae-Kook ; Hieu, Pham-Duong ; Jung, Hwi-Dong ; Kim, Chang-Sung</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jae-Won ; Park, Jin-Young ; Cha, Jae-Kook ; Hieu, Pham-Duong ; Jung, Hwi-Dong ; Kim, Chang-Sung</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to compare open versus closed healing of soft and hard tissue following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures in damaged extraction sockets. ARP was performed in five mongrel dogs using collagenated deproteinized bovine bone mineral (cDBBM) and a resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane (NCCM) in damaged extraction sockets, with each socket entrance left either open (open group) or closed (closed group). Clinical wound epithelization at the socket entrance and the dimensions of keratinized tissue were evaluated over time. Additionally, the augmented ridge dimensions and new bone formation were assessed radiographically and histologically at 8 weeks after surgery. The dimensions of the socket entrance gradually decreased in the open group, and wound epithelization was almost complete within 4 weeks. The mucogingival junction was maintained more apically in the open group than in the closed group (0.14 ± 0.40 mm vs. -0.86 ± 0.71 mm [mean ± SD], p &lt; 0.05). The augmented ridge dimensions did not differ significantly between the open and closed groups (93.1% ± 5.4% vs. 88.3% ± 11.2%, p &gt; 0.05). Histological analyses revealed no significant differences in the amount of newly formed bone. However, membrane resorption in the crestal region was more pronounced in the open group. Open and closed healing approaches for ARP in extraction sockets with damaged buccal wall resulted in similar ridge dimensions and new bone formation. However, there was less reduction of the buccal bone crest and wider keratinized tissue width after open healing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.14376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39465997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2024-10</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-7c20a4cf45d3fc074ff249df833c61d6ee4f28c364a510aa096f76c391b7816b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6408-1618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39465997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jae-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Jae-Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hieu, Pham-Duong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hwi-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang-Sung</creatorcontrib><title>Alveolar Ridge Regeneration With Open Versus Closed Healing in Damaged Extraction Sockets: A Preclinical In Vivo Study</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to compare open versus closed healing of soft and hard tissue following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures in damaged extraction sockets. ARP was performed in five mongrel dogs using collagenated deproteinized bovine bone mineral (cDBBM) and a resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane (NCCM) in damaged extraction sockets, with each socket entrance left either open (open group) or closed (closed group). Clinical wound epithelization at the socket entrance and the dimensions of keratinized tissue were evaluated over time. Additionally, the augmented ridge dimensions and new bone formation were assessed radiographically and histologically at 8 weeks after surgery. The dimensions of the socket entrance gradually decreased in the open group, and wound epithelization was almost complete within 4 weeks. The mucogingival junction was maintained more apically in the open group than in the closed group (0.14 ± 0.40 mm vs. -0.86 ± 0.71 mm [mean ± SD], p &lt; 0.05). The augmented ridge dimensions did not differ significantly between the open and closed groups (93.1% ± 5.4% vs. 88.3% ± 11.2%, p &gt; 0.05). Histological analyses revealed no significant differences in the amount of newly formed bone. However, membrane resorption in the crestal region was more pronounced in the open group. Open and closed healing approaches for ARP in extraction sockets with damaged buccal wall resulted in similar ridge dimensions and new bone formation. However, there was less reduction of the buccal bone crest and wider keratinized tissue width after open healing.</description><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtOwzAURS0EoqUwYAPIQxgE7DixY2ZV-bRSJRCFMoxc57kY3KTYCZ_dsBZWRmgLd_Kkq_Pu4CB0SMkpbXOmnT-lCRN8C3UpJyQiKaHbqEskSSNBOe2gvRCeCSFcZnIXdZhMeCql6KL3vnuDyimP72wxB3wHcyjBq9pWJX609RO-WUKJp-BDE_DAVQEKPATlbDnHtsQXaqHmbXX5UXulV1-TSr9AHc5xH9960C1ptXJ4VH5_Te1bhSd1U3zuox2jXICDze2hh6vL-8EwGt9cjwb9caSpSOtI6JioRJskLZjRRCTGxIksTMaY5rTgAImJM814olJKlCKSG8E1k3QmMspnrIeO17tLX702EOp8YYMG51QJVRNyRmMaZyzORIuerFHtqxA8mHzp7UL5z5yS_Ndz3nrOV55b9mgz28wWUPyTf2LZD-fOeZM</recordid><startdate>20241028</startdate><enddate>20241028</enddate><creator>Choi, Jae-Won</creator><creator>Park, Jin-Young</creator><creator>Cha, Jae-Kook</creator><creator>Hieu, Pham-Duong</creator><creator>Jung, Hwi-Dong</creator><creator>Kim, Chang-Sung</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6408-1618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241028</creationdate><title>Alveolar Ridge Regeneration With Open Versus Closed Healing in Damaged Extraction Sockets: A Preclinical In Vivo Study</title><author>Choi, Jae-Won ; Park, Jin-Young ; Cha, Jae-Kook ; Hieu, Pham-Duong ; Jung, Hwi-Dong ; Kim, Chang-Sung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c175t-7c20a4cf45d3fc074ff249df833c61d6ee4f28c364a510aa096f76c391b7816b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jae-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Jae-Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hieu, Pham-Duong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hwi-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang-Sung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Jae-Won</au><au>Park, Jin-Young</au><au>Cha, Jae-Kook</au><au>Hieu, Pham-Duong</au><au>Jung, Hwi-Dong</au><au>Kim, Chang-Sung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alveolar Ridge Regeneration With Open Versus Closed Healing in Damaged Extraction Sockets: A Preclinical In Vivo Study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2024-10-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to compare open versus closed healing of soft and hard tissue following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures in damaged extraction sockets. ARP was performed in five mongrel dogs using collagenated deproteinized bovine bone mineral (cDBBM) and a resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membrane (NCCM) in damaged extraction sockets, with each socket entrance left either open (open group) or closed (closed group). Clinical wound epithelization at the socket entrance and the dimensions of keratinized tissue were evaluated over time. Additionally, the augmented ridge dimensions and new bone formation were assessed radiographically and histologically at 8 weeks after surgery. The dimensions of the socket entrance gradually decreased in the open group, and wound epithelization was almost complete within 4 weeks. The mucogingival junction was maintained more apically in the open group than in the closed group (0.14 ± 0.40 mm vs. -0.86 ± 0.71 mm [mean ± SD], p &lt; 0.05). The augmented ridge dimensions did not differ significantly between the open and closed groups (93.1% ± 5.4% vs. 88.3% ± 11.2%, p &gt; 0.05). Histological analyses revealed no significant differences in the amount of newly formed bone. However, membrane resorption in the crestal region was more pronounced in the open group. Open and closed healing approaches for ARP in extraction sockets with damaged buccal wall resulted in similar ridge dimensions and new bone formation. However, there was less reduction of the buccal bone crest and wider keratinized tissue width after open healing.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>39465997</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.14376</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6408-1618</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2024-10
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121283287
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Alveolar Ridge Regeneration With Open Versus Closed Healing in Damaged Extraction Sockets: A Preclinical In Vivo Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A06%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alveolar%20Ridge%20Regeneration%20With%20Open%20Versus%20Closed%20Healing%20in%20Damaged%20Extraction%20Sockets:%20A%20Preclinical%20In%C2%A0Vivo%20Study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Choi,%20Jae-Won&rft.date=2024-10-28&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.14376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3121283287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121283287&rft_id=info:pmid/39465997&rfr_iscdi=true