How control modulates pain
Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in cognitive sciences 2025-01, Vol.29 (1), p.60-72 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | Trends in cognitive sciences |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Habermann, Marie Strube, Andreas Büchel, Christian |
description | Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices.
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using di |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121281104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364661324002572</els_id><sourcerecordid>3121281104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-729dc29d68371cec30f48502fc1f4b3776cec497fd46a8d64aba9bcb335823693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMo7rr6AnuQPXppzSRp2oAXWdQVFrwoeAtpkkKWtlmTVvHtzdLVo4dhhuGff2Y-hJaAc8DAb3f54HTMCSYsxyLHwE7QHKpSZBSX76epppxlnAOdoYsYdxhDUZb8HM2oYJxwQedoufFfK-37Ifh21XkztmqwcbVXrr9EZ41qo7065gV6e3x4XW-y7cvT8_p-m2koCM1KIoxOwStagraa4oZVBSaNhobVNC1MTSbKxjCuKsOZqpWodU1pURGajligm8l3H_zHaOMgOxe1bVvVWz9GSYEAqQAwS1IySXXwMQbbyH1wnQrfErA8MJE7eWAiD0wkFjIxSUPXR_-x7qz5G_mFkAR3k8CmLz-dDTJqZ3ttjQtWD9J495__DwVicKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121281104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How control modulates pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Habermann, Marie ; Strube, Andreas ; Büchel, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Marie ; Strube, Andreas ; Büchel, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices.
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-6613</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39462693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agency ; Bayes Theorem ; Brain - physiology ; Brain - physiopathology ; control ; descending pain-modulatory system ; Gyrus Cinguli - physiology ; Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology ; helplessness ; Humans ; pain ; Pain - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Trends in cognitive sciences, 2025-01, Vol.29 (1), p.60-72</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-729dc29d68371cec30f48502fc1f4b3776cec497fd46a8d64aba9bcb335823693</cites><orcidid>0009-0004-2458-7616</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661324002572$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39462693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büchel, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>How control modulates pain</title><title>Trends in cognitive sciences</title><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices.
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).</description><subject>agency</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>control</subject><subject>descending pain-modulatory system</subject><subject>Gyrus Cinguli - physiology</subject><subject>Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology</subject><subject>helplessness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMo7rr6AnuQPXppzSRp2oAXWdQVFrwoeAtpkkKWtlmTVvHtzdLVo4dhhuGff2Y-hJaAc8DAb3f54HTMCSYsxyLHwE7QHKpSZBSX76epppxlnAOdoYsYdxhDUZb8HM2oYJxwQedoufFfK-37Ifh21XkztmqwcbVXrr9EZ41qo7065gV6e3x4XW-y7cvT8_p-m2koCM1KIoxOwStagraa4oZVBSaNhobVNC1MTSbKxjCuKsOZqpWodU1pURGajligm8l3H_zHaOMgOxe1bVvVWz9GSYEAqQAwS1IySXXwMQbbyH1wnQrfErA8MJE7eWAiD0wkFjIxSUPXR_-x7qz5G_mFkAR3k8CmLz-dDTJqZ3ttjQtWD9J495__DwVicKM</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Habermann, Marie</creator><creator>Strube, Andreas</creator><creator>Büchel, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2458-7616</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>How control modulates pain</title><author>Habermann, Marie ; Strube, Andreas ; Büchel, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-729dc29d68371cec30f48502fc1f4b3776cec497fd46a8d64aba9bcb335823693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>agency</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>control</topic><topic>descending pain-modulatory system</topic><topic>Gyrus Cinguli - physiology</topic><topic>Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology</topic><topic>helplessness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büchel, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habermann, Marie</au><au>Strube, Andreas</au><au>Büchel, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How control modulates pain</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>60-72</pages><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><eissn>1879-307X</eissn><abstract>Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices.
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).
Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39462693</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2458-7616</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-6613 |
ispartof | Trends in cognitive sciences, 2025-01, Vol.29 (1), p.60-72 |
issn | 1364-6613 1879-307X 1879-307X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121281104 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | agency Bayes Theorem Brain - physiology Brain - physiopathology control descending pain-modulatory system Gyrus Cinguli - physiology Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology helplessness Humans pain Pain - physiopathology |
title | How control modulates pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A39%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20control%20modulates%20pain&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cognitive%20sciences&rft.au=Habermann,%20Marie&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=60-72&rft.issn=1364-6613&rft.eissn=1879-307X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3121281104%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121281104&rft_id=info:pmid/39462693&rft_els_id=S1364661324002572&rfr_iscdi=true |