How control modulates pain

Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in cognitive sciences 2025-01, Vol.29 (1), p.60-72
Hauptverfasser: Habermann, Marie, Strube, Andreas, Büchel, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title Trends in cognitive sciences
container_volume 29
creator Habermann, Marie
Strube, Andreas
Büchel, Christian
description Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices. Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using di
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121281104</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364661324002572</els_id><sourcerecordid>3121281104</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-729dc29d68371cec30f48502fc1f4b3776cec497fd46a8d64aba9bcb335823693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMo7rr6AnuQPXppzSRp2oAXWdQVFrwoeAtpkkKWtlmTVvHtzdLVo4dhhuGff2Y-hJaAc8DAb3f54HTMCSYsxyLHwE7QHKpSZBSX76epppxlnAOdoYsYdxhDUZb8HM2oYJxwQedoufFfK-37Ifh21XkztmqwcbVXrr9EZ41qo7065gV6e3x4XW-y7cvT8_p-m2koCM1KIoxOwStagraa4oZVBSaNhobVNC1MTSbKxjCuKsOZqpWodU1pURGajligm8l3H_zHaOMgOxe1bVvVWz9GSYEAqQAwS1IySXXwMQbbyH1wnQrfErA8MJE7eWAiD0wkFjIxSUPXR_-x7qz5G_mFkAR3k8CmLz-dDTJqZ3ttjQtWD9J495__DwVicKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121281104</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How control modulates pain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Habermann, Marie ; Strube, Andreas ; Büchel, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Marie ; Strube, Andreas ; Büchel, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices. Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-6613</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39462693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>agency ; Bayes Theorem ; Brain - physiology ; Brain - physiopathology ; control ; descending pain-modulatory system ; Gyrus Cinguli - physiology ; Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology ; helplessness ; Humans ; pain ; Pain - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Trends in cognitive sciences, 2025-01, Vol.29 (1), p.60-72</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-729dc29d68371cec30f48502fc1f4b3776cec497fd46a8d64aba9bcb335823693</cites><orcidid>0009-0004-2458-7616</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661324002572$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39462693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büchel, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>How control modulates pain</title><title>Trends in cognitive sciences</title><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices. Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).</description><subject>agency</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>control</subject><subject>descending pain-modulatory system</subject><subject>Gyrus Cinguli - physiology</subject><subject>Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology</subject><subject>helplessness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMo7rr6AnuQPXppzSRp2oAXWdQVFrwoeAtpkkKWtlmTVvHtzdLVo4dhhuGff2Y-hJaAc8DAb3f54HTMCSYsxyLHwE7QHKpSZBSX76epppxlnAOdoYsYdxhDUZb8HM2oYJxwQedoufFfK-37Ifh21XkztmqwcbVXrr9EZ41qo7065gV6e3x4XW-y7cvT8_p-m2koCM1KIoxOwStagraa4oZVBSaNhobVNC1MTSbKxjCuKsOZqpWodU1pURGajligm8l3H_zHaOMgOxe1bVvVWz9GSYEAqQAwS1IySXXwMQbbyH1wnQrfErA8MJE7eWAiD0wkFjIxSUPXR_-x7qz5G_mFkAR3k8CmLz-dDTJqZ3ttjQtWD9J495__DwVicKM</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Habermann, Marie</creator><creator>Strube, Andreas</creator><creator>Büchel, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2458-7616</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>How control modulates pain</title><author>Habermann, Marie ; Strube, Andreas ; Büchel, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1523-729dc29d68371cec30f48502fc1f4b3776cec497fd46a8d64aba9bcb335823693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>agency</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>control</topic><topic>descending pain-modulatory system</topic><topic>Gyrus Cinguli - physiology</topic><topic>Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology</topic><topic>helplessness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strube, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büchel, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habermann, Marie</au><au>Strube, Andreas</au><au>Büchel, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How control modulates pain</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>60-72</pages><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><eissn>1879-307X</eissn><abstract>Currently, the umbrella term 'control' in the context of studies on pain subsumes very different entities. We offer a more systematic taxonomy of studies to better understand the role of control in the context of pain.Control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model via modulation of expectations. We suggest that changes in mean values and precision are mechanisms through which control modulates pain perception.Controllability is often confounded with predictability, attentional effects, and motor behavior, and thus experimental design is crucial. We argue for better-controlled neuroscientific studies.Control over pain affects neurocognitive mechanisms reflected in changes in activity in the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, and sensory cortices. Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Pain, an indicator of potential tissue damage, ideally falls under individual control. Although previous work shows a trend towards reduced pain in contexts where pain is controllable, there is a large variability across studies that is probably related to different aspects of control. We therefore outline a taxonomy of different aspects of control relevant to pain, sketch how control over pain can be integrated into a Bayesian pain model, and suggest changes in expectations and their precision as potential mechanisms. We also highlight confounding cognitive factors, particularly predictability, that emphasize the necessity for careful experimental designs. Finally, we describe the neurobiological underpinnings of how control affects pain processing in studies using different types of control, and highlight the roles of the anterior insula, middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39462693</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2458-7616</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-6613
ispartof Trends in cognitive sciences, 2025-01, Vol.29 (1), p.60-72
issn 1364-6613
1879-307X
1879-307X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121281104
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agency
Bayes Theorem
Brain - physiology
Brain - physiopathology
control
descending pain-modulatory system
Gyrus Cinguli - physiology
Gyrus Cinguli - physiopathology
helplessness
Humans
pain
Pain - physiopathology
title How control modulates pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A39%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20control%20modulates%20pain&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cognitive%20sciences&rft.au=Habermann,%20Marie&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=60-72&rft.issn=1364-6613&rft.eissn=1879-307X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tics.2024.09.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3121281104%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121281104&rft_id=info:pmid/39462693&rft_els_id=S1364661324002572&rfr_iscdi=true