Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data
A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to incr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie 2024, Vol.66 (8), p.437 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | dut |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 437 |
container_title | Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | de Koning, M B Burger, T J Vellinga, A Van Eck, R M Kikkert, M J de Haan, L de Haas, H J |
description | A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups.
To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations.
After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made.
Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure.
Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121280414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121280414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-768a34a5cd56a51b7b9b47d560b85986335e6b24b2290067d7262fddad56bbd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10M1KAzEUBeAsFFurryBZuhnIJJlk4k6LWqEgSPfDzeROGzt_Jhmqb--AdXU58J2zuBdkyQQTmRbCLMh1jJ-MSWWEviILYaQS3Mgl-XiC-kjjCDVS39OA-6mF5Ic-PtAW99DSJkCHpyEcIx2aGUSEUB_oyacDxW8fk-_3dJw72CfqIMENuWygjXh7viuye3nerTfZ9v31bf24zcZCyUyrEoSEonaFgiK32hor9RyYLQtTKiEKVJZLy7lhTGmnueKNczATax0XK3L_NzuG4WvCmKrOxxrbFnocpliJnOe8ZDKXM70708l26Kox-A7CT_X_BvELtg1X5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121280414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>de Koning, M B ; Burger, T J ; Vellinga, A ; Van Eck, R M ; Kikkert, M J ; de Haan, L ; de Haas, H J</creator><creatorcontrib>de Koning, M B ; Burger, T J ; Vellinga, A ; Van Eck, R M ; Kikkert, M J ; de Haan, L ; de Haas, H J</creatorcontrib><description>A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups.
To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations.
After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made.
Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure.
Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-7339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39463294</identifier><language>dut</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Netherlands ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie, 2024, Vol.66 (8), p.437</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39463294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Koning, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellinga, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eck, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikkert, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haas, H J</creatorcontrib><title>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</title><title>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie</title><addtitle>Tijdschr Psychiatr</addtitle><description>A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups.
To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations.
After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made.
Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure.
Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0303-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo10M1KAzEUBeAsFFurryBZuhnIJJlk4k6LWqEgSPfDzeROGzt_Jhmqb--AdXU58J2zuBdkyQQTmRbCLMh1jJ-MSWWEviILYaQS3Mgl-XiC-kjjCDVS39OA-6mF5Ic-PtAW99DSJkCHpyEcIx2aGUSEUB_oyacDxW8fk-_3dJw72CfqIMENuWygjXh7viuye3nerTfZ9v31bf24zcZCyUyrEoSEonaFgiK32hor9RyYLQtTKiEKVJZLy7lhTGmnueKNczATax0XK3L_NzuG4WvCmKrOxxrbFnocpliJnOe8ZDKXM70708l26Kox-A7CT_X_BvELtg1X5g</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>de Koning, M B</creator><creator>Burger, T J</creator><creator>Vellinga, A</creator><creator>Van Eck, R M</creator><creator>Kikkert, M J</creator><creator>de Haan, L</creator><creator>de Haas, H J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</title><author>de Koning, M B ; Burger, T J ; Vellinga, A ; Van Eck, R M ; Kikkert, M J ; de Haan, L ; de Haas, H J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-768a34a5cd56a51b7b9b47d560b85986335e6b24b2290067d7262fddad56bbd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>dut</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Koning, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellinga, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eck, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikkert, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haas, H J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Koning, M B</au><au>Burger, T J</au><au>Vellinga, A</au><au>Van Eck, R M</au><au>Kikkert, M J</au><au>de Haan, L</au><au>de Haas, H J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</atitle><jtitle>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie</jtitle><addtitle>Tijdschr Psychiatr</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>437</spage><pages>437-</pages><issn>0303-7339</issn><abstract>A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups.
To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations.
After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made.
Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure.
Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>39463294</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0303-7339 |
ispartof | Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie, 2024, Vol.66 (8), p.437 |
issn | 0303-7339 |
language | dut |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121280414 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence Humans Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence Mental Disorders - therapy Netherlands Retrospective Studies |
title | Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%20space%20in%20regulations:%20legal%20frameworks%20of%20research%20with%20existing%20patient%20data&rft.jtitle=Tijdschrift%20voor%20psychiatrie&rft.au=de%20Koning,%20M%20B&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=437&rft.pages=437-&rft.issn=0303-7339&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3121280414%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121280414&rft_id=info:pmid/39463294&rfr_iscdi=true |