Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data

A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to incr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie 2024, Vol.66 (8), p.437
Hauptverfasser: de Koning, M B, Burger, T J, Vellinga, A, Van Eck, R M, Kikkert, M J, de Haan, L, de Haas, H J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:dut
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 437
container_title Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
container_volume 66
creator de Koning, M B
Burger, T J
Vellinga, A
Van Eck, R M
Kikkert, M J
de Haan, L
de Haas, H J
description A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups. To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations. After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made. Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure. Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121280414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121280414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-768a34a5cd56a51b7b9b47d560b85986335e6b24b2290067d7262fddad56bbd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10M1KAzEUBeAsFFurryBZuhnIJJlk4k6LWqEgSPfDzeROGzt_Jhmqb--AdXU58J2zuBdkyQQTmRbCLMh1jJ-MSWWEviILYaQS3Mgl-XiC-kjjCDVS39OA-6mF5Ic-PtAW99DSJkCHpyEcIx2aGUSEUB_oyacDxW8fk-_3dJw72CfqIMENuWygjXh7viuye3nerTfZ9v31bf24zcZCyUyrEoSEonaFgiK32hor9RyYLQtTKiEKVJZLy7lhTGmnueKNczATax0XK3L_NzuG4WvCmKrOxxrbFnocpliJnOe8ZDKXM70708l26Kox-A7CT_X_BvELtg1X5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121280414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>de Koning, M B ; Burger, T J ; Vellinga, A ; Van Eck, R M ; Kikkert, M J ; de Haan, L ; de Haas, H J</creator><creatorcontrib>de Koning, M B ; Burger, T J ; Vellinga, A ; Van Eck, R M ; Kikkert, M J ; de Haan, L ; de Haas, H J</creatorcontrib><description>A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups. To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations. After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made. Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure. Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-7339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39463294</identifier><language>dut</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Humans ; Informed Consent - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Netherlands ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie, 2024, Vol.66 (8), p.437</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39463294$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Koning, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellinga, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eck, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikkert, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haas, H J</creatorcontrib><title>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</title><title>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie</title><addtitle>Tijdschr Psychiatr</addtitle><description>A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups. To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations. After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made. Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure. Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0303-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo10M1KAzEUBeAsFFurryBZuhnIJJlk4k6LWqEgSPfDzeROGzt_Jhmqb--AdXU58J2zuBdkyQQTmRbCLMh1jJ-MSWWEviILYaQS3Mgl-XiC-kjjCDVS39OA-6mF5Ic-PtAW99DSJkCHpyEcIx2aGUSEUB_oyacDxW8fk-_3dJw72CfqIMENuWygjXh7viuye3nerTfZ9v31bf24zcZCyUyrEoSEonaFgiK32hor9RyYLQtTKiEKVJZLy7lhTGmnueKNczATax0XK3L_NzuG4WvCmKrOxxrbFnocpliJnOe8ZDKXM70708l26Kox-A7CT_X_BvELtg1X5g</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>de Koning, M B</creator><creator>Burger, T J</creator><creator>Vellinga, A</creator><creator>Van Eck, R M</creator><creator>Kikkert, M J</creator><creator>de Haan, L</creator><creator>de Haas, H J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</title><author>de Koning, M B ; Burger, T J ; Vellinga, A ; Van Eck, R M ; Kikkert, M J ; de Haan, L ; de Haas, H J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p564-768a34a5cd56a51b7b9b47d560b85986335e6b24b2290067d7262fddad56bbd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>dut</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Koning, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vellinga, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Eck, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikkert, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haan, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haas, H J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Koning, M B</au><au>Burger, T J</au><au>Vellinga, A</au><au>Van Eck, R M</au><au>Kikkert, M J</au><au>de Haan, L</au><au>de Haas, H J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data</atitle><jtitle>Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie</jtitle><addtitle>Tijdschr Psychiatr</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>437</spage><pages>437-</pages><issn>0303-7339</issn><abstract>A subgroup of patients with severe mental illness (SMI) is underrepresented in scientific research, in part due to barriers around giving informed consent. This may lead to response bias and lack of knowledge about this group. Retrospective research with existing patient data is the only way to increase our knowledge for some patient groups. To make recommendations to exploit the possibility of retrospective research with existing patient data, taking into account applicable laws and regulations. After a review of relevant laws and regulations, recommendations are made. Factors that determine the possibilities for retrospective research are 1) whether the researcher works with directly traceable, pseudonymized or anonymized data; 2) whether there is a high risk of response bias when asking for informed consent; 3) whether information is collected within the treatment relationship. Depending on the situation, there are several alternatives to an informed consent procedure. Knowledge of the relevant regulations and collaboration with specialists in the field often makes retrospective research with existing data in those patients with SMI who cannot give informed consent possible.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>39463294</pmid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-7339
ispartof Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie, 2024, Vol.66 (8), p.437
issn 0303-7339
language dut
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121280414
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence
Mental Disorders - therapy
Netherlands
Retrospective Studies
title Back space in regulations: legal frameworks of research with existing patient data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A11%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%20space%20in%20regulations:%20legal%20frameworks%20of%20research%20with%20existing%20patient%20data&rft.jtitle=Tijdschrift%20voor%20psychiatrie&rft.au=de%20Koning,%20M%20B&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=437&rft.pages=437-&rft.issn=0303-7339&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3121280414%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121280414&rft_id=info:pmid/39463294&rfr_iscdi=true