Inter‐Individual Variability in Muscle Fiber–Type Distribution Affects Running Economy but Not Running Gait at Submaximal Running Speeds

ABSTRACT Running economy is an important determinant of endurance running performance, yet insights into characteristics contributing to its inter‐individual variability remain limited. Although slow‐twitch muscle fibers are more energy‐efficient than fast‐twitch fibers during the (near‐)isometric c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2024-11, Vol.34 (11), p.e14748-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Swinnen, Wannes, Lievens, Eline, Hoogkamer, Wouter, De Groote, Friedl, Derave, Wim, Vanwanseele, Benedicte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page e14748
container_title Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
container_volume 34
creator Swinnen, Wannes
Lievens, Eline
Hoogkamer, Wouter
De Groote, Friedl
Derave, Wim
Vanwanseele, Benedicte
description ABSTRACT Running economy is an important determinant of endurance running performance, yet insights into characteristics contributing to its inter‐individual variability remain limited. Although slow‐twitch muscle fibers are more energy‐efficient than fast‐twitch fibers during the (near‐)isometric contractions common during submaximal running, current literature lacks a consensus on whether a relationship between muscle fiber–type distribution and running economy exists. This study aims to resolve the ongoing debate by addressing potential confounding factors often overlooked in prior research, such as the effect of different running speeds, the homogeneity of investigated groups, and the potential impact of the adopted running gait. We selected two groups with predetermined distinct muscle fiber–type distribution in their triceps surae muscle by measurement of carnosine via 1H‐MRS, one predominantly slow (ST; n = 11; carnosine z‐score = −1.31) and the other predominantly fast (FT; n = 10; z‐score = 0.83). Across a range of running speeds (2–4 m/s), we measured running economy (W/kg) through indirect calorimetry, along with running kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity of the lower limb. The ST‐group exhibited, on average, 7.8% better running economy than the FT‐group (p = 0.01) and this difference was consistent across speeds. Both groups demonstrated almost identical kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity patterns across submaximal running speeds. Overall, our findings indicate that distinct muscle fiber–type distribution explains some of the observed variability in running economy, for which a predominance of energy‐efficient slow‐twitch fibers appear beneficial. In contrast, muscle fiber–type distribution does not affect running gait substantially.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sms.14748
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121279794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121279794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-8073c19b743b81386f84867a0f3447cecff189dd9632a79ca3de820c7b5c02683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiimjSZJlnKeBvwAo66LWmaSqRNxyRVu_MBXAi-oU9ixlEXgmdz4JyP_1x-ADYx2sMx9n3j9zBllC-AAc4QShAnfBEMkEDDhGHOV8Cq9_cIYSbocBmsEEEzLBAagNexDdp9vLyNbWkeTdnJGt5KZ2RhahN6aCw877yqNTw2xQx8v-6nGh4aH5wpumBaCw-qSqvg4VVnrbF38Ei1tm16GNvwog2_9RNpApQBTrqikc-miaN-WpOp1qVfB0uVrL3e-M5r4Ob46Hp0mpxdnoxHB2eJSinhCUeMKCwKRknBMeFZxSnPmEQVoZQpraoKc1GWIiOpZEJJUmqeIsWKoUJpxska2JnrTl370Gkf8sZ4petaWt12Pic4xSkT8VkR3f6D3reds3G7SJGUCsHQjNqdU8q13jtd5VMX73N9jlE-syiPFuVfFkV261sxvkGXv-SPJxHYnwNPptb9_0r55Hwyl_wEFaydiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132499704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter‐Individual Variability in Muscle Fiber–Type Distribution Affects Running Economy but Not Running Gait at Submaximal Running Speeds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Swinnen, Wannes ; Lievens, Eline ; Hoogkamer, Wouter ; De Groote, Friedl ; Derave, Wim ; Vanwanseele, Benedicte</creator><creatorcontrib>Swinnen, Wannes ; Lievens, Eline ; Hoogkamer, Wouter ; De Groote, Friedl ; Derave, Wim ; Vanwanseele, Benedicte</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Running economy is an important determinant of endurance running performance, yet insights into characteristics contributing to its inter‐individual variability remain limited. Although slow‐twitch muscle fibers are more energy‐efficient than fast‐twitch fibers during the (near‐)isometric contractions common during submaximal running, current literature lacks a consensus on whether a relationship between muscle fiber–type distribution and running economy exists. This study aims to resolve the ongoing debate by addressing potential confounding factors often overlooked in prior research, such as the effect of different running speeds, the homogeneity of investigated groups, and the potential impact of the adopted running gait. We selected two groups with predetermined distinct muscle fiber–type distribution in their triceps surae muscle by measurement of carnosine via 1H‐MRS, one predominantly slow (ST; n = 11; carnosine z‐score = −1.31) and the other predominantly fast (FT; n = 10; z‐score = 0.83). Across a range of running speeds (2–4 m/s), we measured running economy (W/kg) through indirect calorimetry, along with running kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity of the lower limb. The ST‐group exhibited, on average, 7.8% better running economy than the FT‐group (p = 0.01) and this difference was consistent across speeds. Both groups demonstrated almost identical kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity patterns across submaximal running speeds. Overall, our findings indicate that distinct muscle fiber–type distribution explains some of the observed variability in running economy, for which a predominance of energy‐efficient slow‐twitch fibers appear beneficial. In contrast, muscle fiber–type distribution does not affect running gait substantially.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7188</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sms.14748</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39461900</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Calorimetry, Indirect ; Carnosine - analysis ; Carnosine - metabolism ; energy expenditure ; Female ; fiber typology ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Male ; Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - metabolism ; Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - physiology ; Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch - physiology ; Muscle function ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Physical Endurance - physiology ; Running - physiology ; running economy ; running pattern ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports, 2024-11, Vol.34 (11), p.e14748-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-8073c19b743b81386f84867a0f3447cecff189dd9632a79ca3de820c7b5c02683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6158-9483 ; 0000-0003-2549-3369 ; 0000-0002-5426-5325</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsms.14748$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsms.14748$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39461900$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swinnen, Wannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lievens, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogkamer, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Groote, Friedl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derave, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanwanseele, Benedicte</creatorcontrib><title>Inter‐Individual Variability in Muscle Fiber–Type Distribution Affects Running Economy but Not Running Gait at Submaximal Running Speeds</title><title>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</title><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Running economy is an important determinant of endurance running performance, yet insights into characteristics contributing to its inter‐individual variability remain limited. Although slow‐twitch muscle fibers are more energy‐efficient than fast‐twitch fibers during the (near‐)isometric contractions common during submaximal running, current literature lacks a consensus on whether a relationship between muscle fiber–type distribution and running economy exists. This study aims to resolve the ongoing debate by addressing potential confounding factors often overlooked in prior research, such as the effect of different running speeds, the homogeneity of investigated groups, and the potential impact of the adopted running gait. We selected two groups with predetermined distinct muscle fiber–type distribution in their triceps surae muscle by measurement of carnosine via 1H‐MRS, one predominantly slow (ST; n = 11; carnosine z‐score = −1.31) and the other predominantly fast (FT; n = 10; z‐score = 0.83). Across a range of running speeds (2–4 m/s), we measured running economy (W/kg) through indirect calorimetry, along with running kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity of the lower limb. The ST‐group exhibited, on average, 7.8% better running economy than the FT‐group (p = 0.01) and this difference was consistent across speeds. Both groups demonstrated almost identical kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity patterns across submaximal running speeds. Overall, our findings indicate that distinct muscle fiber–type distribution explains some of the observed variability in running economy, for which a predominance of energy‐efficient slow‐twitch fibers appear beneficial. In contrast, muscle fiber–type distribution does not affect running gait substantially.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Calorimetry, Indirect</subject><subject>Carnosine - analysis</subject><subject>Carnosine - metabolism</subject><subject>energy expenditure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fiber typology</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - metabolism</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle function</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Endurance - physiology</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>running economy</subject><subject>running pattern</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOl4WvoAE3OiimjSZJlnKeBvwAo66LWmaSqRNxyRVu_MBXAi-oU9ixlEXgmdz4JyP_1x-ADYx2sMx9n3j9zBllC-AAc4QShAnfBEMkEDDhGHOV8Cq9_cIYSbocBmsEEEzLBAagNexDdp9vLyNbWkeTdnJGt5KZ2RhahN6aCw877yqNTw2xQx8v-6nGh4aH5wpumBaCw-qSqvg4VVnrbF38Ei1tm16GNvwog2_9RNpApQBTrqikc-miaN-WpOp1qVfB0uVrL3e-M5r4Ob46Hp0mpxdnoxHB2eJSinhCUeMKCwKRknBMeFZxSnPmEQVoZQpraoKc1GWIiOpZEJJUmqeIsWKoUJpxska2JnrTl370Gkf8sZ4petaWt12Pic4xSkT8VkR3f6D3reds3G7SJGUCsHQjNqdU8q13jtd5VMX73N9jlE-syiPFuVfFkV261sxvkGXv-SPJxHYnwNPptb9_0r55Hwyl_wEFaydiQ</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Swinnen, Wannes</creator><creator>Lievens, Eline</creator><creator>Hoogkamer, Wouter</creator><creator>De Groote, Friedl</creator><creator>Derave, Wim</creator><creator>Vanwanseele, Benedicte</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6158-9483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-3369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5426-5325</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Inter‐Individual Variability in Muscle Fiber–Type Distribution Affects Running Economy but Not Running Gait at Submaximal Running Speeds</title><author>Swinnen, Wannes ; Lievens, Eline ; Hoogkamer, Wouter ; De Groote, Friedl ; Derave, Wim ; Vanwanseele, Benedicte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2438-8073c19b743b81386f84867a0f3447cecff189dd9632a79ca3de820c7b5c02683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Calorimetry, Indirect</topic><topic>Carnosine - analysis</topic><topic>Carnosine - metabolism</topic><topic>energy expenditure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fiber typology</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - metabolism</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle function</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Endurance - physiology</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>running economy</topic><topic>running pattern</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swinnen, Wannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lievens, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogkamer, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Groote, Friedl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derave, Wim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanwanseele, Benedicte</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swinnen, Wannes</au><au>Lievens, Eline</au><au>Hoogkamer, Wouter</au><au>De Groote, Friedl</au><au>Derave, Wim</au><au>Vanwanseele, Benedicte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter‐Individual Variability in Muscle Fiber–Type Distribution Affects Running Economy but Not Running Gait at Submaximal Running Speeds</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e14748</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14748-n/a</pages><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><eissn>1600-0838</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Running economy is an important determinant of endurance running performance, yet insights into characteristics contributing to its inter‐individual variability remain limited. Although slow‐twitch muscle fibers are more energy‐efficient than fast‐twitch fibers during the (near‐)isometric contractions common during submaximal running, current literature lacks a consensus on whether a relationship between muscle fiber–type distribution and running economy exists. This study aims to resolve the ongoing debate by addressing potential confounding factors often overlooked in prior research, such as the effect of different running speeds, the homogeneity of investigated groups, and the potential impact of the adopted running gait. We selected two groups with predetermined distinct muscle fiber–type distribution in their triceps surae muscle by measurement of carnosine via 1H‐MRS, one predominantly slow (ST; n = 11; carnosine z‐score = −1.31) and the other predominantly fast (FT; n = 10; z‐score = 0.83). Across a range of running speeds (2–4 m/s), we measured running economy (W/kg) through indirect calorimetry, along with running kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity of the lower limb. The ST‐group exhibited, on average, 7.8% better running economy than the FT‐group (p = 0.01) and this difference was consistent across speeds. Both groups demonstrated almost identical kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity patterns across submaximal running speeds. Overall, our findings indicate that distinct muscle fiber–type distribution explains some of the observed variability in running economy, for which a predominance of energy‐efficient slow‐twitch fibers appear beneficial. In contrast, muscle fiber–type distribution does not affect running gait substantially.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>39461900</pmid><doi>10.1111/sms.14748</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6158-9483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-3369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5426-5325</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7188
ispartof Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2024-11, Vol.34 (11), p.e14748-n/a
issn 0905-7188
1600-0838
1600-0838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3121279794
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Calorimetry, Indirect
Carnosine - analysis
Carnosine - metabolism
energy expenditure
Female
fiber typology
Gait - physiology
Humans
Kinematics
Male
Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - metabolism
Muscle Fibers, Fast-Twitch - physiology
Muscle Fibers, Slow-Twitch - physiology
Muscle function
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Physical Endurance - physiology
Running - physiology
running economy
running pattern
Young Adult
title Inter‐Individual Variability in Muscle Fiber–Type Distribution Affects Running Economy but Not Running Gait at Submaximal Running Speeds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A29%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter%E2%80%90Individual%20Variability%20in%20Muscle%20Fiber%E2%80%93Type%20Distribution%20Affects%20Running%20Economy%20but%20Not%20Running%20Gait%20at%20Submaximal%20Running%20Speeds&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20medicine%20&%20science%20in%20sports&rft.au=Swinnen,%20Wannes&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e14748&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14748-n/a&rft.issn=0905-7188&rft.eissn=1600-0838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sms.14748&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3121279794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132499704&rft_id=info:pmid/39461900&rfr_iscdi=true