Analysis of implementation science strategies to train laparoscopic surgical skills among Liberian surgeons using ALL-SAFE
Background Significant disparities exist in laparoscopic training opportunities for surgeons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). ALL-SAFE is an innovative, low-cost training system for LMIC surgeons’ laparoscopic development. However, strategies to implement and scale ALL-SAFE are unstudied...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2025, Vol.39 (1), p.582-593 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Significant disparities exist in laparoscopic training opportunities for surgeons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). ALL-SAFE is an innovative, low-cost training system for LMIC surgeons’ laparoscopic development. However, strategies to implement and scale ALL-SAFE are unstudied. We aimed to assess the impact of implementation science strategies on ALL-SAFE uptake in Liberia, a novel and low-resource context.
Methods
This study used implementation science approaches to evaluate ALL-SAFE uptake in three Liberian hospitals: John F. Kennedy Medical Center, Phebe, and ELWA. Five validated implementation strategies of program orientation, local champions, network weaving, feedback mechanisms, and practical supervision were piloted. All five strategies were implemented at two hospitals, while four strategies, excluding clinician supervision, were implemented at the final site as a pseudo-control, to evaluate the impact of resource-intensive supervision. Participants included surgical consultants, residents, and medical students. Engagement was assessed with mixed methods including participant number, practice hours, module completion rates, and strategy feasibility through end-user interviews.
Results
Across three hospitals, 33 participants used ALL-SAFE for 87.8 total training hours (5,268 min). Participant numbers varied across sites (
N
JFK
= 20, 80%;
N
Phebe
= 7, 88%;
N
ELWA
= 6, 86%), as did practice times (Total
JFK
= 3,060 min, Median time/Participant
JFK
= 103 min; Total
Phebe
= 1,434 min, Median time/Participant
Phebe
= 126 min; Total
ELWA
= 774 min, Median time/Participant
ELWA
= 100 min). Sites with practical supervision demonstrated higher engagement than those without (
P
= 0.042). Interviews (
n
= 8) revealed positive perceptions toward program orientation, practical supervision, and network weaving. Participants recommended thirteen additional strategies for sustainability including translating ALL-SAFE skills to patient care.
Conclusion
Our study is one of the first to evaluate implementation science strategies for laparoscopic training in sub-Saharan Africa. The implementation bundles of five validated strategies were considered feasible by Liberian surgeons in both urban and rural hospitals. Mixed methods suggested a positive association between engagement and the resource-intensive practical supervision strategy. Future studies should focus on quantifying individual strategy contributions with rigorous implement |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0930-2794 1432-2218 1432-2218 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-024-11340-6 |