Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

Introduction Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Methods The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aesthetic plastic surgery 2024-09, Vol.48 (17), p.3269-3275
Hauptverfasser: Kadhum, Murtaza, Khan, Karishma, Al-Ghanim, Khalifa, Castanov, Valera, Symonette, Caitlin, Javed, Muhammad Umair
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3275
container_issue 17
container_start_page 3269
container_title Aesthetic plastic surgery
container_volume 48
creator Kadhum, Murtaza
Khan, Karishma
Al-Ghanim, Khalifa
Castanov, Valera
Symonette, Caitlin
Javed, Muhammad Umair
description Introduction Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Methods The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review. Results Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%). Conclusion Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft). Level of Evidence III Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3119717205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3119854138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6ee018a31d15911e069de5f105e1c32239a3721daebcf60864096b699b61b8d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPP8ABWeqFS-iM7TgJN7RiAWlVpF2QuFlOMoGgfCx2QrX8-rrsAlIPPc1hnved0cPYMcIZAiQ_PYDQOgKhIpBZkkRqh01QSRHFQuE3NgGpVSRQP-yxfe-fAVAkidplezKNRYoinrBfM0f-ic9c_0Ydn1o31I19JF53fPFUd_2qsX5Y8-XoHsmtz_kFX679QK0d6oIv6LWm37yv-O04FH1L_pB9r2zj6Wg7D9j97PJueh3Nb69uphfzqJBCD5EmAkytxBLjDJFAZyXFFUJMGAghMysTgaWlvKg0pFpBpnOdZbnGPC2FPGCnm96V619G8oNpa19Q09iO-tEbiZglmAiIA_rjH_S5H10Xvnun0lihTAMlNlTheu8dVWbl6ta6tUEwf22bjW0TbJt320aF0Mm2esxbKj8jH3oDIDeAD6suGPy6_Z_aP6qBiIY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3119854138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Kadhum, Murtaza ; Khan, Karishma ; Al-Ghanim, Khalifa ; Castanov, Valera ; Symonette, Caitlin ; Javed, Muhammad Umair</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadhum, Murtaza ; Khan, Karishma ; Al-Ghanim, Khalifa ; Castanov, Valera ; Symonette, Caitlin ; Javed, Muhammad Umair</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Methods The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review. Results Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%). Conclusion Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft). Level of Evidence III Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38528125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cartilage ; Cartilage - transplantation ; Esthetics ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Plastic Surgery ; Review ; Rhinoplasty ; Rhinoplasty - adverse effects ; Rhinoplasty - methods ; Risk Assessment ; Systematic review ; Transplantation, Autologous - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024-09, Vol.48 (17), p.3269-3275</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6ee018a31d15911e069de5f105e1c32239a3721daebcf60864096b699b61b8d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8668-9002</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38528125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadhum, Murtaza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castanov, Valera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonette, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javed, Muhammad Umair</creatorcontrib><title>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Methods The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review. Results Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%). Conclusion Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft). Level of Evidence III Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage - transplantation</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPP8ABWeqFS-iM7TgJN7RiAWlVpF2QuFlOMoGgfCx2QrX8-rrsAlIPPc1hnved0cPYMcIZAiQ_PYDQOgKhIpBZkkRqh01QSRHFQuE3NgGpVSRQP-yxfe-fAVAkidplezKNRYoinrBfM0f-ic9c_0Ydn1o31I19JF53fPFUd_2qsX5Y8-XoHsmtz_kFX679QK0d6oIv6LWm37yv-O04FH1L_pB9r2zj6Wg7D9j97PJueh3Nb69uphfzqJBCD5EmAkytxBLjDJFAZyXFFUJMGAghMysTgaWlvKg0pFpBpnOdZbnGPC2FPGCnm96V619G8oNpa19Q09iO-tEbiZglmAiIA_rjH_S5H10Xvnun0lihTAMlNlTheu8dVWbl6ta6tUEwf22bjW0TbJt320aF0Mm2esxbKj8jH3oDIDeAD6suGPy6_Z_aP6qBiIY</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Kadhum, Murtaza</creator><creator>Khan, Karishma</creator><creator>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</creator><creator>Castanov, Valera</creator><creator>Symonette, Caitlin</creator><creator>Javed, Muhammad Umair</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-9002</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</title><author>Kadhum, Murtaza ; Khan, Karishma ; Al-Ghanim, Khalifa ; Castanov, Valera ; Symonette, Caitlin ; Javed, Muhammad Umair</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6ee018a31d15911e069de5f105e1c32239a3721daebcf60864096b699b61b8d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage - transplantation</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadhum, Murtaza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castanov, Valera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonette, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javed, Muhammad Umair</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadhum, Murtaza</au><au>Khan, Karishma</au><au>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</au><au>Castanov, Valera</au><au>Symonette, Caitlin</au><au>Javed, Muhammad Umair</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>3269</spage><epage>3275</epage><pages>3269-3275</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Introduction Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Methods The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review. Results Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%). Conclusion Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft). Level of Evidence III Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38528125</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-9002</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-216X
ispartof Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024-09, Vol.48 (17), p.3269-3275
issn 0364-216X
1432-5241
1432-5241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3119717205
source MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Cartilage
Cartilage - transplantation
Esthetics
Female
Graft Survival
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Otorhinolaryngology
Plastic Surgery
Review
Rhinoplasty
Rhinoplasty - adverse effects
Rhinoplasty - methods
Risk Assessment
Systematic review
Transplantation, Autologous - methods
Treatment Outcome
title Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T14%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fresh%20Frozen%20Cartilage%20in%20Rhinoplasty%20Surgery:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Kadhum,%20Murtaza&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=3269&rft.epage=3275&rft.pages=3269-3275&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3119854138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3119854138&rft_id=info:pmid/38528125&rfr_iscdi=true