Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes
Introduction Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes. Methods The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 2024-09, Vol.48 (17), p.3269-3275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 3269 |
container_title | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Kadhum, Murtaza Khan, Karishma Al-Ghanim, Khalifa Castanov, Valera Symonette, Caitlin Javed, Muhammad Umair |
description | Introduction
Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes.
Methods
The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review.
Results
Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%).
Conclusion
Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft).
Level of Evidence III
Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3119717205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3119854138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6ee018a31d15911e069de5f105e1c32239a3721daebcf60864096b699b61b8d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPP8ABWeqFS-iM7TgJN7RiAWlVpF2QuFlOMoGgfCx2QrX8-rrsAlIPPc1hnved0cPYMcIZAiQ_PYDQOgKhIpBZkkRqh01QSRHFQuE3NgGpVSRQP-yxfe-fAVAkidplezKNRYoinrBfM0f-ic9c_0Ydn1o31I19JF53fPFUd_2qsX5Y8-XoHsmtz_kFX679QK0d6oIv6LWm37yv-O04FH1L_pB9r2zj6Wg7D9j97PJueh3Nb69uphfzqJBCD5EmAkytxBLjDJFAZyXFFUJMGAghMysTgaWlvKg0pFpBpnOdZbnGPC2FPGCnm96V619G8oNpa19Q09iO-tEbiZglmAiIA_rjH_S5H10Xvnun0lihTAMlNlTheu8dVWbl6ta6tUEwf22bjW0TbJt320aF0Mm2esxbKj8jH3oDIDeAD6suGPy6_Z_aP6qBiIY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3119854138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Kadhum, Murtaza ; Khan, Karishma ; Al-Ghanim, Khalifa ; Castanov, Valera ; Symonette, Caitlin ; Javed, Muhammad Umair</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadhum, Murtaza ; Khan, Karishma ; Al-Ghanim, Khalifa ; Castanov, Valera ; Symonette, Caitlin ; Javed, Muhammad Umair</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes.
Methods
The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review.
Results
Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%).
Conclusion
Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft).
Level of Evidence III
Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38528125</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cartilage ; Cartilage - transplantation ; Esthetics ; Female ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Plastic Surgery ; Review ; Rhinoplasty ; Rhinoplasty - adverse effects ; Rhinoplasty - methods ; Risk Assessment ; Systematic review ; Transplantation, Autologous - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024-09, Vol.48 (17), p.3269-3275</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6ee018a31d15911e069de5f105e1c32239a3721daebcf60864096b699b61b8d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8668-9002</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38528125$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadhum, Murtaza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castanov, Valera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonette, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javed, Muhammad Umair</creatorcontrib><title>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes.
Methods
The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review.
Results
Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%).
Conclusion
Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft).
Level of Evidence III
Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cartilage</subject><subject>Cartilage - transplantation</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPP8ABWeqFS-iM7TgJN7RiAWlVpF2QuFlOMoGgfCx2QrX8-rrsAlIPPc1hnved0cPYMcIZAiQ_PYDQOgKhIpBZkkRqh01QSRHFQuE3NgGpVSRQP-yxfe-fAVAkidplezKNRYoinrBfM0f-ic9c_0Ydn1o31I19JF53fPFUd_2qsX5Y8-XoHsmtz_kFX679QK0d6oIv6LWm37yv-O04FH1L_pB9r2zj6Wg7D9j97PJueh3Nb69uphfzqJBCD5EmAkytxBLjDJFAZyXFFUJMGAghMysTgaWlvKg0pFpBpnOdZbnGPC2FPGCnm96V619G8oNpa19Q09iO-tEbiZglmAiIA_rjH_S5H10Xvnun0lihTAMlNlTheu8dVWbl6ta6tUEwf22bjW0TbJt320aF0Mm2esxbKj8jH3oDIDeAD6suGPy6_Z_aP6qBiIY</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Kadhum, Murtaza</creator><creator>Khan, Karishma</creator><creator>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</creator><creator>Castanov, Valera</creator><creator>Symonette, Caitlin</creator><creator>Javed, Muhammad Umair</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-9002</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</title><author>Kadhum, Murtaza ; Khan, Karishma ; Al-Ghanim, Khalifa ; Castanov, Valera ; Symonette, Caitlin ; Javed, Muhammad Umair</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6ee018a31d15911e069de5f105e1c32239a3721daebcf60864096b699b61b8d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cartilage</topic><topic>Cartilage - transplantation</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadhum, Murtaza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Karishma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castanov, Valera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonette, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Javed, Muhammad Umair</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadhum, Murtaza</au><au>Khan, Karishma</au><au>Al-Ghanim, Khalifa</au><au>Castanov, Valera</au><au>Symonette, Caitlin</au><au>Javed, Muhammad Umair</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>3269</spage><epage>3275</epage><pages>3269-3275</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Cadaveric fresh frozen cartilage provides an enticing alternative to traditional autologous cartilage grafts. This review provides a systematic analysis of existing literature on the use of fresh frozen rib for in rhinoplasties and focuses on clinical and aesthetic outcomes.
Methods
The methodology was designed and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023447166). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was used to perform this systematic review.
Results
Four articles were included, with a total of 554 patients. A total of 477 patients were female (86%). Mean age ranged between 35.8 and 40.6. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.2 to 20.3 months. Only one article had a suitable control (with autologous rib graft). Pooled complications rates were low. Infection occurred in 12 patients (2%), warping in 8 patients (1.4%) and resorption in 3 patients (0.5%).
Conclusion
Fresh frozen cartilage may be a safe and reliable alternative to autologous rib grafts. Complication rates were comparable to previous systematic reviews of autologous graft and irradiated allograft. Overall, patients reported high satisfaction rates with low rates of revision procedures. Further studies are required to assess both clinical and cost effectiveness against the current gold standard (autologous graft).
Level of Evidence III
Rhinoplasty. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38528125</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-9002</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-216X |
ispartof | Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024-09, Vol.48 (17), p.3269-3275 |
issn | 0364-216X 1432-5241 1432-5241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3119717205 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Cartilage Cartilage - transplantation Esthetics Female Graft Survival Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Otorhinolaryngology Plastic Surgery Review Rhinoplasty Rhinoplasty - adverse effects Rhinoplasty - methods Risk Assessment Systematic review Transplantation, Autologous - methods Treatment Outcome |
title | Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Rhinoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T14%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fresh%20Frozen%20Cartilage%20in%20Rhinoplasty%20Surgery:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Kadhum,%20Murtaza&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=3269&rft.epage=3275&rft.pages=3269-3275&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-024-03977-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3119854138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3119854138&rft_id=info:pmid/38528125&rfr_iscdi=true |