Acoustic signature of plastic marine debris mimics the prey items of deep-diving cetaceans
It is largely assumed that odontocetes voluntarily ingest plastic marine debris because they visually mistake it for prey. However, deep-diving whales do not rely on visual systems to forage and instead employ echolocation. Whether or not these whales misinterpret acoustic signals that lead to the a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine pollution bulletin 2024-12, Vol.209 (Pt A), p.117069, Article 117069 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is largely assumed that odontocetes voluntarily ingest plastic marine debris because they visually mistake it for prey. However, deep-diving whales do not rely on visual systems to forage and instead employ echolocation. Whether or not these whales misinterpret acoustic signals that lead to the accidental ingestion of plastic is unknown. We examined this question by measuring the target strength of prey items (squid, squid beaks) and various naturally weathered and fouled plastics sourced from the North Carolina coastline in situ at sea at 38, 70 and 120 kHz. Here we show that 100 % of plastic marine debris tested (plastics commonly found in the stomachs of stranded whales such as plastic bags, rope, and bottles) have either similar or stronger acoustic target strengths compared with that of whale prey items. These finding supports the hypothesis that consumption of plastic by deep-diving odontocetes is driven by a misperception of acoustic signals.
•Acoustic target strength (TS) of plastic debris mimics that of deep-diving whale prey.•Similarity in TS suggests explanation for plastic consumption by deep-diving whales.•Tested target strength in-situ at 38, 70, and 120 kHz |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0025-326X 1879-3363 1879-3363 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117069 |