Catalyst-Controlled Chemoselective γ‑C(sp3)–H Lactonization of Carboxylic Acid: Methyl versus Methylene
Despite recent advances in ligand-enabled C(sp3)–H functionalization of native substrates, controlling chemoselectivity in the presence of methyl and methylene C(sp3)–H bonds remains a significant challenge. Herein, we report the first example of the Pd(II)-catalyzed chemoselective lactonization...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024-10, Vol.146 (43), p.29311-29314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Despite recent advances in ligand-enabled C(sp3)–H functionalization of native substrates, controlling chemoselectivity in the presence of methyl and methylene C(sp3)–H bonds remains a significant challenge. Herein, we report the first example of the Pd(II)-catalyzed chemoselective lactonization of γ-methyl and methylene C(sp3)–H bonds of carboxylic acids. Exclusive chemoselectivity of methyl or methylene γ-lactonization was achieved by using two different classes of Quinoline-Pyridone ligands. The bidentate ligand coordinating with Pd(II) via five-membered chelation favors γ-methyl C–H lactonization, whereas the ligand forming six-membered chelation affords γ-methylene C–H lactonization exclusively. Taking into account our previous findings, we show that the impact of ligand bite angle on chemoselectivity is different for five-membered and six-membered cyclopalladation processes. This method provides simple and versatile access to γ-lactones, including spiro- and fused ring systems. Deuterium incorporation experiments suggest that this observed chemoselectivity arises from both the C–H activation and C–O bond forming steps. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-7863 1520-5126 1520-5126 |
DOI: | 10.1021/jacs.4c12907 |