Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis

Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human fertility (Cambridge, England) England), 2024-12, Vol.27 (1), p.2413531
Hauptverfasser: Hammarberg, Karin, Yang, Florence Hui-Min, Volks, Cal, Whittaker, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2413531
container_title Human fertility (Cambridge, England)
container_volume 27
creator Hammarberg, Karin
Yang, Florence Hui-Min
Volks, Cal
Whittaker, Andrea
description Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due to its significant availability of donors, SA is a popular destination for people who need donor gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of information for oocyte donors available on donor agency websites in SA. A Google search was performed to compile a list of oocyte donor agency websites and content analysis was used to assess the comprehensiveness of the information for donors. Information on 12 websites was analysed. Overall, wording suggested that oocyte donation is a safe and easy procedure which is a process worth experiencing. Possible physical risks and psychological implications of donating oocytes were either not mentioned or downplayed. No website mentioned if or how donors would be followed up after oocyte retrieval or how they would be cared for in case of complications. No website informed donors about the possibility of genetic testing revealing their identity to a child born from their donation. The lack of transparency about the psychological implications and potential risks of donating oocytes suggests that women who contemplate donating oocytes in SA may not have the information they need to make informed decisions about whether to proceed. Since donor agency websites are potential donors' primary source of information, they should provide comprehensive information about all aspects of oocyte donation. This should include transparent and comprehensive information about the known physical and psychological risks. Donors also need to know that oocyte donation may have unknown long-term health risks and that direct-to-consumer genetic testing may reveal their identity to children conceived through their donation in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3116678348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3116678348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-8422becbf39875564d2a856f1e2206d409b9365fb4cc1207f5402908dbcc92aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN1LwzAUxYMoTqd_gpJHXzrz2aa-jeEXDETU55CmiUa6ZCYp0v_elm0-3cPhnHu5PwCuMFpgJNAtZiWrSEUXBBG2IAxTTvEROMMVI4XArD4e9ZgpptAMnKf0jRCpMalPwYzWbNL8DOjXXnUuDzBY6LwNcaOyCx6OCoagh2xgG3yICY7mW-jzF1za6LTyOx-qT-P1AH9Nk1w26Q4qqIPPxmeovOqG5NIFOLGqS-ZyP-fg4-H-ffVUrF8en1fLdaGxqHIhGCGN0Y2ltag4L1lLlOClxYYQVLYM1U1NS24bpjUmqLJ8egKJttG6JkrRObjZ7d3G8NOblOXGJW26TnkT-iQpxmVZCcrEGOW7qI4hpWis3Ea3UXGQGMmJrzzwlRNfuec79q73J_pmY9r_1gEo_QPamnYm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116678348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Hammarberg, Karin ; Yang, Florence Hui-Min ; Volks, Cal ; Whittaker, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Hammarberg, Karin ; Yang, Florence Hui-Min ; Volks, Cal ; Whittaker, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due to its significant availability of donors, SA is a popular destination for people who need donor gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of information for oocyte donors available on donor agency websites in SA. A Google search was performed to compile a list of oocyte donor agency websites and content analysis was used to assess the comprehensiveness of the information for donors. Information on 12 websites was analysed. Overall, wording suggested that oocyte donation is a safe and easy procedure which is a process worth experiencing. Possible physical risks and psychological implications of donating oocytes were either not mentioned or downplayed. No website mentioned if or how donors would be followed up after oocyte retrieval or how they would be cared for in case of complications. No website informed donors about the possibility of genetic testing revealing their identity to a child born from their donation. The lack of transparency about the psychological implications and potential risks of donating oocytes suggests that women who contemplate donating oocytes in SA may not have the information they need to make informed decisions about whether to proceed. Since donor agency websites are potential donors' primary source of information, they should provide comprehensive information about all aspects of oocyte donation. This should include transparent and comprehensive information about the known physical and psychological risks. Donors also need to know that oocyte donation may have unknown long-term health risks and that direct-to-consumer genetic testing may reveal their identity to children conceived through their donation in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-7273</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1742-8149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-8149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39402915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Female ; Humans ; Internet ; Oocyte Donation ; South Africa ; Tissue Donors</subject><ispartof>Human fertility (Cambridge, England), 2024-12, Vol.27 (1), p.2413531</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-8422becbf39875564d2a856f1e2206d409b9365fb4cc1207f5402908dbcc92aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39402915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hammarberg, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Florence Hui-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volks, Cal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis</title><title>Human fertility (Cambridge, England)</title><addtitle>Hum Fertil (Camb)</addtitle><description>Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due to its significant availability of donors, SA is a popular destination for people who need donor gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of information for oocyte donors available on donor agency websites in SA. A Google search was performed to compile a list of oocyte donor agency websites and content analysis was used to assess the comprehensiveness of the information for donors. Information on 12 websites was analysed. Overall, wording suggested that oocyte donation is a safe and easy procedure which is a process worth experiencing. Possible physical risks and psychological implications of donating oocytes were either not mentioned or downplayed. No website mentioned if or how donors would be followed up after oocyte retrieval or how they would be cared for in case of complications. No website informed donors about the possibility of genetic testing revealing their identity to a child born from their donation. The lack of transparency about the psychological implications and potential risks of donating oocytes suggests that women who contemplate donating oocytes in SA may not have the information they need to make informed decisions about whether to proceed. Since donor agency websites are potential donors' primary source of information, they should provide comprehensive information about all aspects of oocyte donation. This should include transparent and comprehensive information about the known physical and psychological risks. Donors also need to know that oocyte donation may have unknown long-term health risks and that direct-to-consumer genetic testing may reveal their identity to children conceived through their donation in the future.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Oocyte Donation</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><issn>1464-7273</issn><issn>1742-8149</issn><issn>1742-8149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN1LwzAUxYMoTqd_gpJHXzrz2aa-jeEXDETU55CmiUa6ZCYp0v_elm0-3cPhnHu5PwCuMFpgJNAtZiWrSEUXBBG2IAxTTvEROMMVI4XArD4e9ZgpptAMnKf0jRCpMalPwYzWbNL8DOjXXnUuDzBY6LwNcaOyCx6OCoagh2xgG3yICY7mW-jzF1za6LTyOx-qT-P1AH9Nk1w26Q4qqIPPxmeovOqG5NIFOLGqS-ZyP-fg4-H-ffVUrF8en1fLdaGxqHIhGCGN0Y2ltag4L1lLlOClxYYQVLYM1U1NS24bpjUmqLJ8egKJttG6JkrRObjZ7d3G8NOblOXGJW26TnkT-iQpxmVZCcrEGOW7qI4hpWis3Ea3UXGQGMmJrzzwlRNfuec79q73J_pmY9r_1gEo_QPamnYm</recordid><startdate>20241231</startdate><enddate>20241231</enddate><creator>Hammarberg, Karin</creator><creator>Yang, Florence Hui-Min</creator><creator>Volks, Cal</creator><creator>Whittaker, Andrea</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241231</creationdate><title>Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis</title><author>Hammarberg, Karin ; Yang, Florence Hui-Min ; Volks, Cal ; Whittaker, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-8422becbf39875564d2a856f1e2206d409b9365fb4cc1207f5402908dbcc92aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Oocyte Donation</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hammarberg, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Florence Hui-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volks, Cal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human fertility (Cambridge, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hammarberg, Karin</au><au>Yang, Florence Hui-Min</au><au>Volks, Cal</au><au>Whittaker, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis</atitle><jtitle>Human fertility (Cambridge, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Fertil (Camb)</addtitle><date>2024-12-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2413531</spage><pages>2413531-</pages><issn>1464-7273</issn><issn>1742-8149</issn><eissn>1742-8149</eissn><abstract>Reproductive travel for gamete donation is becoming increasingly common. South Africa is renowned for its availability and relative affordability of high-quality assisted reproductive technology (ART) services. In South Africa (SA) gamete donation is anonymous by law and donors are compensated. Due to its significant availability of donors, SA is a popular destination for people who need donor gametes. The aim of this study was to assess the quality and comprehensiveness of information for oocyte donors available on donor agency websites in SA. A Google search was performed to compile a list of oocyte donor agency websites and content analysis was used to assess the comprehensiveness of the information for donors. Information on 12 websites was analysed. Overall, wording suggested that oocyte donation is a safe and easy procedure which is a process worth experiencing. Possible physical risks and psychological implications of donating oocytes were either not mentioned or downplayed. No website mentioned if or how donors would be followed up after oocyte retrieval or how they would be cared for in case of complications. No website informed donors about the possibility of genetic testing revealing their identity to a child born from their donation. The lack of transparency about the psychological implications and potential risks of donating oocytes suggests that women who contemplate donating oocytes in SA may not have the information they need to make informed decisions about whether to proceed. Since donor agency websites are potential donors' primary source of information, they should provide comprehensive information about all aspects of oocyte donation. This should include transparent and comprehensive information about the known physical and psychological risks. Donors also need to know that oocyte donation may have unknown long-term health risks and that direct-to-consumer genetic testing may reveal their identity to children conceived through their donation in the future.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39402915</pmid><doi>10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-7273
ispartof Human fertility (Cambridge, England), 2024-12, Vol.27 (1), p.2413531
issn 1464-7273
1742-8149
1742-8149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3116678348
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Female
Humans
Internet
Oocyte Donation
South Africa
Tissue Donors
title Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T16%3A32%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20information%20for%20oocyte%20donors%20on%20South%20African%20donor%20agency%20websites:%20a%20content%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Human%20fertility%20(Cambridge,%20England)&rft.au=Hammarberg,%20Karin&rft.date=2024-12-31&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2413531&rft.pages=2413531-&rft.issn=1464-7273&rft.eissn=1742-8149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14647273.2024.2413531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3116678348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116678348&rft_id=info:pmid/39402915&rfr_iscdi=true