Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial
To compare the accuracy and chair time of self-ligating brackets using direct bonding, traditional indirect bonding (IB), and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) IB techniques after orthodontic leveling and alignment. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to three bondi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Angle orthodontist 2025-01, Vol.95 (1), p.3 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 3 |
| container_title | The Angle orthodontist |
| container_volume | 95 |
| creator | Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi Ursi, Weber Chilvarquer, Israel Neto, José Rino de Paiva, João Batista |
| description | To compare the accuracy and chair time of self-ligating brackets using direct bonding, traditional indirect bonding (IB), and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) IB techniques after orthodontic leveling and alignment.
Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to three bonding groups (G1 [n = 15], G2 [n = 15], and G3 [n = 15]). Evaluation after the alignment and leveling phases used two parameters of the objective grading system of the American Board of Orthodontics for root parallelism and posterior marginal ridges, assessed using panoramic radiographies (PR I and PR II), a digital model, and a plaster model. Blinding was only applied for outcome assessment. No serious harm was observed except for gingivitis associated with plaque accumulation.
Although G3 showed better numerical results, they were not statistically significant in the radiographic or model evaluations (P > .001). Mean chair time was significantly shorter in G3 (1.1 ± 11.8 min) vs. G1 (56.7 ± 7.3 min) and G2 (52.8 ± 8.3 min; P < .001).
The CAD/CAM IB system for self-ligating brackets was as effective as conventional methods, with a shorter chair time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2319/030624-179.1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3115501687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3115501687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1311-69af3db3f3fb6c9b659a577e838d5f0cb1156b6e7e7c1477b64f2d179c2760963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMSOPDKT44tiO2VBVPqRKLDBHjmMXoyQudlKp_HpctTDdne6596QHoWsg85yCvCeU8LzIQMg5nKApyIJlAgg9RVNCCM1oDnKCLmL8IiRnrMjP0YRKWkpWwhS1y61qRzU432Nv8fBpsNJ6DErv9nPj1m5QLXZ944LRA6596vo13sY51r7fmn5_moi4i4Pp4gNWOKi-8Z37MQ3WreudTushONVeojOr2miujnWGPp6W74uXbPX2_Lp4XGUaKEDGpbK0qamltuZa1pxJxYQwJS0bZomuARivuRFGaCiEqHlh8yYJ0LngRHI6Q7eH3E3w36OJQ9W5qE3bqt74MVbpCWMEeCkSendAdfAxBmOrTXCdCrsKSLX3Wx38Vim-goTfHJPHujPNP_wnlP4CvJl13g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115501687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto ; de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez ; Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi ; Ursi, Weber ; Chilvarquer, Israel ; Neto, José Rino ; de Paiva, João Batista</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto ; de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez ; Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi ; Ursi, Weber ; Chilvarquer, Israel ; Neto, José Rino ; de Paiva, João Batista</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the accuracy and chair time of self-ligating brackets using direct bonding, traditional indirect bonding (IB), and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) IB techniques after orthodontic leveling and alignment.
Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to three bonding groups (G1 [n = 15], G2 [n = 15], and G3 [n = 15]). Evaluation after the alignment and leveling phases used two parameters of the objective grading system of the American Board of Orthodontics for root parallelism and posterior marginal ridges, assessed using panoramic radiographies (PR I and PR II), a digital model, and a plaster model. Blinding was only applied for outcome assessment. No serious harm was observed except for gingivitis associated with plaque accumulation.
Although G3 showed better numerical results, they were not statistically significant in the radiographic or model evaluations (P > .001). Mean chair time was significantly shorter in G3 (1.1 ± 11.8 min) vs. G1 (56.7 ± 7.3 min) and G2 (52.8 ± 8.3 min; P < .001).
The CAD/CAM IB system for self-ligating brackets was as effective as conventional methods, with a shorter chair time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3219</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/030624-179.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39389581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Computer-Aided Design ; Dental Bonding - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Dental ; Orthodontic Appliance Design ; Orthodontic Brackets ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2025-01, Vol.95 (1), p.3</ispartof><rights>2025 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39389581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursi, Weber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilvarquer, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, José Rino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paiva, João Batista</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><description>To compare the accuracy and chair time of self-ligating brackets using direct bonding, traditional indirect bonding (IB), and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) IB techniques after orthodontic leveling and alignment.
Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to three bonding groups (G1 [n = 15], G2 [n = 15], and G3 [n = 15]). Evaluation after the alignment and leveling phases used two parameters of the objective grading system of the American Board of Orthodontics for root parallelism and posterior marginal ridges, assessed using panoramic radiographies (PR I and PR II), a digital model, and a plaster model. Blinding was only applied for outcome assessment. No serious harm was observed except for gingivitis associated with plaque accumulation.
Although G3 showed better numerical results, they were not statistically significant in the radiographic or model evaluations (P > .001). Mean chair time was significantly shorter in G3 (1.1 ± 11.8 min) vs. G1 (56.7 ± 7.3 min) and G2 (52.8 ± 8.3 min; P < .001).
The CAD/CAM IB system for self-ligating brackets was as effective as conventional methods, with a shorter chair time.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Dental</subject><subject>Orthodontic Appliance Design</subject><subject>Orthodontic Brackets</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMSOPDKT44tiO2VBVPqRKLDBHjmMXoyQudlKp_HpctTDdne6596QHoWsg85yCvCeU8LzIQMg5nKApyIJlAgg9RVNCCM1oDnKCLmL8IiRnrMjP0YRKWkpWwhS1y61qRzU432Nv8fBpsNJ6DErv9nPj1m5QLXZ944LRA6596vo13sY51r7fmn5_moi4i4Pp4gNWOKi-8Z37MQ3WreudTushONVeojOr2miujnWGPp6W74uXbPX2_Lp4XGUaKEDGpbK0qamltuZa1pxJxYQwJS0bZomuARivuRFGaCiEqHlh8yYJ0LngRHI6Q7eH3E3w36OJQ9W5qE3bqt74MVbpCWMEeCkSendAdfAxBmOrTXCdCrsKSLX3Wx38Vim-goTfHJPHujPNP_wnlP4CvJl13g</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto</creator><creator>de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez</creator><creator>Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi</creator><creator>Ursi, Weber</creator><creator>Chilvarquer, Israel</creator><creator>Neto, José Rino</creator><creator>de Paiva, João Batista</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto ; de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez ; Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi ; Ursi, Weber ; Chilvarquer, Israel ; Neto, José Rino ; de Paiva, João Batista</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1311-69af3db3f3fb6c9b659a577e838d5f0cb1156b6e7e7c1477b64f2d179c2760963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Dental</topic><topic>Orthodontic Appliance Design</topic><topic>Orthodontic Brackets</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ursi, Weber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilvarquer, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neto, José Rino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Paiva, João Batista</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares Ueno, Eloisa Peixoto</au><au>de Carvalho, Teresa Cristina Alvez da Silva Gonzalez</au><au>Kanashiro, Lylian Kazumi</au><au>Ursi, Weber</au><au>Chilvarquer, Israel</au><au>Neto, José Rino</au><au>de Paiva, João Batista</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><addtitle>Angle Orthod</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><pages>3-</pages><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>To compare the accuracy and chair time of self-ligating brackets using direct bonding, traditional indirect bonding (IB), and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) IB techniques after orthodontic leveling and alignment.
Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to three bonding groups (G1 [n = 15], G2 [n = 15], and G3 [n = 15]). Evaluation after the alignment and leveling phases used two parameters of the objective grading system of the American Board of Orthodontics for root parallelism and posterior marginal ridges, assessed using panoramic radiographies (PR I and PR II), a digital model, and a plaster model. Blinding was only applied for outcome assessment. No serious harm was observed except for gingivitis associated with plaque accumulation.
Although G3 showed better numerical results, they were not statistically significant in the radiographic or model evaluations (P > .001). Mean chair time was significantly shorter in G3 (1.1 ± 11.8 min) vs. G1 (56.7 ± 7.3 min) and G2 (52.8 ± 8.3 min; P < .001).
The CAD/CAM IB system for self-ligating brackets was as effective as conventional methods, with a shorter chair time.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39389581</pmid><doi>10.2319/030624-179.1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-3219 |
| ispartof | The Angle orthodontist, 2025-01, Vol.95 (1), p.3 |
| issn | 0003-3219 1945-7103 1945-7103 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3115501687 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Adolescent Computer-Aided Design Dental Bonding - methods Female Humans Male Models, Dental Orthodontic Appliance Design Orthodontic Brackets Radiography, Panoramic Resin Cements - chemistry Time Factors |
| title | Evaluation of the accuracy of digital indirect bonding vs. conventional systems: a randomized clinical trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20accuracy%20of%20digital%20indirect%20bonding%20vs.%20conventional%20systems:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Soares%20Ueno,%20Eloisa%20Peixoto&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.pages=3-&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/030624-179.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115501687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115501687&rft_id=info:pmid/39389581&rfr_iscdi=true |