A novel prognostic risk score model based on RNA editing level in lower-grade glioma

Lower-grade glioma (LGG) refers to WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas. Surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of LGG patients, but tumor progression is still unavoidable. As a form of posttranscriptional regulation, RNA editing (RE) has been reported to be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational biology and chemistry 2024-12, Vol.113, p.108229, Article 108229
Hauptverfasser: Jiang, Bincan, Chen, Ziyang, Zhou, Jiajie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108229
container_title Computational biology and chemistry
container_volume 113
creator Jiang, Bincan
Chen, Ziyang
Zhou, Jiajie
description Lower-grade glioma (LGG) refers to WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas. Surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of LGG patients, but tumor progression is still unavoidable. As a form of posttranscriptional regulation, RNA editing (RE) has been reported to be involved in tumorigenesis and progression and has been intensively studied recently. Survival data and RE data were subjected to univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and lasso regression analysis to establish an RE risk score model. A nomogram combining the risk score and clinicopathological features was built to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probability of patients. The relationship among ADAR1, SOD2 and SOAT1 was verified by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) A risk model associated with RE was constructed and patients were divided into different risk groups based on risk scores. The model demonstrated strong prognostic capability, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.882, 0.938, and 0.947 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival predictions, respectively. Through receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves and calibration curves, it was verified that the constructed nomogram had better performance than age, grade, and risk score in predicting patient survival probability. Apart from this functional analysis, the results of correlation analyses between risk differentially expressed genes (RDEGs) and RE help us to understand the underlying mechanism of RE in LGG. ADAR may regulate the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1 through gene editing. In conclusion, this study establishes a novel and accurate 17-RE model and a nomogram for predicting the survival probability of LGG patients. ADAR may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing gene expression. [Display omitted] •The prognostic model based on RNA editing can efficiently distinguish patients with different prognoses.•ADAR1 may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.•Interfering with the expression of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 decreased the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3115095547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1476927124002172</els_id><sourcerecordid>3115095547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-6decfd790c260566f09fea6b9d3b25f11de8fc752f400cdc2e17ea47260747e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_ggRPXrYm2Y90vZX6CUVBKngLu8lkTd3d1GRb8d-bsrV49DSBed6ZyYPQBSVjSmh2tRxL26xKY2v5Ds2YEZaExoSx_AANacKzKGeTt8P9m9MBOvF-SQiLCUmP0SDO40mcsWSIFlPc2g3UeOVs1VrfGYmd8R_YS-sAN1aFXll4UNi2-OVpikGZzrQVrmEbMy2u7Re4qHKFAlzVxjbFKTrSRe3hbFdH6PXudjF7iObP94-z6TySLI27KFMgteI5kSwjaZZpkmsosjJXcclSTamCiZY8ZTohRCrJgHIoEh5onnBI4hG67OeG4z_X4DvRGC-hrosW7NqLmNKU5Gma8IBe96h01nsHWqycaQr3LSgRW6tiKf5aFVurorcawue7PeuyAbWP_moMwE0PQPjtxoATXhpoZXDlQHZCWfOfPT-13I-U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115095547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A novel prognostic risk score model based on RNA editing level in lower-grade glioma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jiang, Bincan ; Chen, Ziyang ; Zhou, Jiajie</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bincan ; Chen, Ziyang ; Zhou, Jiajie</creatorcontrib><description>Lower-grade glioma (LGG) refers to WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas. Surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of LGG patients, but tumor progression is still unavoidable. As a form of posttranscriptional regulation, RNA editing (RE) has been reported to be involved in tumorigenesis and progression and has been intensively studied recently. Survival data and RE data were subjected to univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and lasso regression analysis to establish an RE risk score model. A nomogram combining the risk score and clinicopathological features was built to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probability of patients. The relationship among ADAR1, SOD2 and SOAT1 was verified by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) A risk model associated with RE was constructed and patients were divided into different risk groups based on risk scores. The model demonstrated strong prognostic capability, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.882, 0.938, and 0.947 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival predictions, respectively. Through receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves and calibration curves, it was verified that the constructed nomogram had better performance than age, grade, and risk score in predicting patient survival probability. Apart from this functional analysis, the results of correlation analyses between risk differentially expressed genes (RDEGs) and RE help us to understand the underlying mechanism of RE in LGG. ADAR may regulate the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1 through gene editing. In conclusion, this study establishes a novel and accurate 17-RE model and a nomogram for predicting the survival probability of LGG patients. ADAR may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing gene expression. [Display omitted] •The prognostic model based on RNA editing can efficiently distinguish patients with different prognoses.•ADAR1 may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.•Interfering with the expression of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 decreased the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-9271</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-928X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-928X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108229</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39383624</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>ADAR ; Adenosine Deaminase - genetics ; Adenosine Deaminase - metabolism ; Brain Neoplasms - genetics ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Brain Neoplasms - therapy ; Female ; Glioma - genetics ; Glioma - pathology ; Glioma - therapy ; Humans ; LGG ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Nomograms ; Prognosis ; prognostic signature ; RNA Editing ; TCGA</subject><ispartof>Computational biology and chemistry, 2024-12, Vol.113, p.108229, Article 108229</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-6decfd790c260566f09fea6b9d3b25f11de8fc752f400cdc2e17ea47260747e43</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-6852-3228</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39383624$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bincan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ziyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiajie</creatorcontrib><title>A novel prognostic risk score model based on RNA editing level in lower-grade glioma</title><title>Computational biology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Chem</addtitle><description>Lower-grade glioma (LGG) refers to WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas. Surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of LGG patients, but tumor progression is still unavoidable. As a form of posttranscriptional regulation, RNA editing (RE) has been reported to be involved in tumorigenesis and progression and has been intensively studied recently. Survival data and RE data were subjected to univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and lasso regression analysis to establish an RE risk score model. A nomogram combining the risk score and clinicopathological features was built to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probability of patients. The relationship among ADAR1, SOD2 and SOAT1 was verified by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) A risk model associated with RE was constructed and patients were divided into different risk groups based on risk scores. The model demonstrated strong prognostic capability, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.882, 0.938, and 0.947 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival predictions, respectively. Through receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves and calibration curves, it was verified that the constructed nomogram had better performance than age, grade, and risk score in predicting patient survival probability. Apart from this functional analysis, the results of correlation analyses between risk differentially expressed genes (RDEGs) and RE help us to understand the underlying mechanism of RE in LGG. ADAR may regulate the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1 through gene editing. In conclusion, this study establishes a novel and accurate 17-RE model and a nomogram for predicting the survival probability of LGG patients. ADAR may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing gene expression. [Display omitted] •The prognostic model based on RNA editing can efficiently distinguish patients with different prognoses.•ADAR1 may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.•Interfering with the expression of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 decreased the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.</description><subject>ADAR</subject><subject>Adenosine Deaminase - genetics</subject><subject>Adenosine Deaminase - metabolism</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glioma - genetics</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Glioma - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LGG</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>prognostic signature</subject><subject>RNA Editing</subject><subject>TCGA</subject><issn>1476-9271</issn><issn>1476-928X</issn><issn>1476-928X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEQhoMotlb_ggRPXrYm2Y90vZX6CUVBKngLu8lkTd3d1GRb8d-bsrV49DSBed6ZyYPQBSVjSmh2tRxL26xKY2v5Ds2YEZaExoSx_AANacKzKGeTt8P9m9MBOvF-SQiLCUmP0SDO40mcsWSIFlPc2g3UeOVs1VrfGYmd8R_YS-sAN1aFXll4UNi2-OVpikGZzrQVrmEbMy2u7Re4qHKFAlzVxjbFKTrSRe3hbFdH6PXudjF7iObP94-z6TySLI27KFMgteI5kSwjaZZpkmsosjJXcclSTamCiZY8ZTohRCrJgHIoEh5onnBI4hG67OeG4z_X4DvRGC-hrosW7NqLmNKU5Gma8IBe96h01nsHWqycaQr3LSgRW6tiKf5aFVurorcawue7PeuyAbWP_moMwE0PQPjtxoATXhpoZXDlQHZCWfOfPT-13I-U</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Jiang, Bincan</creator><creator>Chen, Ziyang</creator><creator>Zhou, Jiajie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6852-3228</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>A novel prognostic risk score model based on RNA editing level in lower-grade glioma</title><author>Jiang, Bincan ; Chen, Ziyang ; Zhou, Jiajie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-6decfd790c260566f09fea6b9d3b25f11de8fc752f400cdc2e17ea47260747e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>ADAR</topic><topic>Adenosine Deaminase - genetics</topic><topic>Adenosine Deaminase - metabolism</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glioma - genetics</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Glioma - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LGG</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>prognostic signature</topic><topic>RNA Editing</topic><topic>TCGA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bincan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ziyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jiajie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computational biology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Bincan</au><au>Chen, Ziyang</au><au>Zhou, Jiajie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A novel prognostic risk score model based on RNA editing level in lower-grade glioma</atitle><jtitle>Computational biology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Chem</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>113</volume><spage>108229</spage><pages>108229-</pages><artnum>108229</artnum><issn>1476-9271</issn><issn>1476-928X</issn><eissn>1476-928X</eissn><abstract>Lower-grade glioma (LGG) refers to WHO grade 2 and 3 gliomas. Surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy can significantly improve the prognosis of LGG patients, but tumor progression is still unavoidable. As a form of posttranscriptional regulation, RNA editing (RE) has been reported to be involved in tumorigenesis and progression and has been intensively studied recently. Survival data and RE data were subjected to univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and lasso regression analysis to establish an RE risk score model. A nomogram combining the risk score and clinicopathological features was built to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probability of patients. The relationship among ADAR1, SOD2 and SOAT1 was verified by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) A risk model associated with RE was constructed and patients were divided into different risk groups based on risk scores. The model demonstrated strong prognostic capability, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of 0.882, 0.938, and 0.947 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival predictions, respectively. Through receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves and calibration curves, it was verified that the constructed nomogram had better performance than age, grade, and risk score in predicting patient survival probability. Apart from this functional analysis, the results of correlation analyses between risk differentially expressed genes (RDEGs) and RE help us to understand the underlying mechanism of RE in LGG. ADAR may regulate the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1 through gene editing. In conclusion, this study establishes a novel and accurate 17-RE model and a nomogram for predicting the survival probability of LGG patients. ADAR may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing gene expression. [Display omitted] •The prognostic model based on RNA editing can efficiently distinguish patients with different prognoses.•ADAR1 may affect the prognosis of glioma patients by influencing the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.•Interfering with the expression of RNA editing enzyme ADAR1 decreased the expression of SOD2 and SOAT1.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39383624</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108229</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6852-3228</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-9271
ispartof Computational biology and chemistry, 2024-12, Vol.113, p.108229, Article 108229
issn 1476-9271
1476-928X
1476-928X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3115095547
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects ADAR
Adenosine Deaminase - genetics
Adenosine Deaminase - metabolism
Brain Neoplasms - genetics
Brain Neoplasms - pathology
Brain Neoplasms - therapy
Female
Glioma - genetics
Glioma - pathology
Glioma - therapy
Humans
LGG
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Nomograms
Prognosis
prognostic signature
RNA Editing
TCGA
title A novel prognostic risk score model based on RNA editing level in lower-grade glioma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A06%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20novel%20prognostic%20risk%20score%20model%20based%20on%20RNA%20editing%20level%20in%20lower-grade%20glioma&rft.jtitle=Computational%20biology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Jiang,%20Bincan&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=113&rft.spage=108229&rft.pages=108229-&rft.artnum=108229&rft.issn=1476-9271&rft.eissn=1476-928X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115095547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115095547&rft_id=info:pmid/39383624&rft_els_id=S1476927124002172&rfr_iscdi=true