Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), an advancement of transcranial magnetic stimulation, was created to reach wider and possibly more profound regions of the brain. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of dTMS in treating obsessiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychiatric research 2024-12, Vol.180, p.96-102
Hauptverfasser: Li, Kun, Qian, Liju, Zhang, Chenchen, Li, Rui, Zeng, Jinkun, Xue, Chuang, Deng, Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue
container_start_page 96
container_title Journal of psychiatric research
container_volume 180
creator Li, Kun
Qian, Liju
Zhang, Chenchen
Li, Rui
Zeng, Jinkun
Xue, Chuang
Deng, Wei
description Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), an advancement of transcranial magnetic stimulation, was created to reach wider and possibly more profound regions of the brain. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of dTMS in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This study used a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dTMS for treating OCD. Four randomized controlled trials were found by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to February 2024. The fixed effects meta-analysis model was used for the purpose of data merging in Stata17. The risk ratio (RR) value was used as the measure of effect size to compare response rates and dropout rates between active and sham dTMS. The meta-analysis included four randomized-controlled trials involving 252 patients with treatment-resistant OCD. Active dTMS showed a notably greater rate of response on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) in comparison to sham dTMS after treatment (Y-BOCS: RR = 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06 to 6.69) and at the one-month follow-up (Y-BOCS: RR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.26). Subgroup analysis revealed that active dTMS with H-coils was more effective than sham dTMS (RR = 3.57, 95%CI 1.93 to 6.60). No serious adverse events were documented in the studies that were included. The findings suggest that dTMS demonstrates notable efficacy and safety in treating patients with treatment-resistant OCD compared to sham dTMS, with sustained effectiveness noted throughout the one-month post-treatment period. •Active dTMS showed notable efficacy in resistant OCD than sham dTMS.•The effect is still significant one-month after active dTMS treatment.•No severe adverse events were reported in the treatment of OCD with dTMS.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3115093907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022395624005648</els_id><sourcerecordid>3115093907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-c867a0d9f3eef54773fe92c3ee292530453a3fc4401c101430d229ecbb82721b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctu1DAUtRCITgu_gLxkk9SvTGJ2peUlVWIDa8uxb8CjOA6-TqXhH_hnPJoCSzb3XkvnIZ9DCOWs5Yzvrw_tYcWj-x4yYCuYUC3TLVPyCdnxodcNl71-SnaMCdFI3e0vyCXigTHWC66ekwup5SB73u3IrzuAlZZsF3R1BDvTaL8tUIKjWELcZltCWuiUckWBLRGW0lTbgMUuhaYRATE8QONSXLf5dFIfMGUP-Q29oRGKbexi52Ol0DTR6uJTDD_BV8pScppn8FW7WuML8myqC14-7ivy9f27L7cfm_vPHz7d3tw3TihdGjfse8u8niTA1Km-lxNo4epLaNFJpjpp5eSUYtzVvJRkXggNbhwHURMY5RV5fdZdc_qxARYTAzqYZ7tA2tBIzjumpWZ9hQ5nqMsJMcNk1hyizUfDmTmVYQ7mXxnmVIZh2tQyKvXVo8s2RvB_iX_Sr4C3ZwDUvz4EyAZdgMWBr1quGJ_C_11-AymapOs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115093907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Li, Kun ; Qian, Liju ; Zhang, Chenchen ; Li, Rui ; Zeng, Jinkun ; Xue, Chuang ; Deng, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Kun ; Qian, Liju ; Zhang, Chenchen ; Li, Rui ; Zeng, Jinkun ; Xue, Chuang ; Deng, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), an advancement of transcranial magnetic stimulation, was created to reach wider and possibly more profound regions of the brain. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of dTMS in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This study used a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dTMS for treating OCD. Four randomized controlled trials were found by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to February 2024. The fixed effects meta-analysis model was used for the purpose of data merging in Stata17. The risk ratio (RR) value was used as the measure of effect size to compare response rates and dropout rates between active and sham dTMS. The meta-analysis included four randomized-controlled trials involving 252 patients with treatment-resistant OCD. Active dTMS showed a notably greater rate of response on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) in comparison to sham dTMS after treatment (Y-BOCS: RR = 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06 to 6.69) and at the one-month follow-up (Y-BOCS: RR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.26). Subgroup analysis revealed that active dTMS with H-coils was more effective than sham dTMS (RR = 3.57, 95%CI 1.93 to 6.60). No serious adverse events were documented in the studies that were included. The findings suggest that dTMS demonstrates notable efficacy and safety in treating patients with treatment-resistant OCD compared to sham dTMS, with sustained effectiveness noted throughout the one-month post-treatment period. •Active dTMS showed notable efficacy in resistant OCD than sham dTMS.•The effect is still significant one-month after active dTMS treatment.•No severe adverse events were reported in the treatment of OCD with dTMS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3956</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39383715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - therapy ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Randomized-controlled trial ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods ; Treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychiatric research, 2024-12, Vol.180, p.96-102</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-c867a0d9f3eef54773fe92c3ee292530453a3fc4401c101430d229ecbb82721b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5196-2096</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39383715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Liju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chenchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jinkun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Chuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials</title><title>Journal of psychiatric research</title><addtitle>J Psychiatr Res</addtitle><description>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), an advancement of transcranial magnetic stimulation, was created to reach wider and possibly more profound regions of the brain. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of dTMS in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This study used a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dTMS for treating OCD. Four randomized controlled trials were found by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to February 2024. The fixed effects meta-analysis model was used for the purpose of data merging in Stata17. The risk ratio (RR) value was used as the measure of effect size to compare response rates and dropout rates between active and sham dTMS. The meta-analysis included four randomized-controlled trials involving 252 patients with treatment-resistant OCD. Active dTMS showed a notably greater rate of response on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) in comparison to sham dTMS after treatment (Y-BOCS: RR = 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06 to 6.69) and at the one-month follow-up (Y-BOCS: RR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.26). Subgroup analysis revealed that active dTMS with H-coils was more effective than sham dTMS (RR = 3.57, 95%CI 1.93 to 6.60). No serious adverse events were documented in the studies that were included. The findings suggest that dTMS demonstrates notable efficacy and safety in treating patients with treatment-resistant OCD compared to sham dTMS, with sustained effectiveness noted throughout the one-month post-treatment period. •Active dTMS showed notable efficacy in resistant OCD than sham dTMS.•The effect is still significant one-month after active dTMS treatment.•No severe adverse events were reported in the treatment of OCD with dTMS.</description><subject>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Randomized-controlled trial</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder</subject><issn>0022-3956</issn><issn>1879-1379</issn><issn>1879-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUctu1DAUtRCITgu_gLxkk9SvTGJ2peUlVWIDa8uxb8CjOA6-TqXhH_hnPJoCSzb3XkvnIZ9DCOWs5Yzvrw_tYcWj-x4yYCuYUC3TLVPyCdnxodcNl71-SnaMCdFI3e0vyCXigTHWC66ekwup5SB73u3IrzuAlZZsF3R1BDvTaL8tUIKjWELcZltCWuiUckWBLRGW0lTbgMUuhaYRATE8QONSXLf5dFIfMGUP-Q29oRGKbexi52Ol0DTR6uJTDD_BV8pScppn8FW7WuML8myqC14-7ivy9f27L7cfm_vPHz7d3tw3TihdGjfse8u8niTA1Km-lxNo4epLaNFJpjpp5eSUYtzVvJRkXggNbhwHURMY5RV5fdZdc_qxARYTAzqYZ7tA2tBIzjumpWZ9hQ5nqMsJMcNk1hyizUfDmTmVYQ7mXxnmVIZh2tQyKvXVo8s2RvB_iX_Sr4C3ZwDUvz4EyAZdgMWBr1quGJ_C_11-AymapOs</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Li, Kun</creator><creator>Qian, Liju</creator><creator>Zhang, Chenchen</creator><creator>Li, Rui</creator><creator>Zeng, Jinkun</creator><creator>Xue, Chuang</creator><creator>Deng, Wei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-2096</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials</title><author>Li, Kun ; Qian, Liju ; Zhang, Chenchen ; Li, Rui ; Zeng, Jinkun ; Xue, Chuang ; Deng, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-c867a0d9f3eef54773fe92c3ee292530453a3fc4401c101430d229ecbb82721b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Randomized-controlled trial</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Liju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chenchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jinkun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Chuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Kun</au><au>Qian, Liju</au><au>Zhang, Chenchen</au><au>Li, Rui</au><au>Zeng, Jinkun</au><au>Xue, Chuang</au><au>Deng, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychiatr Res</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>180</volume><spage>96</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>96-102</pages><issn>0022-3956</issn><issn>1879-1379</issn><eissn>1879-1379</eissn><abstract>Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS), an advancement of transcranial magnetic stimulation, was created to reach wider and possibly more profound regions of the brain. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of dTMS in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This study used a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dTMS for treating OCD. Four randomized controlled trials were found by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to February 2024. The fixed effects meta-analysis model was used for the purpose of data merging in Stata17. The risk ratio (RR) value was used as the measure of effect size to compare response rates and dropout rates between active and sham dTMS. The meta-analysis included four randomized-controlled trials involving 252 patients with treatment-resistant OCD. Active dTMS showed a notably greater rate of response on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) in comparison to sham dTMS after treatment (Y-BOCS: RR = 3.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06 to 6.69) and at the one-month follow-up (Y-BOCS: RR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.59 to 4.26). Subgroup analysis revealed that active dTMS with H-coils was more effective than sham dTMS (RR = 3.57, 95%CI 1.93 to 6.60). No serious adverse events were documented in the studies that were included. The findings suggest that dTMS demonstrates notable efficacy and safety in treating patients with treatment-resistant OCD compared to sham dTMS, with sustained effectiveness noted throughout the one-month post-treatment period. •Active dTMS showed notable efficacy in resistant OCD than sham dTMS.•The effect is still significant one-month after active dTMS treatment.•No severe adverse events were reported in the treatment of OCD with dTMS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39383715</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.043</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5196-2096</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3956
ispartof Journal of psychiatric research, 2024-12, Vol.180, p.96-102
issn 0022-3956
1879-1379
1879-1379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3115093907
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation
Humans
Meta-analysis
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder - therapy
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Randomized-controlled trial
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods
Treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder
title Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A44%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20transcranial%20magnetic%20stimulation%20for%20treatment-resistant%20obsessive-compulsive%20disorder:%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized-controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychiatric%20research&rft.au=Li,%20Kun&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=180&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=96-102&rft.issn=0022-3956&rft.eissn=1879-1379&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3115093907%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115093907&rft_id=info:pmid/39383715&rft_els_id=S0022395624005648&rfr_iscdi=true