Does level of cognitive load affect susceptibility?

We compared how different levels of cognitive load affect frontal P3 (fP3) Event-Related Potential (ERP) to novel sounds. Previous studies demonstrated the predictive value of the probe-elicited frontal P3 (fP3) ERP for subsequent detection failures. They also demonstrated how fP3 is reduced when performing visual and/or manual and/or cognitively demanding tasks. These results are consistent with fP3 indexing orienting to novels or, more neutrally: susceptibility. Here, we tested how fP3 is affected by a threefold variation of cognitive load induced by the verb (generation) task. Participants heard a noun and either listened to it, repeated it, or generated a semantically related verb. These conditions were manipulated between groups. One group (N = 16) experienced the listen and repeat condition; the other group (N = 16) experienced the listen and generate condition. When fP3 was probed 0 or 200 ms after noun offset, it was reduced (relative to no noun) only while repeating or generating, not while listening. An additional probe-elicited ERP was identified as novelty-related negativity, and its contaminating influence on fP3 estimation accounted for by a novel vector-filter procedure. We conclude that cognitive load does not affect fP3-indexed susceptibility. Instead, fP3-indexed susceptibility is affected by presentation of the stimulus, with the most pronounced effect in conditions where a vocal response is needed (i.e., repeat or generate, but not listen), independent of the complexity of the response. •ERP study measures frontal P3 (fP3) response after inducing cognitive load.•Cognitive load is induced using an auditory verb task.•fP3 response is reduced when participants listen to, repeat, or generate a word.•fP3 response is not impacted by cognitive load level.