Quantification and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems (case study: Gorgan County, Iran)
Regulating services are the advantages that humans receive from regulating ecosystem processes. These services include, but are not limited to pollination, climate regulation, water purification, carbon sequestration, and erosion control. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services in agroecosystems...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2024-11, Vol.196 (11), p.1005, Article 1005 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1005 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 196 |
| creator | Shahimoridi, Raziyeh Kazemi, Hossein Kamkar, Behnam Nadimi, Ahmad Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen Yeganeh, Hassan Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur |
| description | Regulating services are the advantages that humans receive from regulating ecosystem processes. These services include, but are not limited to pollination, climate regulation, water purification, carbon sequestration, and erosion control. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services in agroecosystems is one of the main effective actions to increase pay attention to these services and adopt suitable approaches to direct sustainability. The purpose of the study was quantification, and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems of Gorgan County, north of Iran. For this purpose, some regulating services such as carbon sequestration, climate regulation, soil microbial respiration, soil aggregate stability, and pollination by insects were evaluated based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services framework. The information and data required for each of these services were collected through field measurements, laboratory experiments, and field surveys. After quantifying, the surveyed services in canola agroecosystems were presented on geospatial maps generated by ArcGIS software, version 10.3. Results showed that agroecosystems in the west and north of the studied region provided the more regulating services. Also, the results of the pollination showed that pollinating insects belonged to four orders and 13 families. The majority of the pollinators were Hymenoptera (44.74%), especially honey bees (
Apis mellifera
L.), Diptera (5.26%), Butterflies (Lepidoptera; 25%), and the beetles (Coleoptera; 25%), and
Anthophora sp
. and
Andrena sp
. were the second and the third most abundant pollinating species after honey bees. Generally, the canola agroecosystems close to the rivers and the natural ecosystems provided more services than other regions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-024-13100-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3112529697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3112248601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3b7ba8ff0a75343f051505d1a30452933dbe64ed816ad9a9fda7c2111eba08ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1TAQx4Mo7nP1C3iQgJcVrGaaJmm8yUPXhQUR9BymaVq6tMkz0y68b2_ct67gwVOYzG_-M_Bj7CWIdyCEeU8gtIZK1E0FsvxUzSO2A2VkVVtlH7OdAG0qLbU9Y8-IboQQ1jT2KTuTVqpWGbNjt982jOs0TB7XKUWOsecLHg5THHkaeA7jNpdOqYJPdKQ1LJxCvp18ID5F7jGmGTmOOT0AxC88UuC0bv3xA79MecTI92mL6_Etv8oY3zxnTwacKby4f8_Zj8-fvu-_VNdfL6_2H68rXyu9VrIzHbbDINAo2chBKFBC9YBSNKq2UvZd0E3oW9DYW7RDj8bXABA6FC0Gec4uTrmHnH5ugVa3TOTDPGMMaSMnAeoSpK0p6Ot_0Ju05Viuu6PqptUCClWfKJ8TUQ6DO-RpwXx0INxvK-5kxRUr7s6Ka8rQq_vorVtC_zDyR0MB5Amg0opjyH93_yf2F0otmKo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3112248601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems (case study: Gorgan County, Iran)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shahimoridi, Raziyeh ; Kazemi, Hossein ; Kamkar, Behnam ; Nadimi, Ahmad ; Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen ; Yeganeh, Hassan ; Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur</creator><creatorcontrib>Shahimoridi, Raziyeh ; Kazemi, Hossein ; Kamkar, Behnam ; Nadimi, Ahmad ; Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen ; Yeganeh, Hassan ; Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur</creatorcontrib><description>Regulating services are the advantages that humans receive from regulating ecosystem processes. These services include, but are not limited to pollination, climate regulation, water purification, carbon sequestration, and erosion control. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services in agroecosystems is one of the main effective actions to increase pay attention to these services and adopt suitable approaches to direct sustainability. The purpose of the study was quantification, and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems of Gorgan County, north of Iran. For this purpose, some regulating services such as carbon sequestration, climate regulation, soil microbial respiration, soil aggregate stability, and pollination by insects were evaluated based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services framework. The information and data required for each of these services were collected through field measurements, laboratory experiments, and field surveys. After quantifying, the surveyed services in canola agroecosystems were presented on geospatial maps generated by ArcGIS software, version 10.3. Results showed that agroecosystems in the west and north of the studied region provided the more regulating services. Also, the results of the pollination showed that pollinating insects belonged to four orders and 13 families. The majority of the pollinators were Hymenoptera (44.74%), especially honey bees (
Apis mellifera
L.), Diptera (5.26%), Butterflies (Lepidoptera; 25%), and the beetles (Coleoptera; 25%), and
Anthophora sp
. and
Andrena sp
. were the second and the third most abundant pollinating species after honey bees. Generally, the canola agroecosystems close to the rivers and the natural ecosystems provided more services than other regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-13100-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39358577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agriculture - methods ; Animals ; Apis mellifera ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Bees ; Beetles ; Brassica napus ; Butterflies & moths ; Canola ; Carbon ; Carbon Sequestration ; Climate ; Coleoptera ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Erosion control ; Honey ; Insecta ; Insects ; Iran ; Laboratory experimentation ; Laboratory experiments ; Mapping ; Microorganisms ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Plant reproduction ; Pollination ; Pollinators ; Rivers ; Soil - chemistry ; Soil aggregates ; Soil classification ; Soil stability ; Taxonomy ; Water purification</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024-11, Vol.196 (11), p.1005, Article 1005</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3b7ba8ff0a75343f051505d1a30452933dbe64ed816ad9a9fda7c2111eba08ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-024-13100-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-024-13100-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39358577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shahimoridi, Raziyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamkar, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadimi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeganeh, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems (case study: Gorgan County, Iran)</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Regulating services are the advantages that humans receive from regulating ecosystem processes. These services include, but are not limited to pollination, climate regulation, water purification, carbon sequestration, and erosion control. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services in agroecosystems is one of the main effective actions to increase pay attention to these services and adopt suitable approaches to direct sustainability. The purpose of the study was quantification, and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems of Gorgan County, north of Iran. For this purpose, some regulating services such as carbon sequestration, climate regulation, soil microbial respiration, soil aggregate stability, and pollination by insects were evaluated based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services framework. The information and data required for each of these services were collected through field measurements, laboratory experiments, and field surveys. After quantifying, the surveyed services in canola agroecosystems were presented on geospatial maps generated by ArcGIS software, version 10.3. Results showed that agroecosystems in the west and north of the studied region provided the more regulating services. Also, the results of the pollination showed that pollinating insects belonged to four orders and 13 families. The majority of the pollinators were Hymenoptera (44.74%), especially honey bees (
Apis mellifera
L.), Diptera (5.26%), Butterflies (Lepidoptera; 25%), and the beetles (Coleoptera; 25%), and
Anthophora sp
. and
Andrena sp
. were the second and the third most abundant pollinating species after honey bees. Generally, the canola agroecosystems close to the rivers and the natural ecosystems provided more services than other regions.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Brassica napus</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Canola</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Erosion control</subject><subject>Honey</subject><subject>Insecta</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Laboratory experimentation</subject><subject>Laboratory experiments</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Soil - chemistry</subject><subject>Soil aggregates</subject><subject>Soil classification</subject><subject>Soil stability</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGL1TAQx4Mo7nP1C3iQgJcVrGaaJmm8yUPXhQUR9BymaVq6tMkz0y68b2_ct67gwVOYzG_-M_Bj7CWIdyCEeU8gtIZK1E0FsvxUzSO2A2VkVVtlH7OdAG0qLbU9Y8-IboQQ1jT2KTuTVqpWGbNjt982jOs0TB7XKUWOsecLHg5THHkaeA7jNpdOqYJPdKQ1LJxCvp18ID5F7jGmGTmOOT0AxC88UuC0bv3xA79MecTI92mL6_Etv8oY3zxnTwacKby4f8_Zj8-fvu-_VNdfL6_2H68rXyu9VrIzHbbDINAo2chBKFBC9YBSNKq2UvZd0E3oW9DYW7RDj8bXABA6FC0Gec4uTrmHnH5ugVa3TOTDPGMMaSMnAeoSpK0p6Ot_0Ju05Viuu6PqptUCClWfKJ8TUQ6DO-RpwXx0INxvK-5kxRUr7s6Ka8rQq_vorVtC_zDyR0MB5Amg0opjyH93_yf2F0otmKo</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Shahimoridi, Raziyeh</creator><creator>Kazemi, Hossein</creator><creator>Kamkar, Behnam</creator><creator>Nadimi, Ahmad</creator><creator>Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen</creator><creator>Yeganeh, Hassan</creator><creator>Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Quantification and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems (case study: Gorgan County, Iran)</title><author>Shahimoridi, Raziyeh ; Kazemi, Hossein ; Kamkar, Behnam ; Nadimi, Ahmad ; Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen ; Yeganeh, Hassan ; Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-3b7ba8ff0a75343f051505d1a30452933dbe64ed816ad9a9fda7c2111eba08ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Brassica napus</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Canola</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Erosion control</topic><topic>Honey</topic><topic>Insecta</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Laboratory experimentation</topic><topic>Laboratory experiments</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Soil - chemistry</topic><topic>Soil aggregates</topic><topic>Soil classification</topic><topic>Soil stability</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shahimoridi, Raziyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamkar, Behnam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadimi, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeganeh, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shahimoridi, Raziyeh</au><au>Kazemi, Hossein</au><au>Kamkar, Behnam</au><au>Nadimi, Ahmad</au><au>Hosseinalizadeh, Mohsen</au><au>Yeganeh, Hassan</au><au>Yildirim, Mehmet Uğur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems (case study: Gorgan County, Iran)</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1005</spage><pages>1005-</pages><artnum>1005</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Regulating services are the advantages that humans receive from regulating ecosystem processes. These services include, but are not limited to pollination, climate regulation, water purification, carbon sequestration, and erosion control. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services in agroecosystems is one of the main effective actions to increase pay attention to these services and adopt suitable approaches to direct sustainability. The purpose of the study was quantification, and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems of Gorgan County, north of Iran. For this purpose, some regulating services such as carbon sequestration, climate regulation, soil microbial respiration, soil aggregate stability, and pollination by insects were evaluated based on the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services framework. The information and data required for each of these services were collected through field measurements, laboratory experiments, and field surveys. After quantifying, the surveyed services in canola agroecosystems were presented on geospatial maps generated by ArcGIS software, version 10.3. Results showed that agroecosystems in the west and north of the studied region provided the more regulating services. Also, the results of the pollination showed that pollinating insects belonged to four orders and 13 families. The majority of the pollinators were Hymenoptera (44.74%), especially honey bees (
Apis mellifera
L.), Diptera (5.26%), Butterflies (Lepidoptera; 25%), and the beetles (Coleoptera; 25%), and
Anthophora sp
. and
Andrena sp
. were the second and the third most abundant pollinating species after honey bees. Generally, the canola agroecosystems close to the rivers and the natural ecosystems provided more services than other regions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>39358577</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-024-13100-4</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024-11, Vol.196 (11), p.1005, Article 1005 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3112529697 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Agriculture - methods Animals Apis mellifera Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Bees Beetles Brassica napus Butterflies & moths Canola Carbon Carbon Sequestration Climate Coleoptera Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecosystem Ecosystem services Ecosystems Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Management Environmental Monitoring - methods Erosion control Honey Insecta Insects Iran Laboratory experimentation Laboratory experiments Mapping Microorganisms Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Plant reproduction Pollination Pollinators Rivers Soil - chemistry Soil aggregates Soil classification Soil stability Taxonomy Water purification |
| title | Quantification and mapping of regulating ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems (case study: Gorgan County, Iran) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A46%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20and%20mapping%20of%20regulating%20ecosystem%20services%20in%20canola%20agroecosystems%20(case%20study:%20Gorgan%20County,%20Iran)&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Shahimoridi,%20Raziyeh&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1005&rft.pages=1005-&rft.artnum=1005&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-024-13100-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3112248601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3112248601&rft_id=info:pmid/39358577&rfr_iscdi=true |