Laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure for complicated diverticulitis is associated with lower superficial surgical site infections compared to open surgery with similar other outcomes: a NSQIP-based, propensity score matched analysis

Background Open Hartmann’s procedure has traditionally been the procedure of choice to treat complicated diverticulitis. We analyzed the ACS-NSQIP database to compare outcomes in patients who underwent emergent laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure (LHP) to those who had an open Hartmann’s procedure (OH...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2024-10, Vol.50 (5), p.2097-2103
Hauptverfasser: Amodu, Leo I., Hakmi, Hazim, Sohail, Amir H., Akerman, Meredith, Petrone, Patrizio, Halpern, David K., Sonoda, Toyooki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Open Hartmann’s procedure has traditionally been the procedure of choice to treat complicated diverticulitis. We analyzed the ACS-NSQIP database to compare outcomes in patients who underwent emergent laparoscopic Hartmann’s procedure (LHP) to those who had an open Hartmann’s procedure (OHP). Study design Data analyzed from 2015 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes. Patients were matched on several important covariates using a propensity score matching method (PSM). Patients were matched in a 4:1 ratio of controls to cases based on the propensity score. Results We identified 5026, of which 456 had LHP and 4570 had OHP. PSM analysis yielded 369 LHP and 1476 OHP patients. LHP had lower rates of superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) compared to OHP (2.44% vs. 5.89%, p  = 0.007). LHP had similar post-operative outcomes compared to OHP, including 30-day mortality (5.15% vs. 2.98%, p  = 0.060), organ space surgical site infection (OSSSI) (14.36% vs. 12.60%, p  = 0.161), wound disruption (1.36% vs. 2.44%, p  = 0.349), median LOS (8 vs. 9 days, p  = 0.252), readmission within 30 days (11.92% vs. 8.67%, p  = 0.176), rate of reoperation (6.0 vs. 6.5%, p  = 0.897), and discharge to home (76% vs. 77%, p  = 0.992). LHP had longer operative times compared to OHP (median 129 vs. 118 min, p  
ISSN:1863-9933
1863-9941
1863-9941
DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02661-1