Impact of Varicocele Repair on Assisted Reproductive Technique Outcomes in Infertile Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated assisted reproductive technology (ART) success in infertile men with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters who underwent varicocele repair (VR) before the ART procedure as compared to those who did not. A comprehensive search o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The world journal of men's health 2024-09, Vol.42
Hauptverfasser: Palani, Ayad, Cannarella, Rossella, Saleh, Ramadan, Salvio, Gianmaria, Harraz, Ahmed M, Crafa, Andrea, Bahar, Fahmi, Bocu, Kadir, Kumar, Naveen, Kothari, Priyank, Pinggera, Germar-Michael, Cayan, Selahittin, Colpi, Giovanni M, Atmoko, Widi, Shah, Rupin, Agarwal, Ashok
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title The world journal of men's health
container_volume 42
creator Palani, Ayad
Cannarella, Rossella
Saleh, Ramadan
Salvio, Gianmaria
Harraz, Ahmed M
Crafa, Andrea
Bahar, Fahmi
Bocu, Kadir
Kumar, Naveen
Kothari, Priyank
Pinggera, Germar-Michael
Cayan, Selahittin
Colpi, Giovanni M
Atmoko, Widi
Shah, Rupin
Agarwal, Ashok
description In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated assisted reproductive technology (ART) success in infertile men with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters who underwent varicocele repair (VR) before the ART procedure as compared to those who did not. A comprehensive search of the Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted using a specific query string to identify studies examining the impact of VR on ART outcomes, including fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live-birth rate, until October 2023. Outcomes were analyzed based on the type of ART. Studies on VR in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia and those who underwent ART only due to female factor infertility were excluded from the study. Out of 1,554 articles reviewed, only 9 met the inclusion criteria for the study. All the included articles were observational studies. The variability in study quality in the included literature resulted in a moderate overall risk of bias. Data analysis showed that for intrauterine insemination, there was no difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 2.45; p=0.97). However, for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), men with VR showed a significant improvement in fertilization rate (mean difference 10.9, 95% CI: 5.94, 15.89; p
doi_str_mv 10.5534/wjmh.240132
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3111203656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3111203656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-69a32ee7f6d02400150f59f4f15ed25b54dedba383a617764250c505e88e8643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UE1Lw0AQXUSxpfbkXfYoSOp-5sNbKH4UKgUtXsN2M6Fbkk3Nblp68q-7pda5zDDz3mPeQ-iWkomUXDzuN816wgShnF2gIWNpEok4I5fnmZF0gMbObUiolJCE0Gs04BkXgtJkiH5mzVZpj9sKf6nO6FZDDfgDtsp0uLU4d844D-Vx1bVlr73ZAV6CXlvz3QNe9F63DThsLJ7ZCjpvAv8d7BPO8echUBvljQ70nYE9VrYMR6-i3Kr6EKRv0FWlagfjvz5Cy5fn5fQtmi9eZ9N8HmmaJD6KM8UZQFLFJQluCZWkklklKiqhZHIlRQnlSvGUqzgQYsEk0ZJISFNIY8FH6P4kG0yEt50vGuOC1VpZaHtXcEopIzyWcYA-nKC6a53roCq2nWlUdygoKY6ZF8fMi1PmAX33J9yvGij_seeE-S88QH0M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111203656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Varicocele Repair on Assisted Reproductive Technique Outcomes in Infertile Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Diversity Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Palani, Ayad ; Cannarella, Rossella ; Saleh, Ramadan ; Salvio, Gianmaria ; Harraz, Ahmed M ; Crafa, Andrea ; Bahar, Fahmi ; Bocu, Kadir ; Kumar, Naveen ; Kothari, Priyank ; Pinggera, Germar-Michael ; Cayan, Selahittin ; Colpi, Giovanni M ; Atmoko, Widi ; Shah, Rupin ; Agarwal, Ashok</creator><creatorcontrib>Palani, Ayad ; Cannarella, Rossella ; Saleh, Ramadan ; Salvio, Gianmaria ; Harraz, Ahmed M ; Crafa, Andrea ; Bahar, Fahmi ; Bocu, Kadir ; Kumar, Naveen ; Kothari, Priyank ; Pinggera, Germar-Michael ; Cayan, Selahittin ; Colpi, Giovanni M ; Atmoko, Widi ; Shah, Rupin ; Agarwal, Ashok</creatorcontrib><description>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated assisted reproductive technology (ART) success in infertile men with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters who underwent varicocele repair (VR) before the ART procedure as compared to those who did not. A comprehensive search of the Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted using a specific query string to identify studies examining the impact of VR on ART outcomes, including fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live-birth rate, until October 2023. Outcomes were analyzed based on the type of ART. Studies on VR in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia and those who underwent ART only due to female factor infertility were excluded from the study. Out of 1,554 articles reviewed, only 9 met the inclusion criteria for the study. All the included articles were observational studies. The variability in study quality in the included literature resulted in a moderate overall risk of bias. Data analysis showed that for intrauterine insemination, there was no difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 2.45; p=0.97). However, for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), men with VR showed a significant improvement in fertilization rate (mean difference 10.9, 95% CI: 5.94, 15.89; p&lt;0.01), clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.78; p=0.01) and live-birth rate (OR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.97; p&lt;0.01), compared to men who did not undergo VR. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that VR has a positive impact on pregnancy and live birth rates after ICSI. However, biases like small sample sizes and heterogeneous populations highlight the need for larger, well-designed prospective studies to validate these findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2287-4208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2287-4690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.240132</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39344117</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Korea (South)</publisher><ispartof>The world journal of men's health, 2024-09, Vol.42</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-69a32ee7f6d02400150f59f4f15ed25b54dedba383a617764250c505e88e8643</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0503-3533 ; 0000-0001-6463-2494 ; 0000-0003-4784-2208 ; 0000-0003-0585-1026 ; 0000-0001-9290-5699 ; 0000-0002-7868-5949 ; 0000-0002-8311-9095 ; 0000-0003-4323-4037 ; 0000-0001-6176-6913 ; 0000-0002-7793-7083 ; 0000-0002-8902-517X ; 0000-0001-7806-9903 ; 0000-0003-1431-1777 ; 0000-0002-7027-9436 ; 0000-0002-3940-952X ; 0000-0003-4599-8487</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902,33722</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39344117$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palani, Ayad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannarella, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Ramadan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvio, Gianmaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harraz, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crafa, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahar, Fahmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocu, Kadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothari, Priyank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinggera, Germar-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayan, Selahittin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colpi, Giovanni M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmoko, Widi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rupin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ashok</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Varicocele Repair on Assisted Reproductive Technique Outcomes in Infertile Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>The world journal of men's health</title><addtitle>World J Mens Health</addtitle><description>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated assisted reproductive technology (ART) success in infertile men with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters who underwent varicocele repair (VR) before the ART procedure as compared to those who did not. A comprehensive search of the Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted using a specific query string to identify studies examining the impact of VR on ART outcomes, including fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live-birth rate, until October 2023. Outcomes were analyzed based on the type of ART. Studies on VR in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia and those who underwent ART only due to female factor infertility were excluded from the study. Out of 1,554 articles reviewed, only 9 met the inclusion criteria for the study. All the included articles were observational studies. The variability in study quality in the included literature resulted in a moderate overall risk of bias. Data analysis showed that for intrauterine insemination, there was no difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 2.45; p=0.97). However, for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), men with VR showed a significant improvement in fertilization rate (mean difference 10.9, 95% CI: 5.94, 15.89; p&lt;0.01), clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.78; p=0.01) and live-birth rate (OR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.97; p&lt;0.01), compared to men who did not undergo VR. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that VR has a positive impact on pregnancy and live birth rates after ICSI. However, biases like small sample sizes and heterogeneous populations highlight the need for larger, well-designed prospective studies to validate these findings.</description><issn>2287-4208</issn><issn>2287-4690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UE1Lw0AQXUSxpfbkXfYoSOp-5sNbKH4UKgUtXsN2M6Fbkk3Nblp68q-7pda5zDDz3mPeQ-iWkomUXDzuN816wgShnF2gIWNpEok4I5fnmZF0gMbObUiolJCE0Gs04BkXgtJkiH5mzVZpj9sKf6nO6FZDDfgDtsp0uLU4d844D-Vx1bVlr73ZAV6CXlvz3QNe9F63DThsLJ7ZCjpvAv8d7BPO8echUBvljQ70nYE9VrYMR6-i3Kr6EKRv0FWlagfjvz5Cy5fn5fQtmi9eZ9N8HmmaJD6KM8UZQFLFJQluCZWkklklKiqhZHIlRQnlSvGUqzgQYsEk0ZJISFNIY8FH6P4kG0yEt50vGuOC1VpZaHtXcEopIzyWcYA-nKC6a53roCq2nWlUdygoKY6ZF8fMi1PmAX33J9yvGij_seeE-S88QH0M</recordid><startdate>20240912</startdate><enddate>20240912</enddate><creator>Palani, Ayad</creator><creator>Cannarella, Rossella</creator><creator>Saleh, Ramadan</creator><creator>Salvio, Gianmaria</creator><creator>Harraz, Ahmed M</creator><creator>Crafa, Andrea</creator><creator>Bahar, Fahmi</creator><creator>Bocu, Kadir</creator><creator>Kumar, Naveen</creator><creator>Kothari, Priyank</creator><creator>Pinggera, Germar-Michael</creator><creator>Cayan, Selahittin</creator><creator>Colpi, Giovanni M</creator><creator>Atmoko, Widi</creator><creator>Shah, Rupin</creator><creator>Agarwal, Ashok</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-3533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6463-2494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4784-2208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-1026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-5699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-5949</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-9095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4323-4037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-6913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-7083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8902-517X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-9903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1431-1777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3940-952X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4599-8487</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240912</creationdate><title>Impact of Varicocele Repair on Assisted Reproductive Technique Outcomes in Infertile Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Palani, Ayad ; Cannarella, Rossella ; Saleh, Ramadan ; Salvio, Gianmaria ; Harraz, Ahmed M ; Crafa, Andrea ; Bahar, Fahmi ; Bocu, Kadir ; Kumar, Naveen ; Kothari, Priyank ; Pinggera, Germar-Michael ; Cayan, Selahittin ; Colpi, Giovanni M ; Atmoko, Widi ; Shah, Rupin ; Agarwal, Ashok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-69a32ee7f6d02400150f59f4f15ed25b54dedba383a617764250c505e88e8643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palani, Ayad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannarella, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Ramadan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvio, Gianmaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harraz, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crafa, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahar, Fahmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bocu, Kadir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kothari, Priyank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinggera, Germar-Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayan, Selahittin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colpi, Giovanni M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atmoko, Widi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rupin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ashok</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The world journal of men's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palani, Ayad</au><au>Cannarella, Rossella</au><au>Saleh, Ramadan</au><au>Salvio, Gianmaria</au><au>Harraz, Ahmed M</au><au>Crafa, Andrea</au><au>Bahar, Fahmi</au><au>Bocu, Kadir</au><au>Kumar, Naveen</au><au>Kothari, Priyank</au><au>Pinggera, Germar-Michael</au><au>Cayan, Selahittin</au><au>Colpi, Giovanni M</au><au>Atmoko, Widi</au><au>Shah, Rupin</au><au>Agarwal, Ashok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Varicocele Repair on Assisted Reproductive Technique Outcomes in Infertile Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>The world journal of men's health</jtitle><addtitle>World J Mens Health</addtitle><date>2024-09-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>42</volume><issn>2287-4208</issn><eissn>2287-4690</eissn><abstract>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated assisted reproductive technology (ART) success in infertile men with clinical varicocele and abnormal semen parameters who underwent varicocele repair (VR) before the ART procedure as compared to those who did not. A comprehensive search of the Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted using a specific query string to identify studies examining the impact of VR on ART outcomes, including fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live-birth rate, until October 2023. Outcomes were analyzed based on the type of ART. Studies on VR in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia and those who underwent ART only due to female factor infertility were excluded from the study. Out of 1,554 articles reviewed, only 9 met the inclusion criteria for the study. All the included articles were observational studies. The variability in study quality in the included literature resulted in a moderate overall risk of bias. Data analysis showed that for intrauterine insemination, there was no difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42, 2.45; p=0.97). However, for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), men with VR showed a significant improvement in fertilization rate (mean difference 10.9, 95% CI: 5.94, 15.89; p&lt;0.01), clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.78; p=0.01) and live-birth rate (OR 2.07, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.97; p&lt;0.01), compared to men who did not undergo VR. The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that VR has a positive impact on pregnancy and live birth rates after ICSI. However, biases like small sample sizes and heterogeneous populations highlight the need for larger, well-designed prospective studies to validate these findings.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pmid>39344117</pmid><doi>10.5534/wjmh.240132</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0503-3533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6463-2494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4784-2208</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-1026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9290-5699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7868-5949</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-9095</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4323-4037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-6913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-7083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8902-517X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-9903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1431-1777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7027-9436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3940-952X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4599-8487</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2287-4208
ispartof The world journal of men's health, 2024-09, Vol.42
issn 2287-4208
2287-4690
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3111203656
source KoreaMed Synapse; KoreaMed Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Diversity Collection; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; ProQuest Central
title Impact of Varicocele Repair on Assisted Reproductive Technique Outcomes in Infertile Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T12%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Varicocele%20Repair%20on%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technique%20Outcomes%20in%20Infertile%20Men:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20world%20journal%20of%20men's%20health&rft.au=Palani,%20Ayad&rft.date=2024-09-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issn=2287-4208&rft.eissn=2287-4690&rft_id=info:doi/10.5534/wjmh.240132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111203656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111203656&rft_id=info:pmid/39344117&rfr_iscdi=true