Invasion stage and competition intensity co-drive reproductive strategies of native and invasive saltmarsh plants: Evidence from field data
Biological invasion poses a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and also results in substantial economic loss including the excessive cost of management to control it. Still, its impact on plant sexual reproduction strategies remains underexplored in natural settings. We conducted a fiel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2024-12, Vol.954, p.176383, Article 176383 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 176383 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 954 |
creator | Zhang, Jingya Ning, Yuanli Li, Jiaxu Shi, Zilin Zhang, Qinze Li, Longqin Kang, Binyue Du, Zhibo Luo, Jingchun He, Mengxuan Li, Hongyuan |
description | Biological invasion poses a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and also results in substantial economic loss including the excessive cost of management to control it. Still, its impact on plant sexual reproduction strategies remains underexplored in natural settings. We conducted a field experiment on native Phragmites australis and invasive Spartina alterniflora in Bohai Bay and assessed plant size (aboveground biomass and height) and sexual reproduction (ear biomass, reproductive allocation, etc.) in conjunction with water and soil properties. The results showed that during the early stage of invasion, the two species declined in size and sexual reproduction, with S. alterniflora showing a lesser decline than P. australis. However, in the late stage of invasion, S. alterniflora maintained its plant size by reducing its investment in sexual reproduction. Moreover, significant reproductive allometries were demonstrated by S. alterniflora under different competition intensities. P. australis displayed heightened sensitivity to water properties and soil non-resource conditions, while S. alterniflora adapted its inherent traits and environmental tolerance. S. alterniflora allocated more resources to thriving as an individual, while P. australis prioritized reproduction by increasing seed production. Overall, this study revealed the reproductive strategies that invasive and native species employ in response to competition and environmental factors, thereby offering crucial insights for conservation and management efforts.
[Display omitted]
•Analyzed reproductive strategies across invasion stages and competition intensities.•Invasive plants prioritized growth; native plants boosted reproduction to survive.•Native plants was sensitive, while invasive plants tolerated water and soil changes.•Findings informed targeted, stage-specific strategies for managing invasive plants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176383 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3108762789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969724065392</els_id><sourcerecordid>3108762789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-c97c23c1a0fa4a78fedec64495a2933def1192122f2af0b7c649aaf72d0c47693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUctuFDEQtBARWZL8AvjIZRY_hvGYWxQFiBSJCzlbHbsdvJoZL7Z3pHwDPx07G3LFF8vl6qruLkI-crbljA-fd9tsQ4kFl3UrmOi3XA1ylG_Iho9Kd5yJ4S3ZMNaPnR60OiXvc96xetTI35FTqSUXWo0b8vdmWSGHuNBc4AEpLI7aOO-xhNLQsFSPHMpjRTuXwoo04T5Fd7ClPXJJUPAhYKbR0wWewSYSnnUbA6YyQ8q_6X6CpeSv9HoNDheL1Kc4Ux9wctRBgXNy4mHKePFyn5G7b9e_rn50tz-_31xd3nZW9Kp0VisrpOXAPPSgRo8O7dD3-gsILaVDz7kWXAgvwLN7Vf80gFfCMdurQcsz8umoW-f4c8BczByyxam2h_GQjeRsVINQY6OqI9WmmHNCb_Yp1GkeDWemJWF25jUJ05IwxyRq5YcXk8P9jO617t_qK-HySMA66howNaG2FhcS2mJcDP81eQIYi6Kn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3108762789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Invasion stage and competition intensity co-drive reproductive strategies of native and invasive saltmarsh plants: Evidence from field data</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Zhang, Jingya ; Ning, Yuanli ; Li, Jiaxu ; Shi, Zilin ; Zhang, Qinze ; Li, Longqin ; Kang, Binyue ; Du, Zhibo ; Luo, Jingchun ; He, Mengxuan ; Li, Hongyuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jingya ; Ning, Yuanli ; Li, Jiaxu ; Shi, Zilin ; Zhang, Qinze ; Li, Longqin ; Kang, Binyue ; Du, Zhibo ; Luo, Jingchun ; He, Mengxuan ; Li, Hongyuan</creatorcontrib><description>Biological invasion poses a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and also results in substantial economic loss including the excessive cost of management to control it. Still, its impact on plant sexual reproduction strategies remains underexplored in natural settings. We conducted a field experiment on native Phragmites australis and invasive Spartina alterniflora in Bohai Bay and assessed plant size (aboveground biomass and height) and sexual reproduction (ear biomass, reproductive allocation, etc.) in conjunction with water and soil properties. The results showed that during the early stage of invasion, the two species declined in size and sexual reproduction, with S. alterniflora showing a lesser decline than P. australis. However, in the late stage of invasion, S. alterniflora maintained its plant size by reducing its investment in sexual reproduction. Moreover, significant reproductive allometries were demonstrated by S. alterniflora under different competition intensities. P. australis displayed heightened sensitivity to water properties and soil non-resource conditions, while S. alterniflora adapted its inherent traits and environmental tolerance. S. alterniflora allocated more resources to thriving as an individual, while P. australis prioritized reproduction by increasing seed production. Overall, this study revealed the reproductive strategies that invasive and native species employ in response to competition and environmental factors, thereby offering crucial insights for conservation and management efforts.
[Display omitted]
•Analyzed reproductive strategies across invasion stages and competition intensities.•Invasive plants prioritized growth; native plants boosted reproduction to survive.•Native plants was sensitive, while invasive plants tolerated water and soil changes.•Findings informed targeted, stage-specific strategies for managing invasive plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39312978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biological invasion ; Competition ; Invasive plant ; Native plant ; Plastic response ; Sexual reproduction</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2024-12, Vol.954, p.176383, Article 176383</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-c97c23c1a0fa4a78fedec64495a2933def1192122f2af0b7c649aaf72d0c47693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39312978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jingya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yuanli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaxu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Zilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qinze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Longqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Binyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jingchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Mengxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hongyuan</creatorcontrib><title>Invasion stage and competition intensity co-drive reproductive strategies of native and invasive saltmarsh plants: Evidence from field data</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Biological invasion poses a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and also results in substantial economic loss including the excessive cost of management to control it. Still, its impact on plant sexual reproduction strategies remains underexplored in natural settings. We conducted a field experiment on native Phragmites australis and invasive Spartina alterniflora in Bohai Bay and assessed plant size (aboveground biomass and height) and sexual reproduction (ear biomass, reproductive allocation, etc.) in conjunction with water and soil properties. The results showed that during the early stage of invasion, the two species declined in size and sexual reproduction, with S. alterniflora showing a lesser decline than P. australis. However, in the late stage of invasion, S. alterniflora maintained its plant size by reducing its investment in sexual reproduction. Moreover, significant reproductive allometries were demonstrated by S. alterniflora under different competition intensities. P. australis displayed heightened sensitivity to water properties and soil non-resource conditions, while S. alterniflora adapted its inherent traits and environmental tolerance. S. alterniflora allocated more resources to thriving as an individual, while P. australis prioritized reproduction by increasing seed production. Overall, this study revealed the reproductive strategies that invasive and native species employ in response to competition and environmental factors, thereby offering crucial insights for conservation and management efforts.
[Display omitted]
•Analyzed reproductive strategies across invasion stages and competition intensities.•Invasive plants prioritized growth; native plants boosted reproduction to survive.•Native plants was sensitive, while invasive plants tolerated water and soil changes.•Findings informed targeted, stage-specific strategies for managing invasive plants.</description><subject>Biological invasion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Invasive plant</subject><subject>Native plant</subject><subject>Plastic response</subject><subject>Sexual reproduction</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUctuFDEQtBARWZL8AvjIZRY_hvGYWxQFiBSJCzlbHbsdvJoZL7Z3pHwDPx07G3LFF8vl6qruLkI-crbljA-fd9tsQ4kFl3UrmOi3XA1ylG_Iho9Kd5yJ4S3ZMNaPnR60OiXvc96xetTI35FTqSUXWo0b8vdmWSGHuNBc4AEpLI7aOO-xhNLQsFSPHMpjRTuXwoo04T5Fd7ClPXJJUPAhYKbR0wWewSYSnnUbA6YyQ8q_6X6CpeSv9HoNDheL1Kc4Ux9wctRBgXNy4mHKePFyn5G7b9e_rn50tz-_31xd3nZW9Kp0VisrpOXAPPSgRo8O7dD3-gsILaVDz7kWXAgvwLN7Vf80gFfCMdurQcsz8umoW-f4c8BczByyxam2h_GQjeRsVINQY6OqI9WmmHNCb_Yp1GkeDWemJWF25jUJ05IwxyRq5YcXk8P9jO617t_qK-HySMA66howNaG2FhcS2mJcDP81eQIYi6Kn</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Zhang, Jingya</creator><creator>Ning, Yuanli</creator><creator>Li, Jiaxu</creator><creator>Shi, Zilin</creator><creator>Zhang, Qinze</creator><creator>Li, Longqin</creator><creator>Kang, Binyue</creator><creator>Du, Zhibo</creator><creator>Luo, Jingchun</creator><creator>He, Mengxuan</creator><creator>Li, Hongyuan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Invasion stage and competition intensity co-drive reproductive strategies of native and invasive saltmarsh plants: Evidence from field data</title><author>Zhang, Jingya ; Ning, Yuanli ; Li, Jiaxu ; Shi, Zilin ; Zhang, Qinze ; Li, Longqin ; Kang, Binyue ; Du, Zhibo ; Luo, Jingchun ; He, Mengxuan ; Li, Hongyuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-c97c23c1a0fa4a78fedec64495a2933def1192122f2af0b7c649aaf72d0c47693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biological invasion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Invasive plant</topic><topic>Native plant</topic><topic>Plastic response</topic><topic>Sexual reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jingya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yuanli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaxu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Zilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qinze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Longqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Binyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Jingchun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Mengxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hongyuan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Jingya</au><au>Ning, Yuanli</au><au>Li, Jiaxu</au><au>Shi, Zilin</au><au>Zhang, Qinze</au><au>Li, Longqin</au><au>Kang, Binyue</au><au>Du, Zhibo</au><au>Luo, Jingchun</au><au>He, Mengxuan</au><au>Li, Hongyuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Invasion stage and competition intensity co-drive reproductive strategies of native and invasive saltmarsh plants: Evidence from field data</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>954</volume><spage>176383</spage><pages>176383-</pages><artnum>176383</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Biological invasion poses a significant threat to biodiversity conservation and also results in substantial economic loss including the excessive cost of management to control it. Still, its impact on plant sexual reproduction strategies remains underexplored in natural settings. We conducted a field experiment on native Phragmites australis and invasive Spartina alterniflora in Bohai Bay and assessed plant size (aboveground biomass and height) and sexual reproduction (ear biomass, reproductive allocation, etc.) in conjunction with water and soil properties. The results showed that during the early stage of invasion, the two species declined in size and sexual reproduction, with S. alterniflora showing a lesser decline than P. australis. However, in the late stage of invasion, S. alterniflora maintained its plant size by reducing its investment in sexual reproduction. Moreover, significant reproductive allometries were demonstrated by S. alterniflora under different competition intensities. P. australis displayed heightened sensitivity to water properties and soil non-resource conditions, while S. alterniflora adapted its inherent traits and environmental tolerance. S. alterniflora allocated more resources to thriving as an individual, while P. australis prioritized reproduction by increasing seed production. Overall, this study revealed the reproductive strategies that invasive and native species employ in response to competition and environmental factors, thereby offering crucial insights for conservation and management efforts.
[Display omitted]
•Analyzed reproductive strategies across invasion stages and competition intensities.•Invasive plants prioritized growth; native plants boosted reproduction to survive.•Native plants was sensitive, while invasive plants tolerated water and soil changes.•Findings informed targeted, stage-specific strategies for managing invasive plants.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>39312978</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176383</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2024-12, Vol.954, p.176383, Article 176383 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3108762789 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Biological invasion Competition Invasive plant Native plant Plastic response Sexual reproduction |
title | Invasion stage and competition intensity co-drive reproductive strategies of native and invasive saltmarsh plants: Evidence from field data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T20%3A42%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Invasion%20stage%20and%20competition%20intensity%20co-drive%20reproductive%20strategies%20of%20native%20and%20invasive%20saltmarsh%20plants:%20Evidence%20from%20field%20data&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Zhang,%20Jingya&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=954&rft.spage=176383&rft.pages=176383-&rft.artnum=176383&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3108762789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3108762789&rft_id=info:pmid/39312978&rft_els_id=S0048969724065392&rfr_iscdi=true |