Unveiling the applicability of the Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale for hard stool in young children: A South Asian perspective

The Rome IV criteria, the standard for diagnosing functional constipation (FC), deem the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) unsuitable for assessing stool consistency in young children. Hence, the Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale (BITSS) was developed. We aimed to validate and test the reliability of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2024-12, Vol.39 (12), p.2609-2615
Hauptverfasser: Bui, Hung Manh, Trinh, Oanh Thi Hoang, Lin, Shyh-Hsiang, Nguyen-Hoang, Anh, Le, Nguyen Quoc Khanh, Nguyen, Nha Tran, Nguyen, Ngan Thi Kim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Rome IV criteria, the standard for diagnosing functional constipation (FC), deem the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) unsuitable for assessing stool consistency in young children. Hence, the Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale (BITSS) was developed. We aimed to validate and test the reliability of BITSS for hard stools and FC among infants and toddlers, where there is limited evidence in Asian populations. The research evaluated FC in children aged 0-48 months who came for medical examination using Rome IV criteria. Stool properties provided by caregivers were assessed sequentially through three methods: the BSS, the BITSS, and caregiver reports. A total of 370 responses were received, with an average age of 26.2 months. Substantial agreement was observed between the BITSS and caregiver reports for hard stools (concordance rate: 91.9%, κ = 0.75), while near-perfect agreement was found between BITSS and BSS (concordance rate: 93.5%, κ = 0.81). The BITSS exhibited higher sensitivity than the BSS in assessing hard stools (95.3% vs 87.5%, P 
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/jgh.16741