Arthroplasty treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials

Treatment options for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients include unipolar hemiarthroplasty (UHA), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA), unipolar total hip arthroplasty (UTHA), and dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (DMTHA). This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2024-11, Vol.55 (11), p.111875, Article 111875
Hauptverfasser: Saleem, Arhum, Lin, Charles C., Anil, Utkarsh, Rivero, Steven M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 111875
container_title Injury
container_volume 55
creator Saleem, Arhum
Lin, Charles C.
Anil, Utkarsh
Rivero, Steven M.
description Treatment options for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients include unipolar hemiarthroplasty (UHA), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA), unipolar total hip arthroplasty (UTHA), and dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (DMTHA). This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) quantitatively compares these treatments to identify the optimal surgical technique. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search in Medline (PubMed), Cochrane, and EMBASE databases was conducted. RCTs comparing UHA, BHA, UTHA, or DMTHA were included. Interventions were ranked using the SUCRA score. Among 5,542 studies, 12 RCTs met inclusion criteria, involving 1,490 patients. Procedures were ranked by prosthetic dislocation, mortality, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, Harris Hip Score (HHS). BHA ranked the best in dislocation rate, intraoperative blood loss and mortality. UHA had the shortest operating time. DMTHA had the greatest ranking for HHS. However, the differences between these treatment modalities were rarely statistically significantly different. A variety of arthroplasty procedures can be used to treat displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Our results indicate that while BHA resulted in the best post-operative ranking amongst the compared treatment strategies in terms of dislocation rates, blood loss and mortality, the differences between the treatment options does not clearly favor a specific treatment option.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111875
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3108388555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138324006041</els_id><sourcerecordid>3108388555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f70adac6078fadd5d64109be71ddea824fc284e80a9f1fb97427e376168522773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAURS0EokPhHyDkJZsM_khihwXSqAJaqRIbWFse-1n1NLGHZwcUFvx2UqWwZHU3576rdwh5zdmeM96_O-1jOs247AUT7Z5zrlX3hOzWGBomevWU7BgTrOFSywvyopQTY1wxKZ-TCzlIpjgfduT3Aesd5vNoS11oRbB1glRpPteYU6EhIw0wZbQjTeDuaUDr6oxQaEy03gGF0QOOy3t6WIH6M-M9naDaxiY7LiUWmgNFm3ye4i_w1OVUMY_rVLRjeUmehTXg1WNekm-fPn69um5uv3y-uTrcNk60vDZBMeut65nSwXrf-b7lbDiC4t6D1aINTugWNLND4OE4qFYokKrnve6EUEpekrfb3TPm7zOUaqZYHIyjTZDnYiRnWmrddd2KthvqMJeCEMwZ42RxMZyZB_PmZDbz5sG82cyvtTePC_NxAv-v9Ff1CnzYAFj__BEBTXERkgMfEVw1Psf_L_wB9sCZeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3108388555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arthroplasty treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Saleem, Arhum ; Lin, Charles C. ; Anil, Utkarsh ; Rivero, Steven M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Arhum ; Lin, Charles C. ; Anil, Utkarsh ; Rivero, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><description>Treatment options for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients include unipolar hemiarthroplasty (UHA), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA), unipolar total hip arthroplasty (UTHA), and dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (DMTHA). This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) quantitatively compares these treatments to identify the optimal surgical technique. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search in Medline (PubMed), Cochrane, and EMBASE databases was conducted. RCTs comparing UHA, BHA, UTHA, or DMTHA were included. Interventions were ranked using the SUCRA score. Among 5,542 studies, 12 RCTs met inclusion criteria, involving 1,490 patients. Procedures were ranked by prosthetic dislocation, mortality, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, Harris Hip Score (HHS). BHA ranked the best in dislocation rate, intraoperative blood loss and mortality. UHA had the shortest operating time. DMTHA had the greatest ranking for HHS. However, the differences between these treatment modalities were rarely statistically significantly different. A variety of arthroplasty procedures can be used to treat displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Our results indicate that while BHA resulted in the best post-operative ranking amongst the compared treatment strategies in terms of dislocation rates, blood loss and mortality, the differences between the treatment options does not clearly favor a specific treatment option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111875</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39307119</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods ; Femoral neck fracture ; Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery ; Hemiarthroplasty - methods ; Humans ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surgical technique ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2024-11, Vol.55 (11), p.111875, Article 111875</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f70adac6078fadd5d64109be71ddea824fc284e80a9f1fb97427e376168522773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1491-6410 ; 0000-0003-1807-1926 ; 0009-0001-7307-7338</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111875$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39307119$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Arhum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Charles C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Utkarsh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivero, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><title>Arthroplasty treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Treatment options for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients include unipolar hemiarthroplasty (UHA), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA), unipolar total hip arthroplasty (UTHA), and dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (DMTHA). This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) quantitatively compares these treatments to identify the optimal surgical technique. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search in Medline (PubMed), Cochrane, and EMBASE databases was conducted. RCTs comparing UHA, BHA, UTHA, or DMTHA were included. Interventions were ranked using the SUCRA score. Among 5,542 studies, 12 RCTs met inclusion criteria, involving 1,490 patients. Procedures were ranked by prosthetic dislocation, mortality, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, Harris Hip Score (HHS). BHA ranked the best in dislocation rate, intraoperative blood loss and mortality. UHA had the shortest operating time. DMTHA had the greatest ranking for HHS. However, the differences between these treatment modalities were rarely statistically significantly different. A variety of arthroplasty procedures can be used to treat displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Our results indicate that while BHA resulted in the best post-operative ranking amongst the compared treatment strategies in terms of dislocation rates, blood loss and mortality, the differences between the treatment options does not clearly favor a specific treatment option.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</subject><subject>Femoral neck fracture</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Hemiarthroplasty - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surgical technique</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAURS0EokPhHyDkJZsM_khihwXSqAJaqRIbWFse-1n1NLGHZwcUFvx2UqWwZHU3576rdwh5zdmeM96_O-1jOs247AUT7Z5zrlX3hOzWGBomevWU7BgTrOFSywvyopQTY1wxKZ-TCzlIpjgfduT3Aesd5vNoS11oRbB1glRpPteYU6EhIw0wZbQjTeDuaUDr6oxQaEy03gGF0QOOy3t6WIH6M-M9naDaxiY7LiUWmgNFm3ye4i_w1OVUMY_rVLRjeUmehTXg1WNekm-fPn69um5uv3y-uTrcNk60vDZBMeut65nSwXrf-b7lbDiC4t6D1aINTugWNLND4OE4qFYokKrnve6EUEpekrfb3TPm7zOUaqZYHIyjTZDnYiRnWmrddd2KthvqMJeCEMwZ42RxMZyZB_PmZDbz5sG82cyvtTePC_NxAv-v9Ff1CnzYAFj__BEBTXERkgMfEVw1Psf_L_wB9sCZeQ</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Saleem, Arhum</creator><creator>Lin, Charles C.</creator><creator>Anil, Utkarsh</creator><creator>Rivero, Steven M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1491-6410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1807-1926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7307-7338</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Arthroplasty treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials</title><author>Saleem, Arhum ; Lin, Charles C. ; Anil, Utkarsh ; Rivero, Steven M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-f70adac6078fadd5d64109be71ddea824fc284e80a9f1fb97427e376168522773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods</topic><topic>Femoral neck fracture</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Hemiarthroplasty - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surgical technique</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saleem, Arhum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Charles C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Utkarsh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivero, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saleem, Arhum</au><au>Lin, Charles C.</au><au>Anil, Utkarsh</au><au>Rivero, Steven M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arthroplasty treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>111875</spage><pages>111875-</pages><artnum>111875</artnum><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Treatment options for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients include unipolar hemiarthroplasty (UHA), bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA), unipolar total hip arthroplasty (UTHA), and dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty (DMTHA). This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) quantitatively compares these treatments to identify the optimal surgical technique. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search in Medline (PubMed), Cochrane, and EMBASE databases was conducted. RCTs comparing UHA, BHA, UTHA, or DMTHA were included. Interventions were ranked using the SUCRA score. Among 5,542 studies, 12 RCTs met inclusion criteria, involving 1,490 patients. Procedures were ranked by prosthetic dislocation, mortality, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, revision rate, Harris Hip Score (HHS). BHA ranked the best in dislocation rate, intraoperative blood loss and mortality. UHA had the shortest operating time. DMTHA had the greatest ranking for HHS. However, the differences between these treatment modalities were rarely statistically significantly different. A variety of arthroplasty procedures can be used to treat displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Our results indicate that while BHA resulted in the best post-operative ranking amongst the compared treatment strategies in terms of dislocation rates, blood loss and mortality, the differences between the treatment options does not clearly favor a specific treatment option.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39307119</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2024.111875</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1491-6410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1807-1926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7307-7338</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2024-11, Vol.55 (11), p.111875, Article 111875
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3108388555
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
Femoral neck fracture
Femoral Neck Fractures - surgery
Hemiarthroplasty - methods
Humans
Network Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Surgical technique
Treatment Outcome
title Arthroplasty treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly: A network meta-analysis of randomized control trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A07%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arthroplasty%20treatment%20options%20for%20femoral%20neck%20fractures%20in%20the%20elderly:%20A%20network%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20control%20trials&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Saleem,%20Arhum&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=111875&rft.pages=111875-&rft.artnum=111875&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111875&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3108388555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3108388555&rft_id=info:pmid/39307119&rft_els_id=S0020138324006041&rfr_iscdi=true