Effect of dissolved oxygen on sulfur autotrophic denitrification and how to address it: An experimental and modelling work

•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly inhibit SAD.•DO would limit the SAD process by competing with nitrate for electrons.•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) decrease the relative abundance of SOB.•A mathematical model was constructed for analyzing the effect of DO on SAD.•An a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2024-12, Vol.267, p.122415, Article 122415
Hauptverfasser: Kou, Ziwei, Huo, Pengfei, Qi, Xiang, Gu, Yuyi, Huang, Xia, Liang, Peng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 122415
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 267
creator Kou, Ziwei
Huo, Pengfei
Qi, Xiang
Gu, Yuyi
Huang, Xia
Liang, Peng
description •High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly inhibit SAD.•DO would limit the SAD process by competing with nitrate for electrons.•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) decrease the relative abundance of SOB.•A mathematical model was constructed for analyzing the effect of DO on SAD.•An appropriate internal reflux ratio can mitigate the inhibition of DO on SAD. Sulfur autotrophic denitrification (SAD) using elemental sulfur as the electron donor has aroused increasing interest of its application in treating secondary effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, high influent dissolved oxygen (DO) in secondary effluent would limit the SAD process. This study examined the effect of different DO concentrations on SAD. Results revealed that both low (0–0.5 mg/L) and moderate (2.5–3.5 mg/L) DO concentrations would not harm the nitrate removal rate (NRR) (p > 0.05). However, high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly decreased the NRR (p < 0.05) through strong competition over the nitrate for electrons and cutting the relative abundance of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB). Both modeling and experimental results showed that applying internal reflux could serve as a strategy to mitigate the negative effect of high DO concentration, while keeping an appropriate ratio was crucial. When treating real membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluent with high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L), an internal reflux ratio of 0.5 boosted the NRR by 1.5 times. This study provided potential reference and strategy for dealing with high DO concentration wastewater by applying SAD technology. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122415
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3107785966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135424013149</els_id><sourcerecordid>3107785966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-7fd09c49c347c455dee73a51d29a4c0bb12f40d418bbc27f8e71b505121b8e813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1vFDEQhi1ERI7AP0DIJc1e_HnepUCKogCRItEkteW1x4mPPfuwvbmEXx-HDZRU0zwz77wPQh8oWVNCN6fb9cHUDGXNCBNrypig8hVa0V4NHROif41WhAjeUS7FMXpbypYQwhgf3qBjPnAiJVMr9PvCe7AVJ49dKCVN9-Bweni8hYhTxGWe_JyxmWuqOe3vgsUOYqg5-GBNDQ0x0eG7dMA1YeNce6jgUD_js4jhYQ857CBWM_3BdsnBNIV4iw8p_3yHjryZCrx_mSfo5uvF9fn37urHt8vzs6vOtkq1U96RwYrBcqGskNIBKG4kdWwwwpJxpMwL4gTtx9Ey5XtQdJREUkbHHnrKT9Cn5e4-p18zlKp3odj2iImQ5qI5JUr1cthsGioW1OZUSgav962AyY-aEv1sXW_1Yl0_W9eL9bb28SVhHnfg_i391dyALwsAred9gKyLDRAtuJCbfe1S-H_CEy0hly4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3107785966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of dissolved oxygen on sulfur autotrophic denitrification and how to address it: An experimental and modelling work</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kou, Ziwei ; Huo, Pengfei ; Qi, Xiang ; Gu, Yuyi ; Huang, Xia ; Liang, Peng</creator><creatorcontrib>Kou, Ziwei ; Huo, Pengfei ; Qi, Xiang ; Gu, Yuyi ; Huang, Xia ; Liang, Peng</creatorcontrib><description>•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly inhibit SAD.•DO would limit the SAD process by competing with nitrate for electrons.•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) decrease the relative abundance of SOB.•A mathematical model was constructed for analyzing the effect of DO on SAD.•An appropriate internal reflux ratio can mitigate the inhibition of DO on SAD. Sulfur autotrophic denitrification (SAD) using elemental sulfur as the electron donor has aroused increasing interest of its application in treating secondary effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, high influent dissolved oxygen (DO) in secondary effluent would limit the SAD process. This study examined the effect of different DO concentrations on SAD. Results revealed that both low (0–0.5 mg/L) and moderate (2.5–3.5 mg/L) DO concentrations would not harm the nitrate removal rate (NRR) (p &gt; 0.05). However, high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly decreased the NRR (p &lt; 0.05) through strong competition over the nitrate for electrons and cutting the relative abundance of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB). Both modeling and experimental results showed that applying internal reflux could serve as a strategy to mitigate the negative effect of high DO concentration, while keeping an appropriate ratio was crucial. When treating real membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluent with high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L), an internal reflux ratio of 0.5 boosted the NRR by 1.5 times. This study provided potential reference and strategy for dealing with high DO concentration wastewater by applying SAD technology. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39305527</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Autotrophic Processes ; Bioreactors ; Denitrification ; Dissolved oxygen ; Elemental sulfur ; Internal reflux ; Nitrate removal rate ; Nitrates ; Oxygen - metabolism ; Sulfur ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2024-12, Vol.267, p.122415, Article 122415</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-7fd09c49c347c455dee73a51d29a4c0bb12f40d418bbc27f8e71b505121b8e813</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7345-0844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122415$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39305527$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kou, Ziwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yuyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Peng</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of dissolved oxygen on sulfur autotrophic denitrification and how to address it: An experimental and modelling work</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly inhibit SAD.•DO would limit the SAD process by competing with nitrate for electrons.•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) decrease the relative abundance of SOB.•A mathematical model was constructed for analyzing the effect of DO on SAD.•An appropriate internal reflux ratio can mitigate the inhibition of DO on SAD. Sulfur autotrophic denitrification (SAD) using elemental sulfur as the electron donor has aroused increasing interest of its application in treating secondary effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, high influent dissolved oxygen (DO) in secondary effluent would limit the SAD process. This study examined the effect of different DO concentrations on SAD. Results revealed that both low (0–0.5 mg/L) and moderate (2.5–3.5 mg/L) DO concentrations would not harm the nitrate removal rate (NRR) (p &gt; 0.05). However, high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly decreased the NRR (p &lt; 0.05) through strong competition over the nitrate for electrons and cutting the relative abundance of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB). Both modeling and experimental results showed that applying internal reflux could serve as a strategy to mitigate the negative effect of high DO concentration, while keeping an appropriate ratio was crucial. When treating real membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluent with high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L), an internal reflux ratio of 0.5 boosted the NRR by 1.5 times. This study provided potential reference and strategy for dealing with high DO concentration wastewater by applying SAD technology. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Autotrophic Processes</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Elemental sulfur</subject><subject>Internal reflux</subject><subject>Nitrate removal rate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Oxygen - metabolism</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater - chemistry</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1vFDEQhi1ERI7AP0DIJc1e_HnepUCKogCRItEkteW1x4mPPfuwvbmEXx-HDZRU0zwz77wPQh8oWVNCN6fb9cHUDGXNCBNrypig8hVa0V4NHROif41WhAjeUS7FMXpbypYQwhgf3qBjPnAiJVMr9PvCe7AVJ49dKCVN9-Bweni8hYhTxGWe_JyxmWuqOe3vgsUOYqg5-GBNDQ0x0eG7dMA1YeNce6jgUD_js4jhYQ857CBWM_3BdsnBNIV4iw8p_3yHjryZCrx_mSfo5uvF9fn37urHt8vzs6vOtkq1U96RwYrBcqGskNIBKG4kdWwwwpJxpMwL4gTtx9Ey5XtQdJREUkbHHnrKT9Cn5e4-p18zlKp3odj2iImQ5qI5JUr1cthsGioW1OZUSgav962AyY-aEv1sXW_1Yl0_W9eL9bb28SVhHnfg_i391dyALwsAred9gKyLDRAtuJCbfe1S-H_CEy0hly4</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Kou, Ziwei</creator><creator>Huo, Pengfei</creator><creator>Qi, Xiang</creator><creator>Gu, Yuyi</creator><creator>Huang, Xia</creator><creator>Liang, Peng</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-0844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Effect of dissolved oxygen on sulfur autotrophic denitrification and how to address it: An experimental and modelling work</title><author>Kou, Ziwei ; Huo, Pengfei ; Qi, Xiang ; Gu, Yuyi ; Huang, Xia ; Liang, Peng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-7fd09c49c347c455dee73a51d29a4c0bb12f40d418bbc27f8e71b505121b8e813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Autotrophic Processes</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Elemental sulfur</topic><topic>Internal reflux</topic><topic>Nitrate removal rate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Oxygen - metabolism</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kou, Ziwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Pengfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Yuyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Peng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kou, Ziwei</au><au>Huo, Pengfei</au><au>Qi, Xiang</au><au>Gu, Yuyi</au><au>Huang, Xia</au><au>Liang, Peng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of dissolved oxygen on sulfur autotrophic denitrification and how to address it: An experimental and modelling work</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>267</volume><spage>122415</spage><pages>122415-</pages><artnum>122415</artnum><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly inhibit SAD.•DO would limit the SAD process by competing with nitrate for electrons.•High concentration of DO (5.5–6.5 mg/L) decrease the relative abundance of SOB.•A mathematical model was constructed for analyzing the effect of DO on SAD.•An appropriate internal reflux ratio can mitigate the inhibition of DO on SAD. Sulfur autotrophic denitrification (SAD) using elemental sulfur as the electron donor has aroused increasing interest of its application in treating secondary effluent from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, high influent dissolved oxygen (DO) in secondary effluent would limit the SAD process. This study examined the effect of different DO concentrations on SAD. Results revealed that both low (0–0.5 mg/L) and moderate (2.5–3.5 mg/L) DO concentrations would not harm the nitrate removal rate (NRR) (p &gt; 0.05). However, high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L) significantly decreased the NRR (p &lt; 0.05) through strong competition over the nitrate for electrons and cutting the relative abundance of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB). Both modeling and experimental results showed that applying internal reflux could serve as a strategy to mitigate the negative effect of high DO concentration, while keeping an appropriate ratio was crucial. When treating real membrane bioreactor (MBR) effluent with high DO concentration (5.5–6.5 mg/L), an internal reflux ratio of 0.5 boosted the NRR by 1.5 times. This study provided potential reference and strategy for dealing with high DO concentration wastewater by applying SAD technology. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39305527</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2024.122415</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-0844</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2024-12, Vol.267, p.122415, Article 122415
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3107785966
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Autotrophic Processes
Bioreactors
Denitrification
Dissolved oxygen
Elemental sulfur
Internal reflux
Nitrate removal rate
Nitrates
Oxygen - metabolism
Sulfur
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Wastewater - chemistry
title Effect of dissolved oxygen on sulfur autotrophic denitrification and how to address it: An experimental and modelling work
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A04%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20dissolved%20oxygen%20on%20sulfur%20autotrophic%20denitrification%20and%20how%20to%20address%20it:%20An%20experimental%20and%20modelling%20work&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Kou,%20Ziwei&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=267&rft.spage=122415&rft.pages=122415-&rft.artnum=122415&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3107785966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3107785966&rft_id=info:pmid/39305527&rft_els_id=S0043135424013149&rfr_iscdi=true