Safety of Rotavirus Vaccination in Infants That Were Exposed to Biologics In Utero: A Systematic Review
In infants that were exposed to biologics in utero, gastroenterology societal guidelines have either recommended against administration of the live rotavirus vaccine until 6-12 months of age or until serum biologic levels are undetectable. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the safety of r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Inflammatory bowel diseases 2024-09 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Inflammatory bowel diseases |
container_volume | |
creator | Schell, Trevor L Fass, Lucas Hitchcock, Mary E Farraye, Francis A Hayney, Mary S Saha, Sumona Caldera, Freddy |
description | In infants that were exposed to biologics in utero, gastroenterology societal guidelines have either recommended against administration of the live rotavirus vaccine until 6-12 months of age or until serum biologic levels are undetectable. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the safety of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants.
EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from 2006 to 2024 for original data reporting on the safety of rotavirus vaccination in infants that were exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) (ie, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab) and non-TNF biologics (ie, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, rizankizumab, mirikizumab) in utero.
A database search yielded 7185 screening results of which 10 studies met inclusion criteria. There were over 300 instances of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants (n = 162 exposed to anti-TNFs, n = 142 exposed to non-TNF biologics). Biologic-exposed infants were not at an increased risk of severe adverse events or adverse events of any severity related to rotavirus vaccination.
Administration of the live rotavirus vaccine appears to be safe in biologic-exposed infants. As such, with careful examination of the risks and benefits, there may be a role for rotavirus vaccination in this population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ibd/izae220 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3107507096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3107507096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-fe7d818f2e22cd5c32f98bb3b631fee9645b39f474832afa3805925f1e904b573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQQIMotlZP3iVHQdYmm_2Kt1qqFgpCP_S4ZLOTGtnd1E22Wn-9kVaZw8zh8WAeQpeU3FLC2VAX5VB_CwhDcoT6NGZJEGVRdOxvkmYB4TzroTNr3wkJ_fBT1GOcERbSqI_WC6HA7bBReG6c2Oq2s_hFSKkb4bRpsG7wtFGicRYv34TDr9ACnnxtjIUSO4PvtanMWkvrMbxy0Jo7PMKLnXVQe4PEc9hq-DxHJ0pUFi4Oe4BWD5Pl-CmYPT9Ox6NZIGmaukBBWmY0U6H_RpaxZKHiWVGwImFUAfAkigvGVZRGGQuFEiwjMQ9jRYGTqIhTNkDXe--mNR8dWJfX2kqoKtGA6WzOfJOYpIQnHr3Zo7I11rag8k2ra9Huckry37K5L5sfynr66iDuihrKf_YvJfsBk8J1Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3107507096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of Rotavirus Vaccination in Infants That Were Exposed to Biologics In Utero: A Systematic Review</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Schell, Trevor L ; Fass, Lucas ; Hitchcock, Mary E ; Farraye, Francis A ; Hayney, Mary S ; Saha, Sumona ; Caldera, Freddy</creator><creatorcontrib>Schell, Trevor L ; Fass, Lucas ; Hitchcock, Mary E ; Farraye, Francis A ; Hayney, Mary S ; Saha, Sumona ; Caldera, Freddy</creatorcontrib><description>In infants that were exposed to biologics in utero, gastroenterology societal guidelines have either recommended against administration of the live rotavirus vaccine until 6-12 months of age or until serum biologic levels are undetectable. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the safety of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants.
EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from 2006 to 2024 for original data reporting on the safety of rotavirus vaccination in infants that were exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) (ie, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab) and non-TNF biologics (ie, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, rizankizumab, mirikizumab) in utero.
A database search yielded 7185 screening results of which 10 studies met inclusion criteria. There were over 300 instances of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants (n = 162 exposed to anti-TNFs, n = 142 exposed to non-TNF biologics). Biologic-exposed infants were not at an increased risk of severe adverse events or adverse events of any severity related to rotavirus vaccination.
Administration of the live rotavirus vaccine appears to be safe in biologic-exposed infants. As such, with careful examination of the risks and benefits, there may be a role for rotavirus vaccination in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0998</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-4844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izae220</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39303214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024-09</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-fe7d818f2e22cd5c32f98bb3b631fee9645b39f474832afa3805925f1e904b573</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2058-4926 ; 0000-0003-1960-6611 ; 0000-0002-3271-9904</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39303214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schell, Trevor L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fass, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitchcock, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farraye, Francis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayney, Mary S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saha, Sumona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldera, Freddy</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of Rotavirus Vaccination in Infants That Were Exposed to Biologics In Utero: A Systematic Review</title><title>Inflammatory bowel diseases</title><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><description>In infants that were exposed to biologics in utero, gastroenterology societal guidelines have either recommended against administration of the live rotavirus vaccine until 6-12 months of age or until serum biologic levels are undetectable. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the safety of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants.
EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from 2006 to 2024 for original data reporting on the safety of rotavirus vaccination in infants that were exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) (ie, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab) and non-TNF biologics (ie, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, rizankizumab, mirikizumab) in utero.
A database search yielded 7185 screening results of which 10 studies met inclusion criteria. There were over 300 instances of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants (n = 162 exposed to anti-TNFs, n = 142 exposed to non-TNF biologics). Biologic-exposed infants were not at an increased risk of severe adverse events or adverse events of any severity related to rotavirus vaccination.
Administration of the live rotavirus vaccine appears to be safe in biologic-exposed infants. As such, with careful examination of the risks and benefits, there may be a role for rotavirus vaccination in this population.</description><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQQIMotlZP3iVHQdYmm_2Kt1qqFgpCP_S4ZLOTGtnd1E22Wn-9kVaZw8zh8WAeQpeU3FLC2VAX5VB_CwhDcoT6NGZJEGVRdOxvkmYB4TzroTNr3wkJ_fBT1GOcERbSqI_WC6HA7bBReG6c2Oq2s_hFSKkb4bRpsG7wtFGicRYv34TDr9ACnnxtjIUSO4PvtanMWkvrMbxy0Jo7PMKLnXVQe4PEc9hq-DxHJ0pUFi4Oe4BWD5Pl-CmYPT9Ox6NZIGmaukBBWmY0U6H_RpaxZKHiWVGwImFUAfAkigvGVZRGGQuFEiwjMQ9jRYGTqIhTNkDXe--mNR8dWJfX2kqoKtGA6WzOfJOYpIQnHr3Zo7I11rag8k2ra9Huckry37K5L5sfynr66iDuihrKf_YvJfsBk8J1Kg</recordid><startdate>20240920</startdate><enddate>20240920</enddate><creator>Schell, Trevor L</creator><creator>Fass, Lucas</creator><creator>Hitchcock, Mary E</creator><creator>Farraye, Francis A</creator><creator>Hayney, Mary S</creator><creator>Saha, Sumona</creator><creator>Caldera, Freddy</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2058-4926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1960-6611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-9904</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240920</creationdate><title>Safety of Rotavirus Vaccination in Infants That Were Exposed to Biologics In Utero: A Systematic Review</title><author>Schell, Trevor L ; Fass, Lucas ; Hitchcock, Mary E ; Farraye, Francis A ; Hayney, Mary S ; Saha, Sumona ; Caldera, Freddy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c177t-fe7d818f2e22cd5c32f98bb3b631fee9645b39f474832afa3805925f1e904b573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schell, Trevor L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fass, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitchcock, Mary E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farraye, Francis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayney, Mary S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saha, Sumona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldera, Freddy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schell, Trevor L</au><au>Fass, Lucas</au><au>Hitchcock, Mary E</au><au>Farraye, Francis A</au><au>Hayney, Mary S</au><au>Saha, Sumona</au><au>Caldera, Freddy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of Rotavirus Vaccination in Infants That Were Exposed to Biologics In Utero: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Inflammatory bowel diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Inflamm Bowel Dis</addtitle><date>2024-09-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1078-0998</issn><issn>1536-4844</issn><eissn>1536-4844</eissn><abstract>In infants that were exposed to biologics in utero, gastroenterology societal guidelines have either recommended against administration of the live rotavirus vaccine until 6-12 months of age or until serum biologic levels are undetectable. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the safety of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants.
EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from 2006 to 2024 for original data reporting on the safety of rotavirus vaccination in infants that were exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) (ie, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab) and non-TNF biologics (ie, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, rizankizumab, mirikizumab) in utero.
A database search yielded 7185 screening results of which 10 studies met inclusion criteria. There were over 300 instances of rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants (n = 162 exposed to anti-TNFs, n = 142 exposed to non-TNF biologics). Biologic-exposed infants were not at an increased risk of severe adverse events or adverse events of any severity related to rotavirus vaccination.
Administration of the live rotavirus vaccine appears to be safe in biologic-exposed infants. As such, with careful examination of the risks and benefits, there may be a role for rotavirus vaccination in this population.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39303214</pmid><doi>10.1093/ibd/izae220</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2058-4926</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1960-6611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-9904</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0998 |
ispartof | Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024-09 |
issn | 1078-0998 1536-4844 1536-4844 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3107507096 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | Safety of Rotavirus Vaccination in Infants That Were Exposed to Biologics In Utero: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T04%3A45%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20Rotavirus%20Vaccination%20in%20Infants%20That%20Were%20Exposed%20to%20Biologics%20In%20Utero:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Inflammatory%20bowel%20diseases&rft.au=Schell,%20Trevor%20L&rft.date=2024-09-20&rft.issn=1078-0998&rft.eissn=1536-4844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ibd/izae220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3107507096%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3107507096&rft_id=info:pmid/39303214&rfr_iscdi=true |