Combined manifestation of two geometric visual illusions
The present study continued to investigate whether the effects of length misperception caused by cross-shaped (formed by two pairs of the oppositely oriented Müller-Lyer wings) contextual distractors can be explained by the combined manifestation of two different (i.e., the Müller-Lyer and filled-sp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2024-10, Vol.86 (7), p.2456-2474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 2456 |
container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Bulatov, Aleksandr Marma, Vilius Bulatova, Natalija Grigaliūnas, Artūras |
description | The present study continued to investigate whether the effects of length misperception caused by cross-shaped (formed by two pairs of the oppositely oriented Müller-Lyer wings) contextual distractors can be explained by the combined manifestation of two different (i.e., the Müller-Lyer and filled-space) geometric illusions of extent. In psychophysical experiments, the luminance of one pair of wings was randomly changed, while the luminance of the other pair remained constant. Two different distractor orientations were used—when the wings with constant luminance formed the right side of the cross or the left side, otherwise. To separately evaluate the manifestation of the Müller-Lyer illusion under different luminance conditions, two distracting crosses of the same orientation were attached to the lateral stimulus terminators in the first series of experiments. In the following four series, a single distracting cross (with different orientation) was attached to one of the lateral stimulus terminators and various combinations of the constant and background luminance were used. To interpret the experimental data, we used the basic computational principles of previously developed quantitative models of hypothetical visual mechanisms underlying the emergence of the Müller-Lyer illusion and the filled-space illusion. It was shown that the results of theoretical calculations adequately approximate the experimental curves obtained for all modifications of stimuli, which strongly supports the suggestion that the joint manifestations of these two illusions can be considered among the main factors determining the features of the illusion investigated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-024-02957-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3107163065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3107163065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-556a8abc37ed9e19bedc677bb73f944012989483fe9c9a92fffcda6274e13d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBdS8Mabar6aNJcy5gcMvFHwLqRpMjLaZiat4r83s3OCFxJCAuc57zk8AJwjeE14Ud5ERCiiOcTbKwqeiwMwRYKSnAjyerj_YzQBJzGuIWSEcXgMJqkOcSHKKSjnvq1cZ-qsVZ2zJvaqd77LvM36D5-tjG9NH5zO3l0cVJO5phliAuIpOLKqieZs987Ay93ief6QL5_uH-e3y1zjgvV5UTBVqkoTbmphkKhMrRnnVcWJFZRChEUpaEmsEVooga21ulYMc2oQqdOZgasxdxP825D2k62L2jSN6owfoiQIcsQIZEVCL_-gaz-ELm2XKMQZp5SwROGR0sHHGIyVm-BaFT4lgnLrVY5eZfIqv71KkZoudtFD1Zp63_IjMgFkBGIqdSsTfmf_E_sF4tmC7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3117674436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined manifestation of two geometric visual illusions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bulatov, Aleksandr ; Marma, Vilius ; Bulatova, Natalija ; Grigaliūnas, Artūras</creator><creatorcontrib>Bulatov, Aleksandr ; Marma, Vilius ; Bulatova, Natalija ; Grigaliūnas, Artūras</creatorcontrib><description>The present study continued to investigate whether the effects of length misperception caused by cross-shaped (formed by two pairs of the oppositely oriented Müller-Lyer wings) contextual distractors can be explained by the combined manifestation of two different (i.e., the Müller-Lyer and filled-space) geometric illusions of extent. In psychophysical experiments, the luminance of one pair of wings was randomly changed, while the luminance of the other pair remained constant. Two different distractor orientations were used—when the wings with constant luminance formed the right side of the cross or the left side, otherwise. To separately evaluate the manifestation of the Müller-Lyer illusion under different luminance conditions, two distracting crosses of the same orientation were attached to the lateral stimulus terminators in the first series of experiments. In the following four series, a single distracting cross (with different orientation) was attached to one of the lateral stimulus terminators and various combinations of the constant and background luminance were used. To interpret the experimental data, we used the basic computational principles of previously developed quantitative models of hypothetical visual mechanisms underlying the emergence of the Müller-Lyer illusion and the filled-space illusion. It was shown that the results of theoretical calculations adequately approximate the experimental curves obtained for all modifications of stimuli, which strongly supports the suggestion that the joint manifestations of these two illusions can be considered among the main factors determining the features of the illusion investigated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02957-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39302598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Experiments ; Individual Characteristics ; Psychology ; Stimuli ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024-10, Vol.86 (7), p.2456-2474</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Oct 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-556a8abc37ed9e19bedc677bb73f944012989483fe9c9a92fffcda6274e13d3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1149-3296</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-024-02957-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-024-02957-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39302598$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bulatov, Aleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marma, Vilius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulatova, Natalija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigaliūnas, Artūras</creatorcontrib><title>Combined manifestation of two geometric visual illusions</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>The present study continued to investigate whether the effects of length misperception caused by cross-shaped (formed by two pairs of the oppositely oriented Müller-Lyer wings) contextual distractors can be explained by the combined manifestation of two different (i.e., the Müller-Lyer and filled-space) geometric illusions of extent. In psychophysical experiments, the luminance of one pair of wings was randomly changed, while the luminance of the other pair remained constant. Two different distractor orientations were used—when the wings with constant luminance formed the right side of the cross or the left side, otherwise. To separately evaluate the manifestation of the Müller-Lyer illusion under different luminance conditions, two distracting crosses of the same orientation were attached to the lateral stimulus terminators in the first series of experiments. In the following four series, a single distracting cross (with different orientation) was attached to one of the lateral stimulus terminators and various combinations of the constant and background luminance were used. To interpret the experimental data, we used the basic computational principles of previously developed quantitative models of hypothetical visual mechanisms underlying the emergence of the Müller-Lyer illusion and the filled-space illusion. It was shown that the results of theoretical calculations adequately approximate the experimental curves obtained for all modifications of stimuli, which strongly supports the suggestion that the joint manifestations of these two illusions can be considered among the main factors determining the features of the illusion investigated.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gBdS8Mabar6aNJcy5gcMvFHwLqRpMjLaZiat4r83s3OCFxJCAuc57zk8AJwjeE14Ud5ERCiiOcTbKwqeiwMwRYKSnAjyerj_YzQBJzGuIWSEcXgMJqkOcSHKKSjnvq1cZ-qsVZ2zJvaqd77LvM36D5-tjG9NH5zO3l0cVJO5phliAuIpOLKqieZs987Ay93ief6QL5_uH-e3y1zjgvV5UTBVqkoTbmphkKhMrRnnVcWJFZRChEUpaEmsEVooga21ulYMc2oQqdOZgasxdxP825D2k62L2jSN6owfoiQIcsQIZEVCL_-gaz-ELm2XKMQZp5SwROGR0sHHGIyVm-BaFT4lgnLrVY5eZfIqv71KkZoudtFD1Zp63_IjMgFkBGIqdSsTfmf_E_sF4tmC7w</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Bulatov, Aleksandr</creator><creator>Marma, Vilius</creator><creator>Bulatova, Natalija</creator><creator>Grigaliūnas, Artūras</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-3296</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Combined manifestation of two geometric visual illusions</title><author>Bulatov, Aleksandr ; Marma, Vilius ; Bulatova, Natalija ; Grigaliūnas, Artūras</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-556a8abc37ed9e19bedc677bb73f944012989483fe9c9a92fffcda6274e13d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bulatov, Aleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marma, Vilius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulatova, Natalija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grigaliūnas, Artūras</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bulatov, Aleksandr</au><au>Marma, Vilius</au><au>Bulatova, Natalija</au><au>Grigaliūnas, Artūras</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined manifestation of two geometric visual illusions</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2456</spage><epage>2474</epage><pages>2456-2474</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>The present study continued to investigate whether the effects of length misperception caused by cross-shaped (formed by two pairs of the oppositely oriented Müller-Lyer wings) contextual distractors can be explained by the combined manifestation of two different (i.e., the Müller-Lyer and filled-space) geometric illusions of extent. In psychophysical experiments, the luminance of one pair of wings was randomly changed, while the luminance of the other pair remained constant. Two different distractor orientations were used—when the wings with constant luminance formed the right side of the cross or the left side, otherwise. To separately evaluate the manifestation of the Müller-Lyer illusion under different luminance conditions, two distracting crosses of the same orientation were attached to the lateral stimulus terminators in the first series of experiments. In the following four series, a single distracting cross (with different orientation) was attached to one of the lateral stimulus terminators and various combinations of the constant and background luminance were used. To interpret the experimental data, we used the basic computational principles of previously developed quantitative models of hypothetical visual mechanisms underlying the emergence of the Müller-Lyer illusion and the filled-space illusion. It was shown that the results of theoretical calculations adequately approximate the experimental curves obtained for all modifications of stimuli, which strongly supports the suggestion that the joint manifestations of these two illusions can be considered among the main factors determining the features of the illusion investigated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>39302598</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-024-02957-9</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-3296</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2024-10, Vol.86 (7), p.2456-2474 |
issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X 1943-393X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3107163065 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Experiments Individual Characteristics Psychology Stimuli Visual Perception |
title | Combined manifestation of two geometric visual illusions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T20%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20manifestation%20of%20two%20geometric%20visual%20illusions&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Bulatov,%20Aleksandr&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2456&rft.epage=2474&rft.pages=2456-2474&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-024-02957-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3107163065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3117674436&rft_id=info:pmid/39302598&rfr_iscdi=true |