Brouwer and Hausdorff: On reassessing the foundations crisis

Epistemological issues associated with Cantorian set theory were at the center of the foundational debates from 1900 onward. Hermann Weyl, as a central actor, saw this as a smoldering crisis that burst into flames after World War I. The historian Herbert Mehrtens argued that this “foundations crisis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science in context 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.395-413
1. Verfasser: Rowe, David E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 413
container_issue 4
container_start_page 395
container_title Science in context
container_volume 35
creator Rowe, David E.
description Epistemological issues associated with Cantorian set theory were at the center of the foundational debates from 1900 onward. Hermann Weyl, as a central actor, saw this as a smoldering crisis that burst into flames after World War I. The historian Herbert Mehrtens argued that this “foundations crisis” was part of a larger conflict that pitted moderns, led by David Hilbert, against various counter-moderns, who opposed the promotion of set theory and trends toward abstract theories. Among counter-moderns, L.E.J. Brouwer went a step further by proposing new foundational principles based on his philosophy of intuitionism. Meanwhile, Felix Hausdorff emerged as a leading proponent of the new modern style. In this essay, I offer a reassessment of the foundations crisis that stresses the marginal importance of the various intellectual issues involved. Instead, I offer an interpretation that focuses on tensions within the German mathematical community that led to a dramatic power struggle for control of the journal Mathematische Annalen.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0269889724000103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106735218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0269889724000103</cupid><sourcerecordid>3148039046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-662032bf0a9d36d8e1574c97a855414531d1767eb3c423e995b2d6ed4ae248dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8S8OIlut-bFS9a_IJCD-o5bLKTmtJm606C-O9NaVVQPM1hnveZ4SXkmNFzRpm5eKJc2yyzhktKKaNihwyZNDKlWstdMlyv0_V-QA4Q5z2iBdf7ZCAst4oZMyRXNzF07xAT1_jkwXXoQ6yqy2TaJBEcIiDWzSxpXyGpQtd419ahwaSMNdZ4SPYqt0A42s4Rebm7fR4_pJPp_eP4epKWXKk21ZpTwYuKOuuF9hkwZWRpjcuUkkwqwTwz2kAhSskFWKsK7jV46YDLzJdiRM423lUMbx1gmy9rLGGxcA2EDnPBqDZCcZb16OkvdB662PTf9ZTMqLBU6p5iG6qMATFCla9ivXTxI2c0X1eb_6m2z5xszV2xBP-d-OqyB8RW6pZFrP0Mfm7_r_0E26WAuw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3148039046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brouwer and Hausdorff: On reassessing the foundations crisis</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Rowe, David E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rowe, David E.</creatorcontrib><description>Epistemological issues associated with Cantorian set theory were at the center of the foundational debates from 1900 onward. Hermann Weyl, as a central actor, saw this as a smoldering crisis that burst into flames after World War I. The historian Herbert Mehrtens argued that this “foundations crisis” was part of a larger conflict that pitted moderns, led by David Hilbert, against various counter-moderns, who opposed the promotion of set theory and trends toward abstract theories. Among counter-moderns, L.E.J. Brouwer went a step further by proposing new foundational principles based on his philosophy of intuitionism. Meanwhile, Felix Hausdorff emerged as a leading proponent of the new modern style. In this essay, I offer a reassessment of the foundations crisis that stresses the marginal importance of the various intellectual issues involved. Instead, I offer an interpretation that focuses on tensions within the German mathematical community that led to a dramatic power struggle for control of the journal Mathematische Annalen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8897</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0269889724000103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39295177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Applied mathematics ; Crises ; Epistemology ; Foundations ; Mathematicians ; Modernism ; Set theory ; Smoldering</subject><ispartof>Science in context, 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.395-413</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-662032bf0a9d36d8e1574c97a855414531d1767eb3c423e995b2d6ed4ae248dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0269889724000103/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39295177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rowe, David E.</creatorcontrib><title>Brouwer and Hausdorff: On reassessing the foundations crisis</title><title>Science in context</title><addtitle>Sci Context</addtitle><description>Epistemological issues associated with Cantorian set theory were at the center of the foundational debates from 1900 onward. Hermann Weyl, as a central actor, saw this as a smoldering crisis that burst into flames after World War I. The historian Herbert Mehrtens argued that this “foundations crisis” was part of a larger conflict that pitted moderns, led by David Hilbert, against various counter-moderns, who opposed the promotion of set theory and trends toward abstract theories. Among counter-moderns, L.E.J. Brouwer went a step further by proposing new foundational principles based on his philosophy of intuitionism. Meanwhile, Felix Hausdorff emerged as a leading proponent of the new modern style. In this essay, I offer a reassessment of the foundations crisis that stresses the marginal importance of the various intellectual issues involved. Instead, I offer an interpretation that focuses on tensions within the German mathematical community that led to a dramatic power struggle for control of the journal Mathematische Annalen.</description><subject>Applied mathematics</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Foundations</subject><subject>Mathematicians</subject><subject>Modernism</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Smoldering</subject><issn>0269-8897</issn><issn>1474-0664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8S8OIlut-bFS9a_IJCD-o5bLKTmtJm606C-O9NaVVQPM1hnveZ4SXkmNFzRpm5eKJc2yyzhktKKaNihwyZNDKlWstdMlyv0_V-QA4Q5z2iBdf7ZCAst4oZMyRXNzF07xAT1_jkwXXoQ6yqy2TaJBEcIiDWzSxpXyGpQtd419ahwaSMNdZ4SPYqt0A42s4Rebm7fR4_pJPp_eP4epKWXKk21ZpTwYuKOuuF9hkwZWRpjcuUkkwqwTwz2kAhSskFWKsK7jV46YDLzJdiRM423lUMbx1gmy9rLGGxcA2EDnPBqDZCcZb16OkvdB662PTf9ZTMqLBU6p5iG6qMATFCla9ivXTxI2c0X1eb_6m2z5xszV2xBP-d-OqyB8RW6pZFrP0Mfm7_r_0E26WAuw</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Rowe, David E.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Brouwer and Hausdorff: On reassessing the foundations crisis</title><author>Rowe, David E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-662032bf0a9d36d8e1574c97a855414531d1767eb3c423e995b2d6ed4ae248dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Applied mathematics</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Foundations</topic><topic>Mathematicians</topic><topic>Modernism</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Smoldering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rowe, David E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science in context</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rowe, David E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brouwer and Hausdorff: On reassessing the foundations crisis</atitle><jtitle>Science in context</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Context</addtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>395-413</pages><issn>0269-8897</issn><eissn>1474-0664</eissn><abstract>Epistemological issues associated with Cantorian set theory were at the center of the foundational debates from 1900 onward. Hermann Weyl, as a central actor, saw this as a smoldering crisis that burst into flames after World War I. The historian Herbert Mehrtens argued that this “foundations crisis” was part of a larger conflict that pitted moderns, led by David Hilbert, against various counter-moderns, who opposed the promotion of set theory and trends toward abstract theories. Among counter-moderns, L.E.J. Brouwer went a step further by proposing new foundational principles based on his philosophy of intuitionism. Meanwhile, Felix Hausdorff emerged as a leading proponent of the new modern style. In this essay, I offer a reassessment of the foundations crisis that stresses the marginal importance of the various intellectual issues involved. Instead, I offer an interpretation that focuses on tensions within the German mathematical community that led to a dramatic power struggle for control of the journal Mathematische Annalen.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>39295177</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0269889724000103</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8897
ispartof Science in context, 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.395-413
issn 0269-8897
1474-0664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106735218
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Applied mathematics
Crises
Epistemology
Foundations
Mathematicians
Modernism
Set theory
Smoldering
title Brouwer and Hausdorff: On reassessing the foundations crisis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A02%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brouwer%20and%20Hausdorff:%20On%20reassessing%20the%20foundations%20crisis&rft.jtitle=Science%20in%20context&rft.au=Rowe,%20David%20E.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=395-413&rft.issn=0269-8897&rft.eissn=1474-0664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0269889724000103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3148039046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3148039046&rft_id=info:pmid/39295177&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0269889724000103&rfr_iscdi=true