Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG

This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 2024-11, Vol.204, p.109002, Article 109002
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Zhou, Xue, Li, Xu, Weidong, Liu, Jun, Jia, Qi, Liu, Yawen, Zhou, Lu, Hu, Jianghua, Li, Hao, Wu, Jidong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109002
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 204
creator Yu, Zhou
Xue, Li
Xu, Weidong
Liu, Jun
Jia, Qi
Liu, Yawen
Zhou, Lu
Hu, Jianghua
Li, Hao
Wu, Jidong
description This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies. [Display omitted] •ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106731885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393224002173</els_id><sourcerecordid>3106731885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-67891f436eb9e44004ca47779a9c088c5f8d7ac781d9589ea2e50de8e5c5b2673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl5eQbISNx1z6SXZCCLjKIgi6Dpk0tMxQ6epOa2Xtzcy6sKVq0Dy5f_P-Qg54WzKGS_PVtMOxhh6_HDPoQ1Lb6eCiTw9asbEFplwVclMFjzfJpN0ozKppdgj-4grxlheCLVL9qQWWpZSTcjDXYqzLY2AfegQkA6BOrsOY9PaJdDBxiUMSN_88Exr3zQQoRsovPcBxwgU_bJDurAINQ0dnc3mh2SnsS3C0fd5QJ6uZo-X19nt_fzm8uI2c6LkQ1ZWSvMmlyUsNOR5Gs3ZvKoqbbVjSrmiUXVlXaV4rQulwQooWA0KClcsRFnJA3K6ye1jeBkBB7P26KBtbQdhRCM5SxRXqkjo-QZ1MSBGaEwf_drGD8OZ-dJqVuavVvOl1Wy0poDj765xsYb69_uPxwRcbwBIG796iAadh85B7SO4wdTB_7frE3OolBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106731885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yu, Zhou ; Xue, Li ; Xu, Weidong ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Qi ; Liu, Yawen ; Zhou, Lu ; Hu, Jianghua ; Li, Hao ; Wu, Jidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhou ; Xue, Li ; Xu, Weidong ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Qi ; Liu, Yawen ; Zhou, Lu ; Hu, Jianghua ; Li, Hao ; Wu, Jidong</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies. [Display omitted] •ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39293638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Camouflage target exposure signs ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology ; Female ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Humans ; LSTM ; Male ; Neural Networks, Computer ; P300 ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Source localization ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2024-11, Vol.204, p.109002, Article 109002</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-67891f436eb9e44004ca47779a9c088c5f8d7ac781d9589ea2e50de8e5c5b2673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002173$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39293638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jidong</creatorcontrib><title>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies. [Display omitted] •ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Camouflage target exposure signs</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LSTM</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>P300</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Source localization</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl5eQbISNx1z6SXZCCLjKIgi6Dpk0tMxQ6epOa2Xtzcy6sKVq0Dy5f_P-Qg54WzKGS_PVtMOxhh6_HDPoQ1Lb6eCiTw9asbEFplwVclMFjzfJpN0ozKppdgj-4grxlheCLVL9qQWWpZSTcjDXYqzLY2AfegQkA6BOrsOY9PaJdDBxiUMSN_88Exr3zQQoRsovPcBxwgU_bJDurAINQ0dnc3mh2SnsS3C0fd5QJ6uZo-X19nt_fzm8uI2c6LkQ1ZWSvMmlyUsNOR5Gs3ZvKoqbbVjSrmiUXVlXaV4rQulwQooWA0KClcsRFnJA3K6ye1jeBkBB7P26KBtbQdhRCM5SxRXqkjo-QZ1MSBGaEwf_drGD8OZ-dJqVuavVvOl1Wy0poDj765xsYb69_uPxwRcbwBIG796iAadh85B7SO4wdTB_7frE3OolBQ</recordid><startdate>20241105</startdate><enddate>20241105</enddate><creator>Yu, Zhou</creator><creator>Xue, Li</creator><creator>Xu, Weidong</creator><creator>Liu, Jun</creator><creator>Jia, Qi</creator><creator>Liu, Yawen</creator><creator>Zhou, Lu</creator><creator>Hu, Jianghua</creator><creator>Li, Hao</creator><creator>Wu, Jidong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241105</creationdate><title>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</title><author>Yu, Zhou ; Xue, Li ; Xu, Weidong ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Qi ; Liu, Yawen ; Zhou, Lu ; Hu, Jianghua ; Li, Hao ; Wu, Jidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-67891f436eb9e44004ca47779a9c088c5f8d7ac781d9589ea2e50de8e5c5b2673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Camouflage target exposure signs</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LSTM</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>P300</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Source localization</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jidong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Zhou</au><au>Xue, Li</au><au>Xu, Weidong</au><au>Liu, Jun</au><au>Jia, Qi</au><au>Liu, Yawen</au><au>Zhou, Lu</au><au>Hu, Jianghua</au><au>Li, Hao</au><au>Wu, Jidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2024-11-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>204</volume><spage>109002</spage><pages>109002-</pages><artnum>109002</artnum><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies. [Display omitted] •ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39293638</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2024-11, Vol.204, p.109002, Article 109002
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106731885
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
Camouflage target exposure signs
EEG
Electroencephalography
Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology
Female
Functional Laterality - physiology
Humans
LSTM
Male
Neural Networks, Computer
P300
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Photic Stimulation
Source localization
Young Adult
title Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A21%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20responses%20to%20camouflage%20targets%20with%20different%20exposure%20signs%20based%20on%20EEG&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Yu,%20Zhou&rft.date=2024-11-05&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=109002&rft.pages=109002-&rft.artnum=109002&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106731885%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106731885&rft_id=info:pmid/39293638&rft_els_id=S0028393224002173&rfr_iscdi=true