Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG
This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychologia 2024-11, Vol.204, p.109002, Article 109002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109002 |
container_title | Neuropsychologia |
container_volume | 204 |
creator | Yu, Zhou Xue, Li Xu, Weidong Liu, Jun Jia, Qi Liu, Yawen Zhou, Lu Hu, Jianghua Li, Hao Wu, Jidong |
description | This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies.
[Display omitted]
•ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106731885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393224002173</els_id><sourcerecordid>3106731885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-67891f436eb9e44004ca47779a9c088c5f8d7ac781d9589ea2e50de8e5c5b2673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl5eQbISNx1z6SXZCCLjKIgi6Dpk0tMxQ6epOa2Xtzcy6sKVq0Dy5f_P-Qg54WzKGS_PVtMOxhh6_HDPoQ1Lb6eCiTw9asbEFplwVclMFjzfJpN0ozKppdgj-4grxlheCLVL9qQWWpZSTcjDXYqzLY2AfegQkA6BOrsOY9PaJdDBxiUMSN_88Exr3zQQoRsovPcBxwgU_bJDurAINQ0dnc3mh2SnsS3C0fd5QJ6uZo-X19nt_fzm8uI2c6LkQ1ZWSvMmlyUsNOR5Gs3ZvKoqbbVjSrmiUXVlXaV4rQulwQooWA0KClcsRFnJA3K6ye1jeBkBB7P26KBtbQdhRCM5SxRXqkjo-QZ1MSBGaEwf_drGD8OZ-dJqVuavVvOl1Wy0poDj765xsYb69_uPxwRcbwBIG796iAadh85B7SO4wdTB_7frE3OolBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106731885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yu, Zhou ; Xue, Li ; Xu, Weidong ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Qi ; Liu, Yawen ; Zhou, Lu ; Hu, Jianghua ; Li, Hao ; Wu, Jidong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhou ; Xue, Li ; Xu, Weidong ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Qi ; Liu, Yawen ; Zhou, Lu ; Hu, Jianghua ; Li, Hao ; Wu, Jidong</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies.
[Display omitted]
•ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39293638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Camouflage target exposure signs ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology ; Female ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Humans ; LSTM ; Male ; Neural Networks, Computer ; P300 ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Source localization ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2024-11, Vol.204, p.109002, Article 109002</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-67891f436eb9e44004ca47779a9c088c5f8d7ac781d9589ea2e50de8e5c5b2673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393224002173$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39293638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jidong</creatorcontrib><title>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies.
[Display omitted]
•ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Camouflage target exposure signs</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LSTM</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>P300</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Source localization</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtKxDAUhoMoOl5eQbISNx1z6SXZCCLjKIgi6Dpk0tMxQ6epOa2Xtzcy6sKVq0Dy5f_P-Qg54WzKGS_PVtMOxhh6_HDPoQ1Lb6eCiTw9asbEFplwVclMFjzfJpN0ozKppdgj-4grxlheCLVL9qQWWpZSTcjDXYqzLY2AfegQkA6BOrsOY9PaJdDBxiUMSN_88Exr3zQQoRsovPcBxwgU_bJDurAINQ0dnc3mh2SnsS3C0fd5QJ6uZo-X19nt_fzm8uI2c6LkQ1ZWSvMmlyUsNOR5Gs3ZvKoqbbVjSrmiUXVlXaV4rQulwQooWA0KClcsRFnJA3K6ye1jeBkBB7P26KBtbQdhRCM5SxRXqkjo-QZ1MSBGaEwf_drGD8OZ-dJqVuavVvOl1Wy0poDj765xsYb69_uPxwRcbwBIG796iAadh85B7SO4wdTB_7frE3OolBQ</recordid><startdate>20241105</startdate><enddate>20241105</enddate><creator>Yu, Zhou</creator><creator>Xue, Li</creator><creator>Xu, Weidong</creator><creator>Liu, Jun</creator><creator>Jia, Qi</creator><creator>Liu, Yawen</creator><creator>Zhou, Lu</creator><creator>Hu, Jianghua</creator><creator>Li, Hao</creator><creator>Wu, Jidong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241105</creationdate><title>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</title><author>Yu, Zhou ; Xue, Li ; Xu, Weidong ; Liu, Jun ; Jia, Qi ; Liu, Yawen ; Zhou, Lu ; Hu, Jianghua ; Li, Hao ; Wu, Jidong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-67891f436eb9e44004ca47779a9c088c5f8d7ac781d9589ea2e50de8e5c5b2673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Camouflage target exposure signs</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LSTM</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>P300</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Source localization</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yawen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jidong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Zhou</au><au>Xue, Li</au><au>Xu, Weidong</au><au>Liu, Jun</au><au>Jia, Qi</au><au>Liu, Yawen</au><au>Zhou, Lu</au><au>Hu, Jianghua</au><au>Li, Hao</au><au>Wu, Jidong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2024-11-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>204</volume><spage>109002</spage><pages>109002-</pages><artnum>109002</artnum><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the relationship between various target exposure signs and brain activation patterns by analyzing the EEG signals of 35 subjects observing four types of targets: well-camouflaged, with large color differences, with shadows, and of large size. Through ERP analysis and source localization, we have established that different exposure signs elicit distinct brain activation patterns. The ERP analysis revealed a strong correlation between the latency of the P300 component and the visibility of the exposure signs. Furthermore, our source localization findings indicate that exposure signs alter the current density distribution within the cortex, with shadows causing significantly higher activation in the frontal lobe compared to other conditions. The study also uncovered a pronounced right-brain laterality in subjects during target identification. By employing an LSTM neural network, we successfully differentiated EEG signals triggered by various exposure signs, achieving a classification accuracy of up to 96.4%. These results not only suggest that analyzing the P300 latency and cortical current distribution can differentiate the degree of visibility of target exposure signs, but also demonstrate the potential of using EEG characteristics to identify key exposure signs in camouflaged targets. This provides crucial insights for developing auxiliary camouflage strategies.
[Display omitted]
•ERP analysis and source localization methods demonstrated the brain activation patterns vary under different exposure signs.•A strong correlation was found between the latency of the P300 and the degree of visibility of target exposure signs.•Different exposure signs lead to changes in cortical current density distribution.•The LSTM neural network effectively distinguishes EEG signals induced by different exposure signs with accuracy of 96.4%.•Depth information caused by shadows results in higher brain activation levels.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39293638</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-3932 |
ispartof | Neuropsychologia, 2024-11, Vol.204, p.109002, Article 109002 |
issn | 0028-3932 1873-3514 1873-3514 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106731885 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Brain - physiology Brain Mapping Camouflage target exposure signs EEG Electroencephalography Event-Related Potentials, P300 - physiology Female Functional Laterality - physiology Humans LSTM Male Neural Networks, Computer P300 Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation Source localization Young Adult |
title | Neural responses to camouflage targets with different exposure signs based on EEG |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A21%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20responses%20to%20camouflage%20targets%20with%20different%20exposure%20signs%20based%20on%20EEG&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Yu,%20Zhou&rft.date=2024-11-05&rft.volume=204&rft.spage=109002&rft.pages=109002-&rft.artnum=109002&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106731885%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106731885&rft_id=info:pmid/39293638&rft_els_id=S0028393224002173&rfr_iscdi=true |