Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal cardiovascular imaging 2024-12, Vol.26 (1), p.80-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 88 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | European heart journal cardiovascular imaging |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Wang, Tom Kai Ming Kocyigit, Duygu Chan, Nicholas Salam, Donna Turkmani, Mustafa Bullen, Jennifer Popović, Zoran B Nguyen, Christopher Griffin, Brian P Tang, W H Wilson Kwon, Deborah H |
description | Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM.
NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P < 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF.
RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ehjci/jeae233 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106458838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106458838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-c2f4b9c85628104ad6522fb0b6a5dc601db0233cc5ff019d35e52f2eb01eb23b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EolXpyIo8soT6kaTJiCpeUiUYYI78OLeuGru1nUrZ-cMJbeGWO-k-_XT3IXRLyQMlNZ_BeqPsbAMCGOcXaMxIPs9YTtnl_0zyEZrGuCFDFXmZM3qNRrxmVUVoPUbfH8GvnI82YuE03gXQViUfIvYGB7taJ3wAl4JV3VYErPtoOqeS9Q7LHu874ZJNItkDYCWCtkLhVqwcJKtwgOidcAqwddh5l9mo1gLaYXVkfdv7nUjr_gZdGbGNMD33Cfp6fvpcvGbL95e3xeMyU3Rep0wxk8taVUXJKkpyocuCMSOJLEWhVUmolmTwoFRhzPCc5gUUzDCQhIJkXPIJuj_l7oLfdxBT0w4nwXYrHPguNpySMi-qilcDmp1QFXyMAUyzC7YVoW8oaX7dN0f3zdn9wN-dozvZgv6n_0zzH0VIhWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106458838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wang, Tom Kai Ming ; Kocyigit, Duygu ; Chan, Nicholas ; Salam, Donna ; Turkmani, Mustafa ; Bullen, Jennifer ; Popović, Zoran B ; Nguyen, Christopher ; Griffin, Brian P ; Tang, W H Wilson ; Kwon, Deborah H</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tom Kai Ming ; Kocyigit, Duygu ; Chan, Nicholas ; Salam, Donna ; Turkmani, Mustafa ; Bullen, Jennifer ; Popović, Zoran B ; Nguyen, Christopher ; Griffin, Brian P ; Tang, W H Wilson ; Kwon, Deborah H</creatorcontrib><description>Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM.
NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P < 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF.
RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-2404</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2047-2412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-2412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39288019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging ; Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Stroke Volume - physiology ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging, 2024-12, Vol.26 (1), p.80-88</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-c2f4b9c85628104ad6522fb0b6a5dc601db0233cc5ff019d35e52f2eb01eb23b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5403-2935 ; 0000-0001-5570-9402 ; 0000-0001-5547-0235 ; 0000-0003-2191-4111</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39288019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocyigit, Duygu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salam, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkmani, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Zoran B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Brian P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, W H Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Deborah H</creatorcontrib><title>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</title><title>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM.
NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P < 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF.
RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><issn>2047-2404</issn><issn>2047-2412</issn><issn>2047-2412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EolXpyIo8soT6kaTJiCpeUiUYYI78OLeuGru1nUrZ-cMJbeGWO-k-_XT3IXRLyQMlNZ_BeqPsbAMCGOcXaMxIPs9YTtnl_0zyEZrGuCFDFXmZM3qNRrxmVUVoPUbfH8GvnI82YuE03gXQViUfIvYGB7taJ3wAl4JV3VYErPtoOqeS9Q7LHu874ZJNItkDYCWCtkLhVqwcJKtwgOidcAqwddh5l9mo1gLaYXVkfdv7nUjr_gZdGbGNMD33Cfp6fvpcvGbL95e3xeMyU3Rep0wxk8taVUXJKkpyocuCMSOJLEWhVUmolmTwoFRhzPCc5gUUzDCQhIJkXPIJuj_l7oLfdxBT0w4nwXYrHPguNpySMi-qilcDmp1QFXyMAUyzC7YVoW8oaX7dN0f3zdn9wN-dozvZgv6n_0zzH0VIhWE</recordid><startdate>20241231</startdate><enddate>20241231</enddate><creator>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</creator><creator>Kocyigit, Duygu</creator><creator>Chan, Nicholas</creator><creator>Salam, Donna</creator><creator>Turkmani, Mustafa</creator><creator>Bullen, Jennifer</creator><creator>Popović, Zoran B</creator><creator>Nguyen, Christopher</creator><creator>Griffin, Brian P</creator><creator>Tang, W H Wilson</creator><creator>Kwon, Deborah H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-2935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-9402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-4111</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241231</creationdate><title>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</title><author>Wang, Tom Kai Ming ; Kocyigit, Duygu ; Chan, Nicholas ; Salam, Donna ; Turkmani, Mustafa ; Bullen, Jennifer ; Popović, Zoran B ; Nguyen, Christopher ; Griffin, Brian P ; Tang, W H Wilson ; Kwon, Deborah H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-c2f4b9c85628104ad6522fb0b6a5dc601db0233cc5ff019d35e52f2eb01eb23b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocyigit, Duygu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salam, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkmani, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Zoran B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Brian P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, W H Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Deborah H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</au><au>Kocyigit, Duygu</au><au>Chan, Nicholas</au><au>Salam, Donna</au><au>Turkmani, Mustafa</au><au>Bullen, Jennifer</au><au>Popović, Zoran B</au><au>Nguyen, Christopher</au><au>Griffin, Brian P</au><au>Tang, W H Wilson</au><au>Kwon, Deborah H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2024-12-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>80-88</pages><issn>2047-2404</issn><issn>2047-2412</issn><eissn>2047-2412</eissn><abstract>Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM.
NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P < 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF.
RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39288019</pmid><doi>10.1093/ehjci/jeae233</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-2935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-9402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-4111</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-2404 |
ispartof | European heart journal cardiovascular imaging, 2024-12, Vol.26 (1), p.80-88 |
issn | 2047-2404 2047-2412 2047-2412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106458838 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
subjects | Aged Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology Cohort Studies Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods Male Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Prognosis Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment Stroke Volume - physiology Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology |
title | Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognosis%20and%20predictors%20of%20right%20ventricular%20dysfunction%20by%20quantitative%20cardiac%20magnetic%20resonance%20in%20non-ischaemic%20cardiomyopathy&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal%20cardiovascular%20imaging&rft.au=Wang,%20Tom%20Kai%20Ming&rft.date=2024-12-31&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=80-88&rft.issn=2047-2404&rft.eissn=2047-2412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ehjci/jeae233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106458838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106458838&rft_id=info:pmid/39288019&rfr_iscdi=true |