Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal cardiovascular imaging 2024-12, Vol.26 (1), p.80-88
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Tom Kai Ming, Kocyigit, Duygu, Chan, Nicholas, Salam, Donna, Turkmani, Mustafa, Bullen, Jennifer, Popović, Zoran B, Nguyen, Christopher, Griffin, Brian P, Tang, W H Wilson, Kwon, Deborah H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title European heart journal cardiovascular imaging
container_volume 26
creator Wang, Tom Kai Ming
Kocyigit, Duygu
Chan, Nicholas
Salam, Donna
Turkmani, Mustafa
Bullen, Jennifer
Popović, Zoran B
Nguyen, Christopher
Griffin, Brian P
Tang, W H Wilson
Kwon, Deborah H
description Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM. NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P < 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF. RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ehjci/jeae233
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106458838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106458838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-c2f4b9c85628104ad6522fb0b6a5dc601db0233cc5ff019d35e52f2eb01eb23b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EolXpyIo8soT6kaTJiCpeUiUYYI78OLeuGru1nUrZ-cMJbeGWO-k-_XT3IXRLyQMlNZ_BeqPsbAMCGOcXaMxIPs9YTtnl_0zyEZrGuCFDFXmZM3qNRrxmVUVoPUbfH8GvnI82YuE03gXQViUfIvYGB7taJ3wAl4JV3VYErPtoOqeS9Q7LHu874ZJNItkDYCWCtkLhVqwcJKtwgOidcAqwddh5l9mo1gLaYXVkfdv7nUjr_gZdGbGNMD33Cfp6fvpcvGbL95e3xeMyU3Rep0wxk8taVUXJKkpyocuCMSOJLEWhVUmolmTwoFRhzPCc5gUUzDCQhIJkXPIJuj_l7oLfdxBT0w4nwXYrHPguNpySMi-qilcDmp1QFXyMAUyzC7YVoW8oaX7dN0f3zdn9wN-dozvZgv6n_0zzH0VIhWE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106458838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wang, Tom Kai Ming ; Kocyigit, Duygu ; Chan, Nicholas ; Salam, Donna ; Turkmani, Mustafa ; Bullen, Jennifer ; Popović, Zoran B ; Nguyen, Christopher ; Griffin, Brian P ; Tang, W H Wilson ; Kwon, Deborah H</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tom Kai Ming ; Kocyigit, Duygu ; Chan, Nicholas ; Salam, Donna ; Turkmani, Mustafa ; Bullen, Jennifer ; Popović, Zoran B ; Nguyen, Christopher ; Griffin, Brian P ; Tang, W H Wilson ; Kwon, Deborah H</creatorcontrib><description>Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM. NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P &lt; 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF. RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-2404</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2047-2412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-2412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39288019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging ; Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Stroke Volume - physiology ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging, 2024-12, Vol.26 (1), p.80-88</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-c2f4b9c85628104ad6522fb0b6a5dc601db0233cc5ff019d35e52f2eb01eb23b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5403-2935 ; 0000-0001-5570-9402 ; 0000-0001-5547-0235 ; 0000-0003-2191-4111</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39288019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocyigit, Duygu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salam, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkmani, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Zoran B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Brian P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, W H Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Deborah H</creatorcontrib><title>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</title><title>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM. NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P &lt; 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF. RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</subject><issn>2047-2404</issn><issn>2047-2412</issn><issn>2047-2412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kLtPwzAQhy0EolXpyIo8soT6kaTJiCpeUiUYYI78OLeuGru1nUrZ-cMJbeGWO-k-_XT3IXRLyQMlNZ_BeqPsbAMCGOcXaMxIPs9YTtnl_0zyEZrGuCFDFXmZM3qNRrxmVUVoPUbfH8GvnI82YuE03gXQViUfIvYGB7taJ3wAl4JV3VYErPtoOqeS9Q7LHu874ZJNItkDYCWCtkLhVqwcJKtwgOidcAqwddh5l9mo1gLaYXVkfdv7nUjr_gZdGbGNMD33Cfp6fvpcvGbL95e3xeMyU3Rep0wxk8taVUXJKkpyocuCMSOJLEWhVUmolmTwoFRhzPCc5gUUzDCQhIJkXPIJuj_l7oLfdxBT0w4nwXYrHPguNpySMi-qilcDmp1QFXyMAUyzC7YVoW8oaX7dN0f3zdn9wN-dozvZgv6n_0zzH0VIhWE</recordid><startdate>20241231</startdate><enddate>20241231</enddate><creator>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</creator><creator>Kocyigit, Duygu</creator><creator>Chan, Nicholas</creator><creator>Salam, Donna</creator><creator>Turkmani, Mustafa</creator><creator>Bullen, Jennifer</creator><creator>Popović, Zoran B</creator><creator>Nguyen, Christopher</creator><creator>Griffin, Brian P</creator><creator>Tang, W H Wilson</creator><creator>Kwon, Deborah H</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-2935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-9402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-4111</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241231</creationdate><title>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</title><author>Wang, Tom Kai Ming ; Kocyigit, Duygu ; Chan, Nicholas ; Salam, Donna ; Turkmani, Mustafa ; Bullen, Jennifer ; Popović, Zoran B ; Nguyen, Christopher ; Griffin, Brian P ; Tang, W H Wilson ; Kwon, Deborah H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c179t-c2f4b9c85628104ad6522fb0b6a5dc601db0233cc5ff019d35e52f2eb01eb23b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocyigit, Duygu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salam, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkmani, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullen, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popović, Zoran B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Brian P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, W H Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Deborah H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Tom Kai Ming</au><au>Kocyigit, Duygu</au><au>Chan, Nicholas</au><au>Salam, Donna</au><au>Turkmani, Mustafa</au><au>Bullen, Jennifer</au><au>Popović, Zoran B</au><au>Nguyen, Christopher</au><au>Griffin, Brian P</au><au>Tang, W H Wilson</au><au>Kwon, Deborah H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy</atitle><jtitle>European heart journal cardiovascular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2024-12-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>80-88</pages><issn>2047-2404</issn><issn>2047-2412</issn><eissn>2047-2412</eissn><abstract>Pathophysiology and prognostic implications of right ventricle (RV) dysfunction in heart failure are complex and incompletely elucidated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the reference standard for RV quantification, but its clinical implications in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), in the context of myocardial fibrosis and functional mitral regurgitation are not well defined. We evaluated predictors, prognostic impact, and thresholds for defining significant RV dysfunction in NICM. NICM patients (n = 624) undergoing CMR assessment during 2002-2017 were retrospectively studied. CMR's quantification of right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) was evaluated against the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, heart transplant, and/or left ventricular assist device implantation in threshold and multivariable analyses. Mean RVEF was 43 ± 13%, and factors associated with reduced RVEF were male sex, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, right bundle branch block, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, higher mitral regurgitant fraction (MR-RF) and right ventricle size in NICM. RVEF per 5% increase was independently associated with the primary endpoint hazards ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.80 (0.73-0.88), P &lt; 0.001. RVEF ≤40% was the optimal threshold associated with worse prognosis, regardless of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or MR-RF quantification. On the other hand, higher LGE was associated with primary endpoint in patients with RVEF ≤ 40% only, while risk associated with MR-RF was significant dampened after adjusting for RVEF. RVEF provides powerful risk stratification, with RVEF ≤ 40% defining significant RV dysfunction associated with adverse outcomes in NICM. The integration of quantitative CMR measurements for RVEF, LGE, and MR-RF provides comprehensive NICM risk prognostication.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39288019</pmid><doi>10.1093/ehjci/jeae233</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-2935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-9402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-0235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-4111</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2047-2404
ispartof European heart journal cardiovascular imaging, 2024-12, Vol.26 (1), p.80-88
issn 2047-2404
2047-2412
2047-2412
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106458838
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Aged
Cardiomyopathies - diagnostic imaging
Cardiomyopathies - physiopathology
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Stroke Volume - physiology
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right - physiopathology
title Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prognosis%20and%20predictors%20of%20right%20ventricular%20dysfunction%20by%20quantitative%20cardiac%20magnetic%20resonance%20in%20non-ischaemic%20cardiomyopathy&rft.jtitle=European%20heart%20journal%20cardiovascular%20imaging&rft.au=Wang,%20Tom%20Kai%20Ming&rft.date=2024-12-31&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=80-88&rft.issn=2047-2404&rft.eissn=2047-2412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ehjci/jeae233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106458838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106458838&rft_id=info:pmid/39288019&rfr_iscdi=true