Addressing challenges in diagnostic X-ray dosimetry: uncertainties and corrections for Al2O3:C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters

The use of Al 2 O 3 :C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) in diagnostic X-ray is a challenge because of their energy dependence (ED) and variability of element sensitivity factors (ESFs). This study aims to develop a method to determine ED and ESFs of Landauer nanoDot™ OSLDs f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine 2024-09, Vol.47 (3), p.821-832
Hauptverfasser: Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding, Ismail, Wan Hazlinda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 832
container_issue 3
container_start_page 821
container_title Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine
container_volume 47
creator Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding
Ismail, Wan Hazlinda
description The use of Al 2 O 3 :C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) in diagnostic X-ray is a challenge because of their energy dependence (ED) and variability of element sensitivity factors (ESFs). This study aims to develop a method to determine ED and ESFs of Landauer nanoDot™ OSLDs for clinical X-ray and investigate the uncertainties associated with ESF and ED correction factors. An area of 2 × 2 cm 2 at the central axis of the X-ray field was used to establish the ESFs. A total of 80 OSLDs were categorized into “controlled” ( n  = 40) and “less-controlled” groups ( n  = 40). The ESFs of the OSLDs were determined using an 80 kVp X-ray beam quality in free-air geometry. The OSLDs were cross-calibrated with an ion chamber to establish the average calibration coefficient and ESFs. The OSLDs were then irradiated at tube potentials ranging from 50 to 150 kVp to determine their ED. The uniformity of the X-ray field was ± 1.5% at 100 cm source-to-surface distance. The batch homogeneities of user-defined ESFs were 2.4% and 8.7% for controlled and less-controlled OSLDs, respectively. The ED of OSLDs ranged from 1.125 to 0.812 as tube potential increased from 50 kVp to 150 kVp. The total uncertainty of OSLDs, without ED correction, could be as high as 16%. After applying ESF and ED correction, the total uncertainties were reduced to 6.3% in controlled OLSDs and 11.6% in less-controlled ones. OSLDs corrected with user-defined ESF and ED can reduce the uncertainty of dose measurements in diagnostic X-rays, particularly in managing less-controlled OSLDs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13246-024-01407-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106026403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106026403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bcbde080dc3bfb1f2e81539559cc410f51f29f616e2dc1b68ac791cec823a8f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoeiYGn7B1wF3LiJzcckM9Pd5aKtUOhGwV3IJGduU2aSa05mMf_Cn2zsVQsuXCUcnvfhcN6mecvZB85Yd41cilZTJlrKeMs6up0150JrQdtOdq_-_sXwprlCfGKMCcV5p9V582PnfQbEEA_EPdp5hngAJCESH-whJizBkW802434hGGBkrcbskYHudgQS6iwjZ64lDO4ElJEMqVMdrN4kDd7OloET9Kxaqp8I9W3rLMtdTivS4iADmL544aMl83ryc4IV7_fi-brp49f9nf0_uH28353T51kstDRjR5Yz7yT4zTySUDPlRyUGpxrOZtUHQ2T5hqEd3zUvXXdwB24XkjbT528aN6fvMecvq-AxSyh7jLPNkJa0UjONBO6ZbKi7_5Bn9KaY93umRItV0pVSpwolxNihskcc1hs3gxn5ldP5tSTqT2Z557MVkPyFMIK18vnF_V_Uj8BBnaZSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106241555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addressing challenges in diagnostic X-ray dosimetry: uncertainties and corrections for Al2O3:C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding ; Ismail, Wan Hazlinda</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding ; Ismail, Wan Hazlinda</creatorcontrib><description>The use of Al 2 O 3 :C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) in diagnostic X-ray is a challenge because of their energy dependence (ED) and variability of element sensitivity factors (ESFs). This study aims to develop a method to determine ED and ESFs of Landauer nanoDot™ OSLDs for clinical X-ray and investigate the uncertainties associated with ESF and ED correction factors. An area of 2 × 2 cm 2 at the central axis of the X-ray field was used to establish the ESFs. A total of 80 OSLDs were categorized into “controlled” ( n  = 40) and “less-controlled” groups ( n  = 40). The ESFs of the OSLDs were determined using an 80 kVp X-ray beam quality in free-air geometry. The OSLDs were cross-calibrated with an ion chamber to establish the average calibration coefficient and ESFs. The OSLDs were then irradiated at tube potentials ranging from 50 to 150 kVp to determine their ED. The uniformity of the X-ray field was ± 1.5% at 100 cm source-to-surface distance. The batch homogeneities of user-defined ESFs were 2.4% and 8.7% for controlled and less-controlled OSLDs, respectively. The ED of OSLDs ranged from 1.125 to 0.812 as tube potential increased from 50 kVp to 150 kVp. The total uncertainty of OSLDs, without ED correction, could be as high as 16%. After applying ESF and ED correction, the total uncertainties were reduced to 6.3% in controlled OLSDs and 11.6% in less-controlled ones. OSLDs corrected with user-defined ESF and ED can reduce the uncertainty of dose measurements in diagnostic X-rays, particularly in managing less-controlled OSLDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2662-4729</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0158-9938</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2662-4737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2662-4737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-5447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01407-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Aluminum oxide ; Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Biophysics ; Diagnostic systems ; Dosimeters ; Ionization chambers ; Medical and Radiation Physics ; Scientific Paper ; Uncertainty ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Australasian physical &amp; engineering sciences in medicine, 2024-09, Vol.47 (3), p.821-832</ispartof><rights>Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bcbde080dc3bfb1f2e81539559cc410f51f29f616e2dc1b68ac791cec823a8f73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8080-1294</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13246-024-01407-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13246-024-01407-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Wan Hazlinda</creatorcontrib><title>Addressing challenges in diagnostic X-ray dosimetry: uncertainties and corrections for Al2O3:C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters</title><title>Australasian physical &amp; engineering sciences in medicine</title><addtitle>Phys Eng Sci Med</addtitle><description>The use of Al 2 O 3 :C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) in diagnostic X-ray is a challenge because of their energy dependence (ED) and variability of element sensitivity factors (ESFs). This study aims to develop a method to determine ED and ESFs of Landauer nanoDot™ OSLDs for clinical X-ray and investigate the uncertainties associated with ESF and ED correction factors. An area of 2 × 2 cm 2 at the central axis of the X-ray field was used to establish the ESFs. A total of 80 OSLDs were categorized into “controlled” ( n  = 40) and “less-controlled” groups ( n  = 40). The ESFs of the OSLDs were determined using an 80 kVp X-ray beam quality in free-air geometry. The OSLDs were cross-calibrated with an ion chamber to establish the average calibration coefficient and ESFs. The OSLDs were then irradiated at tube potentials ranging from 50 to 150 kVp to determine their ED. The uniformity of the X-ray field was ± 1.5% at 100 cm source-to-surface distance. The batch homogeneities of user-defined ESFs were 2.4% and 8.7% for controlled and less-controlled OSLDs, respectively. The ED of OSLDs ranged from 1.125 to 0.812 as tube potential increased from 50 kVp to 150 kVp. The total uncertainty of OSLDs, without ED correction, could be as high as 16%. After applying ESF and ED correction, the total uncertainties were reduced to 6.3% in controlled OLSDs and 11.6% in less-controlled ones. OSLDs corrected with user-defined ESF and ED can reduce the uncertainty of dose measurements in diagnostic X-rays, particularly in managing less-controlled OSLDs.</description><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Dosimeters</subject><subject>Ionization chambers</subject><subject>Medical and Radiation Physics</subject><subject>Scientific Paper</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>2662-4729</issn><issn>0158-9938</issn><issn>2662-4737</issn><issn>2662-4737</issn><issn>1879-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoeiYGn7B1wF3LiJzcckM9Pd5aKtUOhGwV3IJGduU2aSa05mMf_Cn2zsVQsuXCUcnvfhcN6mecvZB85Yd41cilZTJlrKeMs6up0150JrQdtOdq_-_sXwprlCfGKMCcV5p9V582PnfQbEEA_EPdp5hngAJCESH-whJizBkW802434hGGBkrcbskYHudgQS6iwjZ64lDO4ElJEMqVMdrN4kDd7OloET9Kxaqp8I9W3rLMtdTivS4iADmL544aMl83ryc4IV7_fi-brp49f9nf0_uH28353T51kstDRjR5Yz7yT4zTySUDPlRyUGpxrOZtUHQ2T5hqEd3zUvXXdwB24XkjbT528aN6fvMecvq-AxSyh7jLPNkJa0UjONBO6ZbKi7_5Bn9KaY93umRItV0pVSpwolxNihskcc1hs3gxn5ldP5tSTqT2Z557MVkPyFMIK18vnF_V_Uj8BBnaZSg</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding</creator><creator>Ismail, Wan Hazlinda</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8080-1294</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Addressing challenges in diagnostic X-ray dosimetry: uncertainties and corrections for Al2O3:C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters</title><author>Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding ; Ismail, Wan Hazlinda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bcbde080dc3bfb1f2e81539559cc410f51f29f616e2dc1b68ac791cec823a8f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Dosimeters</topic><topic>Ionization chambers</topic><topic>Medical and Radiation Physics</topic><topic>Scientific Paper</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Wan Hazlinda</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australasian physical &amp; engineering sciences in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding</au><au>Ismail, Wan Hazlinda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Addressing challenges in diagnostic X-ray dosimetry: uncertainties and corrections for Al2O3:C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters</atitle><jtitle>Australasian physical &amp; engineering sciences in medicine</jtitle><stitle>Phys Eng Sci Med</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>821</spage><epage>832</epage><pages>821-832</pages><issn>2662-4729</issn><issn>0158-9938</issn><issn>2662-4737</issn><eissn>2662-4737</eissn><eissn>1879-5447</eissn><abstract>The use of Al 2 O 3 :C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLDs) in diagnostic X-ray is a challenge because of their energy dependence (ED) and variability of element sensitivity factors (ESFs). This study aims to develop a method to determine ED and ESFs of Landauer nanoDot™ OSLDs for clinical X-ray and investigate the uncertainties associated with ESF and ED correction factors. An area of 2 × 2 cm 2 at the central axis of the X-ray field was used to establish the ESFs. A total of 80 OSLDs were categorized into “controlled” ( n  = 40) and “less-controlled” groups ( n  = 40). The ESFs of the OSLDs were determined using an 80 kVp X-ray beam quality in free-air geometry. The OSLDs were cross-calibrated with an ion chamber to establish the average calibration coefficient and ESFs. The OSLDs were then irradiated at tube potentials ranging from 50 to 150 kVp to determine their ED. The uniformity of the X-ray field was ± 1.5% at 100 cm source-to-surface distance. The batch homogeneities of user-defined ESFs were 2.4% and 8.7% for controlled and less-controlled OSLDs, respectively. The ED of OSLDs ranged from 1.125 to 0.812 as tube potential increased from 50 kVp to 150 kVp. The total uncertainty of OSLDs, without ED correction, could be as high as 16%. After applying ESF and ED correction, the total uncertainties were reduced to 6.3% in controlled OLSDs and 11.6% in less-controlled ones. OSLDs corrected with user-defined ESF and ED can reduce the uncertainty of dose measurements in diagnostic X-rays, particularly in managing less-controlled OSLDs.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s13246-024-01407-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8080-1294</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2662-4729
ispartof Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, 2024-09, Vol.47 (3), p.821-832
issn 2662-4729
0158-9938
2662-4737
2662-4737
1879-5447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3106026403
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aluminum oxide
Biological and Medical Physics
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Biomedicine
Biophysics
Diagnostic systems
Dosimeters
Ionization chambers
Medical and Radiation Physics
Scientific Paper
Uncertainty
X-rays
title Addressing challenges in diagnostic X-ray dosimetry: uncertainties and corrections for Al2O3:C-based optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T15%3A32%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addressing%20challenges%20in%20diagnostic%20X-ray%20dosimetry:%20uncertainties%20and%20corrections%20for%20Al2O3:C-based%20optically%20stimulated%20luminescent%20dosimeters&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20physical%20&%20engineering%20sciences%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Wong,%20Jeannie%20Hsiu%20Ding&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=821&rft.epage=832&rft.pages=821-832&rft.issn=2662-4729&rft.eissn=2662-4737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13246-024-01407-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106026403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106241555&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true