Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: catheter ablation vs. standard medical therapy — a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The latest guidelines advocate for catheter ablation (CA) over standard medical therapy (SMT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of CA vs. SMT in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart failure reviews 2025-01, Vol.30 (1), p.1-15
Hauptverfasser: Mahalleh, Mehrdad, Soleimani, Hamidreza, Pazoki, Mohammadreza, Maleki, Saba, Dastjerdi, Parham, Ebrahimi, Pouya, Zafarmandi, Sahar, Khamene, Sima Shamshiri, Khawajah, Izat Mohammad, Tabassum, Shehroze, Bhardwaj, Rahul, Mattumpuram, Jishanth, Kaplan, Andrew, Vaseghi, Marmar, Seilani, Parisa, Bozorgi, Ali, Hosseini, Kaveh, Tzeis, Stylianos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Heart failure reviews
container_volume 30
creator Mahalleh, Mehrdad
Soleimani, Hamidreza
Pazoki, Mohammadreza
Maleki, Saba
Dastjerdi, Parham
Ebrahimi, Pouya
Zafarmandi, Sahar
Khamene, Sima Shamshiri
Khawajah, Izat Mohammad
Tabassum, Shehroze
Bhardwaj, Rahul
Mattumpuram, Jishanth
Kaplan, Andrew
Vaseghi, Marmar
Seilani, Parisa
Bozorgi, Ali
Hosseini, Kaveh
Tzeis, Stylianos
description Background The latest guidelines advocate for catheter ablation (CA) over standard medical therapy (SMT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of CA vs. SMT in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Embase until February 2024 were systematically searched. Given the limited number of randomized studies, propensity score-matched observational studies comparing CA with SMT in AF patients with HFpEF were also included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Results Eight studies that enrolled 17,717 SMT and 2537 CA patients were included. CA was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.85). The risk of HF hospitalization (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23–0.83), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22–0.84), and AF recurrence (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39–0.73) were also lower in the CA group. Conclusion CA demonstrated significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits compared to SMT in the HFpEF population.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10741-024-10437-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3105492236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3144438704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-313d884534b50f5997c3d33385b1ca5eb7e942b5f6d82908891fd9f8e99748093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi1ERMLABVggS2yy6cTPsc0ORYEgRWIDa8vtLhOP-jHY7olmxyE4QM6Wk-BJh4dYsHKp6vt_u_wj9IqSM0qIOs-UKEEbwkRDieCq4U_QCZWKN4oz9vSv-hg9z3lDCBFGkGfomBumtDHsBN1dgUsFBxf7OQG-jeUGbxNkSDvoMGzAlziNOCS3FG7ssCspuh6H2KbY9-7Qf4u9KzdQIGHXLi28y2c4lypwqcMDdNFXUYWS2-7x_fcf2OG8zwWGinucYBfh9sF_gOIaN7p-n2N-gY6C6zO8fDxX6Mv7y88XV831pw8fL95dN57JdWk45Z3WQnLRShKkMcrzjnOuZUu9k9AqMIK1Mqw7zQzR2tDQmaChkkITw1fodPHdpunbDLnYIWYPdb8RpjlbTokUhjG-ruibf9DNNKf63gMlhOBa1ThWiC2UT1POCYLdpji4tLeU2EN-dsnP1vzsQ36WV9HrR-u5rV_2W_IrsArwBch1NH6F9Ofu_9j-BIoQqG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3144438704</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: catheter ablation vs. standard medical therapy — a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Mahalleh, Mehrdad ; Soleimani, Hamidreza ; Pazoki, Mohammadreza ; Maleki, Saba ; Dastjerdi, Parham ; Ebrahimi, Pouya ; Zafarmandi, Sahar ; Khamene, Sima Shamshiri ; Khawajah, Izat Mohammad ; Tabassum, Shehroze ; Bhardwaj, Rahul ; Mattumpuram, Jishanth ; Kaplan, Andrew ; Vaseghi, Marmar ; Seilani, Parisa ; Bozorgi, Ali ; Hosseini, Kaveh ; Tzeis, Stylianos</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahalleh, Mehrdad ; Soleimani, Hamidreza ; Pazoki, Mohammadreza ; Maleki, Saba ; Dastjerdi, Parham ; Ebrahimi, Pouya ; Zafarmandi, Sahar ; Khamene, Sima Shamshiri ; Khawajah, Izat Mohammad ; Tabassum, Shehroze ; Bhardwaj, Rahul ; Mattumpuram, Jishanth ; Kaplan, Andrew ; Vaseghi, Marmar ; Seilani, Parisa ; Bozorgi, Ali ; Hosseini, Kaveh ; Tzeis, Stylianos</creatorcontrib><description>Background The latest guidelines advocate for catheter ablation (CA) over standard medical therapy (SMT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of CA vs. SMT in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Embase until February 2024 were systematically searched. Given the limited number of randomized studies, propensity score-matched observational studies comparing CA with SMT in AF patients with HFpEF were also included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Results Eight studies that enrolled 17,717 SMT and 2537 CA patients were included. CA was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.85). The risk of HF hospitalization (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23–0.83), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22–0.84), and AF recurrence (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39–0.73) were also lower in the CA group. Conclusion CA demonstrated significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits compared to SMT in the HFpEF population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-7322</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1382-4147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10741-024-10437-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39278992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; Atrial Fibrillation - therapy ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Catheter Ablation - methods ; Catheters ; Congestive heart failure ; Ejection fraction ; Fibrillation ; Heart failure ; Heart Failure - mortality ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-analysis ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Review ; Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><ispartof>Heart failure reviews, 2025-01, Vol.30 (1), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2024 Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jan 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-313d884534b50f5997c3d33385b1ca5eb7e942b5f6d82908891fd9f8e99748093</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9701-9706 ; 0000-0002-6210-2112 ; 0000-0002-3115-5545 ; 0009-0005-3694-6863 ; 0000-0002-6359-3435 ; 0009-0001-0804-7511 ; 0000-0001-5676-3099 ; 0000-0003-2802-4613</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10741-024-10437-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10741-024-10437-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39278992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahalleh, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soleimani, Hamidreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazoki, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleki, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dastjerdi, Parham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, Pouya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafarmandi, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khamene, Sima Shamshiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khawajah, Izat Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabassum, Shehroze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattumpuram, Jishanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seilani, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozorgi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Kaveh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeis, Stylianos</creatorcontrib><title>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: catheter ablation vs. standard medical therapy — a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Heart failure reviews</title><addtitle>Heart Fail Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Heart Fail Rev</addtitle><description>Background The latest guidelines advocate for catheter ablation (CA) over standard medical therapy (SMT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of CA vs. SMT in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Embase until February 2024 were systematically searched. Given the limited number of randomized studies, propensity score-matched observational studies comparing CA with SMT in AF patients with HFpEF were also included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Results Eight studies that enrolled 17,717 SMT and 2537 CA patients were included. CA was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.85). The risk of HF hospitalization (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23–0.83), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22–0.84), and AF recurrence (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39–0.73) were also lower in the CA group. Conclusion CA demonstrated significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits compared to SMT in the HFpEF population.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - methods</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Congestive heart failure</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Fibrillation</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - mortality</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Stroke Volume - physiology</subject><issn>1573-7322</issn><issn>1382-4147</issn><issn>1573-7322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi1ERMLABVggS2yy6cTPsc0ORYEgRWIDa8vtLhOP-jHY7olmxyE4QM6Wk-BJh4dYsHKp6vt_u_wj9IqSM0qIOs-UKEEbwkRDieCq4U_QCZWKN4oz9vSv-hg9z3lDCBFGkGfomBumtDHsBN1dgUsFBxf7OQG-jeUGbxNkSDvoMGzAlziNOCS3FG7ssCspuh6H2KbY9-7Qf4u9KzdQIGHXLi28y2c4lypwqcMDdNFXUYWS2-7x_fcf2OG8zwWGinucYBfh9sF_gOIaN7p-n2N-gY6C6zO8fDxX6Mv7y88XV831pw8fL95dN57JdWk45Z3WQnLRShKkMcrzjnOuZUu9k9AqMIK1Mqw7zQzR2tDQmaChkkITw1fodPHdpunbDLnYIWYPdb8RpjlbTokUhjG-ruibf9DNNKf63gMlhOBa1ThWiC2UT1POCYLdpji4tLeU2EN-dsnP1vzsQ36WV9HrR-u5rV_2W_IrsArwBch1NH6F9Ofu_9j-BIoQqG0</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Mahalleh, Mehrdad</creator><creator>Soleimani, Hamidreza</creator><creator>Pazoki, Mohammadreza</creator><creator>Maleki, Saba</creator><creator>Dastjerdi, Parham</creator><creator>Ebrahimi, Pouya</creator><creator>Zafarmandi, Sahar</creator><creator>Khamene, Sima Shamshiri</creator><creator>Khawajah, Izat Mohammad</creator><creator>Tabassum, Shehroze</creator><creator>Bhardwaj, Rahul</creator><creator>Mattumpuram, Jishanth</creator><creator>Kaplan, Andrew</creator><creator>Vaseghi, Marmar</creator><creator>Seilani, Parisa</creator><creator>Bozorgi, Ali</creator><creator>Hosseini, Kaveh</creator><creator>Tzeis, Stylianos</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-9706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6210-2112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3694-6863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-3435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0804-7511</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-3099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-4613</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: catheter ablation vs. standard medical therapy — a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Mahalleh, Mehrdad ; Soleimani, Hamidreza ; Pazoki, Mohammadreza ; Maleki, Saba ; Dastjerdi, Parham ; Ebrahimi, Pouya ; Zafarmandi, Sahar ; Khamene, Sima Shamshiri ; Khawajah, Izat Mohammad ; Tabassum, Shehroze ; Bhardwaj, Rahul ; Mattumpuram, Jishanth ; Kaplan, Andrew ; Vaseghi, Marmar ; Seilani, Parisa ; Bozorgi, Ali ; Hosseini, Kaveh ; Tzeis, Stylianos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-313d884534b50f5997c3d33385b1ca5eb7e942b5f6d82908891fd9f8e99748093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - therapy</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - methods</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Congestive heart failure</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Fibrillation</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - mortality</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Stroke Volume - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahalleh, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soleimani, Hamidreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazoki, Mohammadreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maleki, Saba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dastjerdi, Parham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ebrahimi, Pouya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafarmandi, Sahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khamene, Sima Shamshiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khawajah, Izat Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabassum, Shehroze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhardwaj, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattumpuram, Jishanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaseghi, Marmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seilani, Parisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozorgi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosseini, Kaveh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzeis, Stylianos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart failure reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahalleh, Mehrdad</au><au>Soleimani, Hamidreza</au><au>Pazoki, Mohammadreza</au><au>Maleki, Saba</au><au>Dastjerdi, Parham</au><au>Ebrahimi, Pouya</au><au>Zafarmandi, Sahar</au><au>Khamene, Sima Shamshiri</au><au>Khawajah, Izat Mohammad</au><au>Tabassum, Shehroze</au><au>Bhardwaj, Rahul</au><au>Mattumpuram, Jishanth</au><au>Kaplan, Andrew</au><au>Vaseghi, Marmar</au><au>Seilani, Parisa</au><au>Bozorgi, Ali</au><au>Hosseini, Kaveh</au><au>Tzeis, Stylianos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: catheter ablation vs. standard medical therapy — a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Heart failure reviews</jtitle><stitle>Heart Fail Rev</stitle><addtitle>Heart Fail Rev</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>1573-7322</issn><issn>1382-4147</issn><eissn>1573-7322</eissn><abstract>Background The latest guidelines advocate for catheter ablation (CA) over standard medical therapy (SMT) for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of CA vs. SMT in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods PubMed, Scopus, and Embase until February 2024 were systematically searched. Given the limited number of randomized studies, propensity score-matched observational studies comparing CA with SMT in AF patients with HFpEF were also included. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization. Results Eight studies that enrolled 17,717 SMT and 2537 CA patients were included. CA was associated with a significantly lower risk of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.85). The risk of HF hospitalization (HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23–0.83), cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22–0.84), and AF recurrence (HR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39–0.73) were also lower in the CA group. Conclusion CA demonstrated significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality benefits compared to SMT in the HFpEF population.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>39278992</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10741-024-10437-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-9706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6210-2112</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3694-6863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-3435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0804-7511</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-3099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-4613</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1573-7322
ispartof Heart failure reviews, 2025-01, Vol.30 (1), p.1-15
issn 1573-7322
1382-4147
1573-7322
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3105492236
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Ablation
Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation - surgery
Atrial Fibrillation - therapy
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiology
Cardiovascular diseases
Catheter Ablation - methods
Catheters
Congestive heart failure
Ejection fraction
Fibrillation
Heart failure
Heart Failure - mortality
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Hospitalization
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Morbidity
Mortality
Radiofrequency ablation
Review
Stroke Volume - physiology
title Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation: catheter ablation vs. standard medical therapy — a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T07%3A38%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heart%20failure%20with%20preserved%20ejection%20fraction%20and%20atrial%20fibrillation:%20catheter%20ablation%20vs.%20standard%20medical%20therapy%20%E2%80%94%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Heart%20failure%20reviews&rft.au=Mahalleh,%20Mehrdad&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=1573-7322&rft.eissn=1573-7322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10741-024-10437-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3144438704%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3144438704&rft_id=info:pmid/39278992&rfr_iscdi=true