Variability in Profiles and Prevalences of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Analysis
An increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is observed worldwide, partly due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which are ineffective in certain population subgroups. This negatively impacts both the healthcare system and patients. Our study aimed to investigate the current AMR profiles fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2024-09, Vol.13 (17), p.5311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 5311 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Nedbal, Carlotta Mahobia, Nitin Browning, Dave Somani, Bhaskar Kumar |
description | An increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is observed worldwide, partly due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which are ineffective in certain population subgroups. This negatively impacts both the healthcare system and patients. Our study aimed to investigate the current AMR profiles for the most commonly used antibiotics in treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB) across different age and gender subpopulations. By doing so, we provide valuable information for doctors managing prophylactic and empiric therapeutic treatments.
We retrospectively analysed over 650,000 urine cultures collected in the Microbiology Department of a referral university hospital in Southern England from January 2014 to December 2022. A population-based analysis for subgroups was performed to rule out differences in AMR patterns. Our report was recorded at UHS as an internal audit (UHS7670).
146,867 cultures were found positive for GNB growth. Nitrofurantoin showed the best sensitivity patterns for all age subgroups (0.93% for patients aged ≤ 18; 1.22% for patients aged 19-40; 2.17% for patients aged 40-60; and 3.48% for patients aged > 60), regardless of gender (male: 6.37%, female: 2.59%). Ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim showed a poor AMR profile for all age groups (>55% and >28%, respectively) and genders (>60% and >28%, respectively). All the other tested antibiotics (cefalexin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, co-amoxiclav, gentamicin) showed an overall good profile for GNB resistance across all subgroups. For all antibiotics except trimethoprim, the risk of developing AMR was significantly higher in the male population. We also found that people aged over 60 had a higher risk of AMR compared to the other age groups for all antibiotics, with the exception of cefotaxime and co-amoxiclav.
With an overall rise in resistance patterns for GNB-related UTIs, certain antibiotics-particularly ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim-now exhibit very poor sensitivity profiles. However, antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and gentamicin remain excellent options for empirically treating UTIs. It is important to note that AMR can vary across different populations, with higher resistance often found in elderly and male patients. Clinicians must stay informed about current guidelines and research to provide the best treatment options while minimizing the risk of further AMR development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm13175311 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3104542245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104012223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-56849ba13020b889c3729c69e440ab513b73e3ce69aeaa40b3fd1844e8a5f4ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotmhP3iXgRZDVJJPt7npri19Q1IN6XWbTWUnZj5rsFuqvN6Uq4lxm3uGZYYaXsRMpLgEycbU0tQSZxCDlHhsqkSSRgBT2_9QDNvJ-KUKkqVYyOWQDyFSiYwVD9vmGzmJhK9ttuG34s2tLW5Hn2CyCoDVW1Jig25LfOayjR3rHzq6JT9F0FGa3U6_ONug2_MWFJn9oSjKdbRt_zSf8uV31FW5lNEVPCz5psNp464_ZQYmVp9F3PmKvtzcvs_to_nT3MJvMI6O06qJ4nOqsQAlCiSJNMwOJysw4I60FFrGEIgECQ-MMCVGLAsqFTLWmFONSE8ERO9_tXbn2oyff5bX1hqoKG2p7n4MUOtZK6TigZ__QZdu7cO-OElIpBYG62FHGtd47KvOVs3X4P5ci37qS_3El0KffO_uipsUv--MBfAH2WYcM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3104012223</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variability in Profiles and Prevalences of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nedbal, Carlotta ; Mahobia, Nitin ; Browning, Dave ; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Nedbal, Carlotta ; Mahobia, Nitin ; Browning, Dave ; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>An increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is observed worldwide, partly due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which are ineffective in certain population subgroups. This negatively impacts both the healthcare system and patients. Our study aimed to investigate the current AMR profiles for the most commonly used antibiotics in treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB) across different age and gender subpopulations. By doing so, we provide valuable information for doctors managing prophylactic and empiric therapeutic treatments.
We retrospectively analysed over 650,000 urine cultures collected in the Microbiology Department of a referral university hospital in Southern England from January 2014 to December 2022. A population-based analysis for subgroups was performed to rule out differences in AMR patterns. Our report was recorded at UHS as an internal audit (UHS7670).
146,867 cultures were found positive for GNB growth. Nitrofurantoin showed the best sensitivity patterns for all age subgroups (0.93% for patients aged ≤ 18; 1.22% for patients aged 19-40; 2.17% for patients aged 40-60; and 3.48% for patients aged > 60), regardless of gender (male: 6.37%, female: 2.59%). Ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim showed a poor AMR profile for all age groups (>55% and >28%, respectively) and genders (>60% and >28%, respectively). All the other tested antibiotics (cefalexin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, co-amoxiclav, gentamicin) showed an overall good profile for GNB resistance across all subgroups. For all antibiotics except trimethoprim, the risk of developing AMR was significantly higher in the male population. We also found that people aged over 60 had a higher risk of AMR compared to the other age groups for all antibiotics, with the exception of cefotaxime and co-amoxiclav.
With an overall rise in resistance patterns for GNB-related UTIs, certain antibiotics-particularly ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim-now exhibit very poor sensitivity profiles. However, antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and gentamicin remain excellent options for empirically treating UTIs. It is important to note that AMR can vary across different populations, with higher resistance often found in elderly and male patients. Clinicians must stay informed about current guidelines and research to provide the best treatment options while minimizing the risk of further AMR development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39274523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accreditation ; Age groups ; Antibiotics ; Antimicrobial agents ; Automation ; Bacteria ; Catheters ; Clinical outcomes ; Drug resistance ; Females ; Gender ; Gram-negative bacteria ; Hospitals ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories ; Pathogens ; Patients ; Software ; Urinary tract diseases ; Urinary tract infections ; Urine ; Urogenital system</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-09, Vol.13 (17), p.5311</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-56849ba13020b889c3729c69e440ab513b73e3ce69aeaa40b3fd1844e8a5f4ee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2031-347X ; 0000-0002-6248-6478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39274523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nedbal, Carlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahobia, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somani, Bhaskar Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Variability in Profiles and Prevalences of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>An increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is observed worldwide, partly due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which are ineffective in certain population subgroups. This negatively impacts both the healthcare system and patients. Our study aimed to investigate the current AMR profiles for the most commonly used antibiotics in treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB) across different age and gender subpopulations. By doing so, we provide valuable information for doctors managing prophylactic and empiric therapeutic treatments.
We retrospectively analysed over 650,000 urine cultures collected in the Microbiology Department of a referral university hospital in Southern England from January 2014 to December 2022. A population-based analysis for subgroups was performed to rule out differences in AMR patterns. Our report was recorded at UHS as an internal audit (UHS7670).
146,867 cultures were found positive for GNB growth. Nitrofurantoin showed the best sensitivity patterns for all age subgroups (0.93% for patients aged ≤ 18; 1.22% for patients aged 19-40; 2.17% for patients aged 40-60; and 3.48% for patients aged > 60), regardless of gender (male: 6.37%, female: 2.59%). Ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim showed a poor AMR profile for all age groups (>55% and >28%, respectively) and genders (>60% and >28%, respectively). All the other tested antibiotics (cefalexin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, co-amoxiclav, gentamicin) showed an overall good profile for GNB resistance across all subgroups. For all antibiotics except trimethoprim, the risk of developing AMR was significantly higher in the male population. We also found that people aged over 60 had a higher risk of AMR compared to the other age groups for all antibiotics, with the exception of cefotaxime and co-amoxiclav.
With an overall rise in resistance patterns for GNB-related UTIs, certain antibiotics-particularly ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim-now exhibit very poor sensitivity profiles. However, antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and gentamicin remain excellent options for empirically treating UTIs. It is important to note that AMR can vary across different populations, with higher resistance often found in elderly and male patients. Clinicians must stay informed about current guidelines and research to provide the best treatment options while minimizing the risk of further AMR development.</description><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gram-negative bacteria</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LAzEQhoMotmhP3iXgRZDVJJPt7npri19Q1IN6XWbTWUnZj5rsFuqvN6Uq4lxm3uGZYYaXsRMpLgEycbU0tQSZxCDlHhsqkSSRgBT2_9QDNvJ-KUKkqVYyOWQDyFSiYwVD9vmGzmJhK9ttuG34s2tLW5Hn2CyCoDVW1Jig25LfOayjR3rHzq6JT9F0FGa3U6_ONug2_MWFJn9oSjKdbRt_zSf8uV31FW5lNEVPCz5psNp464_ZQYmVp9F3PmKvtzcvs_to_nT3MJvMI6O06qJ4nOqsQAlCiSJNMwOJysw4I60FFrGEIgECQ-MMCVGLAsqFTLWmFONSE8ERO9_tXbn2oyff5bX1hqoKG2p7n4MUOtZK6TigZ__QZdu7cO-OElIpBYG62FHGtd47KvOVs3X4P5ci37qS_3El0KffO_uipsUv--MBfAH2WYcM</recordid><startdate>20240907</startdate><enddate>20240907</enddate><creator>Nedbal, Carlotta</creator><creator>Mahobia, Nitin</creator><creator>Browning, Dave</creator><creator>Somani, Bhaskar Kumar</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-347X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240907</creationdate><title>Variability in Profiles and Prevalences of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Analysis</title><author>Nedbal, Carlotta ; Mahobia, Nitin ; Browning, Dave ; Somani, Bhaskar Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-56849ba13020b889c3729c69e440ab513b73e3ce69aeaa40b3fd1844e8a5f4ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gram-negative bacteria</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nedbal, Carlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahobia, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browning, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somani, Bhaskar Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nedbal, Carlotta</au><au>Mahobia, Nitin</au><au>Browning, Dave</au><au>Somani, Bhaskar Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variability in Profiles and Prevalences of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-09-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>5311</spage><pages>5311-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>An increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is observed worldwide, partly due to the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, which are ineffective in certain population subgroups. This negatively impacts both the healthcare system and patients. Our study aimed to investigate the current AMR profiles for the most commonly used antibiotics in treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by gram-negative bacteria (GNB) across different age and gender subpopulations. By doing so, we provide valuable information for doctors managing prophylactic and empiric therapeutic treatments.
We retrospectively analysed over 650,000 urine cultures collected in the Microbiology Department of a referral university hospital in Southern England from January 2014 to December 2022. A population-based analysis for subgroups was performed to rule out differences in AMR patterns. Our report was recorded at UHS as an internal audit (UHS7670).
146,867 cultures were found positive for GNB growth. Nitrofurantoin showed the best sensitivity patterns for all age subgroups (0.93% for patients aged ≤ 18; 1.22% for patients aged 19-40; 2.17% for patients aged 40-60; and 3.48% for patients aged > 60), regardless of gender (male: 6.37%, female: 2.59%). Ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim showed a poor AMR profile for all age groups (>55% and >28%, respectively) and genders (>60% and >28%, respectively). All the other tested antibiotics (cefalexin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, co-amoxiclav, gentamicin) showed an overall good profile for GNB resistance across all subgroups. For all antibiotics except trimethoprim, the risk of developing AMR was significantly higher in the male population. We also found that people aged over 60 had a higher risk of AMR compared to the other age groups for all antibiotics, with the exception of cefotaxime and co-amoxiclav.
With an overall rise in resistance patterns for GNB-related UTIs, certain antibiotics-particularly ampicillin/amoxicillin and trimethoprim-now exhibit very poor sensitivity profiles. However, antibiotics such as nitrofurantoin and gentamicin remain excellent options for empirically treating UTIs. It is important to note that AMR can vary across different populations, with higher resistance often found in elderly and male patients. Clinicians must stay informed about current guidelines and research to provide the best treatment options while minimizing the risk of further AMR development.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39274523</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13175311</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-347X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6248-6478</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-09, Vol.13 (17), p.5311 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3104542245 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accreditation Age groups Antibiotics Antimicrobial agents Automation Bacteria Catheters Clinical outcomes Drug resistance Females Gender Gram-negative bacteria Hospitals Infectious diseases Laboratories Pathogens Patients Software Urinary tract diseases Urinary tract infections Urine Urogenital system |
title | Variability in Profiles and Prevalences of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T05%3A01%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variability%20in%20Profiles%20and%20Prevalences%20of%20Gram-Negative%20Bacteria%20in%20Urinary%20Tract%20Infections:%20A%20Population-Based%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Nedbal,%20Carlotta&rft.date=2024-09-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=5311&rft.pages=5311-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13175311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3104012223%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104012223&rft_id=info:pmid/39274523&rfr_iscdi=true |