Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis
This study aims to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery using two different biometry devices, the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700, and to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on these outcomes. In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2994 eyes that underwe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2024-08, Vol.13 (17), p.5125 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 17 |
| container_start_page | 5125 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Arens, Sebastian Böhringer, Daniel Lapp, Thabo Reinhard, Thomas Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja |
| description | This study aims to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery using two different biometry devices, the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700, and to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on these outcomes.
In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2994 eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the impact of the biometry device (IOL Master 500 or IOL Master 700), patient age, time elapsed between biometry and surgery, gender, and insurance status, as well as biometric parameters (anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal curvature), on postoperative refractive outcomes, specifically the deviation from target refraction.
The choice of the IOL Master device did not result in a statistically significant difference between the two devices (
= 0.205). Age (
= 0.006) and gender (
= 0.001) were identified as significant predictors of refractive outcomes, with older patients and males experiencing slightly more hyperopic outcomes compared to younger patients and females, respectively. The time elapsed between biometry and surgery and insurance status did not significantly influence the refractive outcomes.
Our study, supported by a large cohort and a diverse group of patients representing typical anatomical variants seen in cataract surgery, supports the thesis that the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 can be regarded as equivalent and effective for biometry in cataract surgery. The differences between the devices were negligible. Therefore, switching between the devices is safe for bilateral patients. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm13175125 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3104541626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104541626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-951707d8016aa6cf9fc24d2096b05f660e97fa4fb82e18bda698bac4be753b413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFrGzEQhUVpiYPjU-9FkEshOBlJu9Jubo5TpwEHQ9ucF612ZNbsWq606-Cfkn9bOXaKW10knr55M8Mj5DODayFyuFmZlgmmUsbTD-Scg1JjEJn4ePIekFEIK4gnyxLO1BkZiJyrRAh1Tl6nrt1or7t6i3Sy1s0u1IE6S3-g9dq8yYu-M67FQGeuadxLvV7Sqe70_pv-7P0S_Y4-h738uJjTJx069DQFoHpdnUoqSnd1dOpiwT1ua4Phlk5iq867sEHzzxAX5JPVTcDR8R6S59m3X9Pv4_ni4XE6mY8Nh7Qb5ylToKoMmNRaGptbw5OKQy5LSK2UgLmyOrFlxpFlZaVlnpXaJCWqVJQJE0Py9eC78e53j6Er2joYbBq9RteHQjBI0oRJLiN6-R-6cr2P8x4oEJIDj9TVgTJxq-DRFhtft9rvCgbFPrTiJLRIfzl69mWL1V_2PSLxBxLMkUI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3104036202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Arens, Sebastian ; Böhringer, Daniel ; Lapp, Thabo ; Reinhard, Thomas ; Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja</creator><creatorcontrib>Arens, Sebastian ; Böhringer, Daniel ; Lapp, Thabo ; Reinhard, Thomas ; Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery using two different biometry devices, the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700, and to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on these outcomes.
In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2994 eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the impact of the biometry device (IOL Master 500 or IOL Master 700), patient age, time elapsed between biometry and surgery, gender, and insurance status, as well as biometric parameters (anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal curvature), on postoperative refractive outcomes, specifically the deviation from target refraction.
The choice of the IOL Master device did not result in a statistically significant difference between the two devices (
= 0.205). Age (
= 0.006) and gender (
= 0.001) were identified as significant predictors of refractive outcomes, with older patients and males experiencing slightly more hyperopic outcomes compared to younger patients and females, respectively. The time elapsed between biometry and surgery and insurance status did not significantly influence the refractive outcomes.
Our study, supported by a large cohort and a diverse group of patients representing typical anatomical variants seen in cataract surgery, supports the thesis that the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 can be regarded as equivalent and effective for biometry in cataract surgery. The differences between the devices were negligible. Therefore, switching between the devices is safe for bilateral patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13175125</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39274337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biometrics ; Cataracts ; Cornea ; Eye surgery ; Gender ; Interferometry ; Intraocular lenses ; Patient satisfaction ; Statistical analysis ; Surgeons ; Tomography ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-08, Vol.13 (17), p.5125</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-951707d8016aa6cf9fc24d2096b05f660e97fa4fb82e18bda698bac4be753b413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6569-630X ; 0009-0007-7431-647X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39274337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arens, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhringer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapp, Thabo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhard, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>This study aims to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery using two different biometry devices, the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700, and to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on these outcomes.
In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2994 eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the impact of the biometry device (IOL Master 500 or IOL Master 700), patient age, time elapsed between biometry and surgery, gender, and insurance status, as well as biometric parameters (anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal curvature), on postoperative refractive outcomes, specifically the deviation from target refraction.
The choice of the IOL Master device did not result in a statistically significant difference between the two devices (
= 0.205). Age (
= 0.006) and gender (
= 0.001) were identified as significant predictors of refractive outcomes, with older patients and males experiencing slightly more hyperopic outcomes compared to younger patients and females, respectively. The time elapsed between biometry and surgery and insurance status did not significantly influence the refractive outcomes.
Our study, supported by a large cohort and a diverse group of patients representing typical anatomical variants seen in cataract surgery, supports the thesis that the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 can be regarded as equivalent and effective for biometry in cataract surgery. The differences between the devices were negligible. Therefore, switching between the devices is safe for bilateral patients.</description><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Interferometry</subject><subject>Intraocular lenses</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFrGzEQhUVpiYPjU-9FkEshOBlJu9Jubo5TpwEHQ9ucF612ZNbsWq606-Cfkn9bOXaKW10knr55M8Mj5DODayFyuFmZlgmmUsbTD-Scg1JjEJn4ePIekFEIK4gnyxLO1BkZiJyrRAh1Tl6nrt1or7t6i3Sy1s0u1IE6S3-g9dq8yYu-M67FQGeuadxLvV7Sqe70_pv-7P0S_Y4-h738uJjTJx069DQFoHpdnUoqSnd1dOpiwT1ua4Phlk5iq867sEHzzxAX5JPVTcDR8R6S59m3X9Pv4_ni4XE6mY8Nh7Qb5ylToKoMmNRaGptbw5OKQy5LSK2UgLmyOrFlxpFlZaVlnpXaJCWqVJQJE0Py9eC78e53j6Er2joYbBq9RteHQjBI0oRJLiN6-R-6cr2P8x4oEJIDj9TVgTJxq-DRFhtft9rvCgbFPrTiJLRIfzl69mWL1V_2PSLxBxLMkUI</recordid><startdate>20240829</startdate><enddate>20240829</enddate><creator>Arens, Sebastian</creator><creator>Böhringer, Daniel</creator><creator>Lapp, Thabo</creator><creator>Reinhard, Thomas</creator><creator>Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-630X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7431-647X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240829</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis</title><author>Arens, Sebastian ; Böhringer, Daniel ; Lapp, Thabo ; Reinhard, Thomas ; Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c205t-951707d8016aa6cf9fc24d2096b05f660e97fa4fb82e18bda698bac4be753b413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Interferometry</topic><topic>Intraocular lenses</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arens, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhringer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapp, Thabo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhard, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arens, Sebastian</au><au>Böhringer, Daniel</au><au>Lapp, Thabo</au><au>Reinhard, Thomas</au><au>Heinzelmann-Mink, Sonja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-08-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>5125</spage><pages>5125-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>This study aims to compare the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery using two different biometry devices, the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700, and to investigate the influence of patient-related factors on these outcomes.
In this retrospective study, we analyzed data from 2994 eyes that underwent cataract surgery. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine the impact of the biometry device (IOL Master 500 or IOL Master 700), patient age, time elapsed between biometry and surgery, gender, and insurance status, as well as biometric parameters (anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal curvature), on postoperative refractive outcomes, specifically the deviation from target refraction.
The choice of the IOL Master device did not result in a statistically significant difference between the two devices (
= 0.205). Age (
= 0.006) and gender (
= 0.001) were identified as significant predictors of refractive outcomes, with older patients and males experiencing slightly more hyperopic outcomes compared to younger patients and females, respectively. The time elapsed between biometry and surgery and insurance status did not significantly influence the refractive outcomes.
Our study, supported by a large cohort and a diverse group of patients representing typical anatomical variants seen in cataract surgery, supports the thesis that the IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 can be regarded as equivalent and effective for biometry in cataract surgery. The differences between the devices were negligible. Therefore, switching between the devices is safe for bilateral patients.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39274337</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13175125</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-630X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7431-647X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-08, Vol.13 (17), p.5125 |
| issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3104541626 |
| source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Biometrics Cataracts Cornea Eye surgery Gender Interferometry Intraocular lenses Patient satisfaction Statistical analysis Surgeons Tomography Ultrasonic imaging Visual acuity |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Refractive Outcomes Following Cataract Surgery Using IOL Master 500 and IOL Master 700 Biometry Devices: A Retrospective Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A30%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Refractive%20Outcomes%20Following%20Cataract%20Surgery%20Using%20IOL%20Master%20500%20and%20IOL%20Master%20700%20Biometry%20Devices:%20A%20Retrospective%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Arens,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2024-08-29&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=5125&rft.pages=5125-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13175125&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3104541626%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104036202&rft_id=info:pmid/39274337&rfr_iscdi=true |