Research biopsies in kidney transplantation: an evaluation of surgical techniques and optimal tissue mass allowing molecular and histological analyses
Research biopsies have great potential to advance scientific knowledge by helping to establish predictors of favourable or unfavourable outcomes in kidney transplantation. We evaluated punch and core biopsies of different sizes to determine the optimal size for clinical use. A total of 54 punch biop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical proteomics 2024-09, Vol.21 (1), p.55, Article 55 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Clinical proteomics |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Shaheed, Sadr Ul McGivern, Hannah Oliveira, Marta Snashall, Corinna Sutton, Chris W Tam, Ka Ho Knight, Simon Abbas, Syed Hussain Kers, Jesper Cross, Sarah Ploeg, Rutger Hunter, James |
description | Research biopsies have great potential to advance scientific knowledge by helping to establish predictors of favourable or unfavourable outcomes in kidney transplantation. We evaluated punch and core biopsies of different sizes to determine the optimal size for clinical use.
A total of 54 punch biopsies and 18 core needle biopsies were retrieved by three transplant surgeons. Each surgeon obtained three separate 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm punch biopsy samples and three 23 mm (length) core needle biopsies from two pig kidneys.
4 mm punch biopsies yielded the greatest amount of protein (2.11 ± 0.41 mg) with good reproducibility between surgeons and biopsy types (Coefficient of Variation ∼ 22.13%). All surgeons found 2 mm biopsies technically challenging to obtain and sample processing was difficult due to the sample size. Shotgun proteomics identified 3853 gene products with no significant difference in the quantitative proteome of 2 mm and 3 mm punch biopsies. However, the expression of 158 Kidney enriched genes, was higher in bigger and deeper 4 mm punch and core needle biopsies compared to 2 mm biopsy. Only 80% of 2 mm biopsies demonstrated the presence of glomeruli, whereas glomeruli were present in 100% of all other biopsy sizes.
The 2 mm punch biopsy has been shown to be challenging to use and frequently provides inadequate tissue for histology and proteomics while 3 mm research biopsies were the smallest size that were technically obtainable with adequate tissue for molecular studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12014-024-09508-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3104538664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A808658166</galeid><sourcerecordid>A808658166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-25b44b2c2d397536b385b2b849f46a869fd433dbbc22d31725c439ebd94dea723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt2K1TAUhYsozjj6Al5IQBBvOua_jXfD4B8MCKLXIUnT02ia1O5WOS_i85qejuKAhJBk8a1N9mZV1VOCLwlp5SsgFBNeY1q2Erit6b3qnAihitSI-9ud01pyIs-qRwBfMaaKq_ZhdcYUbYhq8Hn165MHb2Y3IBvyBMEDCgl9C13yR7TMJsEUTVrMEnJ6jUxC_oeJ6-mJco9gnQ_BmYgW74YUvq_Fb1KH8rSEcZMDwOrRaKDoMeafIR3QmKN3azTzCR0CLDnmvYxJJh7Bw-PqQW8i-Ce350X15e2bz9fv65uP7z5cX93UjlG51FRYzi11tGOqEUxa1gpLbctVz6Vppeo7zlhnraMFIQ0VjjPlbad4501D2UX1cq87zXn7_KLHAM7H0rPPK2hGMBeslZIX9PmOHkz0OqQ-l_G4DddXLW6laImUhbr8D1VW58fgcvJ9KPodw4t_DIM3cRkgx3WbMNwF6Q66OQPMvtfTXGY8HzXBesuD3vOgSx70KQ966-_ZbX-rHX331_InAOw3HeiyUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3104538664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research biopsies in kidney transplantation: an evaluation of surgical techniques and optimal tissue mass allowing molecular and histological analyses</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shaheed, Sadr Ul ; McGivern, Hannah ; Oliveira, Marta ; Snashall, Corinna ; Sutton, Chris W ; Tam, Ka Ho ; Knight, Simon ; Abbas, Syed Hussain ; Kers, Jesper ; Cross, Sarah ; Ploeg, Rutger ; Hunter, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaheed, Sadr Ul ; McGivern, Hannah ; Oliveira, Marta ; Snashall, Corinna ; Sutton, Chris W ; Tam, Ka Ho ; Knight, Simon ; Abbas, Syed Hussain ; Kers, Jesper ; Cross, Sarah ; Ploeg, Rutger ; Hunter, James</creatorcontrib><description>Research biopsies have great potential to advance scientific knowledge by helping to establish predictors of favourable or unfavourable outcomes in kidney transplantation. We evaluated punch and core biopsies of different sizes to determine the optimal size for clinical use.
A total of 54 punch biopsies and 18 core needle biopsies were retrieved by three transplant surgeons. Each surgeon obtained three separate 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm punch biopsy samples and three 23 mm (length) core needle biopsies from two pig kidneys.
4 mm punch biopsies yielded the greatest amount of protein (2.11 ± 0.41 mg) with good reproducibility between surgeons and biopsy types (Coefficient of Variation ∼ 22.13%). All surgeons found 2 mm biopsies technically challenging to obtain and sample processing was difficult due to the sample size. Shotgun proteomics identified 3853 gene products with no significant difference in the quantitative proteome of 2 mm and 3 mm punch biopsies. However, the expression of 158 Kidney enriched genes, was higher in bigger and deeper 4 mm punch and core needle biopsies compared to 2 mm biopsy. Only 80% of 2 mm biopsies demonstrated the presence of glomeruli, whereas glomeruli were present in 100% of all other biopsy sizes.
The 2 mm punch biopsy has been shown to be challenging to use and frequently provides inadequate tissue for histology and proteomics while 3 mm research biopsies were the smallest size that were technically obtainable with adequate tissue for molecular studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-6416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12014-024-09508-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39271970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Kidneys ; Methods ; Surgery ; Swine ; Transplantation</subject><ispartof>Clinical proteomics, 2024-09, Vol.21 (1), p.55, Article 55</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-25b44b2c2d397536b385b2b849f46a869fd433dbbc22d31725c439ebd94dea723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39271970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaheed, Sadr Ul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGivern, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snashall, Corinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Chris W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Ka Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Syed Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kers, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploeg, Rutger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, James</creatorcontrib><title>Research biopsies in kidney transplantation: an evaluation of surgical techniques and optimal tissue mass allowing molecular and histological analyses</title><title>Clinical proteomics</title><addtitle>Clin Proteomics</addtitle><description>Research biopsies have great potential to advance scientific knowledge by helping to establish predictors of favourable or unfavourable outcomes in kidney transplantation. We evaluated punch and core biopsies of different sizes to determine the optimal size for clinical use.
A total of 54 punch biopsies and 18 core needle biopsies were retrieved by three transplant surgeons. Each surgeon obtained three separate 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm punch biopsy samples and three 23 mm (length) core needle biopsies from two pig kidneys.
4 mm punch biopsies yielded the greatest amount of protein (2.11 ± 0.41 mg) with good reproducibility between surgeons and biopsy types (Coefficient of Variation ∼ 22.13%). All surgeons found 2 mm biopsies technically challenging to obtain and sample processing was difficult due to the sample size. Shotgun proteomics identified 3853 gene products with no significant difference in the quantitative proteome of 2 mm and 3 mm punch biopsies. However, the expression of 158 Kidney enriched genes, was higher in bigger and deeper 4 mm punch and core needle biopsies compared to 2 mm biopsy. Only 80% of 2 mm biopsies demonstrated the presence of glomeruli, whereas glomeruli were present in 100% of all other biopsy sizes.
The 2 mm punch biopsy has been shown to be challenging to use and frequently provides inadequate tissue for histology and proteomics while 3 mm research biopsies were the smallest size that were technically obtainable with adequate tissue for molecular studies.</description><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><issn>1542-6416</issn><issn>1559-0275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkt2K1TAUhYsozjj6Al5IQBBvOua_jXfD4B8MCKLXIUnT02ia1O5WOS_i85qejuKAhJBk8a1N9mZV1VOCLwlp5SsgFBNeY1q2Erit6b3qnAihitSI-9ud01pyIs-qRwBfMaaKq_ZhdcYUbYhq8Hn165MHb2Y3IBvyBMEDCgl9C13yR7TMJsEUTVrMEnJ6jUxC_oeJ6-mJco9gnQ_BmYgW74YUvq_Fb1KH8rSEcZMDwOrRaKDoMeafIR3QmKN3azTzCR0CLDnmvYxJJh7Bw-PqQW8i-Ce350X15e2bz9fv65uP7z5cX93UjlG51FRYzi11tGOqEUxa1gpLbctVz6Vppeo7zlhnraMFIQ0VjjPlbad4501D2UX1cq87zXn7_KLHAM7H0rPPK2hGMBeslZIX9PmOHkz0OqQ-l_G4DddXLW6laImUhbr8D1VW58fgcvJ9KPodw4t_DIM3cRkgx3WbMNwF6Q66OQPMvtfTXGY8HzXBesuD3vOgSx70KQ966-_ZbX-rHX331_InAOw3HeiyUg</recordid><startdate>20240914</startdate><enddate>20240914</enddate><creator>Shaheed, Sadr Ul</creator><creator>McGivern, Hannah</creator><creator>Oliveira, Marta</creator><creator>Snashall, Corinna</creator><creator>Sutton, Chris W</creator><creator>Tam, Ka Ho</creator><creator>Knight, Simon</creator><creator>Abbas, Syed Hussain</creator><creator>Kers, Jesper</creator><creator>Cross, Sarah</creator><creator>Ploeg, Rutger</creator><creator>Hunter, James</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240914</creationdate><title>Research biopsies in kidney transplantation: an evaluation of surgical techniques and optimal tissue mass allowing molecular and histological analyses</title><author>Shaheed, Sadr Ul ; McGivern, Hannah ; Oliveira, Marta ; Snashall, Corinna ; Sutton, Chris W ; Tam, Ka Ho ; Knight, Simon ; Abbas, Syed Hussain ; Kers, Jesper ; Cross, Sarah ; Ploeg, Rutger ; Hunter, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-25b44b2c2d397536b385b2b849f46a869fd433dbbc22d31725c439ebd94dea723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaheed, Sadr Ul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGivern, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snashall, Corinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Chris W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, Ka Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Syed Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kers, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploeg, Rutger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, James</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical proteomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaheed, Sadr Ul</au><au>McGivern, Hannah</au><au>Oliveira, Marta</au><au>Snashall, Corinna</au><au>Sutton, Chris W</au><au>Tam, Ka Ho</au><au>Knight, Simon</au><au>Abbas, Syed Hussain</au><au>Kers, Jesper</au><au>Cross, Sarah</au><au>Ploeg, Rutger</au><au>Hunter, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research biopsies in kidney transplantation: an evaluation of surgical techniques and optimal tissue mass allowing molecular and histological analyses</atitle><jtitle>Clinical proteomics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Proteomics</addtitle><date>2024-09-14</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><pages>55-</pages><artnum>55</artnum><issn>1542-6416</issn><eissn>1559-0275</eissn><abstract>Research biopsies have great potential to advance scientific knowledge by helping to establish predictors of favourable or unfavourable outcomes in kidney transplantation. We evaluated punch and core biopsies of different sizes to determine the optimal size for clinical use.
A total of 54 punch biopsies and 18 core needle biopsies were retrieved by three transplant surgeons. Each surgeon obtained three separate 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm punch biopsy samples and three 23 mm (length) core needle biopsies from two pig kidneys.
4 mm punch biopsies yielded the greatest amount of protein (2.11 ± 0.41 mg) with good reproducibility between surgeons and biopsy types (Coefficient of Variation ∼ 22.13%). All surgeons found 2 mm biopsies technically challenging to obtain and sample processing was difficult due to the sample size. Shotgun proteomics identified 3853 gene products with no significant difference in the quantitative proteome of 2 mm and 3 mm punch biopsies. However, the expression of 158 Kidney enriched genes, was higher in bigger and deeper 4 mm punch and core needle biopsies compared to 2 mm biopsy. Only 80% of 2 mm biopsies demonstrated the presence of glomeruli, whereas glomeruli were present in 100% of all other biopsy sizes.
The 2 mm punch biopsy has been shown to be challenging to use and frequently provides inadequate tissue for histology and proteomics while 3 mm research biopsies were the smallest size that were technically obtainable with adequate tissue for molecular studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>39271970</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12014-024-09508-2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1542-6416 |
ispartof | Clinical proteomics, 2024-09, Vol.21 (1), p.55, Article 55 |
issn | 1542-6416 1559-0275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3104538664 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Kidneys Methods Surgery Swine Transplantation |
title | Research biopsies in kidney transplantation: an evaluation of surgical techniques and optimal tissue mass allowing molecular and histological analyses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T04%3A56%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20biopsies%20in%20kidney%20transplantation:%20an%20evaluation%20of%20surgical%20techniques%20and%20optimal%20tissue%20mass%20allowing%20molecular%20and%20histological%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20proteomics&rft.au=Shaheed,%20Sadr%20Ul&rft.date=2024-09-14&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.pages=55-&rft.artnum=55&rft.issn=1542-6416&rft.eissn=1559-0275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12014-024-09508-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA808658166%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104538664&rft_id=info:pmid/39271970&rft_galeid=A808658166&rfr_iscdi=true |