Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis

The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2024-12, Vol.176 (6), p.1653-1660
Hauptverfasser: Endo, Yutaka, Woldesenbet, Selamawit, Kawashima, Jun, Tsilimigras, Diamantis I., Rashid, Zayed, Catalano, Giovanni, Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P., Pawlik, Timothy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1660
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1653
container_title Surgery
container_volume 176
creator Endo, Yutaka
Woldesenbet, Selamawit
Kawashima, Jun
Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
Rashid, Zayed
Catalano, Giovanni
Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.
Pawlik, Timothy M.
description The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy. Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue. Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3103446560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606024005828</els_id><sourcerecordid>3103446560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f0621ed960f96af5e80560427a4dc9cfee5fc06f4d7ba0c882fb39eddd5b85043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpaCZpf6CLoGU3dp4kW2OHbEJok0Agm3YtNNJTR4NtOZI8ZP6-GibtsqsHj3Mv3EPIVwY1Ayavd3Va4u-aA29q6GoA8YGsWCt4tRaSfSSr8ukrCRLOyUVKOwDoG9Z9Iuei55Jx0a_I29M4a5NpcHQb0uyzHug-DMuIVE-WOm384POBmq2OhcPoU_Ym0TDROaQcZow6-z3SsGQTRkxUu0LRLc46o8lhPNzQOzqi9YUrKT3p4ZB8-kzOnB4Sfnm_l-TXj-8_7x-r55eHp_u758pwsc6VA8kZ2l6C66V2LXbQSmj4WjfW9MYhts6AdI1dbzSYruNuI3q01rabroVGXJJvp945htcFU1ajTwaHQU8YlqQEA9E0spQWlJ9QE0NKEZ2aox91PCgG6mhc7dTRuDoaV9Cp4reErt77l01Z-S_yV3EBbk8AlpV7j1El43EyxUgsgpQN_n_9fwBYMJW_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3103446560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Endo, Yutaka ; Woldesenbet, Selamawit ; Kawashima, Jun ; Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Rashid, Zayed ; Catalano, Giovanni ; Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yutaka ; Woldesenbet, Selamawit ; Kawashima, Jun ; Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Rashid, Zayed ; Catalano, Giovanni ; Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy. Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue. Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39261239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Hepatectomy - adverse effects ; Hepatectomy - mortality ; Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2024-12, Vol.176 (6), p.1653-1660</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f0621ed960f96af5e80560427a4dc9cfee5fc06f4d7ba0c882fb39eddd5b85043</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7994-9870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606024005828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39261239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawashima, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy. Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue. Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpaCZpf6CLoGU3dp4kW2OHbEJok0Agm3YtNNJTR4NtOZI8ZP6-GibtsqsHj3Mv3EPIVwY1Ayavd3Va4u-aA29q6GoA8YGsWCt4tRaSfSSr8ukrCRLOyUVKOwDoG9Z9Iuei55Jx0a_I29M4a5NpcHQb0uyzHug-DMuIVE-WOm384POBmq2OhcPoU_Ym0TDROaQcZow6-z3SsGQTRkxUu0LRLc46o8lhPNzQOzqi9YUrKT3p4ZB8-kzOnB4Sfnm_l-TXj-8_7x-r55eHp_u758pwsc6VA8kZ2l6C66V2LXbQSmj4WjfW9MYhts6AdI1dbzSYruNuI3q01rabroVGXJJvp945htcFU1ajTwaHQU8YlqQEA9E0spQWlJ9QE0NKEZ2aox91PCgG6mhc7dTRuDoaV9Cp4reErt77l01Z-S_yV3EBbk8AlpV7j1El43EyxUgsgpQN_n_9fwBYMJW_</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Endo, Yutaka</creator><creator>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</creator><creator>Kawashima, Jun</creator><creator>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creator><creator>Rashid, Zayed</creator><creator>Catalano, Giovanni</creator><creator>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</creator><creator>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-9870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</title><author>Endo, Yutaka ; Woldesenbet, Selamawit ; Kawashima, Jun ; Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Rashid, Zayed ; Catalano, Giovanni ; Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f0621ed960f96af5e80560427a4dc9cfee5fc06f4d7ba0c882fb39eddd5b85043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawashima, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Endo, Yutaka</au><au>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</au><au>Kawashima, Jun</au><au>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</au><au>Rashid, Zayed</au><au>Catalano, Giovanni</au><au>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</au><au>Pawlik, Timothy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>176</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1653</spage><epage>1660</epage><pages>1653-1660</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy. Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue. Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39261239</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-9870</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2024-12, Vol.176 (6), p.1653-1660
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3103446560
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Female
Hepatectomy - adverse effects
Hepatectomy - mortality
Hepatectomy - statistics & numerical data
Hospital Mortality
Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Medicare - statistics & numerical data
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
United States - epidemiology
title Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A44%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20hospital%20volume%20and%20facility%20characteristics%20on%20postoperative%20outcomes%20after%20hepatectomy:%20A%20mediation%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Endo,%20Yutaka&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1653&rft.epage=1660&rft.pages=1653-1660&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3103446560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3103446560&rft_id=info:pmid/39261239&rft_els_id=S0039606024005828&rfr_iscdi=true