Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis
The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery 2024-12, Vol.176 (6), p.1653-1660 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1660 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1653 |
container_title | Surgery |
container_volume | 176 |
creator | Endo, Yutaka Woldesenbet, Selamawit Kawashima, Jun Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. Rashid, Zayed Catalano, Giovanni Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P. Pawlik, Timothy M. |
description | The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy.
Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.
The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue.
Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3103446560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606024005828</els_id><sourcerecordid>3103446560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f0621ed960f96af5e80560427a4dc9cfee5fc06f4d7ba0c882fb39eddd5b85043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpaCZpf6CLoGU3dp4kW2OHbEJok0Agm3YtNNJTR4NtOZI8ZP6-GibtsqsHj3Mv3EPIVwY1Ayavd3Va4u-aA29q6GoA8YGsWCt4tRaSfSSr8ukrCRLOyUVKOwDoG9Z9Iuei55Jx0a_I29M4a5NpcHQb0uyzHug-DMuIVE-WOm384POBmq2OhcPoU_Ym0TDROaQcZow6-z3SsGQTRkxUu0LRLc46o8lhPNzQOzqi9YUrKT3p4ZB8-kzOnB4Sfnm_l-TXj-8_7x-r55eHp_u758pwsc6VA8kZ2l6C66V2LXbQSmj4WjfW9MYhts6AdI1dbzSYruNuI3q01rabroVGXJJvp945htcFU1ajTwaHQU8YlqQEA9E0spQWlJ9QE0NKEZ2aox91PCgG6mhc7dTRuDoaV9Cp4reErt77l01Z-S_yV3EBbk8AlpV7j1El43EyxUgsgpQN_n_9fwBYMJW_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3103446560</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Endo, Yutaka ; Woldesenbet, Selamawit ; Kawashima, Jun ; Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Rashid, Zayed ; Catalano, Giovanni ; Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yutaka ; Woldesenbet, Selamawit ; Kawashima, Jun ; Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Rashid, Zayed ; Catalano, Giovanni ; Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy.
Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.
The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue.
Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39261239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Hepatectomy - adverse effects ; Hepatectomy - mortality ; Hepatectomy - statistics & numerical data ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Medicare - statistics & numerical data ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2024-12, Vol.176 (6), p.1653-1660</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f0621ed960f96af5e80560427a4dc9cfee5fc06f4d7ba0c882fb39eddd5b85043</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7994-9870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606024005828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39261239$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawashima, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy.
Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.
The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue.
Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - mortality</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAURUVpaCZpf6CLoGU3dp4kW2OHbEJok0Agm3YtNNJTR4NtOZI8ZP6-GibtsqsHj3Mv3EPIVwY1Ayavd3Va4u-aA29q6GoA8YGsWCt4tRaSfSSr8ukrCRLOyUVKOwDoG9Z9Iuei55Jx0a_I29M4a5NpcHQb0uyzHug-DMuIVE-WOm384POBmq2OhcPoU_Ym0TDROaQcZow6-z3SsGQTRkxUu0LRLc46o8lhPNzQOzqi9YUrKT3p4ZB8-kzOnB4Sfnm_l-TXj-8_7x-r55eHp_u758pwsc6VA8kZ2l6C66V2LXbQSmj4WjfW9MYhts6AdI1dbzSYruNuI3q01rabroVGXJJvp945htcFU1ajTwaHQU8YlqQEA9E0spQWlJ9QE0NKEZ2aox91PCgG6mhc7dTRuDoaV9Cp4reErt77l01Z-S_yV3EBbk8AlpV7j1El43EyxUgsgpQN_n_9fwBYMJW_</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Endo, Yutaka</creator><creator>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</creator><creator>Kawashima, Jun</creator><creator>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creator><creator>Rashid, Zayed</creator><creator>Catalano, Giovanni</creator><creator>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</creator><creator>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-9870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</title><author>Endo, Yutaka ; Woldesenbet, Selamawit ; Kawashima, Jun ; Tsilimigras, Diamantis I. ; Rashid, Zayed ; Catalano, Giovanni ; Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P. ; Pawlik, Timothy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f0621ed960f96af5e80560427a4dc9cfee5fc06f4d7ba0c882fb39eddd5b85043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - mortality</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Endo, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawashima, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawlik, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Endo, Yutaka</au><au>Woldesenbet, Selamawit</au><au>Kawashima, Jun</au><au>Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.</au><au>Rashid, Zayed</au><au>Catalano, Giovanni</au><au>Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas P.</au><au>Pawlik, Timothy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>176</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1653</spage><epage>1660</epage><pages>1653-1660</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>The impact of hospital procedural volume on outcomes after hepatectomy relative to other facility-related factors remains unclear. We sought to define the comparative impact of hospital volume compared with other facility-related factors on postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepatectomy.
Data on patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2013 and 2021 were collected from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and linked with facility-level data from the American Hospital Association Survey databases. Hospital volume was stratified into high- (top 10%) and low-volume centers. Propensity score matching was used to account for variable imbalances in patient characteristics among high-compared with low-volume centers. Mediation analysis was employed to delineate facility-related factors responsible for the impact of hospital volume on outcomes with a specific focus on incidence of complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue.
The analytic cohort included 22,969 patients from 340 institutions. After propensity score matching, receipt of surgery at a high-volume center was associated with a lower likelihood of postoperative complications (39.9% vs 41.7%, P = .01), in-hospital mortality (2.2% vs 2.8%, P = .02), and failure to rescue (5.4% vs 6.5%, P = .04) versus low-volume centers. Mediation analysis revealed that hospital capacity (bed capacity and nurse-to-bed ratio) contributed the most to the variations in risk of complications and in-hospital mortality, whereas liver transplant program status had the largest impact on failure to rescue.
Hospital volume is a significant determinant of postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy, with hospital capacity and liver transplant program status being important mediators of this effect. Centralization and optimal resource distribution are important to achieve favorable outcomes following liver resection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39261239</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7994-9870</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0039-6060 |
ispartof | Surgery, 2024-12, Vol.176 (6), p.1653-1660 |
issn | 0039-6060 1532-7361 1532-7361 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3103446560 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Failure to Rescue, Health Care - statistics & numerical data Female Hepatectomy - adverse effects Hepatectomy - mortality Hepatectomy - statistics & numerical data Hospital Mortality Hospitals, High-Volume - statistics & numerical data Hospitals, Low-Volume - statistics & numerical data Humans Male Medicare - statistics & numerical data Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Propensity Score Retrospective Studies United States - epidemiology |
title | Impact of hospital volume and facility characteristics on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A mediation analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A44%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20hospital%20volume%20and%20facility%20characteristics%20on%20postoperative%20outcomes%20after%20hepatectomy:%20A%20mediation%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Endo,%20Yutaka&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1653&rft.epage=1660&rft.pages=1653-1660&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3103446560%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3103446560&rft_id=info:pmid/39261239&rft_els_id=S0039606024005828&rfr_iscdi=true |