Role of apolipoprotein B in the clinical management of cardiovascular risk in adults: An Expert Clinical Consensus from the National Lipid Association

•ApoB and non-HDL-C stratify ASCVD risk more accurately than LDL-C.•Discordance between apoB and LDL-C, and non-HDL-C and LDL-C, is common.•With discordance, apoB and non-HDL-C correlate more closely with ASCVD risk.•ApoB thresholds are proposed that may be considered for treatment intensification....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical lipidology 2024-09, Vol.18 (5), p.e647-e663
Hauptverfasser: Soffer, Daniel E., Marston, Nicholas A., Maki, Kevin C., Jacobson, Terry A., Bittner, Vera A., Peña, Jessica M., Thanassoulis, George, Martin, Seth S., Kirkpatrick, Carol F., Virani, Salim S., Dixon, Dave L., Ballantyne, Christie M., Remaley, Alan T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e663
container_issue 5
container_start_page e647
container_title Journal of clinical lipidology
container_volume 18
creator Soffer, Daniel E.
Marston, Nicholas A.
Maki, Kevin C.
Jacobson, Terry A.
Bittner, Vera A.
Peña, Jessica M.
Thanassoulis, George
Martin, Seth S.
Kirkpatrick, Carol F.
Virani, Salim S.
Dixon, Dave L.
Ballantyne, Christie M.
Remaley, Alan T.
description •ApoB and non-HDL-C stratify ASCVD risk more accurately than LDL-C.•Discordance between apoB and LDL-C, and non-HDL-C and LDL-C, is common.•With discordance, apoB and non-HDL-C correlate more closely with ASCVD risk.•ApoB thresholds are proposed that may be considered for treatment intensification. This National Lipid Association (NLA) Expert Clinical Consensus provides an overview of the physiologic and clinical considerations regarding the role of apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement to guide clinical care based on the available scientific evidence and expert opinion. ApoB represents the total concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles in the circulation and more accurately reflects the atherogenic burden of lipoproteins when compared to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). ApoB is a validated clinical measurement that augments the information found in a standard lipoprotein lipid panel; therefore, there is clinical value in using apoB in conjunction with a standard lipoprotein lipid profile when assessing risk and managing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). ApoB has been shown to be superior to LDL-C in risk assessment both before and during treatment with LLT. In individuals, there can be discordance between levels of LDL-C and apoB, as well as LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), despite high levels of population-wide correlation. When there is discordance between LDL-C and apoB, or LDL-C and non-HDL-C, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk generally aligns better with apoB or non-HDL-C. Additionally, apoB can be used in tandem with standard lipoprotein lipid measurements to diagnose distinct lipoprotein phenotypes. ApoB testing can inform clinical prognosis and care, as well as enable family cascade screening, when an inherited lipoprotein syndrome is identified. The NLA and other organizations will continue to educate clinicians about the role of apoB measurement in improving clinical risk assessment and dyslipidemia management. An urgent need exists to improve access and reimbursement for apoB testing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.08.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102878687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S193328742400240X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3102878687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1527-3bfa85ff4c0305b0a98961f16b7fec3bd227125f9269f4d83d96b9ed47fa6ec23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhr0A0VJ4ARaVl91M8CUXp-pmOioXaQQSgrXl2MfUU8dO7aSCF-F5cTotSza2ZH__L53zIfSOkooS2r4_VAelfcUIqysiKkL5C3RKe843THT1CXqd84GQpulI8wqd8J41LRHdKfrzLXrA0WI1Re-mOKU4gwv4GpdjvgWsvQtOK49HFdRPGCHMK65VMi4-qKwXrxJOLt-tCWUWP-dLvA345tcEaca75_wuhgwhLxnbFMfH7i9qdjGUv72bnMHbnKN2j29v0EurfIa3T_cZ-vHh5vvu02b_9ePn3Xa_0bRh3YYPVonG2loTTpqBqF70LbW0HToLmg-GsY6yxvas7W1tBDd9O_Rg6s6qFjTjZ-ji2Fvmvl8gz3J0WYP3KkBcsuSUlP2JVnQFZUdUp5hzAiun5EaVfktK5OpAHuTqQK4OJBGyOCih86f-ZRjB_Is8CyjA1RGAMuWDgySzdhA0GJdAz9JE97_-vyeknJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102878687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of apolipoprotein B in the clinical management of cardiovascular risk in adults: An Expert Clinical Consensus from the National Lipid Association</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Soffer, Daniel E. ; Marston, Nicholas A. ; Maki, Kevin C. ; Jacobson, Terry A. ; Bittner, Vera A. ; Peña, Jessica M. ; Thanassoulis, George ; Martin, Seth S. ; Kirkpatrick, Carol F. ; Virani, Salim S. ; Dixon, Dave L. ; Ballantyne, Christie M. ; Remaley, Alan T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soffer, Daniel E. ; Marston, Nicholas A. ; Maki, Kevin C. ; Jacobson, Terry A. ; Bittner, Vera A. ; Peña, Jessica M. ; Thanassoulis, George ; Martin, Seth S. ; Kirkpatrick, Carol F. ; Virani, Salim S. ; Dixon, Dave L. ; Ballantyne, Christie M. ; Remaley, Alan T.</creatorcontrib><description>•ApoB and non-HDL-C stratify ASCVD risk more accurately than LDL-C.•Discordance between apoB and LDL-C, and non-HDL-C and LDL-C, is common.•With discordance, apoB and non-HDL-C correlate more closely with ASCVD risk.•ApoB thresholds are proposed that may be considered for treatment intensification. This National Lipid Association (NLA) Expert Clinical Consensus provides an overview of the physiologic and clinical considerations regarding the role of apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement to guide clinical care based on the available scientific evidence and expert opinion. ApoB represents the total concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles in the circulation and more accurately reflects the atherogenic burden of lipoproteins when compared to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). ApoB is a validated clinical measurement that augments the information found in a standard lipoprotein lipid panel; therefore, there is clinical value in using apoB in conjunction with a standard lipoprotein lipid profile when assessing risk and managing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). ApoB has been shown to be superior to LDL-C in risk assessment both before and during treatment with LLT. In individuals, there can be discordance between levels of LDL-C and apoB, as well as LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), despite high levels of population-wide correlation. When there is discordance between LDL-C and apoB, or LDL-C and non-HDL-C, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk generally aligns better with apoB or non-HDL-C. Additionally, apoB can be used in tandem with standard lipoprotein lipid measurements to diagnose distinct lipoprotein phenotypes. ApoB testing can inform clinical prognosis and care, as well as enable family cascade screening, when an inherited lipoprotein syndrome is identified. The NLA and other organizations will continue to educate clinicians about the role of apoB measurement in improving clinical risk assessment and dyslipidemia management. An urgent need exists to improve access and reimbursement for apoB testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1933-2874</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.08.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39256087</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Apolipoprotein B ; Apolipoproteins B - blood ; Atherosclerosis ; Cardiovascular Diseases - blood ; Cholesterol, LDL - blood ; Consensus ; Discordance ; Heart Disease Risk Factors ; Humans ; Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ; Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical lipidology, 2024-09, Vol.18 (5), p.e647-e663</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1527-3bfa85ff4c0305b0a98961f16b7fec3bd227125f9269f4d83d96b9ed47fa6ec23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5089-9494 ; 0000-0001-9541-6954 ; 0000-0003-2473-5549 ; 0000-0003-3165-849X ; 0000-0001-9456-850X ; 0000-0001-6164-4617 ; 0000-0001-5147-5469 ; 0000-0001-7681-6303</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.08.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39256087$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soffer, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marston, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Terry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bittner, Vera A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thanassoulis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Seth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Carol F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virani, Salim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Dave L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballantyne, Christie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remaley, Alan T.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of apolipoprotein B in the clinical management of cardiovascular risk in adults: An Expert Clinical Consensus from the National Lipid Association</title><title>Journal of clinical lipidology</title><addtitle>J Clin Lipidol</addtitle><description>•ApoB and non-HDL-C stratify ASCVD risk more accurately than LDL-C.•Discordance between apoB and LDL-C, and non-HDL-C and LDL-C, is common.•With discordance, apoB and non-HDL-C correlate more closely with ASCVD risk.•ApoB thresholds are proposed that may be considered for treatment intensification. This National Lipid Association (NLA) Expert Clinical Consensus provides an overview of the physiologic and clinical considerations regarding the role of apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement to guide clinical care based on the available scientific evidence and expert opinion. ApoB represents the total concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles in the circulation and more accurately reflects the atherogenic burden of lipoproteins when compared to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). ApoB is a validated clinical measurement that augments the information found in a standard lipoprotein lipid panel; therefore, there is clinical value in using apoB in conjunction with a standard lipoprotein lipid profile when assessing risk and managing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). ApoB has been shown to be superior to LDL-C in risk assessment both before and during treatment with LLT. In individuals, there can be discordance between levels of LDL-C and apoB, as well as LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), despite high levels of population-wide correlation. When there is discordance between LDL-C and apoB, or LDL-C and non-HDL-C, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk generally aligns better with apoB or non-HDL-C. Additionally, apoB can be used in tandem with standard lipoprotein lipid measurements to diagnose distinct lipoprotein phenotypes. ApoB testing can inform clinical prognosis and care, as well as enable family cascade screening, when an inherited lipoprotein syndrome is identified. The NLA and other organizations will continue to educate clinicians about the role of apoB measurement in improving clinical risk assessment and dyslipidemia management. An urgent need exists to improve access and reimbursement for apoB testing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Apolipoprotein B</subject><subject>Apolipoproteins B - blood</subject><subject>Atherosclerosis</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - blood</subject><subject>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Discordance</subject><subject>Heart Disease Risk Factors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol</subject><subject>Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>1933-2874</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhr0A0VJ4ARaVl91M8CUXp-pmOioXaQQSgrXl2MfUU8dO7aSCF-F5cTotSza2ZH__L53zIfSOkooS2r4_VAelfcUIqysiKkL5C3RKe843THT1CXqd84GQpulI8wqd8J41LRHdKfrzLXrA0WI1Re-mOKU4gwv4GpdjvgWsvQtOK49HFdRPGCHMK65VMi4-qKwXrxJOLt-tCWUWP-dLvA345tcEaca75_wuhgwhLxnbFMfH7i9qdjGUv72bnMHbnKN2j29v0EurfIa3T_cZ-vHh5vvu02b_9ePn3Xa_0bRh3YYPVonG2loTTpqBqF70LbW0HToLmg-GsY6yxvas7W1tBDd9O_Rg6s6qFjTjZ-ji2Fvmvl8gz3J0WYP3KkBcsuSUlP2JVnQFZUdUp5hzAiun5EaVfktK5OpAHuTqQK4OJBGyOCih86f-ZRjB_Is8CyjA1RGAMuWDgySzdhA0GJdAz9JE97_-vyeknJY</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Soffer, Daniel E.</creator><creator>Marston, Nicholas A.</creator><creator>Maki, Kevin C.</creator><creator>Jacobson, Terry A.</creator><creator>Bittner, Vera A.</creator><creator>Peña, Jessica M.</creator><creator>Thanassoulis, George</creator><creator>Martin, Seth S.</creator><creator>Kirkpatrick, Carol F.</creator><creator>Virani, Salim S.</creator><creator>Dixon, Dave L.</creator><creator>Ballantyne, Christie M.</creator><creator>Remaley, Alan T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5089-9494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-6954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3165-849X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-850X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-4617</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5147-5469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-6303</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Role of apolipoprotein B in the clinical management of cardiovascular risk in adults: An Expert Clinical Consensus from the National Lipid Association</title><author>Soffer, Daniel E. ; Marston, Nicholas A. ; Maki, Kevin C. ; Jacobson, Terry A. ; Bittner, Vera A. ; Peña, Jessica M. ; Thanassoulis, George ; Martin, Seth S. ; Kirkpatrick, Carol F. ; Virani, Salim S. ; Dixon, Dave L. ; Ballantyne, Christie M. ; Remaley, Alan T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1527-3bfa85ff4c0305b0a98961f16b7fec3bd227125f9269f4d83d96b9ed47fa6ec23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Apolipoprotein B</topic><topic>Apolipoproteins B - blood</topic><topic>Atherosclerosis</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - blood</topic><topic>Cholesterol, LDL - blood</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Discordance</topic><topic>Heart Disease Risk Factors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol</topic><topic>Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soffer, Daniel E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marston, Nicholas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Kevin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Terry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bittner, Vera A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peña, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thanassoulis, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Seth S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkpatrick, Carol F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virani, Salim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Dave L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballantyne, Christie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remaley, Alan T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical lipidology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soffer, Daniel E.</au><au>Marston, Nicholas A.</au><au>Maki, Kevin C.</au><au>Jacobson, Terry A.</au><au>Bittner, Vera A.</au><au>Peña, Jessica M.</au><au>Thanassoulis, George</au><au>Martin, Seth S.</au><au>Kirkpatrick, Carol F.</au><au>Virani, Salim S.</au><au>Dixon, Dave L.</au><au>Ballantyne, Christie M.</au><au>Remaley, Alan T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of apolipoprotein B in the clinical management of cardiovascular risk in adults: An Expert Clinical Consensus from the National Lipid Association</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical lipidology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Lipidol</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e647</spage><epage>e663</epage><pages>e647-e663</pages><issn>1933-2874</issn><abstract>•ApoB and non-HDL-C stratify ASCVD risk more accurately than LDL-C.•Discordance between apoB and LDL-C, and non-HDL-C and LDL-C, is common.•With discordance, apoB and non-HDL-C correlate more closely with ASCVD risk.•ApoB thresholds are proposed that may be considered for treatment intensification. This National Lipid Association (NLA) Expert Clinical Consensus provides an overview of the physiologic and clinical considerations regarding the role of apolipoprotein B (apoB) measurement to guide clinical care based on the available scientific evidence and expert opinion. ApoB represents the total concentration of atherogenic lipoprotein particles in the circulation and more accurately reflects the atherogenic burden of lipoproteins when compared to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). ApoB is a validated clinical measurement that augments the information found in a standard lipoprotein lipid panel; therefore, there is clinical value in using apoB in conjunction with a standard lipoprotein lipid profile when assessing risk and managing lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). ApoB has been shown to be superior to LDL-C in risk assessment both before and during treatment with LLT. In individuals, there can be discordance between levels of LDL-C and apoB, as well as LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), despite high levels of population-wide correlation. When there is discordance between LDL-C and apoB, or LDL-C and non-HDL-C, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk generally aligns better with apoB or non-HDL-C. Additionally, apoB can be used in tandem with standard lipoprotein lipid measurements to diagnose distinct lipoprotein phenotypes. ApoB testing can inform clinical prognosis and care, as well as enable family cascade screening, when an inherited lipoprotein syndrome is identified. The NLA and other organizations will continue to educate clinicians about the role of apoB measurement in improving clinical risk assessment and dyslipidemia management. An urgent need exists to improve access and reimbursement for apoB testing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39256087</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacl.2024.08.013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5089-9494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-6954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-5549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3165-849X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-850X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-4617</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5147-5469</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-6303</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1933-2874
ispartof Journal of clinical lipidology, 2024-09, Vol.18 (5), p.e647-e663
issn 1933-2874
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3102878687
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Apolipoprotein B
Apolipoproteins B - blood
Atherosclerosis
Cardiovascular Diseases - blood
Cholesterol, LDL - blood
Consensus
Discordance
Heart Disease Risk Factors
Humans
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Risk Assessment
title Role of apolipoprotein B in the clinical management of cardiovascular risk in adults: An Expert Clinical Consensus from the National Lipid Association
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T11%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20apolipoprotein%20B%20in%20the%20clinical%20management%20of%20cardiovascular%20risk%20in%20adults:%20An%20Expert%20Clinical%20Consensus%20from%20the%20National%20Lipid%20Association&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20lipidology&rft.au=Soffer,%20Daniel%20E.&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e647&rft.epage=e663&rft.pages=e647-e663&rft.issn=1933-2874&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacl.2024.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102878687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102878687&rft_id=info:pmid/39256087&rft_els_id=S193328742400240X&rfr_iscdi=true