Systematization of a toxicity screening method based on a combination of chemical analysis and the delayed fluorescence algal growth inhibition test for use in emergency environmental surveys
In recent years, heavy rainfall disasters linked to climate change have become more frequent, raising concerns about the release of chemicals stored in factories. Assessing chemical contamination during such emergencies therefore necessitates the development of a quick and easy method for evaluating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2024-09, Vol.31 (43), p.55447-55461 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 55461 |
---|---|
container_issue | 43 |
container_start_page | 55447 |
container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Koga, Toyokazu Hirakawa, Shusaku Nakagawa, Shuhei Ishibashi, Yuko Kashiwabara, Manabu Miyawaki, Takashi |
description | In recent years, heavy rainfall disasters linked to climate change have become more frequent, raising concerns about the release of chemicals stored in factories. Assessing chemical contamination during such emergencies therefore necessitates the development of a quick and easy method for evaluating hazardous contaminants in combination with toxicity testing. This study proposes a “toxicity screening” method that combines biological response testing and chemical analysis to systematically evaluate hazardous contaminants in emergency situations. The toxicity screening method evaluates the water quality in three steps, including water quality measurements and a delayed fluorescence (DF) assay, metal content measurements and a DF assay, and targeted screening analysis and a DF assay. The efficacy of this method was tested using industrial wastewater from 14 locations. Seven of the samples were non-toxic, while the other seven samples were toxic, displaying no observed effect concentration (NOEC) values ranging from 0.625 to 20%. Two toxic samples in the first phase possessed high total chlorine concentrations (0.4 mg L
−1
) and conductivities (2200 mS m
−1
), indicating that the main sources of toxicity were residual chlorine and a high salt concentration. In the second phase, metal content analysis identified metals as the toxicity cause in four samples. In the third phase, the organic contaminants were analyzed, and tri-
n
-octyl phosphate (TNOP) was detected at a concentration of 0.00027 mg L
−1
. The results of solid-phase extraction experiments and exposure tests with TNOP alone indicated that the contribution of TNOP to the toxicity was negligible and that chemicals not adsorbed on the solid-phase extraction cartridges were the cause of toxicity. The proposed method can therefore be considered effective for disaster-related water quality assessment, delivering results within 12 days.
Graphical Abstract |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-024-34821-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3100565272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3100565272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1716-9f73ff44b8946c91ac8b1ab487402731c6fbd5fffac307082d385850e04a9bee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O1iAUhhujccbRG3BhSNy4qfLX0i7NxL9kEhfqmgA9tEwKjEBnrDfnrYnfN47GhQvCCTzvyzm8TfOU4JcEY_EqE8K6vsWUt4wPlLT9veaU9IS3go_j_b_qk-ZRzpcYUzxS8bA5YSNleCDstPnxac8FvCrue10xoGiRQiV-c8aVHWWTAIILM_JQljghrTJMqHIKmei1C3cqs4B3Rq1IBbXu2eVaTKgsgCZY1V5Vdt1igmwgGEBqnSs7p3hTFuTC4rQ7OBXIBdmY0JahniPwkOaq2BGEa5di8BBKVeYtXcOeHzcPrFozPLndz5ovb998Pn_fXnx89-H89UVriCB9O1rBrOVcDyPvzUiUGTRRmg-CYyoYMb3VU2etVYZhgQc6saEbOgyYq1EDsLPmxdH3KsWvW-1RelcnWVcVIG5ZsppI13dU0Io-_we9jFuqn3KgBKMdHsZK0SNlUsw5gZVXyXmVdkmw_BWvPMYra7zyEK_sq-jZrfWmPUx3kt95VoAdgVyvwgzpz9v_sf0JFH21AA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3107325089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematization of a toxicity screening method based on a combination of chemical analysis and the delayed fluorescence algal growth inhibition test for use in emergency environmental surveys</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Koga, Toyokazu ; Hirakawa, Shusaku ; Nakagawa, Shuhei ; Ishibashi, Yuko ; Kashiwabara, Manabu ; Miyawaki, Takashi</creator><creatorcontrib>Koga, Toyokazu ; Hirakawa, Shusaku ; Nakagawa, Shuhei ; Ishibashi, Yuko ; Kashiwabara, Manabu ; Miyawaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, heavy rainfall disasters linked to climate change have become more frequent, raising concerns about the release of chemicals stored in factories. Assessing chemical contamination during such emergencies therefore necessitates the development of a quick and easy method for evaluating hazardous contaminants in combination with toxicity testing. This study proposes a “toxicity screening” method that combines biological response testing and chemical analysis to systematically evaluate hazardous contaminants in emergency situations. The toxicity screening method evaluates the water quality in three steps, including water quality measurements and a delayed fluorescence (DF) assay, metal content measurements and a DF assay, and targeted screening analysis and a DF assay. The efficacy of this method was tested using industrial wastewater from 14 locations. Seven of the samples were non-toxic, while the other seven samples were toxic, displaying no observed effect concentration (NOEC) values ranging from 0.625 to 20%. Two toxic samples in the first phase possessed high total chlorine concentrations (0.4 mg L
−1
) and conductivities (2200 mS m
−1
), indicating that the main sources of toxicity were residual chlorine and a high salt concentration. In the second phase, metal content analysis identified metals as the toxicity cause in four samples. In the third phase, the organic contaminants were analyzed, and tri-
n
-octyl phosphate (TNOP) was detected at a concentration of 0.00027 mg L
−1
. The results of solid-phase extraction experiments and exposure tests with TNOP alone indicated that the contribution of TNOP to the toxicity was negligible and that chemicals not adsorbed on the solid-phase extraction cartridges were the cause of toxicity. The proposed method can therefore be considered effective for disaster-related water quality assessment, delivering results within 12 days.
Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-34821-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39230813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algae ; Algal growth ; Analytical chemistry ; Aquatic Pollution ; Assaying ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Chemical analysis ; Chemical contaminants ; Chemical contamination ; Chemical pollution ; Chlorine ; Climate change ; Contaminants ; Content analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Effectiveness ; Emergency response ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental surveys ; Evaluation ; Fluorescence ; Growth inhibition test ; Industrial wastes ; Industrial wastewater ; Metal concentrations ; Metals ; Organic contaminants ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Rainfall ; Research Article ; Residual chlorine ; Screening ; Solid phases ; Toxicity ; Toxicity testing ; Toxicity Tests - methods ; Waste Water Technology ; Wastewater - chemistry ; Water Management ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; Water Pollution Control ; Water Quality ; Water quality assessments ; Water quality measurements</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024-09, Vol.31 (43), p.55447-55461</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1716-9f73ff44b8946c91ac8b1ab487402731c6fbd5fffac307082d385850e04a9bee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-024-34821-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-024-34821-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39230813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koga, Toyokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Shusaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Shuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwabara, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyawaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><title>Systematization of a toxicity screening method based on a combination of chemical analysis and the delayed fluorescence algal growth inhibition test for use in emergency environmental surveys</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>In recent years, heavy rainfall disasters linked to climate change have become more frequent, raising concerns about the release of chemicals stored in factories. Assessing chemical contamination during such emergencies therefore necessitates the development of a quick and easy method for evaluating hazardous contaminants in combination with toxicity testing. This study proposes a “toxicity screening” method that combines biological response testing and chemical analysis to systematically evaluate hazardous contaminants in emergency situations. The toxicity screening method evaluates the water quality in three steps, including water quality measurements and a delayed fluorescence (DF) assay, metal content measurements and a DF assay, and targeted screening analysis and a DF assay. The efficacy of this method was tested using industrial wastewater from 14 locations. Seven of the samples were non-toxic, while the other seven samples were toxic, displaying no observed effect concentration (NOEC) values ranging from 0.625 to 20%. Two toxic samples in the first phase possessed high total chlorine concentrations (0.4 mg L
−1
) and conductivities (2200 mS m
−1
), indicating that the main sources of toxicity were residual chlorine and a high salt concentration. In the second phase, metal content analysis identified metals as the toxicity cause in four samples. In the third phase, the organic contaminants were analyzed, and tri-
n
-octyl phosphate (TNOP) was detected at a concentration of 0.00027 mg L
−1
. The results of solid-phase extraction experiments and exposure tests with TNOP alone indicated that the contribution of TNOP to the toxicity was negligible and that chemicals not adsorbed on the solid-phase extraction cartridges were the cause of toxicity. The proposed method can therefore be considered effective for disaster-related water quality assessment, delivering results within 12 days.
Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Algal growth</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chemical contaminants</subject><subject>Chemical contamination</subject><subject>Chemical pollution</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Emergency response</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental surveys</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Growth inhibition test</subject><subject>Industrial wastes</subject><subject>Industrial wastewater</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Organic contaminants</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Residual chlorine</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Solid phases</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity testing</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests - methods</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water quality assessments</subject><subject>Water quality measurements</subject><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2O1iAUhhujccbRG3BhSNy4qfLX0i7NxL9kEhfqmgA9tEwKjEBnrDfnrYnfN47GhQvCCTzvyzm8TfOU4JcEY_EqE8K6vsWUt4wPlLT9veaU9IS3go_j_b_qk-ZRzpcYUzxS8bA5YSNleCDstPnxac8FvCrue10xoGiRQiV-c8aVHWWTAIILM_JQljghrTJMqHIKmei1C3cqs4B3Rq1IBbXu2eVaTKgsgCZY1V5Vdt1igmwgGEBqnSs7p3hTFuTC4rQ7OBXIBdmY0JahniPwkOaq2BGEa5di8BBKVeYtXcOeHzcPrFozPLndz5ovb998Pn_fXnx89-H89UVriCB9O1rBrOVcDyPvzUiUGTRRmg-CYyoYMb3VU2etVYZhgQc6saEbOgyYq1EDsLPmxdH3KsWvW-1RelcnWVcVIG5ZsppI13dU0Io-_we9jFuqn3KgBKMdHsZK0SNlUsw5gZVXyXmVdkmw_BWvPMYra7zyEK_sq-jZrfWmPUx3kt95VoAdgVyvwgzpz9v_sf0JFH21AA</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Koga, Toyokazu</creator><creator>Hirakawa, Shusaku</creator><creator>Nakagawa, Shuhei</creator><creator>Ishibashi, Yuko</creator><creator>Kashiwabara, Manabu</creator><creator>Miyawaki, Takashi</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Systematization of a toxicity screening method based on a combination of chemical analysis and the delayed fluorescence algal growth inhibition test for use in emergency environmental surveys</title><author>Koga, Toyokazu ; Hirakawa, Shusaku ; Nakagawa, Shuhei ; Ishibashi, Yuko ; Kashiwabara, Manabu ; Miyawaki, Takashi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1716-9f73ff44b8946c91ac8b1ab487402731c6fbd5fffac307082d385850e04a9bee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Algal growth</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chemical contaminants</topic><topic>Chemical contamination</topic><topic>Chemical pollution</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Emergency response</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental surveys</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Growth inhibition test</topic><topic>Industrial wastes</topic><topic>Industrial wastewater</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Organic contaminants</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Residual chlorine</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Solid phases</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity testing</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests - methods</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water quality assessments</topic><topic>Water quality measurements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koga, Toyokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirakawa, Shusaku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Shuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwabara, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyawaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koga, Toyokazu</au><au>Hirakawa, Shusaku</au><au>Nakagawa, Shuhei</au><au>Ishibashi, Yuko</au><au>Kashiwabara, Manabu</au><au>Miyawaki, Takashi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematization of a toxicity screening method based on a combination of chemical analysis and the delayed fluorescence algal growth inhibition test for use in emergency environmental surveys</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>43</issue><spage>55447</spage><epage>55461</epage><pages>55447-55461</pages><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>In recent years, heavy rainfall disasters linked to climate change have become more frequent, raising concerns about the release of chemicals stored in factories. Assessing chemical contamination during such emergencies therefore necessitates the development of a quick and easy method for evaluating hazardous contaminants in combination with toxicity testing. This study proposes a “toxicity screening” method that combines biological response testing and chemical analysis to systematically evaluate hazardous contaminants in emergency situations. The toxicity screening method evaluates the water quality in three steps, including water quality measurements and a delayed fluorescence (DF) assay, metal content measurements and a DF assay, and targeted screening analysis and a DF assay. The efficacy of this method was tested using industrial wastewater from 14 locations. Seven of the samples were non-toxic, while the other seven samples were toxic, displaying no observed effect concentration (NOEC) values ranging from 0.625 to 20%. Two toxic samples in the first phase possessed high total chlorine concentrations (0.4 mg L
−1
) and conductivities (2200 mS m
−1
), indicating that the main sources of toxicity were residual chlorine and a high salt concentration. In the second phase, metal content analysis identified metals as the toxicity cause in four samples. In the third phase, the organic contaminants were analyzed, and tri-
n
-octyl phosphate (TNOP) was detected at a concentration of 0.00027 mg L
−1
. The results of solid-phase extraction experiments and exposure tests with TNOP alone indicated that the contribution of TNOP to the toxicity was negligible and that chemicals not adsorbed on the solid-phase extraction cartridges were the cause of toxicity. The proposed method can therefore be considered effective for disaster-related water quality assessment, delivering results within 12 days.
Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39230813</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-024-34821-6</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1614-7499 |
ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024-09, Vol.31 (43), p.55447-55461 |
issn | 1614-7499 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3100565272 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algae Algal growth Analytical chemistry Aquatic Pollution Assaying Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Chemical analysis Chemical contaminants Chemical contamination Chemical pollution Chlorine Climate change Contaminants Content analysis Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Effectiveness Emergency response Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental surveys Evaluation Fluorescence Growth inhibition test Industrial wastes Industrial wastewater Metal concentrations Metals Organic contaminants Quality assessment Quality control Rainfall Research Article Residual chlorine Screening Solid phases Toxicity Toxicity testing Toxicity Tests - methods Waste Water Technology Wastewater - chemistry Water Management Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity Water Pollution Control Water Quality Water quality assessments Water quality measurements |
title | Systematization of a toxicity screening method based on a combination of chemical analysis and the delayed fluorescence algal growth inhibition test for use in emergency environmental surveys |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A33%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematization%20of%20a%20toxicity%20screening%20method%20based%20on%20a%20combination%20of%20chemical%20analysis%20and%20the%20delayed%20fluorescence%20algal%20growth%20inhibition%20test%20for%20use%20in%20emergency%20environmental%20surveys&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Koga,%20Toyokazu&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=43&rft.spage=55447&rft.epage=55461&rft.pages=55447-55461&rft.issn=1614-7499&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-024-34821-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3100565272%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3107325089&rft_id=info:pmid/39230813&rfr_iscdi=true |