A moving-mesh finite-volume method to solve free-surface seepage problem in arbitrary geometries

The main objective of this work is to develop a novel moving‐mesh finite‐volume method capable of solving the seepage problem in domains with arbitrary geometries. One major difficulty in analysing the seepage problem is the position of phreatic boundary which is unknown at the beginning of solution...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics 2007-12, Vol.31 (14), p.1609-1629
Hauptverfasser: Darbandi, M., Torabi, S. O., Saadat, M., Daghighi, Y., Jarrahbashi, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1629
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1609
container_title International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics
container_volume 31
creator Darbandi, M.
Torabi, S. O.
Saadat, M.
Daghighi, Y.
Jarrahbashi, D.
description The main objective of this work is to develop a novel moving‐mesh finite‐volume method capable of solving the seepage problem in domains with arbitrary geometries. One major difficulty in analysing the seepage problem is the position of phreatic boundary which is unknown at the beginning of solution. In the current algorithm, we first choose an arbitrary solution domain with a hypothetical phreatic boundary and distribute the finite volumes therein. Then, we derive the conservative statement on a curvilinear co‐ordinate system for each cell and implement the known boundary conditions all over the solution domain. Defining a consistency factor, the inconsistency between the hypothesis boundary and the known boundary conditions is measured at the phreatic boundary. Subsequently, the preceding mesh is suitably deformed so that its upper boundary matches the new location of the phreatic surface. This tactic results in a moving‐mesh procedure which is continued until the nonlinear boundary conditions are fully satisfied at the phreatic boundary. To validate the developed algorithm, a number of seepage models, which have been previously targeted by the other investigators, are solved. Comparisons between the current results and those of other numerical methods as well as the experimental data show that the current moving‐grid finite‐volume method is highly robust and it provides sufficient accuracy and reliability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nag.611
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31002303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31002303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4491-f28646eb887f2f100566ed94df88ced4ff9c19be433e24609522433e976e9e033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtOAyEUBmBiNLFe4iuwUReGCsMMhWW9VY2pG43ukE4PFZ0ZKkyrvr3UMbpyBQkff875EdpjtM8ozY4bM-sLxtZQj1EliJIFX0c9ygUnigq2ibZifKGUFum1h56GuPZL18xIDfEZW9e4FsjSV4sacA3ts5_i1uPoqyVgGwBIXARrSsARYG5mgOfBTyqosWuwCRPXBhM-8Qx8-hwcxB20YU0VYffn3Eb3F-d3p5fk5nZ0dTq8ISbPFSM2kyIXMJFyYDObFimEgKnKp1bKEqa5tapkagI555Dlgqoiy1Z3NRCggHK-jQ663DTP2wJiq2sXS6gq04BfRM1X5fBveNjBMvgYA1g9D65OQ2tG9Qrp1KBODSa5_xNpYmkqG0xTuvjHVcakFEVyR517dxV8_henx8NRl0o67WILH7_ahFctBnxQ6IfxSF-fPJ7JC5nrM_4FA7GNpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>31002303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A moving-mesh finite-volume method to solve free-surface seepage problem in arbitrary geometries</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Darbandi, M. ; Torabi, S. O. ; Saadat, M. ; Daghighi, Y. ; Jarrahbashi, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Darbandi, M. ; Torabi, S. O. ; Saadat, M. ; Daghighi, Y. ; Jarrahbashi, D.</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of this work is to develop a novel moving‐mesh finite‐volume method capable of solving the seepage problem in domains with arbitrary geometries. One major difficulty in analysing the seepage problem is the position of phreatic boundary which is unknown at the beginning of solution. In the current algorithm, we first choose an arbitrary solution domain with a hypothetical phreatic boundary and distribute the finite volumes therein. Then, we derive the conservative statement on a curvilinear co‐ordinate system for each cell and implement the known boundary conditions all over the solution domain. Defining a consistency factor, the inconsistency between the hypothesis boundary and the known boundary conditions is measured at the phreatic boundary. Subsequently, the preceding mesh is suitably deformed so that its upper boundary matches the new location of the phreatic surface. This tactic results in a moving‐mesh procedure which is continued until the nonlinear boundary conditions are fully satisfied at the phreatic boundary. To validate the developed algorithm, a number of seepage models, which have been previously targeted by the other investigators, are solved. Comparisons between the current results and those of other numerical methods as well as the experimental data show that the current moving‐grid finite‐volume method is highly robust and it provides sufficient accuracy and reliability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-9061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9853</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nag.611</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJNGDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Dams and subsidiary installations ; Exact sciences and technology ; finite volume ; Hydraulic constructions ; moving boundary ; moving grid ; phreatic boundary ; seepage ; Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><ispartof>International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 2007-12, Vol.31 (14), p.1609-1629</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4491-f28646eb887f2f100566ed94df88ced4ff9c19be433e24609522433e976e9e033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4491-f28646eb887f2f100566ed94df88ced4ff9c19be433e24609522433e976e9e033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnag.611$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnag.611$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19218865$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Darbandi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torabi, S. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadat, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daghighi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrahbashi, D.</creatorcontrib><title>A moving-mesh finite-volume method to solve free-surface seepage problem in arbitrary geometries</title><title>International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics</title><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech</addtitle><description>The main objective of this work is to develop a novel moving‐mesh finite‐volume method capable of solving the seepage problem in domains with arbitrary geometries. One major difficulty in analysing the seepage problem is the position of phreatic boundary which is unknown at the beginning of solution. In the current algorithm, we first choose an arbitrary solution domain with a hypothetical phreatic boundary and distribute the finite volumes therein. Then, we derive the conservative statement on a curvilinear co‐ordinate system for each cell and implement the known boundary conditions all over the solution domain. Defining a consistency factor, the inconsistency between the hypothesis boundary and the known boundary conditions is measured at the phreatic boundary. Subsequently, the preceding mesh is suitably deformed so that its upper boundary matches the new location of the phreatic surface. This tactic results in a moving‐mesh procedure which is continued until the nonlinear boundary conditions are fully satisfied at the phreatic boundary. To validate the developed algorithm, a number of seepage models, which have been previously targeted by the other investigators, are solved. Comparisons between the current results and those of other numerical methods as well as the experimental data show that the current moving‐grid finite‐volume method is highly robust and it provides sufficient accuracy and reliability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Dams and subsidiary installations</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>finite volume</subject><subject>Hydraulic constructions</subject><subject>moving boundary</subject><subject>moving grid</subject><subject>phreatic boundary</subject><subject>seepage</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><issn>0363-9061</issn><issn>1096-9853</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtOAyEUBmBiNLFe4iuwUReGCsMMhWW9VY2pG43ukE4PFZ0ZKkyrvr3UMbpyBQkff875EdpjtM8ozY4bM-sLxtZQj1EliJIFX0c9ygUnigq2ibZifKGUFum1h56GuPZL18xIDfEZW9e4FsjSV4sacA3ts5_i1uPoqyVgGwBIXARrSsARYG5mgOfBTyqosWuwCRPXBhM-8Qx8-hwcxB20YU0VYffn3Eb3F-d3p5fk5nZ0dTq8ISbPFSM2kyIXMJFyYDObFimEgKnKp1bKEqa5tapkagI555Dlgqoiy1Z3NRCggHK-jQ663DTP2wJiq2sXS6gq04BfRM1X5fBveNjBMvgYA1g9D65OQ2tG9Qrp1KBODSa5_xNpYmkqG0xTuvjHVcakFEVyR517dxV8_henx8NRl0o67WILH7_ahFctBnxQ6IfxSF-fPJ7JC5nrM_4FA7GNpg</recordid><startdate>20071210</startdate><enddate>20071210</enddate><creator>Darbandi, M.</creator><creator>Torabi, S. O.</creator><creator>Saadat, M.</creator><creator>Daghighi, Y.</creator><creator>Jarrahbashi, D.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071210</creationdate><title>A moving-mesh finite-volume method to solve free-surface seepage problem in arbitrary geometries</title><author>Darbandi, M. ; Torabi, S. O. ; Saadat, M. ; Daghighi, Y. ; Jarrahbashi, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4491-f28646eb887f2f100566ed94df88ced4ff9c19be433e24609522433e976e9e033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Dams and subsidiary installations</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>finite volume</topic><topic>Hydraulic constructions</topic><topic>moving boundary</topic><topic>moving grid</topic><topic>phreatic boundary</topic><topic>seepage</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Darbandi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torabi, S. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadat, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daghighi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrahbashi, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Darbandi, M.</au><au>Torabi, S. O.</au><au>Saadat, M.</au><au>Daghighi, Y.</au><au>Jarrahbashi, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A moving-mesh finite-volume method to solve free-surface seepage problem in arbitrary geometries</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech</addtitle><date>2007-12-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1609</spage><epage>1629</epage><pages>1609-1629</pages><issn>0363-9061</issn><eissn>1096-9853</eissn><coden>IJNGDZ</coden><abstract>The main objective of this work is to develop a novel moving‐mesh finite‐volume method capable of solving the seepage problem in domains with arbitrary geometries. One major difficulty in analysing the seepage problem is the position of phreatic boundary which is unknown at the beginning of solution. In the current algorithm, we first choose an arbitrary solution domain with a hypothetical phreatic boundary and distribute the finite volumes therein. Then, we derive the conservative statement on a curvilinear co‐ordinate system for each cell and implement the known boundary conditions all over the solution domain. Defining a consistency factor, the inconsistency between the hypothesis boundary and the known boundary conditions is measured at the phreatic boundary. Subsequently, the preceding mesh is suitably deformed so that its upper boundary matches the new location of the phreatic surface. This tactic results in a moving‐mesh procedure which is continued until the nonlinear boundary conditions are fully satisfied at the phreatic boundary. To validate the developed algorithm, a number of seepage models, which have been previously targeted by the other investigators, are solved. Comparisons between the current results and those of other numerical methods as well as the experimental data show that the current moving‐grid finite‐volume method is highly robust and it provides sufficient accuracy and reliability. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/nag.611</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-9061
ispartof International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 2007-12, Vol.31 (14), p.1609-1629
issn 0363-9061
1096-9853
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_31002303
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Dams and subsidiary installations
Exact sciences and technology
finite volume
Hydraulic constructions
moving boundary
moving grid
phreatic boundary
seepage
Structural analysis. Stresses
title A moving-mesh finite-volume method to solve free-surface seepage problem in arbitrary geometries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A55%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20moving-mesh%20finite-volume%20method%20to%20solve%20free-surface%20seepage%20problem%20in%20arbitrary%20geometries&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20and%20analytical%20methods%20in%20geomechanics&rft.au=Darbandi,%20M.&rft.date=2007-12-10&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1609&rft.epage=1629&rft.pages=1609-1629&rft.issn=0363-9061&rft.eissn=1096-9853&rft.coden=IJNGDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nag.611&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E31002303%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31002303&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true