A critical meta-analysis of predicted no effect concentrations for antimicrobial resistance selection in the environment

•Environmental risk assessment of antimicrobials is needed to reduce AMR selection.•Semi-systematic searches found selective concentrations, collated into a database.•PNECR interpretation facilitated through appraisal of approaches used.•Until further review, a PNECR of 0.01 µg/L for all antibiotics...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2024-11, Vol.266, p.122310, Article 122310
Hauptverfasser: Murray, Aimee K., Stanton, Isobel C., Tipper, Holly J., Wilkinson, Helen, Schmidt, Wiebke, Hart, Alwyn, Singer, Andrew C., Gaze, William H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 122310
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 266
creator Murray, Aimee K.
Stanton, Isobel C.
Tipper, Holly J.
Wilkinson, Helen
Schmidt, Wiebke
Hart, Alwyn
Singer, Andrew C.
Gaze, William H.
description •Environmental risk assessment of antimicrobials is needed to reduce AMR selection.•Semi-systematic searches found selective concentrations, collated into a database.•PNECR interpretation facilitated through appraisal of approaches used.•Until further review, a PNECR of 0.01 µg/L for all antibiotics could be considered.•Future research directions are provided. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest threats to human health with a growing body of evidence demonstrating that selection for AMR can occur at environmental antimicrobial concentrations. Understanding the concentrations at which selection for resistance may occur is critical to help inform environmental risk assessments and highlight where mitigation strategies are required. A variety of experimental and data approaches have been used to determine these concentrations. However, there is minimal standardisation of existing approaches and no consensus on the relative merits of different methods. We conducted a semi-systematic literature review to collect and critically appraise available minimal selective concentration (MSC) and predicted no effect concentration for resistance (PNECR) data and the approaches used to derive them. There were 21 relevant articles providing 331 selective concentrations, ranging from 0.00087 µg/L (ciprofloxacin) to 2000 µg/L (carbenicillin). Meta-analyses of these data found that selective concentrations are highly compound-dependent, and only a subset of all antimicrobials have been the focus of most of the research. The variety of approaches that have been used, knowledge gaps and future research priorities were identified, as well as recommendations for those considering the selective risks of antimicrobials in the environment. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122310
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099855406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135424012090</els_id><sourcerecordid>3099855406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-2dc1d6a9f510ad8bb55e7d15ab716be450737a398136edcaa64e16533c58b7c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtuFDEQRS1ERIaEP0DISzY92G27HxukKOIlRWJD1la1XS1q1G0Ptichfx9HnbBkVZtzb1Udxt5LsZdCdp8O-3soCfO-Fa3ey7ZVUrxiOzn0Y9NqPbxmOyG0aqQy-py9zfkghKjU-Iadq7GVfafVjv294i5RIQcLX7FAAwGWh0yZx5kfE3pyBT0PkeM8oyvcxeAwlASFYsh8jolDKLSSS3Gi2lJPolygUjzjUiOV4xR4-Y0cwx2lGNZacMnOZlgyvnueF-z265df19-bm5_fflxf3TSu1bI0rXfSdzDORgrwwzQZg72XBqZedhNqI3rVgxoHqTr0DqDTKDujlDPD1LtBXbCPW-8xxT8nzMWulB0uCwSMp2yVGMfBGC26iuoNra_knHC2x0QrpAcrhX1ybg92c26fnNvNeY19eN5wmlb0_0IvkivweQOw_nlHmGx2hFWQp1T9WB_p_xseAYBtlxc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099855406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critical meta-analysis of predicted no effect concentrations for antimicrobial resistance selection in the environment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Murray, Aimee K. ; Stanton, Isobel C. ; Tipper, Holly J. ; Wilkinson, Helen ; Schmidt, Wiebke ; Hart, Alwyn ; Singer, Andrew C. ; Gaze, William H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Aimee K. ; Stanton, Isobel C. ; Tipper, Holly J. ; Wilkinson, Helen ; Schmidt, Wiebke ; Hart, Alwyn ; Singer, Andrew C. ; Gaze, William H.</creatorcontrib><description>•Environmental risk assessment of antimicrobials is needed to reduce AMR selection.•Semi-systematic searches found selective concentrations, collated into a database.•PNECR interpretation facilitated through appraisal of approaches used.•Until further review, a PNECR of 0.01 µg/L for all antibiotics could be considered.•Future research directions are provided. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest threats to human health with a growing body of evidence demonstrating that selection for AMR can occur at environmental antimicrobial concentrations. Understanding the concentrations at which selection for resistance may occur is critical to help inform environmental risk assessments and highlight where mitigation strategies are required. A variety of experimental and data approaches have been used to determine these concentrations. However, there is minimal standardisation of existing approaches and no consensus on the relative merits of different methods. We conducted a semi-systematic literature review to collect and critically appraise available minimal selective concentration (MSC) and predicted no effect concentration for resistance (PNECR) data and the approaches used to derive them. There were 21 relevant articles providing 331 selective concentrations, ranging from 0.00087 µg/L (ciprofloxacin) to 2000 µg/L (carbenicillin). Meta-analyses of these data found that selective concentrations are highly compound-dependent, and only a subset of all antimicrobials have been the focus of most of the research. The variety of approaches that have been used, knowledge gaps and future research priorities were identified, as well as recommendations for those considering the selective risks of antimicrobials in the environment. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122310</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39217643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacology ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Drug Resistance, Microbial ; Environment ; Humans ; Minimal selective concentration ; Predicted no effect concentration for resistance ; Risk assessment ; Selection</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2024-11, Vol.266, p.122310, Article 122310</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-2dc1d6a9f510ad8bb55e7d15ab716be450737a398136edcaa64e16533c58b7c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1857-9204 ; 0000-0003-4705-6063 ; 0000-0002-2700-2407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122310$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39217643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Aimee K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Isobel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipper, Holly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Wiebke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Alwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaze, William H.</creatorcontrib><title>A critical meta-analysis of predicted no effect concentrations for antimicrobial resistance selection in the environment</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>•Environmental risk assessment of antimicrobials is needed to reduce AMR selection.•Semi-systematic searches found selective concentrations, collated into a database.•PNECR interpretation facilitated through appraisal of approaches used.•Until further review, a PNECR of 0.01 µg/L for all antibiotics could be considered.•Future research directions are provided. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest threats to human health with a growing body of evidence demonstrating that selection for AMR can occur at environmental antimicrobial concentrations. Understanding the concentrations at which selection for resistance may occur is critical to help inform environmental risk assessments and highlight where mitigation strategies are required. A variety of experimental and data approaches have been used to determine these concentrations. However, there is minimal standardisation of existing approaches and no consensus on the relative merits of different methods. We conducted a semi-systematic literature review to collect and critically appraise available minimal selective concentration (MSC) and predicted no effect concentration for resistance (PNECR) data and the approaches used to derive them. There were 21 relevant articles providing 331 selective concentrations, ranging from 0.00087 µg/L (ciprofloxacin) to 2000 µg/L (carbenicillin). Meta-analyses of these data found that selective concentrations are highly compound-dependent, and only a subset of all antimicrobials have been the focus of most of the research. The variety of approaches that have been used, knowledge gaps and future research priorities were identified, as well as recommendations for those considering the selective risks of antimicrobials in the environment. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Microbial</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Minimal selective concentration</subject><subject>Predicted no effect concentration for resistance</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Selection</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtuFDEQRS1ERIaEP0DISzY92G27HxukKOIlRWJD1la1XS1q1G0Ptichfx9HnbBkVZtzb1Udxt5LsZdCdp8O-3soCfO-Fa3ey7ZVUrxiOzn0Y9NqPbxmOyG0aqQy-py9zfkghKjU-Iadq7GVfafVjv294i5RIQcLX7FAAwGWh0yZx5kfE3pyBT0PkeM8oyvcxeAwlASFYsh8jolDKLSSS3Gi2lJPolygUjzjUiOV4xR4-Y0cwx2lGNZacMnOZlgyvnueF-z265df19-bm5_fflxf3TSu1bI0rXfSdzDORgrwwzQZg72XBqZedhNqI3rVgxoHqTr0DqDTKDujlDPD1LtBXbCPW-8xxT8nzMWulB0uCwSMp2yVGMfBGC26iuoNra_knHC2x0QrpAcrhX1ybg92c26fnNvNeY19eN5wmlb0_0IvkivweQOw_nlHmGx2hFWQp1T9WB_p_xseAYBtlxc</recordid><startdate>20241115</startdate><enddate>20241115</enddate><creator>Murray, Aimee K.</creator><creator>Stanton, Isobel C.</creator><creator>Tipper, Holly J.</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Helen</creator><creator>Schmidt, Wiebke</creator><creator>Hart, Alwyn</creator><creator>Singer, Andrew C.</creator><creator>Gaze, William H.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-9204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-6063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-2407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241115</creationdate><title>A critical meta-analysis of predicted no effect concentrations for antimicrobial resistance selection in the environment</title><author>Murray, Aimee K. ; Stanton, Isobel C. ; Tipper, Holly J. ; Wilkinson, Helen ; Schmidt, Wiebke ; Hart, Alwyn ; Singer, Andrew C. ; Gaze, William H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c241t-2dc1d6a9f510ad8bb55e7d15ab716be450737a398136edcaa64e16533c58b7c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Microbial</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Minimal selective concentration</topic><topic>Predicted no effect concentration for resistance</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Selection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Aimee K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanton, Isobel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipper, Holly J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Wiebke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Alwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Andrew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaze, William H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Aimee K.</au><au>Stanton, Isobel C.</au><au>Tipper, Holly J.</au><au>Wilkinson, Helen</au><au>Schmidt, Wiebke</au><au>Hart, Alwyn</au><au>Singer, Andrew C.</au><au>Gaze, William H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critical meta-analysis of predicted no effect concentrations for antimicrobial resistance selection in the environment</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2024-11-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>266</volume><spage>122310</spage><pages>122310-</pages><artnum>122310</artnum><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>•Environmental risk assessment of antimicrobials is needed to reduce AMR selection.•Semi-systematic searches found selective concentrations, collated into a database.•PNECR interpretation facilitated through appraisal of approaches used.•Until further review, a PNECR of 0.01 µg/L for all antibiotics could be considered.•Future research directions are provided. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest threats to human health with a growing body of evidence demonstrating that selection for AMR can occur at environmental antimicrobial concentrations. Understanding the concentrations at which selection for resistance may occur is critical to help inform environmental risk assessments and highlight where mitigation strategies are required. A variety of experimental and data approaches have been used to determine these concentrations. However, there is minimal standardisation of existing approaches and no consensus on the relative merits of different methods. We conducted a semi-systematic literature review to collect and critically appraise available minimal selective concentration (MSC) and predicted no effect concentration for resistance (PNECR) data and the approaches used to derive them. There were 21 relevant articles providing 331 selective concentrations, ranging from 0.00087 µg/L (ciprofloxacin) to 2000 µg/L (carbenicillin). Meta-analyses of these data found that selective concentrations are highly compound-dependent, and only a subset of all antimicrobials have been the focus of most of the research. The variety of approaches that have been used, knowledge gaps and future research priorities were identified, as well as recommendations for those considering the selective risks of antimicrobials in the environment. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39217643</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2024.122310</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-9204</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-6063</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2700-2407</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2024-11, Vol.266, p.122310, Article 122310
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099855406
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacology
Antimicrobial resistance
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Environment
Humans
Minimal selective concentration
Predicted no effect concentration for resistance
Risk assessment
Selection
title A critical meta-analysis of predicted no effect concentrations for antimicrobial resistance selection in the environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critical%20meta-analysis%20of%20predicted%20no%20effect%20concentrations%20for%20antimicrobial%20resistance%20selection%20in%20the%20environment&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Murray,%20Aimee%20K.&rft.date=2024-11-15&rft.volume=266&rft.spage=122310&rft.pages=122310-&rft.artnum=122310&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122310&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099855406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099855406&rft_id=info:pmid/39217643&rft_els_id=S0043135424012090&rfr_iscdi=true