Boston Type II Keratoprosthesis, 7 Years of Experience and Outcomes From a Spanish Tertiary Eye Care Hospital

To report midterm outcomes of Boston Keratoprosthesis type II at a reference center in Spain. Retrospective case series. This observational study included medical records of 9 patients who underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis type II surgery at Cruces University Hospital from May 2016 through May 2023....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2025-01, Vol.269, p.327-338
Hauptverfasser: Orive Bañuelos, Ana, Sacristán Egüén, Cristina, Arce Soto, Ana, Santamaría Carro, Alaitz, Feijóo Lera, Raquel, Andollo Victoriano, Noelia, Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 338
container_issue
container_start_page 327
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 269
creator Orive Bañuelos, Ana
Sacristán Egüén, Cristina
Arce Soto, Ana
Santamaría Carro, Alaitz
Feijóo Lera, Raquel
Andollo Victoriano, Noelia
Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime
description To report midterm outcomes of Boston Keratoprosthesis type II at a reference center in Spain. Retrospective case series. This observational study included medical records of 9 patients who underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis type II surgery at Cruces University Hospital from May 2016 through May 2023. A total of 9 eyes received this device during the study period. One patient who had undergone a modification of the standard procedure was excluded. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were studied. The main outcomes analyzed were visual acuity, device retention, and complications and their management. The most common indication for implantation was severe Sjögren syndrome (33.3%) followed by graft-versus-host disease (22.2%). The mean follow-up was 3.89 years (±2.08). Visual acuity improved to better than or equal to 20/40 in 8 eyes (88.8%) and 20/25 in 6 eyes (66.6%), while best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 was achieved in 4 eyes (44.4%). At the last visit, maximum visual acuity was maintained in 4 patients. The most common postoperative complication was retroprosthetic membrane formation (77.7%). New-onset glaucoma was detected in 4 patients (44.4%). Device extrusion occurred in 1 eye and 2 more patients required replacement surgery. All but 1 of the patients are on postoperative treatment with systemic immunosuppressants. The Boston type II Keratoprosthesis is a useful option for visual rehabilitation in end-stage ocular surface diseases. Multidisciplinary management of complications is of vital importance for the maintenance of vision and the device. Immunosuppressive treatment helps control the inflammation that leads to most associated complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099802952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002939424003714</els_id><sourcerecordid>3099802952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-da8d8c40989706172d0e7d9028c5bc06efe746d2c7d0b9ef44fd6c286540bab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFvEzEQhS0EomnLD-CCfOTAbsdeZ22LE0QpjVqpB3LpyfLas6qj7HqxNxX597hN4chpNKP3nuZ9hHxkUDNg7dWutrtYc-CiBlUDgzdkwZTUFVOavSULAOCVbrQ4I-c578raSiHfk7NGcyYa3SzI8D3mOY50e5yQbjb0FpOd45TK9RFzyF-opA9oU6axp-vfE6aAo0NqR0_vD7OLA2Z6neJALf052THkR7rFNAebjnR9RLqyCelNzFOY7f6SvOvtPuOH13lBttfr7eqmurv_sVl9u6scb5Zz5a3yygnQSktomeQeUHoNXLll56DFHqVoPXfSQ6exF6L3reOqXQrobNdckM-n2NLj1wHzbIaQHe73dsR4yKYBrRVwveRFyk5SVyrnhL2ZUhjK84aBeYZsdqZANs-QDShTIBfPp9f4Qzeg_-f4S7UIvp4EWDo-BUwmuxdsPiR0s_Ex_Cf-D220jLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099802952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Boston Type II Keratoprosthesis, 7 Years of Experience and Outcomes From a Spanish Tertiary Eye Care Hospital</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Orive Bañuelos, Ana ; Sacristán Egüén, Cristina ; Arce Soto, Ana ; Santamaría Carro, Alaitz ; Feijóo Lera, Raquel ; Andollo Victoriano, Noelia ; Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime</creator><creatorcontrib>Orive Bañuelos, Ana ; Sacristán Egüén, Cristina ; Arce Soto, Ana ; Santamaría Carro, Alaitz ; Feijóo Lera, Raquel ; Andollo Victoriano, Noelia ; Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime</creatorcontrib><description>To report midterm outcomes of Boston Keratoprosthesis type II at a reference center in Spain. Retrospective case series. This observational study included medical records of 9 patients who underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis type II surgery at Cruces University Hospital from May 2016 through May 2023. A total of 9 eyes received this device during the study period. One patient who had undergone a modification of the standard procedure was excluded. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were studied. The main outcomes analyzed were visual acuity, device retention, and complications and their management. The most common indication for implantation was severe Sjögren syndrome (33.3%) followed by graft-versus-host disease (22.2%). The mean follow-up was 3.89 years (±2.08). Visual acuity improved to better than or equal to 20/40 in 8 eyes (88.8%) and 20/25 in 6 eyes (66.6%), while best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 was achieved in 4 eyes (44.4%). At the last visit, maximum visual acuity was maintained in 4 patients. The most common postoperative complication was retroprosthetic membrane formation (77.7%). New-onset glaucoma was detected in 4 patients (44.4%). Device extrusion occurred in 1 eye and 2 more patients required replacement surgery. All but 1 of the patients are on postoperative treatment with systemic immunosuppressants. The Boston type II Keratoprosthesis is a useful option for visual rehabilitation in end-stage ocular surface diseases. Multidisciplinary management of complications is of vital importance for the maintenance of vision and the device. Immunosuppressive treatment helps control the inflammation that leads to most associated complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39214393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Artificial Organs ; Cornea ; Corneal Diseases - physiopathology ; Corneal Diseases - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; Prostheses and Implants ; Prosthesis Implantation ; Retrospective Studies ; Spain ; Tertiary Care Centers ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2025-01, Vol.269, p.327-338</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-da8d8c40989706172d0e7d9028c5bc06efe746d2c7d0b9ef44fd6c286540bab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1779-2169 ; 0000-0003-0589-5854 ; 0000-0002-0335-4301</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939424003714$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39214393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orive Bañuelos, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacristán Egüén, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arce Soto, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaría Carro, Alaitz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijóo Lera, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andollo Victoriano, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime</creatorcontrib><title>Boston Type II Keratoprosthesis, 7 Years of Experience and Outcomes From a Spanish Tertiary Eye Care Hospital</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To report midterm outcomes of Boston Keratoprosthesis type II at a reference center in Spain. Retrospective case series. This observational study included medical records of 9 patients who underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis type II surgery at Cruces University Hospital from May 2016 through May 2023. A total of 9 eyes received this device during the study period. One patient who had undergone a modification of the standard procedure was excluded. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were studied. The main outcomes analyzed were visual acuity, device retention, and complications and their management. The most common indication for implantation was severe Sjögren syndrome (33.3%) followed by graft-versus-host disease (22.2%). The mean follow-up was 3.89 years (±2.08). Visual acuity improved to better than or equal to 20/40 in 8 eyes (88.8%) and 20/25 in 6 eyes (66.6%), while best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 was achieved in 4 eyes (44.4%). At the last visit, maximum visual acuity was maintained in 4 patients. The most common postoperative complication was retroprosthetic membrane formation (77.7%). New-onset glaucoma was detected in 4 patients (44.4%). Device extrusion occurred in 1 eye and 2 more patients required replacement surgery. All but 1 of the patients are on postoperative treatment with systemic immunosuppressants. The Boston type II Keratoprosthesis is a useful option for visual rehabilitation in end-stage ocular surface diseases. Multidisciplinary management of complications is of vital importance for the maintenance of vision and the device. Immunosuppressive treatment helps control the inflammation that leads to most associated complications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Artificial Organs</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Corneal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFvEzEQhS0EomnLD-CCfOTAbsdeZ22LE0QpjVqpB3LpyfLas6qj7HqxNxX597hN4chpNKP3nuZ9hHxkUDNg7dWutrtYc-CiBlUDgzdkwZTUFVOavSULAOCVbrQ4I-c578raSiHfk7NGcyYa3SzI8D3mOY50e5yQbjb0FpOd45TK9RFzyF-opA9oU6axp-vfE6aAo0NqR0_vD7OLA2Z6neJALf052THkR7rFNAebjnR9RLqyCelNzFOY7f6SvOvtPuOH13lBttfr7eqmurv_sVl9u6scb5Zz5a3yygnQSktomeQeUHoNXLll56DFHqVoPXfSQ6exF6L3reOqXQrobNdckM-n2NLj1wHzbIaQHe73dsR4yKYBrRVwveRFyk5SVyrnhL2ZUhjK84aBeYZsdqZANs-QDShTIBfPp9f4Qzeg_-f4S7UIvp4EWDo-BUwmuxdsPiR0s_Ex_Cf-D220jLk</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Orive Bañuelos, Ana</creator><creator>Sacristán Egüén, Cristina</creator><creator>Arce Soto, Ana</creator><creator>Santamaría Carro, Alaitz</creator><creator>Feijóo Lera, Raquel</creator><creator>Andollo Victoriano, Noelia</creator><creator>Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1779-2169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-5854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-4301</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Boston Type II Keratoprosthesis, 7 Years of Experience and Outcomes From a Spanish Tertiary Eye Care Hospital</title><author>Orive Bañuelos, Ana ; Sacristán Egüén, Cristina ; Arce Soto, Ana ; Santamaría Carro, Alaitz ; Feijóo Lera, Raquel ; Andollo Victoriano, Noelia ; Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c235t-da8d8c40989706172d0e7d9028c5bc06efe746d2c7d0b9ef44fd6c286540bab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Artificial Organs</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Corneal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orive Bañuelos, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacristán Egüén, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arce Soto, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaría Carro, Alaitz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feijóo Lera, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andollo Victoriano, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orive Bañuelos, Ana</au><au>Sacristán Egüén, Cristina</au><au>Arce Soto, Ana</au><au>Santamaría Carro, Alaitz</au><au>Feijóo Lera, Raquel</au><au>Andollo Victoriano, Noelia</au><au>Etxebarria Ecenarro, Jaime</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Boston Type II Keratoprosthesis, 7 Years of Experience and Outcomes From a Spanish Tertiary Eye Care Hospital</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>269</volume><spage>327</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>327-338</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><abstract>To report midterm outcomes of Boston Keratoprosthesis type II at a reference center in Spain. Retrospective case series. This observational study included medical records of 9 patients who underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis type II surgery at Cruces University Hospital from May 2016 through May 2023. A total of 9 eyes received this device during the study period. One patient who had undergone a modification of the standard procedure was excluded. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were studied. The main outcomes analyzed were visual acuity, device retention, and complications and their management. The most common indication for implantation was severe Sjögren syndrome (33.3%) followed by graft-versus-host disease (22.2%). The mean follow-up was 3.89 years (±2.08). Visual acuity improved to better than or equal to 20/40 in 8 eyes (88.8%) and 20/25 in 6 eyes (66.6%), while best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 was achieved in 4 eyes (44.4%). At the last visit, maximum visual acuity was maintained in 4 patients. The most common postoperative complication was retroprosthetic membrane formation (77.7%). New-onset glaucoma was detected in 4 patients (44.4%). Device extrusion occurred in 1 eye and 2 more patients required replacement surgery. All but 1 of the patients are on postoperative treatment with systemic immunosuppressants. The Boston type II Keratoprosthesis is a useful option for visual rehabilitation in end-stage ocular surface diseases. Multidisciplinary management of complications is of vital importance for the maintenance of vision and the device. Immunosuppressive treatment helps control the inflammation that leads to most associated complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39214393</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.010</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1779-2169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-5854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-4301</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2025-01, Vol.269, p.327-338
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099802952
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Artificial Organs
Cornea
Corneal Diseases - physiopathology
Corneal Diseases - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications
Prostheses and Implants
Prosthesis Implantation
Retrospective Studies
Spain
Tertiary Care Centers
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity - physiology
title Boston Type II Keratoprosthesis, 7 Years of Experience and Outcomes From a Spanish Tertiary Eye Care Hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A06%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Boston%20Type%20II%20Keratoprosthesis,%207%20Years%20of%20Experience%20and%20Outcomes%20From%20a%20Spanish%20Tertiary%20Eye%20Care%20Hospital&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Orive%20Ba%C3%B1uelos,%20Ana&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=269&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=327-338&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099802952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099802952&rft_id=info:pmid/39214393&rft_els_id=S0002939424003714&rfr_iscdi=true