Inclusion of Histopathology in Dose Range-Finding Nonclinical Studies for Inhaled Drug Products

Drug development is a lengthy process that promotes and protects the health and safety of future patients. Nonclinical safety studies follow essentially similar designs that fulfill regulatory requirements but are amended based on factors including the mechanism of action, class of molecule, and rou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of toxicology 2024-12, Vol.43 (6), p.540-548
Hauptverfasser: Resseguie, Emily A., Palmer, Helen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 548
container_issue 6
container_start_page 540
container_title International journal of toxicology
container_volume 43
creator Resseguie, Emily A.
Palmer, Helen
description Drug development is a lengthy process that promotes and protects the health and safety of future patients. Nonclinical safety studies follow essentially similar designs that fulfill regulatory requirements but are amended based on factors including the mechanism of action, class of molecule, and route of administration. Clinical observations, clinical pathology, and macroscopic pathology in dose range-finding (DRF) studies generally provide sufficient information to select doses for pivotal studies by most delivery routes. Inhaled drug candidates are recognized for producing adverse effects on the respiratory system at the microscopic level that may otherwise be unpredictable; therefore, unlike other routes of administration, inhalation DRF studies typically include histopathology of the respiratory tract. Histopathology evaluations can add several weeks to the Investigational New Drug (IND) application timeline along with additional costs but have been considered necessary to support accurate dose selection for adequate safety margins, thereby potentially avoiding additional studies and animal usage by ensuring achievement of a NOAEL in the pivotal studies. Therefore, DRF inhalation studies initiated from 2018 to 2021 at Labcorp were reviewed to determine whether inclusion of histopathology on preliminary inhalation studies was necessary for subsequent dose selection. Histopathology findings in the DRF impacted dose selection in pivotal inhalation studies for approximately 45% of rat and dog studies. This review identified histopathology findings in rat and dog that support continued inclusion of respiratory tract histopathology in DRF studies. Future investigations will evaluate potential surrogate endpoints for these findings, which could reduce nonclinical drug development timelines by several weeks.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10915818241276439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099799929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10915818241276439</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3099799929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-fc1c0be0a4413770651e1d9ef0829aa23760c0d00880327cca3419fd5d2c52983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EolD4ASzII0vK2U7qeEQtpZUqQHxIbJFrO6mr1C52MvTfk9LCgsR0p9PzvtI9CF0RGBDC-S0BQbKc5DQllA9TJo7QWXejSc7Tj-PvnSQ7oIfOY1wBwJBn5BT1mKCQM8bPUDFzqm6j9Q77Ek9tbPxGNktf-2qLrcNjHw1-ka4yycQ6bV2FH30Xsc4qWePXptXWRFz6gGduKWuj8Ti0FX4OXreqiRfopJR1NJeH2Ufvk_u30TSZPz3MRnfzRFFKm6RURMHCgExTwjiHYUYM0cKUkFMhJWV8CAo0QJ4Do1wpyVIiSp1pqjIqctZHN_veTfCfrYlNsbZRmbqWzvg2FgyE4EIIKjqU7FEVfIzBlMUm2LUM24JAsfNa_PHaZa4P9e1ibfRv4kdkBwz2QJSVKVa-Da5795_GL4eif3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099799929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inclusion of Histopathology in Dose Range-Finding Nonclinical Studies for Inhaled Drug Products</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Resseguie, Emily A. ; Palmer, Helen</creator><creatorcontrib>Resseguie, Emily A. ; Palmer, Helen</creatorcontrib><description>Drug development is a lengthy process that promotes and protects the health and safety of future patients. Nonclinical safety studies follow essentially similar designs that fulfill regulatory requirements but are amended based on factors including the mechanism of action, class of molecule, and route of administration. Clinical observations, clinical pathology, and macroscopic pathology in dose range-finding (DRF) studies generally provide sufficient information to select doses for pivotal studies by most delivery routes. Inhaled drug candidates are recognized for producing adverse effects on the respiratory system at the microscopic level that may otherwise be unpredictable; therefore, unlike other routes of administration, inhalation DRF studies typically include histopathology of the respiratory tract. Histopathology evaluations can add several weeks to the Investigational New Drug (IND) application timeline along with additional costs but have been considered necessary to support accurate dose selection for adequate safety margins, thereby potentially avoiding additional studies and animal usage by ensuring achievement of a NOAEL in the pivotal studies. Therefore, DRF inhalation studies initiated from 2018 to 2021 at Labcorp were reviewed to determine whether inclusion of histopathology on preliminary inhalation studies was necessary for subsequent dose selection. Histopathology findings in the DRF impacted dose selection in pivotal inhalation studies for approximately 45% of rat and dog studies. This review identified histopathology findings in rat and dog that support continued inclusion of respiratory tract histopathology in DRF studies. Future investigations will evaluate potential surrogate endpoints for these findings, which could reduce nonclinical drug development timelines by several weeks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-5818</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1092-874X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1092-874X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10915818241276439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39208337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Animals ; Dogs ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods ; Humans ; No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level ; Rats ; Respiratory System - drug effects ; Respiratory System - pathology ; Toxicity Tests</subject><ispartof>International journal of toxicology, 2024-12, Vol.43 (6), p.540-548</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-fc1c0be0a4413770651e1d9ef0829aa23760c0d00880327cca3419fd5d2c52983</cites><orcidid>0009-0001-0012-3663</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10915818241276439$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10915818241276439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39208337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Resseguie, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Helen</creatorcontrib><title>Inclusion of Histopathology in Dose Range-Finding Nonclinical Studies for Inhaled Drug Products</title><title>International journal of toxicology</title><addtitle>Int J Toxicol</addtitle><description>Drug development is a lengthy process that promotes and protects the health and safety of future patients. Nonclinical safety studies follow essentially similar designs that fulfill regulatory requirements but are amended based on factors including the mechanism of action, class of molecule, and route of administration. Clinical observations, clinical pathology, and macroscopic pathology in dose range-finding (DRF) studies generally provide sufficient information to select doses for pivotal studies by most delivery routes. Inhaled drug candidates are recognized for producing adverse effects on the respiratory system at the microscopic level that may otherwise be unpredictable; therefore, unlike other routes of administration, inhalation DRF studies typically include histopathology of the respiratory tract. Histopathology evaluations can add several weeks to the Investigational New Drug (IND) application timeline along with additional costs but have been considered necessary to support accurate dose selection for adequate safety margins, thereby potentially avoiding additional studies and animal usage by ensuring achievement of a NOAEL in the pivotal studies. Therefore, DRF inhalation studies initiated from 2018 to 2021 at Labcorp were reviewed to determine whether inclusion of histopathology on preliminary inhalation studies was necessary for subsequent dose selection. Histopathology findings in the DRF impacted dose selection in pivotal inhalation studies for approximately 45% of rat and dog studies. This review identified histopathology findings in rat and dog that support continued inclusion of respiratory tract histopathology in DRF studies. Future investigations will evaluate potential surrogate endpoints for these findings, which could reduce nonclinical drug development timelines by several weeks.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Respiratory System - drug effects</subject><subject>Respiratory System - pathology</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><issn>1091-5818</issn><issn>1092-874X</issn><issn>1092-874X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EolD4ASzII0vK2U7qeEQtpZUqQHxIbJFrO6mr1C52MvTfk9LCgsR0p9PzvtI9CF0RGBDC-S0BQbKc5DQllA9TJo7QWXejSc7Tj-PvnSQ7oIfOY1wBwJBn5BT1mKCQM8bPUDFzqm6j9Q77Ek9tbPxGNktf-2qLrcNjHw1-ka4yycQ6bV2FH30Xsc4qWePXptXWRFz6gGduKWuj8Ti0FX4OXreqiRfopJR1NJeH2Ufvk_u30TSZPz3MRnfzRFFKm6RURMHCgExTwjiHYUYM0cKUkFMhJWV8CAo0QJ4Do1wpyVIiSp1pqjIqctZHN_veTfCfrYlNsbZRmbqWzvg2FgyE4EIIKjqU7FEVfIzBlMUm2LUM24JAsfNa_PHaZa4P9e1ibfRv4kdkBwz2QJSVKVa-Da5795_GL4eif3o</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Resseguie, Emily A.</creator><creator>Palmer, Helen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0012-3663</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Inclusion of Histopathology in Dose Range-Finding Nonclinical Studies for Inhaled Drug Products</title><author>Resseguie, Emily A. ; Palmer, Helen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-fc1c0be0a4413770651e1d9ef0829aa23760c0d00880327cca3419fd5d2c52983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Respiratory System - drug effects</topic><topic>Respiratory System - pathology</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Resseguie, Emily A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Helen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Resseguie, Emily A.</au><au>Palmer, Helen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inclusion of Histopathology in Dose Range-Finding Nonclinical Studies for Inhaled Drug Products</atitle><jtitle>International journal of toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Toxicol</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>540</spage><epage>548</epage><pages>540-548</pages><issn>1091-5818</issn><issn>1092-874X</issn><eissn>1092-874X</eissn><abstract>Drug development is a lengthy process that promotes and protects the health and safety of future patients. Nonclinical safety studies follow essentially similar designs that fulfill regulatory requirements but are amended based on factors including the mechanism of action, class of molecule, and route of administration. Clinical observations, clinical pathology, and macroscopic pathology in dose range-finding (DRF) studies generally provide sufficient information to select doses for pivotal studies by most delivery routes. Inhaled drug candidates are recognized for producing adverse effects on the respiratory system at the microscopic level that may otherwise be unpredictable; therefore, unlike other routes of administration, inhalation DRF studies typically include histopathology of the respiratory tract. Histopathology evaluations can add several weeks to the Investigational New Drug (IND) application timeline along with additional costs but have been considered necessary to support accurate dose selection for adequate safety margins, thereby potentially avoiding additional studies and animal usage by ensuring achievement of a NOAEL in the pivotal studies. Therefore, DRF inhalation studies initiated from 2018 to 2021 at Labcorp were reviewed to determine whether inclusion of histopathology on preliminary inhalation studies was necessary for subsequent dose selection. Histopathology findings in the DRF impacted dose selection in pivotal inhalation studies for approximately 45% of rat and dog studies. This review identified histopathology findings in rat and dog that support continued inclusion of respiratory tract histopathology in DRF studies. Future investigations will evaluate potential surrogate endpoints for these findings, which could reduce nonclinical drug development timelines by several weeks.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>39208337</pmid><doi>10.1177/10915818241276439</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0012-3663</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-5818
ispartof International journal of toxicology, 2024-12, Vol.43 (6), p.540-548
issn 1091-5818
1092-874X
1092-874X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099799929
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Animals
Dogs
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods
Humans
No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level
Rats
Respiratory System - drug effects
Respiratory System - pathology
Toxicity Tests
title Inclusion of Histopathology in Dose Range-Finding Nonclinical Studies for Inhaled Drug Products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A48%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inclusion%20of%20Histopathology%20in%20Dose%20Range-Finding%20Nonclinical%20Studies%20for%20Inhaled%20Drug%20Products&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20toxicology&rft.au=Resseguie,%20Emily%20A.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=540&rft.epage=548&rft.pages=540-548&rft.issn=1091-5818&rft.eissn=1092-874X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10915818241276439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099799929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099799929&rft_id=info:pmid/39208337&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10915818241276439&rfr_iscdi=true