Bridging classical nucleation theory and molecular dynamics simulation for homogeneous ice nucleation
Water freezing, initiated by ice nucleation, occurs widely in nature, ranging from cellular to global phenomena. Ice nucleation has been experimentally proven to require the formation of a critical ice nucleus, consistent with classical nucleation theory (CNT). However, the accuracy of CNT quantitat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of chemical physics 2024-08, Vol.161 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | The Journal of chemical physics |
container_volume | 161 |
creator | Lin, Min Xiong, Zhewen Cao, Haishan |
description | Water freezing, initiated by ice nucleation, occurs widely in nature, ranging from cellular to global phenomena. Ice nucleation has been experimentally proven to require the formation of a critical ice nucleus, consistent with classical nucleation theory (CNT). However, the accuracy of CNT quantitative predictions of critical cluster sizes and nucleation rates has never been verified experimentally. In this study, we circumvent this difficulty by using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The physical properties of water/ice for CNT predictions, including density, chemical potential difference, and diffusion coefficient, are independently obtained using MD simulation, whereas the calculation of interfacial free energy is based on thermodynamic assumptions of CNT, including capillarity approximation among others. The CNT predictions are compared to the MD evaluations of brute-force simulations and forward flux sampling methods. We find that the CNT and MD predicted critical cluster sizes are consistent, and the CNT predicted nucleation rates are higher than the MD predicted values within three orders of magnitude. We also find that the ice crystallized from supercooled water is stacking-disordered ice with a stacking of cubic and hexagonal ices in four representative types of stacking. The prediction discrepancies in nucleation rate mainly arise from the stacking-disordered ice structure, the asphericity of ice cluster, the uncertainty of ice–water interfacial free energy, and the kinetic attachment rate. Our study establishes a relation between CNT and MD to predict homogeneous ice nucleation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0216645 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099798416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3098361145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-f425d23513dc1cd4fe3b0d0ae05f53333ef5153106d3ceb8fbbc2201779588a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznhZ-AIScKNCx1yatFnq4A0G3Oi6pLnMZGibMWkX8_ZmLoq48GwOHD4-_vMDcIHRBCNO79gEEcx5zg7AGKNSZAUX6BCMUTpngiM-AicxLhFCuCD5MRhRQRAviRgD8xCcnrtuDlUjY3RKNrAbVGNk73wH-4XxYQ1lp2HrG6OGRgao151snYowujYdtqD1AS586-emM36I0Cnzy3MGjqxsojnf71Pw8fT4Pn3JZm_Pr9P7WaYILfvM5oRpQhmmWmGlc2tojTSSBjHLaBpjGWY0_aypMnVp61oRkp4qBCtLyegpuN55V8F_Dib2VeuiMk0jt6kqioQoRJljntCrP-jSD6FL6TZUSTnG-UZ4s6NU8DEGY6tVcK0M6wqjatN9xap994m93BuHujX6h_wuOwG3OyAq1297-cf2BaYFjEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098361145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bridging classical nucleation theory and molecular dynamics simulation for homogeneous ice nucleation</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Lin, Min ; Xiong, Zhewen ; Cao, Haishan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Min ; Xiong, Zhewen ; Cao, Haishan</creatorcontrib><description>Water freezing, initiated by ice nucleation, occurs widely in nature, ranging from cellular to global phenomena. Ice nucleation has been experimentally proven to require the formation of a critical ice nucleus, consistent with classical nucleation theory (CNT). However, the accuracy of CNT quantitative predictions of critical cluster sizes and nucleation rates has never been verified experimentally. In this study, we circumvent this difficulty by using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The physical properties of water/ice for CNT predictions, including density, chemical potential difference, and diffusion coefficient, are independently obtained using MD simulation, whereas the calculation of interfacial free energy is based on thermodynamic assumptions of CNT, including capillarity approximation among others. The CNT predictions are compared to the MD evaluations of brute-force simulations and forward flux sampling methods. We find that the CNT and MD predicted critical cluster sizes are consistent, and the CNT predicted nucleation rates are higher than the MD predicted values within three orders of magnitude. We also find that the ice crystallized from supercooled water is stacking-disordered ice with a stacking of cubic and hexagonal ices in four representative types of stacking. The prediction discrepancies in nucleation rate mainly arise from the stacking-disordered ice structure, the asphericity of ice cluster, the uncertainty of ice–water interfacial free energy, and the kinetic attachment rate. Our study establishes a relation between CNT and MD to predict homogeneous ice nucleation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9606</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0216645</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39206829</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCPSA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Asphericity ; Capillarity ; Chemical potential ; Clusters ; Crystallization ; Diffusion coefficient ; Diffusion rate ; Free energy ; Freezing ; Ice formation ; Molecular dynamics ; Nucleation ; Physical properties ; Predictions ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of chemical physics, 2024-08, Vol.161 (8)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-f425d23513dc1cd4fe3b0d0ae05f53333ef5153106d3ceb8fbbc2201779588a53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1621-8592 ; 0009-0004-5148-4268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jcp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0216645$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,794,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39206829$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Zhewen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Haishan</creatorcontrib><title>Bridging classical nucleation theory and molecular dynamics simulation for homogeneous ice nucleation</title><title>The Journal of chemical physics</title><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><description>Water freezing, initiated by ice nucleation, occurs widely in nature, ranging from cellular to global phenomena. Ice nucleation has been experimentally proven to require the formation of a critical ice nucleus, consistent with classical nucleation theory (CNT). However, the accuracy of CNT quantitative predictions of critical cluster sizes and nucleation rates has never been verified experimentally. In this study, we circumvent this difficulty by using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The physical properties of water/ice for CNT predictions, including density, chemical potential difference, and diffusion coefficient, are independently obtained using MD simulation, whereas the calculation of interfacial free energy is based on thermodynamic assumptions of CNT, including capillarity approximation among others. The CNT predictions are compared to the MD evaluations of brute-force simulations and forward flux sampling methods. We find that the CNT and MD predicted critical cluster sizes are consistent, and the CNT predicted nucleation rates are higher than the MD predicted values within three orders of magnitude. We also find that the ice crystallized from supercooled water is stacking-disordered ice with a stacking of cubic and hexagonal ices in four representative types of stacking. The prediction discrepancies in nucleation rate mainly arise from the stacking-disordered ice structure, the asphericity of ice cluster, the uncertainty of ice–water interfacial free energy, and the kinetic attachment rate. Our study establishes a relation between CNT and MD to predict homogeneous ice nucleation.</description><subject>Asphericity</subject><subject>Capillarity</subject><subject>Chemical potential</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Diffusion rate</subject><subject>Free energy</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Ice formation</subject><subject>Molecular dynamics</subject><subject>Nucleation</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznhZ-AIScKNCx1yatFnq4A0G3Oi6pLnMZGibMWkX8_ZmLoq48GwOHD4-_vMDcIHRBCNO79gEEcx5zg7AGKNSZAUX6BCMUTpngiM-AicxLhFCuCD5MRhRQRAviRgD8xCcnrtuDlUjY3RKNrAbVGNk73wH-4XxYQ1lp2HrG6OGRgao151snYowujYdtqD1AS586-emM36I0Cnzy3MGjqxsojnf71Pw8fT4Pn3JZm_Pr9P7WaYILfvM5oRpQhmmWmGlc2tojTSSBjHLaBpjGWY0_aypMnVp61oRkp4qBCtLyegpuN55V8F_Dib2VeuiMk0jt6kqioQoRJljntCrP-jSD6FL6TZUSTnG-UZ4s6NU8DEGY6tVcK0M6wqjatN9xap994m93BuHujX6h_wuOwG3OyAq1297-cf2BaYFjEs</recordid><startdate>20240828</startdate><enddate>20240828</enddate><creator>Lin, Min</creator><creator>Xiong, Zhewen</creator><creator>Cao, Haishan</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-8592</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5148-4268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240828</creationdate><title>Bridging classical nucleation theory and molecular dynamics simulation for homogeneous ice nucleation</title><author>Lin, Min ; Xiong, Zhewen ; Cao, Haishan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c238t-f425d23513dc1cd4fe3b0d0ae05f53333ef5153106d3ceb8fbbc2201779588a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Asphericity</topic><topic>Capillarity</topic><topic>Chemical potential</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Diffusion rate</topic><topic>Free energy</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Ice formation</topic><topic>Molecular dynamics</topic><topic>Nucleation</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Zhewen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Haishan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Min</au><au>Xiong, Zhewen</au><au>Cao, Haishan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bridging classical nucleation theory and molecular dynamics simulation for homogeneous ice nucleation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of chemical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Chem Phys</addtitle><date>2024-08-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>0021-9606</issn><issn>1089-7690</issn><eissn>1089-7690</eissn><coden>JCPSA6</coden><abstract>Water freezing, initiated by ice nucleation, occurs widely in nature, ranging from cellular to global phenomena. Ice nucleation has been experimentally proven to require the formation of a critical ice nucleus, consistent with classical nucleation theory (CNT). However, the accuracy of CNT quantitative predictions of critical cluster sizes and nucleation rates has never been verified experimentally. In this study, we circumvent this difficulty by using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. The physical properties of water/ice for CNT predictions, including density, chemical potential difference, and diffusion coefficient, are independently obtained using MD simulation, whereas the calculation of interfacial free energy is based on thermodynamic assumptions of CNT, including capillarity approximation among others. The CNT predictions are compared to the MD evaluations of brute-force simulations and forward flux sampling methods. We find that the CNT and MD predicted critical cluster sizes are consistent, and the CNT predicted nucleation rates are higher than the MD predicted values within three orders of magnitude. We also find that the ice crystallized from supercooled water is stacking-disordered ice with a stacking of cubic and hexagonal ices in four representative types of stacking. The prediction discrepancies in nucleation rate mainly arise from the stacking-disordered ice structure, the asphericity of ice cluster, the uncertainty of ice–water interfacial free energy, and the kinetic attachment rate. Our study establishes a relation between CNT and MD to predict homogeneous ice nucleation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><pmid>39206829</pmid><doi>10.1063/5.0216645</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1621-8592</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5148-4268</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9606 |
ispartof | The Journal of chemical physics, 2024-08, Vol.161 (8) |
issn | 0021-9606 1089-7690 1089-7690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3099798416 |
source | AIP Journals Complete |
subjects | Asphericity Capillarity Chemical potential Clusters Crystallization Diffusion coefficient Diffusion rate Free energy Freezing Ice formation Molecular dynamics Nucleation Physical properties Predictions Simulation |
title | Bridging classical nucleation theory and molecular dynamics simulation for homogeneous ice nucleation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A02%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging%20classical%20nucleation%20theory%20and%20molecular%20dynamics%20simulation%20for%20homogeneous%20ice%20nucleation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20chemical%20physics&rft.au=Lin,%20Min&rft.date=2024-08-28&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=0021-9606&rft.eissn=1089-7690&rft.coden=JCPSA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0216645&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3098361145%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098361145&rft_id=info:pmid/39206829&rfr_iscdi=true |