Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks
We study the problem of coverage in planar heterogeneous sensor networks. Coverage is a performance metric that quantifies how well a field of interest is monitored by the sensor deployment. To derive analytical expressions of coverage for heterogeneous sensor networks, we formulate the coverage pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ACM transactions on sensor networks 2006-08, Vol.2 (3), p.325-358 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 358 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 325 |
container_title | ACM transactions on sensor networks |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Lazos, Loukas Poovendran, Radha |
description | We study the problem of
coverage
in planar heterogeneous sensor networks. Coverage is a performance metric that quantifies how well a field of interest is monitored by the sensor deployment. To derive analytical expressions of coverage for heterogeneous sensor networks, we formulate the coverage problem as a set intersection problem, a problem studied in integral geometry. Compared to previous analytical results, our formulation allows us to consider a network model where sensors are deployed according to an arbitrary stochastic distribution; sensing areas of sensors need not follow the unit disk model but can have any arbitrary shape; sensors need not have an identical sensing capability. Furthermore, our formulation does not assume deployment of sensors over an infinite plane and, hence, our derivations do not suffer from the border effect problem arising in a bounded field of interest. We compare our theoretical results with the spatial Poisson approximation that is widely used in modeling coverage. By computing the Kullback-Leibler and total variation distance between the probability density functions derived via our theoretical results, the Poisson approximation, and the simulation, we show that our formulas provide a more accurate representation of the coverage in sensor networks. Finally, we provide examples of calculating network parameters such as the network size and sensing range in order to achieve a desired degree of coverage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1145/1167935.1167937 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30980346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30980346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c8aa8f87b2fbda71e02eac81dee261af8d1f77ad713c5eeef7524653b20382443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqUws2ZiS2v72rEzooqXVIkBmC3HuW4DaVxsF8S_55GI6TvD0dHRR8glowvGhFwyVqka5GKkOiIzJiUtha7U8X-W9Sk5S-mVUgABdEbEUw5ua1PuXOHCB0a7waIbii1mjGGDA4ZDKhIOKcRiwPwZ4ls6Jyfe9gkvJs7Jy-3N8-q-XD_ePayu16UD0Ll02lrttWq4b1qrGFKO1mnWIvKKWa9b5pWyrWLgJCJ6JbmoJDScguZCwJxcjbv7GN4PmLLZdclh39u_WwZorSmI6qe4HIsuhpQierOP3c7GL8Oo-bVjJjsTFXwDN7FX6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>30980346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks</title><source>ACM Digital Library Complete</source><creator>Lazos, Loukas ; Poovendran, Radha</creator><creatorcontrib>Lazos, Loukas ; Poovendran, Radha</creatorcontrib><description>We study the problem of
coverage
in planar heterogeneous sensor networks. Coverage is a performance metric that quantifies how well a field of interest is monitored by the sensor deployment. To derive analytical expressions of coverage for heterogeneous sensor networks, we formulate the coverage problem as a set intersection problem, a problem studied in integral geometry. Compared to previous analytical results, our formulation allows us to consider a network model where sensors are deployed according to an arbitrary stochastic distribution; sensing areas of sensors need not follow the unit disk model but can have any arbitrary shape; sensors need not have an identical sensing capability. Furthermore, our formulation does not assume deployment of sensors over an infinite plane and, hence, our derivations do not suffer from the border effect problem arising in a bounded field of interest. We compare our theoretical results with the spatial Poisson approximation that is widely used in modeling coverage. By computing the Kullback-Leibler and total variation distance between the probability density functions derived via our theoretical results, the Poisson approximation, and the simulation, we show that our formulas provide a more accurate representation of the coverage in sensor networks. Finally, we provide examples of calculating network parameters such as the network size and sensing range in order to achieve a desired degree of coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-4859</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-4867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/1167935.1167937</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>ACM transactions on sensor networks, 2006-08, Vol.2 (3), p.325-358</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c8aa8f87b2fbda71e02eac81dee261af8d1f77ad713c5eeef7524653b20382443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c8aa8f87b2fbda71e02eac81dee261af8d1f77ad713c5eeef7524653b20382443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lazos, Loukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poovendran, Radha</creatorcontrib><title>Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks</title><title>ACM transactions on sensor networks</title><description>We study the problem of
coverage
in planar heterogeneous sensor networks. Coverage is a performance metric that quantifies how well a field of interest is monitored by the sensor deployment. To derive analytical expressions of coverage for heterogeneous sensor networks, we formulate the coverage problem as a set intersection problem, a problem studied in integral geometry. Compared to previous analytical results, our formulation allows us to consider a network model where sensors are deployed according to an arbitrary stochastic distribution; sensing areas of sensors need not follow the unit disk model but can have any arbitrary shape; sensors need not have an identical sensing capability. Furthermore, our formulation does not assume deployment of sensors over an infinite plane and, hence, our derivations do not suffer from the border effect problem arising in a bounded field of interest. We compare our theoretical results with the spatial Poisson approximation that is widely used in modeling coverage. By computing the Kullback-Leibler and total variation distance between the probability density functions derived via our theoretical results, the Poisson approximation, and the simulation, we show that our formulas provide a more accurate representation of the coverage in sensor networks. Finally, we provide examples of calculating network parameters such as the network size and sensing range in order to achieve a desired degree of coverage.</description><issn>1550-4859</issn><issn>1550-4867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqUws2ZiS2v72rEzooqXVIkBmC3HuW4DaVxsF8S_55GI6TvD0dHRR8glowvGhFwyVqka5GKkOiIzJiUtha7U8X-W9Sk5S-mVUgABdEbEUw5ua1PuXOHCB0a7waIbii1mjGGDA4ZDKhIOKcRiwPwZ4ls6Jyfe9gkvJs7Jy-3N8-q-XD_ePayu16UD0Ll02lrttWq4b1qrGFKO1mnWIvKKWa9b5pWyrWLgJCJ6JbmoJDScguZCwJxcjbv7GN4PmLLZdclh39u_WwZorSmI6qe4HIsuhpQierOP3c7GL8Oo-bVjJjsTFXwDN7FX6w</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>Lazos, Loukas</creator><creator>Poovendran, Radha</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks</title><author>Lazos, Loukas ; Poovendran, Radha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-c8aa8f87b2fbda71e02eac81dee261af8d1f77ad713c5eeef7524653b20382443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lazos, Loukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poovendran, Radha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>ACM transactions on sensor networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lazos, Loukas</au><au>Poovendran, Radha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks</atitle><jtitle>ACM transactions on sensor networks</jtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>325-358</pages><issn>1550-4859</issn><eissn>1550-4867</eissn><abstract>We study the problem of
coverage
in planar heterogeneous sensor networks. Coverage is a performance metric that quantifies how well a field of interest is monitored by the sensor deployment. To derive analytical expressions of coverage for heterogeneous sensor networks, we formulate the coverage problem as a set intersection problem, a problem studied in integral geometry. Compared to previous analytical results, our formulation allows us to consider a network model where sensors are deployed according to an arbitrary stochastic distribution; sensing areas of sensors need not follow the unit disk model but can have any arbitrary shape; sensors need not have an identical sensing capability. Furthermore, our formulation does not assume deployment of sensors over an infinite plane and, hence, our derivations do not suffer from the border effect problem arising in a bounded field of interest. We compare our theoretical results with the spatial Poisson approximation that is widely used in modeling coverage. By computing the Kullback-Leibler and total variation distance between the probability density functions derived via our theoretical results, the Poisson approximation, and the simulation, we show that our formulas provide a more accurate representation of the coverage in sensor networks. Finally, we provide examples of calculating network parameters such as the network size and sensing range in order to achieve a desired degree of coverage.</abstract><doi>10.1145/1167935.1167937</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1550-4859 |
ispartof | ACM transactions on sensor networks, 2006-08, Vol.2 (3), p.325-358 |
issn | 1550-4859 1550-4867 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30980346 |
source | ACM Digital Library Complete |
title | Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A47%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stochastic%20coverage%20in%20heterogeneous%20sensor%20networks&rft.jtitle=ACM%20transactions%20on%20sensor%20networks&rft.au=Lazos,%20Loukas&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=325-358&rft.issn=1550-4859&rft.eissn=1550-4867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/1167935.1167937&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E30980346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=30980346&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |