Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis

Recent studies have provided promising evidence that neuroimaging data can predict treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). As most of these studies had small sample sizes, a meta-analysis is warranted to identify the most robust findings and imaging modalities, and to c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular psychiatry 2024-08
Hauptverfasser: Long, Fenghua, Chen, Yufei, Zhang, Qian, Li, Qian, Wang, Yaxuan, Wang, Yitian, Li, Haoran, Zhao, Youjin, McNamara, Robert K, DelBello, Melissa P, Sweeney, John A, Gong, Qiyong, Li, Fei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Molecular psychiatry
container_volume
creator Long, Fenghua
Chen, Yufei
Zhang, Qian
Li, Qian
Wang, Yaxuan
Wang, Yitian
Li, Haoran
Zhao, Youjin
McNamara, Robert K
DelBello, Melissa P
Sweeney, John A
Gong, Qiyong
Li, Fei
description Recent studies have provided promising evidence that neuroimaging data can predict treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). As most of these studies had small sample sizes, a meta-analysis is warranted to identify the most robust findings and imaging modalities, and to compare predictive outcomes obtained in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and studies using clinical and demographic features. We conducted a literature search from database inception to July 22, 2023, to identify studies using pretreatment clinical or brain MRI features to predict treatment outcomes in patients with MDD. Two meta-analyses were conducted on clinical and MRI studies, respectively. The meta-regression was employed to explore the effects of covariates and compare the predictive performance between clinical and MRI groups, as well as across MRI modalities and intervention subgroups. Meta-analysis of 13 clinical studies yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73, while in 44 MRI studies, the AUC was 0.89. MRI studies showed a higher sensitivity than clinical studies (0.78 vs. 0.62, Z = 3.42, P = 0.001). In MRI studies, resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) exhibited a higher specificity than task-based fMRI (tbfMRI) (0.79 vs. 0.69, Z = -2.86, P = 0.004). No significant differences in predictive performance were found between structural and functional MRI, nor between different interventions. Of note, predictive MRI features for treatment outcomes in studies using antidepressants were predominantly located in the limbic and default mode networks, while studies of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) were restricted mainly to the limbic network. Our findings suggest a promise for pretreatment brain MRI features to predict MDD treatment outcomes, outperforming clinical features. While tasks in tbfMRI studies differed, those studies overall had less predictive utility than rsfMRI data. Overlapping but distinct network-level measures predicted antidepressants and ECT outcomes. Future studies are needed to predict outcomes using multiple MRI features, and to clarify whether imaging features predict outcomes generally or differ depending on treatments.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41380-024-02710-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3097492971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3097492971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-a02930226a72eb0d48baa6d45c96ceb99a68589b18cb9cf82d959a846d1020c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6BTxIjl6qSZq2iTdZ_AcLetBzmSazS5Y2rUkq7Le3qyt4GGZ4_ObxeIRccnbDWa5uo-S5YhkTcpqKs6w8InMuqzIrikod_7tn5CzGLWN7oTgls1xzVZWimJPwFtA6k5zf0BQQUoc-0X5Mpu8wUudpB9s-UItDwBjdF1LrYh8sBjrG_VcT4IfaeEzO0InqPXiD1E3aBNxRoB0myMBDu4sunpOTNbQRLw57QT4eH96Xz9nq9elleb_KBi55yoAJnTMhSqgENsxK1QCUVhZGlwYbraFUhdINV6bRZq2E1YUGJUvLmWCG5Qty_es7hP5zxJjqzkWDbQse-zHWOdOV1EJXfEKvDujYdGjrIUzhw67-6yn_BiWZbKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097492971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Long, Fenghua ; Chen, Yufei ; Zhang, Qian ; Li, Qian ; Wang, Yaxuan ; Wang, Yitian ; Li, Haoran ; Zhao, Youjin ; McNamara, Robert K ; DelBello, Melissa P ; Sweeney, John A ; Gong, Qiyong ; Li, Fei</creator><creatorcontrib>Long, Fenghua ; Chen, Yufei ; Zhang, Qian ; Li, Qian ; Wang, Yaxuan ; Wang, Yitian ; Li, Haoran ; Zhao, Youjin ; McNamara, Robert K ; DelBello, Melissa P ; Sweeney, John A ; Gong, Qiyong ; Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies have provided promising evidence that neuroimaging data can predict treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). As most of these studies had small sample sizes, a meta-analysis is warranted to identify the most robust findings and imaging modalities, and to compare predictive outcomes obtained in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and studies using clinical and demographic features. We conducted a literature search from database inception to July 22, 2023, to identify studies using pretreatment clinical or brain MRI features to predict treatment outcomes in patients with MDD. Two meta-analyses were conducted on clinical and MRI studies, respectively. The meta-regression was employed to explore the effects of covariates and compare the predictive performance between clinical and MRI groups, as well as across MRI modalities and intervention subgroups. Meta-analysis of 13 clinical studies yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73, while in 44 MRI studies, the AUC was 0.89. MRI studies showed a higher sensitivity than clinical studies (0.78 vs. 0.62, Z = 3.42, P = 0.001). In MRI studies, resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) exhibited a higher specificity than task-based fMRI (tbfMRI) (0.79 vs. 0.69, Z = -2.86, P = 0.004). No significant differences in predictive performance were found between structural and functional MRI, nor between different interventions. Of note, predictive MRI features for treatment outcomes in studies using antidepressants were predominantly located in the limbic and default mode networks, while studies of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) were restricted mainly to the limbic network. Our findings suggest a promise for pretreatment brain MRI features to predict MDD treatment outcomes, outperforming clinical features. While tasks in tbfMRI studies differed, those studies overall had less predictive utility than rsfMRI data. Overlapping but distinct network-level measures predicted antidepressants and ECT outcomes. Future studies are needed to predict outcomes using multiple MRI features, and to clarify whether imaging features predict outcomes generally or differ depending on treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-5578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41380-024-02710-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39187625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Molecular psychiatry, 2024-08</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-5912-4871 ; 0000-0002-4737-5710 ; 0000-0002-8287-9009</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39187625$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Long, Fenghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yufei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yitian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Haoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Youjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Robert K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelBello, Melissa P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Qiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis</title><title>Molecular psychiatry</title><addtitle>Mol Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Recent studies have provided promising evidence that neuroimaging data can predict treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). As most of these studies had small sample sizes, a meta-analysis is warranted to identify the most robust findings and imaging modalities, and to compare predictive outcomes obtained in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and studies using clinical and demographic features. We conducted a literature search from database inception to July 22, 2023, to identify studies using pretreatment clinical or brain MRI features to predict treatment outcomes in patients with MDD. Two meta-analyses were conducted on clinical and MRI studies, respectively. The meta-regression was employed to explore the effects of covariates and compare the predictive performance between clinical and MRI groups, as well as across MRI modalities and intervention subgroups. Meta-analysis of 13 clinical studies yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73, while in 44 MRI studies, the AUC was 0.89. MRI studies showed a higher sensitivity than clinical studies (0.78 vs. 0.62, Z = 3.42, P = 0.001). In MRI studies, resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) exhibited a higher specificity than task-based fMRI (tbfMRI) (0.79 vs. 0.69, Z = -2.86, P = 0.004). No significant differences in predictive performance were found between structural and functional MRI, nor between different interventions. Of note, predictive MRI features for treatment outcomes in studies using antidepressants were predominantly located in the limbic and default mode networks, while studies of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) were restricted mainly to the limbic network. Our findings suggest a promise for pretreatment brain MRI features to predict MDD treatment outcomes, outperforming clinical features. While tasks in tbfMRI studies differed, those studies overall had less predictive utility than rsfMRI data. Overlapping but distinct network-level measures predicted antidepressants and ECT outcomes. Future studies are needed to predict outcomes using multiple MRI features, and to clarify whether imaging features predict outcomes generally or differ depending on treatments.</description><issn>1476-5578</issn><issn>1476-5578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6BTxIjl6qSZq2iTdZ_AcLetBzmSazS5Y2rUkq7Le3qyt4GGZ4_ObxeIRccnbDWa5uo-S5YhkTcpqKs6w8InMuqzIrikod_7tn5CzGLWN7oTgls1xzVZWimJPwFtA6k5zf0BQQUoc-0X5Mpu8wUudpB9s-UItDwBjdF1LrYh8sBjrG_VcT4IfaeEzO0InqPXiD1E3aBNxRoB0myMBDu4sunpOTNbQRLw57QT4eH96Xz9nq9elleb_KBi55yoAJnTMhSqgENsxK1QCUVhZGlwYbraFUhdINV6bRZq2E1YUGJUvLmWCG5Qty_es7hP5zxJjqzkWDbQse-zHWOdOV1EJXfEKvDujYdGjrIUzhw67-6yn_BiWZbKw</recordid><startdate>20240826</startdate><enddate>20240826</enddate><creator>Long, Fenghua</creator><creator>Chen, Yufei</creator><creator>Zhang, Qian</creator><creator>Li, Qian</creator><creator>Wang, Yaxuan</creator><creator>Wang, Yitian</creator><creator>Li, Haoran</creator><creator>Zhao, Youjin</creator><creator>McNamara, Robert K</creator><creator>DelBello, Melissa P</creator><creator>Sweeney, John A</creator><creator>Gong, Qiyong</creator><creator>Li, Fei</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-4871</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-5710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8287-9009</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240826</creationdate><title>Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis</title><author>Long, Fenghua ; Chen, Yufei ; Zhang, Qian ; Li, Qian ; Wang, Yaxuan ; Wang, Yitian ; Li, Haoran ; Zhao, Youjin ; McNamara, Robert K ; DelBello, Melissa P ; Sweeney, John A ; Gong, Qiyong ; Li, Fei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-a02930226a72eb0d48baa6d45c96ceb99a68589b18cb9cf82d959a846d1020c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Long, Fenghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yufei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yaxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yitian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Haoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Youjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Robert K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelBello, Melissa P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, John A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Qiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Long, Fenghua</au><au>Chen, Yufei</au><au>Zhang, Qian</au><au>Li, Qian</au><au>Wang, Yaxuan</au><au>Wang, Yitian</au><au>Li, Haoran</au><au>Zhao, Youjin</au><au>McNamara, Robert K</au><au>DelBello, Melissa P</au><au>Sweeney, John A</au><au>Gong, Qiyong</au><au>Li, Fei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Molecular psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2024-08-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>1476-5578</issn><eissn>1476-5578</eissn><abstract>Recent studies have provided promising evidence that neuroimaging data can predict treatment outcomes for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). As most of these studies had small sample sizes, a meta-analysis is warranted to identify the most robust findings and imaging modalities, and to compare predictive outcomes obtained in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and studies using clinical and demographic features. We conducted a literature search from database inception to July 22, 2023, to identify studies using pretreatment clinical or brain MRI features to predict treatment outcomes in patients with MDD. Two meta-analyses were conducted on clinical and MRI studies, respectively. The meta-regression was employed to explore the effects of covariates and compare the predictive performance between clinical and MRI groups, as well as across MRI modalities and intervention subgroups. Meta-analysis of 13 clinical studies yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73, while in 44 MRI studies, the AUC was 0.89. MRI studies showed a higher sensitivity than clinical studies (0.78 vs. 0.62, Z = 3.42, P = 0.001). In MRI studies, resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) exhibited a higher specificity than task-based fMRI (tbfMRI) (0.79 vs. 0.69, Z = -2.86, P = 0.004). No significant differences in predictive performance were found between structural and functional MRI, nor between different interventions. Of note, predictive MRI features for treatment outcomes in studies using antidepressants were predominantly located in the limbic and default mode networks, while studies of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) were restricted mainly to the limbic network. Our findings suggest a promise for pretreatment brain MRI features to predict MDD treatment outcomes, outperforming clinical features. While tasks in tbfMRI studies differed, those studies overall had less predictive utility than rsfMRI data. Overlapping but distinct network-level measures predicted antidepressants and ECT outcomes. Future studies are needed to predict outcomes using multiple MRI features, and to clarify whether imaging features predict outcomes generally or differ depending on treatments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>39187625</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41380-024-02710-6</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-4871</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-5710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8287-9009</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-5578
ispartof Molecular psychiatry, 2024-08
issn 1476-5578
1476-5578
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3097492971
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
title Predicting treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder using brain magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A00%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20treatment%20outcomes%20in%20major%20depressive%20disorder%20using%20brain%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging:%20a%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20psychiatry&rft.au=Long,%20Fenghua&rft.date=2024-08-26&rft.issn=1476-5578&rft.eissn=1476-5578&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41380-024-02710-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3097492971%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097492971&rft_id=info:pmid/39187625&rfr_iscdi=true