Implicit audiomotor adaptation

•Sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbed visual and auditory stimuli.•Evidence of implicit audiomotor aftereffects following adapted reaching.•Auditory aftereffects observed with both loudspeaker and headphones presentation.•Adaptation may attenuate with rapid targets and non-veridical base...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience 2024-10, Vol.558, p.81-91
Hauptverfasser: Miller-Mills, Benjamin, McAnally, Kenneth, Leow, Li-Ann, Keane, Brendan F., Grove, Philip, Carroll, Timothy J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue
container_start_page 81
container_title Neuroscience
container_volume 558
creator Miller-Mills, Benjamin
McAnally, Kenneth
Leow, Li-Ann
Keane, Brendan F.
Grove, Philip
Carroll, Timothy J.
description •Sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbed visual and auditory stimuli.•Evidence of implicit audiomotor aftereffects following adapted reaching.•Auditory aftereffects observed with both loudspeaker and headphones presentation.•Adaptation may attenuate with rapid targets and non-veridical baseline feedback. Sensorimotor adaptation alters mappings between motor commands and their predicted outcomes. Such remapping has been extensively studied in the visual domain, but the degree to which it occurs in modalities other than vision remains less well understood. Here, we manipulated the modality of reach target presentation to compare sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbations of visual and auditory feedback location. We compared the extent of adaptation to perturbed sensory feedback for visual and auditory sensory modalities, and the magnitude of reach-direction aftereffects when the perturbation was removed. To isolate the contribution of implicit sensorimotor recalibration to adaptation in reach direction, we held sensory prediction errors and task-performance errors constant via a task-irrelevant clamp of sensory feedback. Seventy-two participants performed one of three experiments in which target location information and endpoint reach direction feedback were presented by loudspeakers (n = 24), headphones (n = 24), or a visual display (n = 24). Presentation durations for target stimuli (500 ms) and (non-veridical) endpoint feedback of reach direction (100 ms) were matched for visual and auditory modalities. For all three groups, when endpoint feedback was perturbed, adaptation was evident: reach-directions increased significantly in the direction opposite the clamped feedback, and a significant aftereffect persisted after participants were instructed that the perturbation had been removed. This study provides new evidence that implicit sensorimotor adaptation occurs in response to perturbed auditory feedback of reach direction, suggesting that an implicit neural process to recalibrate sensory to motor maps in response to sensory prediction errors may be ubiquitous across sensory modalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.08.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3095675977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306452224004111</els_id><sourcerecordid>3095675977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-98f0079361a00a8fe7a1fa9cbbe3779f569a24f3475e6034dfa1033c59cc58cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC1XFik3COH7F7FB5VarEBtaW69iSqyQOdoLE35OqAbFkNrM5947mIHSNIceA-e0-b-0QQzLetsbmBRQ0hzKHgp-gOS4FyQSj9BTNgQDPKCuKGbpIaQ_jMErO0YxIzEssyBwtN01Xe-P7lR4qH5rQh7jSle563fvQXqIzp-tkr6a9QO9Pj2_rl2z7-rxZ328zQ4D1mSwdgJCEYw2gS2eFxk5Ls9tZIoR0jEtdUEeoYJYDoZXTGAgxTBrDSlORBbo59nYxfAw29arxydi61q0NQ1IEJOOCSSFG9O6ImlFBitapLvpGxy-FQR38qL3660cd_Cgo1ehnDC-nO8OusdVv9EfICDwcATt---ltVFNN5aM1vaqC_8-db-TFfKk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3095675977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit audiomotor adaptation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Miller-Mills, Benjamin ; McAnally, Kenneth ; Leow, Li-Ann ; Keane, Brendan F. ; Grove, Philip ; Carroll, Timothy J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller-Mills, Benjamin ; McAnally, Kenneth ; Leow, Li-Ann ; Keane, Brendan F. ; Grove, Philip ; Carroll, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><description>•Sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbed visual and auditory stimuli.•Evidence of implicit audiomotor aftereffects following adapted reaching.•Auditory aftereffects observed with both loudspeaker and headphones presentation.•Adaptation may attenuate with rapid targets and non-veridical baseline feedback. Sensorimotor adaptation alters mappings between motor commands and their predicted outcomes. Such remapping has been extensively studied in the visual domain, but the degree to which it occurs in modalities other than vision remains less well understood. Here, we manipulated the modality of reach target presentation to compare sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbations of visual and auditory feedback location. We compared the extent of adaptation to perturbed sensory feedback for visual and auditory sensory modalities, and the magnitude of reach-direction aftereffects when the perturbation was removed. To isolate the contribution of implicit sensorimotor recalibration to adaptation in reach direction, we held sensory prediction errors and task-performance errors constant via a task-irrelevant clamp of sensory feedback. Seventy-two participants performed one of three experiments in which target location information and endpoint reach direction feedback were presented by loudspeakers (n = 24), headphones (n = 24), or a visual display (n = 24). Presentation durations for target stimuli (500 ms) and (non-veridical) endpoint feedback of reach direction (100 ms) were matched for visual and auditory modalities. For all three groups, when endpoint feedback was perturbed, adaptation was evident: reach-directions increased significantly in the direction opposite the clamped feedback, and a significant aftereffect persisted after participants were instructed that the perturbation had been removed. This study provides new evidence that implicit sensorimotor adaptation occurs in response to perturbed auditory feedback of reach direction, suggesting that an implicit neural process to recalibrate sensory to motor maps in response to sensory prediction errors may be ubiquitous across sensory modalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4522</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-7544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7544</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.08.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39168173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adaptation, Physiological - physiology ; Adult ; Auditory localization ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Cerebellum ; Feedback, Sensory - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Implicit motor learning ; Male ; Motor control ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Sensorimotor adaptation ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visuomotor adaptation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience, 2024-10, Vol.558, p.81-91</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-98f0079361a00a8fe7a1fa9cbbe3779f569a24f3475e6034dfa1033c59cc58cd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2975-8213 ; 0000-0002-3761-9689 ; 0000-0003-0761-1819 ; 0000-0003-1787-0750</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452224004111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39168173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller-Mills, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAnally, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leow, Li-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Brendan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit audiomotor adaptation</title><title>Neuroscience</title><addtitle>Neuroscience</addtitle><description>•Sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbed visual and auditory stimuli.•Evidence of implicit audiomotor aftereffects following adapted reaching.•Auditory aftereffects observed with both loudspeaker and headphones presentation.•Adaptation may attenuate with rapid targets and non-veridical baseline feedback. Sensorimotor adaptation alters mappings between motor commands and their predicted outcomes. Such remapping has been extensively studied in the visual domain, but the degree to which it occurs in modalities other than vision remains less well understood. Here, we manipulated the modality of reach target presentation to compare sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbations of visual and auditory feedback location. We compared the extent of adaptation to perturbed sensory feedback for visual and auditory sensory modalities, and the magnitude of reach-direction aftereffects when the perturbation was removed. To isolate the contribution of implicit sensorimotor recalibration to adaptation in reach direction, we held sensory prediction errors and task-performance errors constant via a task-irrelevant clamp of sensory feedback. Seventy-two participants performed one of three experiments in which target location information and endpoint reach direction feedback were presented by loudspeakers (n = 24), headphones (n = 24), or a visual display (n = 24). Presentation durations for target stimuli (500 ms) and (non-veridical) endpoint feedback of reach direction (100 ms) were matched for visual and auditory modalities. For all three groups, when endpoint feedback was perturbed, adaptation was evident: reach-directions increased significantly in the direction opposite the clamped feedback, and a significant aftereffect persisted after participants were instructed that the perturbation had been removed. This study provides new evidence that implicit sensorimotor adaptation occurs in response to perturbed auditory feedback of reach direction, suggesting that an implicit neural process to recalibrate sensory to motor maps in response to sensory prediction errors may be ubiquitous across sensory modalities.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory localization</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Cerebellum</subject><subject>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit motor learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motor control</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Sensorimotor adaptation</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visuomotor adaptation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0306-4522</issn><issn>1873-7544</issn><issn>1873-7544</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC1XFik3COH7F7FB5VarEBtaW69iSqyQOdoLE35OqAbFkNrM5947mIHSNIceA-e0-b-0QQzLetsbmBRQ0hzKHgp-gOS4FyQSj9BTNgQDPKCuKGbpIaQ_jMErO0YxIzEssyBwtN01Xe-P7lR4qH5rQh7jSle563fvQXqIzp-tkr6a9QO9Pj2_rl2z7-rxZ328zQ4D1mSwdgJCEYw2gS2eFxk5Ls9tZIoR0jEtdUEeoYJYDoZXTGAgxTBrDSlORBbo59nYxfAw29arxydi61q0NQ1IEJOOCSSFG9O6ImlFBitapLvpGxy-FQR38qL3660cd_Cgo1ehnDC-nO8OusdVv9EfICDwcATt---ltVFNN5aM1vaqC_8-db-TFfKk</recordid><startdate>20241018</startdate><enddate>20241018</enddate><creator>Miller-Mills, Benjamin</creator><creator>McAnally, Kenneth</creator><creator>Leow, Li-Ann</creator><creator>Keane, Brendan F.</creator><creator>Grove, Philip</creator><creator>Carroll, Timothy J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2975-8213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-9689</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-1819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-0750</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241018</creationdate><title>Implicit audiomotor adaptation</title><author>Miller-Mills, Benjamin ; McAnally, Kenneth ; Leow, Li-Ann ; Keane, Brendan F. ; Grove, Philip ; Carroll, Timothy J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-98f0079361a00a8fe7a1fa9cbbe3779f569a24f3475e6034dfa1033c59cc58cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological - physiology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory localization</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Cerebellum</topic><topic>Feedback, Sensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit motor learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motor control</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Sensorimotor adaptation</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visuomotor adaptation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller-Mills, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAnally, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leow, Li-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Brendan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller-Mills, Benjamin</au><au>McAnally, Kenneth</au><au>Leow, Li-Ann</au><au>Keane, Brendan F.</au><au>Grove, Philip</au><au>Carroll, Timothy J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit audiomotor adaptation</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroscience</addtitle><date>2024-10-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>558</volume><spage>81</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>81-91</pages><issn>0306-4522</issn><issn>1873-7544</issn><eissn>1873-7544</eissn><abstract>•Sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbed visual and auditory stimuli.•Evidence of implicit audiomotor aftereffects following adapted reaching.•Auditory aftereffects observed with both loudspeaker and headphones presentation.•Adaptation may attenuate with rapid targets and non-veridical baseline feedback. Sensorimotor adaptation alters mappings between motor commands and their predicted outcomes. Such remapping has been extensively studied in the visual domain, but the degree to which it occurs in modalities other than vision remains less well understood. Here, we manipulated the modality of reach target presentation to compare sensorimotor adaptation in response to perturbations of visual and auditory feedback location. We compared the extent of adaptation to perturbed sensory feedback for visual and auditory sensory modalities, and the magnitude of reach-direction aftereffects when the perturbation was removed. To isolate the contribution of implicit sensorimotor recalibration to adaptation in reach direction, we held sensory prediction errors and task-performance errors constant via a task-irrelevant clamp of sensory feedback. Seventy-two participants performed one of three experiments in which target location information and endpoint reach direction feedback were presented by loudspeakers (n = 24), headphones (n = 24), or a visual display (n = 24). Presentation durations for target stimuli (500 ms) and (non-veridical) endpoint feedback of reach direction (100 ms) were matched for visual and auditory modalities. For all three groups, when endpoint feedback was perturbed, adaptation was evident: reach-directions increased significantly in the direction opposite the clamped feedback, and a significant aftereffect persisted after participants were instructed that the perturbation had been removed. This study provides new evidence that implicit sensorimotor adaptation occurs in response to perturbed auditory feedback of reach direction, suggesting that an implicit neural process to recalibrate sensory to motor maps in response to sensory prediction errors may be ubiquitous across sensory modalities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39168173</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.08.026</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2975-8213</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3761-9689</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-1819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-0750</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-4522
ispartof Neuroscience, 2024-10, Vol.558, p.81-91
issn 0306-4522
1873-7544
1873-7544
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3095675977
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Adaptation, Physiological - physiology
Adult
Auditory localization
Auditory Perception - physiology
Cerebellum
Feedback, Sensory - physiology
Female
Humans
Implicit motor learning
Male
Motor control
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Sensorimotor adaptation
Visual Perception - physiology
Visuomotor adaptation
Young Adult
title Implicit audiomotor adaptation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T03%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20audiomotor%20adaptation&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience&rft.au=Miller-Mills,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2024-10-18&rft.volume=558&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=81-91&rft.issn=0306-4522&rft.eissn=1873-7544&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.08.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3095675977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3095675977&rft_id=info:pmid/39168173&rft_els_id=S0306452224004111&rfr_iscdi=true