Multicenter Real-World Analysis of Combined MET and EGFR Inhibition in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Acquired MET Amplification or Polysomy After EGFR Inhibition
•Combined EGFRi/METi is effective in EGFR+ NSCLC with acquired MET dysregulation.•EGFR+ MET-amplified tumors had improved rwPFS with EGFRi/METi compared to SoC.•In contrast, with MET polysomy, efficacy of EGFRi/METI and SoC was comparable. MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical lung cancer 2024-12, Vol.25 (8), p.672-682.e5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Combined EGFRi/METi is effective in EGFR+ NSCLC with acquired MET dysregulation.•EGFR+ MET-amplified tumors had improved rwPFS with EGFRi/METi compared to SoC.•In contrast, with MET polysomy, efficacy of EGFRi/METI and SoC was comparable.
MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several trials showed encouraging results with combined EGFR and MET inhibition (EGFRi/METi). However, MET amplification has been inconsistently defined and frequently included both polysomy and true amplification.
This is a multicenter, real-world analysis in patients with disease progression on EGFR inhibition and MET copy number gain (CNG), defined as either true amplification (MET to centromere of chromosome 7 ratio [MET-CEP7] ≥ 2) or polysomy (gene copy number ≥ 5, MET-CEP7 < 2).
A total of 43 patients with MET CNG were included, 42 of whom were detected by FISH. Twenty-three, 7, and 14 received EGFRi/METi, METi, and SoC, respectively. Patients in the EGFRi/METi cohort exhibited a superior real-world clinical benefit rate, defined as stable disease or better, of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60-95) compared to METi (29%, 4-71) and SoC (50%, 23-77). Median real-world progression-free survival was longer with EGFRi/METi with 9.8 vs. 4.3 months with METi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19, 95% CI, 0.06-0.57) and 3.7 months with SoC (0.41, 0.18-0.91), respectively. Overall survival was numerically improved. Interaction analysis with treatment and type of CNG (amplification vs. polysomy) suggests that differences were exclusively driven by MET-amplified patients receiving EGFRi/METi (HR for OS, 0.09, 0.01-0.54).
In this real-world study, EGFRi/METi showed clinical benefit over METi and SoC. Future studies should focus on the differential impact of the type of MET CNG with a focus on true MET amplification as predictor of response.
MET amplification is a common resistance mechanism to EGFR inhibition in NSCLC. However, the term MET amplification has been used inconsistently and frequently included polysomy. In this retrospective study, patients with true MET amplification rather than polysomy derived clinical benefit from combined MET and EGFR inhibition compared to SoC. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1525-7304 1938-0690 1938-0690 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.07.012 |