Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review

Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology venereology, and leprology, 2024-09, Vol.90 (5), p.599-605, Article 599
Hauptverfasser: Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi, Bonifacio, Mirian, Ascimann, Laura Takahashi, Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli, Parisi, Julia Risso, Renno, Ana Paula, Garcia, Livia Assis, Ribeiro, Daniel Araki, Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 605
container_issue 5
container_start_page 599
container_title Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology
container_volume 90
creator Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi
Bonifacio, Mirian
Ascimann, Laura Takahashi
Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli
Parisi, Julia Risso
Renno, Ana Paula
Garcia, Livia Assis
Ribeiro, Daniel Araki
Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz
description Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.
doi_str_mv 10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3094045776</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3094045776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-48e9a22e023996e7313b7041ca7b4c651f88e4dcf3176e67cb693d7b51b704eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMyGPLAH77NgxW1UKFCqxAGvkOGcIykeJE1D-PQEKA9OdTs_76vQQcszZGcQQm_PV7eXTOuUMTAoMYIdMmdEiEgZgd9yFTiIlQEzIQQivjIFUgu-TiTA8hiQxU3K39L5w1g3U1jkN1mM30MbTou6wDkg3fRkwp2Xx_NKNR9o2wTq0F3ROwxA6rGxXONrie4Efh2TP2xE_2s4ZebxaPixuovX99WoxX0cOQHaRTNBYAGQgjFGoBReZZpI7qzPpVMx9kqDMnRdcK1TaZcqIXGcx_8IwEzNy-tO7aZu3HkOXVkVwWJa2xqYPqWBGMhlrrUaU_aBufDy06NNNW1S2HUZn6bfC9J_CMXKybe-zCvO_wK8z8Qkvemvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3094045776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Bioline International</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi ; Bonifacio, Mirian ; Ascimann, Laura Takahashi ; Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli ; Parisi, Julia Risso ; Renno, Ana Paula ; Garcia, Livia Assis ; Ribeiro, Daniel Araki ; Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz</creator><creatorcontrib>Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi ; Bonifacio, Mirian ; Ascimann, Laura Takahashi ; Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli ; Parisi, Julia Risso ; Renno, Ana Paula ; Garcia, Livia Assis ; Ribeiro, Daniel Araki ; Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz</creatorcontrib><description>Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-6323</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0973-3922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-3922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39152889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Humans ; Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - adverse effects ; Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods ; Rosacea - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology, 2024-09, Vol.90 (5), p.599-605, Article 599</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-48e9a22e023996e7313b7041ca7b4c651f88e4dcf3176e67cb693d7b51b704eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39152889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonifacio, Mirian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascimann, Laura Takahashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisi, Julia Risso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renno, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Livia Assis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Daniel Araki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review</title><title>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</title><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol</addtitle><description>Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Rosacea - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0378-6323</issn><issn>0973-3922</issn><issn>0973-3922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwMyGPLAH77NgxW1UKFCqxAGvkOGcIykeJE1D-PQEKA9OdTs_76vQQcszZGcQQm_PV7eXTOuUMTAoMYIdMmdEiEgZgd9yFTiIlQEzIQQivjIFUgu-TiTA8hiQxU3K39L5w1g3U1jkN1mM30MbTou6wDkg3fRkwp2Xx_NKNR9o2wTq0F3ROwxA6rGxXONrie4Efh2TP2xE_2s4ZebxaPixuovX99WoxX0cOQHaRTNBYAGQgjFGoBReZZpI7qzPpVMx9kqDMnRdcK1TaZcqIXGcx_8IwEzNy-tO7aZu3HkOXVkVwWJa2xqYPqWBGMhlrrUaU_aBufDy06NNNW1S2HUZn6bfC9J_CMXKybe-zCvO_wK8z8Qkvemvw</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi</creator><creator>Bonifacio, Mirian</creator><creator>Ascimann, Laura Takahashi</creator><creator>Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli</creator><creator>Parisi, Julia Risso</creator><creator>Renno, Ana Paula</creator><creator>Garcia, Livia Assis</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Daniel Araki</creator><creator>Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review</title><author>Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi ; Bonifacio, Mirian ; Ascimann, Laura Takahashi ; Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli ; Parisi, Julia Risso ; Renno, Ana Paula ; Garcia, Livia Assis ; Ribeiro, Daniel Araki ; Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c224t-48e9a22e023996e7313b7041ca7b4c651f88e4dcf3176e67cb693d7b51b704eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Rosacea - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonifacio, Mirian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ascimann, Laura Takahashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisi, Julia Risso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renno, Ana Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Livia Assis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Daniel Araki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martignago, Cintia Cristina Santi</au><au>Bonifacio, Mirian</au><au>Ascimann, Laura Takahashi</au><au>Vassão, Patricia Gabrielli</au><au>Parisi, Julia Risso</au><au>Renno, Ana Paula</au><au>Garcia, Livia Assis</au><au>Ribeiro, Daniel Araki</au><au>Renno, Ana Claudia Muniz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>599-605</pages><artnum>599</artnum><issn>0378-6323</issn><issn>0973-3922</issn><eissn>0973-3922</eissn><abstract>Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>39152889</pmid><doi>10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-6323
ispartof Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology, 2024-09, Vol.90 (5), p.599-605, Article 599
issn 0378-6323
0973-3922
0973-3922
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3094045776
source MEDLINE; Bioline International; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Humans
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - adverse effects
Intense Pulsed Light Therapy - methods
Rosacea - therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T12%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20intense%20pulsed%20light%20in%20rosacea:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20dermatology,%20venereology,%20and%20leprology&rft.au=Martignago,%20Cintia%20Cristina%20Santi&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=599-605&rft.artnum=599&rft.issn=0378-6323&rft.eissn=0973-3922&rft_id=info:doi/10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3094045776%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3094045776&rft_id=info:pmid/39152889&rfr_iscdi=true